Effects of collicular lesions in the hamster during visual discrimination. An analysis from computer-video actograms

Relationships between the superior colliculus and hippocampus: Neural and behavioral considerations

Theories of superior collicular and hippocampal function have remarkable similarities. Both structures have been repeatedly implicated in spatial and attentional behaviour and in inhibitory control of locomotion. Moreover, they share certain electrophysiological properties in their single unit responses and in the synchronous appearance and disappearance of slow wave activity. Both are phylogenetically old and the colliculus projects strongly to brainstem nuclei instrumental in the generation of theta rhythm in the hippocampal EEC

On the other hand, close inspection of behavioural and electrophysiological data reveals disparities. In particular, hippocampal processing mainly concerns stimulus ambiguity, contextual significance, and spatial relations or other subtle, higher order characteristics. This requires the use of largely preprocessed sensory information and mediation of poststimulus investigation. Although collicular activity must also be integrated with that of “higher” centres (probably to a varying degree, depending on the nature of stimuli being processed and the task requirements), its primary role in attention is more “peripheral” and specific in controlling orienting/localisation via eye and body movements toward egocentrically labelled spatial positions. In addition, the colliculus may exert a nonspecific influence in alerting higher centres to the imminence of information potentially worthy of focal attention. Nevertheless, it is noteworthy that collicular and hippocampal lesions produce deficits on similar tasks, although the type of deficit is usually different (often opposite) in each case. Functional overlap between hippocampus and colliculus (i.e., strategically synchronised or mutually interdependent activity) is virtually certain vis-à-vis stimulus sampling, for example in the acquisition of information via vibrissal movements and visual scanning. In addition, insofar as stimulus significance is a factor in collicular orienting mechanisms, the hippocampus — cingulate – cortex — colliculus pathway may play a significant role, modulating collicular responsiveness and thus ensuring an attentional strategy appropriate to current requirements (stimulus familiarity, stage of learning). A tentative “reciprocal loop” model is proposed which bridges physiological and behavioural levels of analysis and which would account for the observed degree and nature of functional overlap between the superior colliculus and hippocampus.

Movements of cats on a rotating cylinder: role of the substantia nigra pars reticulata and the deeper layers of the superior colliculus

Recently it has been shown that the substantia nigra pars reticulata (SNR) is required for adjusting the body position. In this study the role of the SNR in the execution of movements was investigated. Therefore, the effects of bilateral SNR injections of picrotoxin (500 ng/0.5 microliter) and muscimol (200 ng/1 microliter) were investigated on movements of cats which were trained to cross a rotating cylinder. SNR injection of picrotoxin suppressed the movements that were executed by cats injected with distilled water (0.5 microliter), i.e. 'normal movements'. While crossing the rotating cylinder, picrotoxin-injected cats mainly executed movements that almost never occurred in distilled water treated cats. Picrotoxin-injected cats executed 'special movements', i.e. forward locomotion in which the hindlimbs were affected, and 'counter-movements'. While executing the latter movements no forward locomotion occurred at all; the cats solely executed lateral fore- and hindlimb movements opposite to the direction in which the cylinder rotated. SNR application of muscimol enhanced the execution of 'normal movements'. Since the SNR sends information to the deeper layers of the superior colliculus (dl-SC) via GABAergic fibers, it was also investigated whether pharmacological stimulation (muscimol) and inhibition (picrotoxin) of the GABAergic dl-SC activity affected these movements on the rotating cylinder: no changes were observed after injecting otherwise effective doses of muscimol (75 ng/1 microliter) and picrotoxin (100 ng/0.5 microliter). In order to compare the function of the SNR and dl-SC in programming a different type of movements, the effects of GABAergic agents in the dl-SC (picrotoxin 100 ng/0.5 microliter and muscimol 75 ng/1 microliter) and the SNR (picrotoxin 500 ng/0.5 microliter and muscimol 200 ng/1 microliter) were investigated on the feline ability to execute goal-directed movements in an experimental set-up that prevented the occurrence of targeting movements which were continuously guided by external, i.e. auditory, visual, tactile and olfactory stimuli. For that purpose cats were trained to step out of a startbox on a rotating cylinder, i.e. the target. Dl-SC injection of muscimol or SNR application of picrotoxin prevented the cats from stepping out of the startbox on the rotating cylinder. In contrast, cats injected with muscimol into the SNR or picrotoxin into the dl-SC stepped out of the startbox, although dl-SC application of picrotoxin elicited forelimb misplacements: frequently the cats placed their forelimbs alongside of, but not on the cylinder when trying to leave the startbox.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 400 WORDS)