Orthodontic management of a non-vital immature tooth treated with regenerative endodontics: a case report

Long-Term Clinical and Radiographic Observation of Previously Regenerated Treated Incisors Subjected to Orthodontic Movement. A Case Series

INTRODUCTION

With an increasing number of anterior traumatized teeth treated with regenerative endodontic procedures (REPs) nowadays, orthodontic movement of such teeth is expected to become a common scenario in everyday clinical practice. However, little is known about the clinical implications and the response capacity of regenerated tissues to orthodontic forces.

METHODS

The aim of this clinical article was to report on 4 cases of REP-treated immature anterior permanent teeth subjected to orthodontic forces, and to describe the long-term response of the regenerated apical and intracanal tissues.

RESULTS

Signs of orthodontic-induced external root resorption were observed in 2 of the 4 presented cases without, however, the presence of any associated adverse events. No other complications were observed, either clinically or radiographically, throughout the observation period. In the long-term, all 4 cases responded favorably to orthodontic forces, maintaining healthy apical tissues and structural integrity of both intracanal as well as apically regenerated tissues.

CONCLUSIONS

The orthodontic movement of REP-treated teeth seems feasible, nevertheless, special care should be implemented. Lightly acting orthodontic forces, short duration of active movement, and close monitoring of the patient seem to be prerequisites to limit complications to a minimum and achieve a favorable healing of REP-treated teeth in the long-term following orthodontic treatment completion.

Orthodontic management of traumatized teeth: A national survey of UK orthodontists

BACKGROUND/AIM

There is a lack of research into orthodontic movement and management strategies of traumatized teeth. The aim of this survey was to assess the knowledge of UK-based orthodontists in the orthodontic management of traumatized teeth.

MATERIALS/METHODS

A 24-item questionnaire survey was electronically distributed to all members of the British Orthodontic Society.

RESULTS

A total of 213 respondents completed the survey with the majority of these being UK registered specialists in orthodontics. Three responses were excluded as one was not based within the UK and two were orthodontic trainees with <1 year of experience, leaving a total of 210 respondents. The majority had orthodontically treated up to three patients with a history of dental trauma in the preceding 3 months. Obtaining a trauma history was done by the majority of respondents. A wide variation in times waited by respondents before orthodontically treating teeth with different types of traumatic injuries was observed. Similarly, the preferred orthodontic management strategies of traumatized teeth differed substantially among respondents. Almost all respondents were interested in further training in the management of dental trauma.

CONCLUSIONS

The study showed a wide variation in the orthodontic management of traumatized teeth among UK-based orthodontists. Further training and national guideline establishment are indicated for orthodontic management of traumatized teeth in the UK.