Gender specific considerations in atrial fibrillation treatment: a review

Sex-based differences in safety and efficacy of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation

BACKGROUND

Studies have identified significant sex-based differences and disparities in the clinical presentation and treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF). Studies have shown women are less likely to be referred for catheter ablation, are older at the time of ablation, and are more likely to have recurrence after ablation. However, in most studies investigating AF ablation outcomes, the female cohorts were relatively small. The impact of sex on the outcome and safety of ablation procedures is still unclear.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate sex-based differences in outcomes and complications after AF catheter ablation, with a significant female cohort METHOD: In this retrospective study, patients undergoing AF ablation from January 1, 2014, to March 31, 2021, were included. We investigated clinical characteristics, duration and progression of AF, number of EP appointments from diagnosis to ablation, procedural data, and procedure complications.

RESULTS

Total of 1346 patients underwent first catheter ablation for AF during this period, including 896 (66.5%) male and 450 (33.4%) female patients. Female patients were older at the time of ablation (66.2 vs. 62.4 years; p < .001). Women had higher CHA2 DS2 -VASc (congestive heart failure, hypertension, age, diabetes, stroke, vascular disease, sex category) scores (3 vs. 2; p < .001) than men, expectedly, as the female sex warrants an additional point. 25.3% female patients had PersAF at the time of diagnosis versus 35.3% male patients (p < .001). At the time of ablation, 31.8% female patients had PersAF as compared to 43.1% male patients (p < .001), indicating progression of PAF to PersAF in both sexes. Women tried more AADs than men before ablation (1.13 vs. 0.98; p = .002). Male and female patients had no statistically significant difference in (a) arrhythmia recurrence at 1-year post ablation (27.7% vs. 30%; p = .38) or (b) procedural complication rate (1.8% vs. 3.1%; p = .56).

CONCLUSION

Female patients were older and had higher CHA2 DS2 -VASc scores compared to males at the time of AF ablation. Women tried more AADs than men before ablation. One-year arrhythmia recurrence rates and procedural complications were similar in both sexes. No sex-based differences were observed in safety and efficacy of ablation.

Women with atrial fibrillation undergoing pulmonary vein isolation are more symptomatic but improve more in health-related quality of life and symptom burden than men

Gender differences in symptoms and perceived health-related quality of life (HRQOL) in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) referred to pulmonary vein isolation (PVI) have been reported previously. Women experience a lower HRQOL, faster heart rate, and more symptoms such as palpitation and dyspnea than men. Furthermore, they experience worse physical functioning independently of other heart diseases or age. This study evaluates referral patterns and symptoms, morbidity, functional impairment, and HRQOL from a gender perspective in patients with AF before and 6 months after PVI. The study includes 242 patients (121 men), mean age 62 ± 9 years, referred for PVI. Symptoms were assessed with the Symptom Checklist: Frequency and Severity (SCL), HRQOL with Short Form 36 (SF-36), and the functional impairment with Sickness Impact Profile (SIP). The patients' own experiences of the referral process and history of their disease were evaluated with a supplementary questionnaire. The results showed that women improved more than men in HRQOL, SIP, and SCL 6 months post PVI. There were no sex differences in proportion of paroxysmal and persistent AF or ablation outcome. At baseline, women scored higher than men in both scales of the SCL (p < 0.001), scored lower in all components in SF-36, and scored higher in five categories of the SIP. Women were not more reluctant to accept referral for ablation when offered. The conclusion is that women with AF undergoing PVI are more symptomatic but also improve more in HRQOL and in symptom burden than men.

Structural Remodeling and Rotational Activity in Persistent/Long-Lasting Atrial Fibrillation: Gender-Effect Differences and Impact on Post-ablation Outcome

Background

Structural and post-ablation gender differences are reported in atrial fibrillation (AF). We analyzed the gender differences in structural remodeling and AF mechanisms in patients with persistent/long-lasting AF who underwent wide area circumferential pulmonary vein isolation (WACPVI).

Materials and Methods

Ultra-high-density mapping was used to study atrial remodeling and AF drivers in 85 consecutive patients. Focal and rotational activity (RAc) were identified with the CartoFinder system and activation sequence analysis. The impact of RAc location on post-ablation outcomes was analyzed.

Results

This study included 64 men and 21 women. RAc was detected in 73.4% of men and 38.1% of women (p = 0.003). RAc patients had higher left atrium (LA) voltage (0.64 ± 0.3 vs. 0.50 ± 0.2 mV; p = 0.01), RAc sites had higher voltage than non-RAc sites 0.77 ± 0.46 vs. 0.53 ± 0.37 mV (p < 0.001). Women had lower LA voltage than men (0.42 vs. 0.64 mV; p < 0.001), including pulmonary vein (PV) antra (0.16 vs. 0.30 mV; p < 0.001) and posterior wall (0.34 vs. 0.51 mV; p < 0.001). RAc in the posterior atrium was recorded in few women (23.8 vs. 54.7% in men; p = 0.014). AF recurrence rate was higher in patients with RAc outside WACPVI than those with all RAc inside WACPVI or no RAc (63.4 vs. 11.1 and 31.0%; p = 0.008 and p = 0.01). Comparison of selected patients using propensity score matching confirmed lower atrial voltage (0.4 ± 0.2 vs. 0.7 ± 0.3 mV; p = 0.007) and less RAc (38 vs. 75%; p = 0.02) in women.

Conclusion

Women have shown more advanced structural remodeling at ablation, which is associated with a lower incidence of RAc (usually located outside the WACPVI). These findings could explain post-ablation gender differences.

Arrhythmia profile and ablation-outcome in elderly women with atrial fibrillation undergoing first catheter ablation

BACKGROUND

This study evaluated the arrhythmia profile and ablation outcome in women with atrial fibrillation (AF) aged ≥75 years.

METHODS

A total of 573 consecutive female patients undergoing first AF ablation were classified into group 1: ≥75 years (n = 221) and group 2: < 75 years (n = 352). Isolation of PVs, posterior wall and superior vena cava was performed in all. Non-PV triggers from other areas were ablated based on operator's discretion.

RESULTS

Group 1 had higher prevalence of hypertension (154 (69.7%) vs. 188 (53.4%), p < .001) and non-paroxysmal AF (136 (61.5%) vs. 126 (35.8%), p < .001). Non-PV triggers were detected in 194 (87.8%) patients from group 1 and 143 (40.6%) from group 2 (p < .001) and were ablated in 152 (68.8%) and 114 (32.4%) from group 1 and 2 respectively. Remaining patients (group 1: 69/221 and group 2: 238/352) received no additional ablation. At 4 years, 109 (49.3%) and 185 (52.6%) from group 1 and 2, respectively, were arrhythmia-free, p = .69. When stratified by ablation-strategy, success-rate was similar across groups in patients receiving non-PV trigger ablation (96 (63.2%) in group 1 and 76 (66.7%) in group 2, p = .61), whereas it was significantly lower in group 1 patients not receiving additional ablation compared to those from group 2 (13 (18.8%) vs. 109 (45.8%), p < .001).

CONCLUSION

Non-paroxysmal AF was more common in women aged ≥75 years. Furthermore, significantly higher number of non-PV triggers were detected in elderly women and ablation of those provided similar ablation success as that in women aged < 75 years.

Predictors of recurrent atrial fibrillation following catheter ablation

INTRODUCTION

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a complex and multi-factorial rhythm disorder. Catheter ablation is widely used for the management of AF. However, it is limited by relapse of the arrhythmia necessitating repeat procedures.

AREAS COVERED

This review aims to discuss the predictors of post-ablation recurrent AF including age, gender, genetic predisposition, AF type and duration, comorbidities, lifestyle factors, echocardiographic parameters of heart chambers, left atrial fibrosis and ablation strategies and targets. An extensive literature search was undertaken on PubMed and Google Scholar to obtain full texts of relevant AF-related articles.

EXPERT OPINION

Maintenance of stable sinus rhythm is the main intended outcome of AF ablation. Therefore, it is very crucial to identify the risk factors that may influence the ablation success. Most of these predictors such as comorbidities, ablation strategy and targets and lifestyle factors are either reversible or modifiable. Thus, not only the awareness of these known risk factors by both patients and their physicians but also future research to identify the unknown predictors are critical to optimize care in this multi-faceted morbidity.

Sex-based differences in procedural complications associated with atrial fibrillation catheter ablation: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Women undergoing atrial fibrillation catheter ablation (AFCA) have higher rates of vascular complications and major bleeding. However, most studies have been underpowered to detect differences in rarer complications such as stroke/transient ischemic attack (TIA) and procedural mortality.

METHODS

We performed a systematic review of databases (PubMed, World of Science, and Embase) to identify studies published since 2010 reporting AFCA complications by sex. Six complications of interest were (1) vascular/groin complications; (2) pericardial effusion/tamponade; (3) stroke/TIA; (4) permanent phrenic nerve injury; (5) major bleeding; and (6) procedural mortality. For meta-analysis, random effects models were used when heterogeneity between studies was ≥50% (vascular complications and major bleeding) and fixed effects models for other endpoints.

RESULTS

Of 5716 citations, 19 studies met inclusion criteria, comprising 244,353 patients undergoing AFCA, of whom 33% were women. Women were older (65.3 ± 11.2 vs. 60.4 ± 13.2 years), more likely hypertensive (60.6% vs. 55.5%) and diabetic (18.3% vs. 16.5%), and had higher CHA₂ DS₂ -VASc scores (3.0 ± 1.8 vs. 1.4 ± 1.4) (p < .0001 for all comparisons). The rates of all six complications were significantly higher in women. However, despite statistically significant differences, the overall incidences of major complications were very low in both sexes: stroke/TIA (women 0.51% vs. men 0.39%) and procedural mortality (women 0.25% vs. men 0.19%).

CONCLUSION

Women experience significantly higher rates of AFCA complications. However, the incidence of major procedural complications is very low in both sexes. The higher rate of complications in women may be partially attributable to older age and a higher prevalence of comorbidities at the time of ablation. More detailed studies are needed to better define the mechanisms of increased risk in women and to identify strategies for closing the sex gap.

Gender Differences in Arrhythmias: Focused on Atrial Fibrillation

There are significant differences in clinical presentation and treatment of atrial fibrillation (AF) between women and men. The primary goal of AF management is to restore sinus rhythm and to prevent various complications, including stroke and heart failure. In many areas of AF, such as prevalence, clinical manifestations, morbidity, risk factors, pathophysiology, treatment strategies, and complications, gender-specific variability is observed and needs to be further addressed by large-scale population researches or randomized clinical trials, which help to promote the customization of AF treatment programs, hence to maximize the success rate of AF therapy in both sexes. This review highlights our current understanding of these gender differences in AF and how these differences affect treatment decisions on AF.