Can the ethnic differences in IVF cycle outcome be influenced by the impact of BMI?

A Systematic Review of Genetics and Reproductive Health Outcomes: Asian Perspective

In the last four decades, advances in assisted reproductive technology (ART) have offered hope to individuals with fertility problems to conceive. However, a closer examination of the clinical outcomes of ART shows a stark contrast in Asian women compared to Caucasians, with majority of studies reporting lower reproductive success among Asian women. We performed a systematic review to elucidate the genes associated with ART clinical outcomes, with a focus on Asian ethnicities. We completed a database search to identify all studies associated with reproductive outcomes in women of different ethnic backgrounds. Following PRISMA, 128 studies were analyzed. Pathway analysis of gene sets was done using Cytoscapev3.4.0. We observed that age at menarche (AAM) was correlated with the timing of the first pregnancy, with Hawaiians having the lowest age (22.2 years) and Japanese the highest age (25.0 years). LIN28 mutations were associated with AAM and prevalent in both Chinese and American populations. FMR1 was most associated with ovarian reserve. Network analysis highlighted a close association between FMR1, FSHR, ESR1, BMP15, and INHA, through biological functions affecting menstrual cycle and hypothalamic-pituitary axis and therefore ovarian follicle development. Leveraging these findings, we propose the development of a personalized, ethnic-specific biomarker panel which would enhance patient stratification to address every woman's unique reproductive potential.

Comparison of the number of oocytes obtained after ovarian stimulation between Chinese and Caucasian women undergoing in vitro fertilization using a standardized stimulation regime

Background

In vitro fertilization (IVF) is a well-established method to treat various causes of infertility. Some previous retrospective studies suggested a lower ovarian response in Asian women compared to Caucasian women. However, the ovarian stimulation regimens were not standardized, potentially confounding the findings. The objective of this study is to compare the number of oocytes obtained after ovarian stimulation between Chinese and Caucasian women undergoing IVF using a standardized stimulation regimen.

Methods

This is a prospective cohort study conducted in two tertiary IVF units in Hong Kong, China and Sydney, Australia from October 2016 to August 2019. A total of 192 women aged 18–42 years with a body weight > 60 kg underwent IVF with a standard ovarian stimulation regimen of 150 micrograms corifollitropin alfa (Elonva®) followed by 200 IU follitropin beta (Puregon®) per day. The number of oocytes retrieved in Chinese women treated in the Hong Kong center was compared to that of Caucasian women treated in the Australian center.

Results

Serum AMH levels were similar between the two groups. Although women in the Chinese cohort were older and had a higher body mass index (BMI), longer duration of infertility and lower antral follicle count (AFC) than those in the Caucasian cohort in this study, no differences in the number of oocytes retrieved [11 (8–17) vs. 11 (6–17), p=0.29], total dosage and duration of stimulation and number of follicles aspirated were noted between the two ethnic cohorts. The peak estradiol level was greater in Chinese women than in Caucasian women. After controlling for age, BMI and AFC, ethnicity was a significant independent determinant of the number of oocytes obtained.

Conclusions

Chinese women had a higher number of oocytes after ovarian stimulation using a standardized stimulation regimen compared with Caucasian women undergoing IVF after controlling for age, BMI, AFC and AMH despite presenting later after a longer duration of infertility. Trial registration number: NCT02748278

Asian Americans and Infertility: Genetic Susceptibilities, Sociocultural Stigma and Access to Care

Infertility affects over 6 million people in the United States and has been shown to disproportionally affect minority patient populations. Asian American infertility is a particularly understudied area of research. This mini review article explores the current state of published research focusing on Asian American infertility trends as well as their barriers to fertility care. A small number of published studies have found that Asian American patients have decreased success with fertility treatments, including lower rates of pregnancy and live birth. These trends may be attributed to a combination of genetic, environmental, and cultural factors, which will be discussed here in further detail. It is crucial to continue building on Asian American fertility research to provide this diverse patient population with comprehensive, compassionate, and culturally sensitive care.

Factors contributing to persistent disparate outcomes of in vitro fertilization treatment

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Disparate healthcare outcomes are ubiquitous and occur across all fields of medicine, specifically for racial and ethnic minorities. Within reproductive health, minority women face disparate access to care, particularly infertility services, poor outcomes of fertility treatment, alarmingly higher rates of maternal morbidity and mortality as well as higher rates of preterm birth, lower live birth rates when they conceive spontaneously or when they conceive with assisted reproductive technology. The objective of this review is to highlight factors contributing to the persistent racial/ethnic disparities in in vitro fertilization (IVF) outcomes.

RECENT FINDINGS

Recent studies document poorer outcomes after IVF treatment. Black women have been shown to have lower live birth rates following IVF treatment for more than 15 years.

SUMMARY

In an effort to better understand these negative outcomes, scientists and clinicians have investigated possible biological contributing factors including the vaginal microbiome, differences in oocyte quality, embryo viability, endometrial factors, and hormonal differences. Multiple social/cultural factors also play a role including access to care, particularly for people with low income, patient (mis)education, and medical racism/bias.