1
|
Moore V, Rumbold A, Fernandez R, McElroy H, Moore L, Giles L, Grzeskowiak L, Roughead E, Stark M, Davies M. Dispensing of clomiphene citrate to treat infertility: medication supplied and population prevalence of assisted pregnancies and multiple births. Fertil Steril 2021; 117:202-212. [PMID: 34656304 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2021.08.030] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2021] [Revised: 06/30/2021] [Accepted: 08/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine the proportion of pregnancies resulting in birth that were conceived with the use of clomiphene citrate (CC) and the frequency of multiple pregnancy. DESIGN Whole-of-population cohort study, constructed through data linkage. Comprehensive Australian Government records of dispensed medications were linked to state Perinatal Registry records for all births of at least 20 weeks' gestation. SETTING The state of South Australia. PATIENT(S) Women who maintained pregnancy for at least 20 weeks and gave birth between July 2003 and December 2015, a total of 150,713 women with 241,561 pregnancies. INTERVENTION(S) Not applicable. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) Ongoing pregnancy occurring in proximity to CC, defined as dispensing from 90 days before to the end of a conception window derived from newborn date of birth and gestational age. RESULT(S) Linkage to dispensed prescription records was achieved for 97.9% of women. Women who conceived with CC tended to be older and socioeconomically advantaged and more likely than other women to have a history of miscarriage. Ongoing pregnancies associated with CC comprised 1.6% of the total; 5.7% were multiple births (mostly twins, 94.6%) compared with 1.5% in the remainder (98.5% twins). CONCLUSION(S) In South Australia, 1.6% of pregnancies (1 in 60) of at least 20 weeks' gestation were conceived proximal to CC dispensing. Of these, 5.7% were multiple pregnancies. This takes the proportion of women who achieved an ongoing pregnancy with medical assistance from 4.4%, based on reports from assisted reproductive technology clinics, to 6% in total.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vivienne Moore
- School of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, South Australia; Robinson Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, South Australia.
| | - Alice Rumbold
- Robinson Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, South Australia; South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, South Australia
| | - Renae Fernandez
- Robinson Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, South Australia; Discipline of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Adelaide, South Australia
| | - Heather McElroy
- Discipline of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Adelaide, South Australia
| | - Lynette Moore
- SA Pathology, Women's and Children's Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia; Discipline of Medical Sciences, The University of Adelaide, South Australia
| | - Lynne Giles
- School of Public Health, The University of Adelaide, South Australia; Robinson Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, South Australia
| | - Luke Grzeskowiak
- Robinson Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, South Australia; South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, South Australia; Discipline of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Adelaide, South Australia; College of Medicine and Public Health, Flinders University, South Australia
| | - Elizabeth Roughead
- Quality Use of Medicines and Pharmacy Research Centre, University of South Australia, South Australia
| | - Michael Stark
- Robinson Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, South Australia; Discipline of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Adelaide, South Australia
| | - Michael Davies
- Robinson Research Institute, The University of Adelaide, South Australia; Discipline of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, The University of Adelaide, South Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
O’Driscoll V, Georgescu I, Koo I, Arthur R, Chuang R, Dempsey JA, De Franco G, Jones CA. Reducing day 3 baseline monitoring bloodwork and ultrasound for patients undergoing timed intercourse and intrauterine insemination treatment cycles. FERTILITY RESEARCH AND PRACTICE 2021; 7:11. [PMID: 33931123 PMCID: PMC8085474 DOI: 10.1186/s40738-021-00102-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/17/2021] [Accepted: 04/12/2021] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND In the current context of a global pandemic it is imperative for fertility clinics to consider the necessity of individual tests and eliminate those that have limited utility and may impose unnecessary risk of exposure. The purpose of this study was to implement and evaluate a multi-modal quality improvement (QI) strategy to promote resource stewardship by reducing routine day 3 (d3) bloodwork and transvaginal ultrasound (TVUS) for patients undergoing intrauterine insemination (IUI) and timed intercourse (IC) treatment cycles. METHODS After literature review, clinic stakeholders at an academic fertility centre met to discuss d3 testing utility and factors contributing to d3 bloodwork/TVUS in IC/IUI treatment cycles. Consensus was reached that it was unnecessary in patients taking oral/no medications. The primary intervention changed the default setting on the electronic order set to exclude d3 testing for IC/IUI cycles with oral/no medications. Exceptions required active test selection. Protocols were updated and education sessions were held. The main outcome measure was the proportion of cycles receiving d3 bloodwork/TVUS during the 8-week post-intervention period compared with the 8-week pre-intervention period. Balancing measures included provider satisfaction, pregnancy rates, and incidence of cycle cancellation. RESULTS A significant reduction in the proportion of cycles receiving d3 TVUS (57.2% vs 20.8%, p < 0.001) and ≥ 1 blood test (58.6% vs 22.8%, p < 0.001) was observed post-intervention. There was no significant difference in cycle cancellation or pregnancy rates pre- and post-intervention (p = 0.86). Treatment with medications, cyst history, prescribing physician, and treatment centre were associated with receiving d3 bloodwork/TVUS. 74% of providers were satisfied with the intervention. CONCLUSION A significant reduction in IC/IUI treatment cycles that received d3 bloodwork/TVUS was achieved without measured negative treatment impacts. During a pandemic, eliminating routine d3 bloodwork/TVUS represents a safe way to reduce monitoring appointments and exposure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Victoria O’Driscoll
- University of Toronto, Undergraduate Medical Education, 1 King’s College Circle, Room 3157, Toronto, ON M5S 1A8 Canada
- University of Toronto, Institute of Health Policy, Management, and Evaluation, 155 College Street, 4th floor, Toronto, ON M5T 3M6 Canada
| | - Ilinca Georgescu
- Schulich School of Medicine & Dentistry, Western University, 1151 Richmond Street, London, ON N6A 5C1 Canada
| | - Irene Koo
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Toronto, 123 Edward Street, Suite 1200, Toronto, ON M5G 1E2 Canada
- Mount Sinai Fertility, Sinai Health System, 250 Dundas Street West, Suite 700, Toronto, ON M5T 2Z5 Canada
| | - Rebecca Arthur
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Toronto, 123 Edward Street, Suite 1200, Toronto, ON M5G 1E2 Canada
- Mount Sinai Fertility, Sinai Health System, 250 Dundas Street West, Suite 700, Toronto, ON M5T 2Z5 Canada
| | - Rita Chuang
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Toronto, 123 Edward Street, Suite 1200, Toronto, ON M5G 1E2 Canada
| | - Jillian Ann Dempsey
- Mount Sinai Fertility, Sinai Health System, 250 Dundas Street West, Suite 700, Toronto, ON M5T 2Z5 Canada
| | - Giulia De Franco
- Mount Sinai Fertility, Sinai Health System, 250 Dundas Street West, Suite 700, Toronto, ON M5T 2Z5 Canada
| | - Claire Ann Jones
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Toronto, 123 Edward Street, Suite 1200, Toronto, ON M5G 1E2 Canada
- Mount Sinai Fertility, Sinai Health System, 250 Dundas Street West, Suite 700, Toronto, ON M5T 2Z5 Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Garthwaite H, Stewart J, Wilkes S. Multiple pregnancy rate in patients undergoing treatment with clomifene citrate for WHO group II ovulatory disorders: a systematic review. HUM FERTIL 2021; 25:618-624. [PMID: 33451262 DOI: 10.1080/14647273.2021.1872803] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/22/2022]
Abstract
Clomifene citrate has long been associated with a multiple pregnancy rate of up to 8-10%. Studies from which these figures originated have largely included patients who received clomifene outside of current national and international treatment guidelines. In January 2020, a systematic review of MEDLINE and relevant reference lists was conducted. Studies were included that reported multiple pregnancy rate in a cohort of patients undergoing treatment with single agent clomifene citrate for WHO group II dysovulatory subfertility. Twelve studies were included in the analysis, with a total sample size of 1,387 patients. The overall multiple pregnancy rate was 3.8% (3.6% twins/0.2% triplets); this dropped to 2.4% (all twins) when studies with a mean BMI ≥35kg/m2 were excluded. This review suggests that contemporary single agent clomifene use following current guidelines in terms of indication, results in a lower than expected multiple pregnancy rate. Further evidence from clinical practice is required to ensure that patients are adequately informed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heather Garthwaite
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Wellbeing, University of Sunderland, Sunderland, UK
| | - Jane Stewart
- Newcastle Fertility Centre at Life, Newcastle Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, UK
| | - Scott Wilkes
- Faculty of Health Sciences and Wellbeing, University of Sunderland, Sunderland, UK
| |
Collapse
|