1
|
Barbanti P, Allais G, Cevoli S, Guerzoni S, Valeriani M, Vernieri F. The Role of the Combination Paracetamol/Caffeine in Treatment of Acute Migraine Pain: A Narrative Review. Pain Ther 2024; 13:319-346. [PMID: 38446344 PMCID: PMC11111640 DOI: 10.1007/s40122-024-00581-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/17/2023] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 03/07/2024] Open
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Thirty years ago, the first migraine-specific drugs (triptans) appeared. Today two new categories (gepants and ditans) are marketed for acute migraine treatment. That said, is there still a role for conventional therapy? The aim of the present narrative review is to provide an expert overview examining the possible role of the combination paracetamol/caffeine in treatment of acute migraine pain. METHODS To understand possible settings for more appropriate use of paracetamol/caffeine (1000 mg/130 mg) in treatment of acute migraine, a structured literature search was performed using the PubMed database by a panel of experts from major Italian headache centers; articles not referring to migraine pain were excluded from this review; review articles were prioritized. RESULTS Overall response, even to newer specific and selective trigeminal targeted drugs (TTTs), is not over 60%; thus, there is still room for conventional therapies in acute migraine treatment. The panel identified settings in which the use of paracetamol/caffeine combination to treat acute migraine attacks might offer benefit considering the consolidated use through years, despite the lack of studies directly addressing the efficacy of paracetamol/caffeine in the identified populations: subjects > 65 years of age; presence of cardiovascular (CV) comorbidities; TTTs non-responders; pregnancy and breastfeeding; subjects < 18 years of age; paracetamol/caffeine as add-on therapy. CONCLUSIONS Paracetamol is included in the World Health Organization (WHO) essential drug list and has a high level of popularity among patients. Caffeine enhances the analgesic effect of other drugs including paracetamol. In early treatment of acute migraine pain, prescribing physicians might consider using the paracetamol/caffeine combination among other options.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Piero Barbanti
- Headache and Pain Unit-IRCCS San Raffaele, via della Pisana 235, 00163, Rome, Italy.
- University San Raffaele, Rome, Italy.
| | - Gianni Allais
- Department of Surgical Sciences, Women's Headache Center, University of Turin, Turin, Italy
| | - Sabina Cevoli
- Sabina Cevoli IRCCS Istituto delle Scienze Neurologiche di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Simona Guerzoni
- Digital and Predictive Medicine, Pharmacology and Clinical Metabolic Toxicology-Headache Center and Drug Abuse-Laboratory of Clinical Pharmacology and Pharmacogenomics, Department of Specialist Medicines, AOU Policlinico di Modena, Modena, Italy
| | - Massimiliano Valeriani
- Developmental Neurology Unit, IRCSS Ospedale Pediatrico Bambino Gesù, Rome, Italy
- Center for Sensory-Motor Interaction, Aalborg University, Aalborg, Denmark
| | - Fabrizio Vernieri
- Headache Unit, Fondazione Policlinico Campus Bio-Medico, Rome, Italy
- Neurology, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Onan D, Wells-Gatnik WD, Bentivegna E, Lampl C, Martelletti P. New Migraine Drugs for Older Adults. Drugs Aging 2023; 40:301-305. [PMID: 36826751 DOI: 10.1007/s40266-023-01012-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/07/2023] [Indexed: 02/25/2023]
Abstract
Migraine is one of the most widespread and burdensome diseases, affecting one in every seven individuals in the world, for an estimated global prevalence of 14%. Until recently, therapeutic choices for older migraineurs have been limited by safety concerns and such patients have typically been excluded from clinical trials. However, randomized controlled trials (RCTs) of new migraine drugs have begun to include participants aged over 65 years, offering clinicians relevant safety and efficacy data to be able to treat older patients with the newest drug classes, including monoclonal antibodies for CGRP (r), CGRP antagonists, and drugs targeting the serotonin 5-HT1F receptor. RCT inclusion criteria nonetheless select the most appropriate older patients, usually excluding polymorbid participants. In a real-life setting, older patients may have several comorbidities, and this reduces the clinical applicability of the new drugs to these patients. Two main points should be addressed to solve this barrier: the inclusion of a sufficient number of migraineurs aged over 65 years in RCTs and the publication of appropriate guidelines for a tailored treatment that considers the existence of multimorbid pathologies in this population of individuals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Dilara Onan
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.,Back and Neck Health Unit, Faculty of Physical Therapy and Rehabilitation, Hacettepe University, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | - Enrico Bentivegna
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy
| | - Christian Lampl
- Department of Neurology and Headache Medical Centre, Konventhospital Barmherzige Brüder Linz, Seilerstätte 2, 4021, Linz, Austria
| | - Paolo Martelletti
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University, Rome, Italy.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Martin V, Tassorelli C, Ettrup A, Hirman J, Cady R. Eptinezumab for migraine prevention in patients 50 years or older. Acta Neurol Scand 2022; 145:698-705. [PMID: 35218203 PMCID: PMC9305510 DOI: 10.1111/ane.13603] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2021] [Revised: 01/13/2022] [Accepted: 02/13/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To evaluate the efficacy and safety of eptinezumab versus placebo in patients ≥50 years old with episodic (EM) or chronic migraine (CM). MATERIALS AND METHODS This post hoc analysis included data from two phase 3, parallel-group, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled studies in adults with EM (PROMISE-1) or CM (PROMISE-2). Patients ≥50 years at baseline treated with eptinezumab 100 mg, 300 mg, or placebo were pooled from both studies to evaluate efficacy and safety. RESULTS A total of 385/1960 (19.6%) EM and CM patients who were ≥50 years old at baseline (range, 50-71 and 50-65 years, respectively) received eptinezumab 100 mg (n = 132), 300 mg (n = 127), or placebo (n = 126) over Weeks 1-12. Reductions in mean monthly migraine days (MMDs) in ≥50-year-old EM patients were -3.8 (100 mg) and -4.4 (300 mg) with eptinezumab versus -2.6 with placebo. In ≥50-year-old CM patients, mean changes in MMDs were -7.7 (100 mg) and -8.6 (300 mg) with eptinezumab versus -6.0 with placebo. Changes in MMDs were comparable to total study results. A ≥50% MMD reduction over Weeks 1-12 was achieved by 57.9% of eptinezumab-treated versus 35.7% of patients who received placebo, and a ≥75% reduction by 30.5% versus 13.5%, respectively. The incidence of treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in EM and CM patients ≥50 years old was similar across treatment groups, with ≥96% of TEAEs mild or moderate in severity. CONCLUSIONS Treatment with eptinezumab was efficacious, tolerable, and safe in patients ≥50 years with EM or CM, congruent with results from the overall study population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Vincent Martin
- University of Cincinnati Headache and Facial Pain Center Cincinnati Ohio USA
| | - Cristina Tassorelli
- Headache Science and Neurorehabilitation Centre IRCCS Mondino Foundation Pavia Italy
- Department of Brain and Behavioral Sciences University of Pavia Pavia Italy
| | | | - Joe Hirman
- Pacific Northwest Statistical Consulting, Inc Woodinville Washington USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
4
|
Wang W, Liu Z, Kong F, He L, Fang L, Shu Q. Quantitative analysis of resveratrol derivatives in the seed coats of tree peonies and their hypoglycemic activities in vitro/ vivo. Food Funct 2022; 13:846-856. [PMID: 34989366 DOI: 10.1039/d1fo03412j] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/19/2023]
Abstract
Tree peonies are well-known horticultural and medicinal plants. The tree peony seeds, as emerging woody oil crops, recently have attracted great attention for their metabolites and bioactivities. In this study, the phytochemicals isolated from tree peony seed coats were systematically investigated. Seven polyphenolics were separated and prepared, mainly belonging to resveratrol derivatives. There was a great variation in the seed coat polyphenolic content among eight Paeonia species, and the contents of the resveratrol trimers and dimers were significantly higher in the seed coats of Paeonia ostii than other species. Based on the HPLC fingerprint characteristics and chemometric analysis, a clear discrimination among Paeonia plants was found, including the composition patterns and contents of the constituents. Moreover, the characteristic phytochemicals (vateriferol and trans-ε-viniferin) could significantly reduce the starch-mediated levels of postprandial blood glucose in diabetic/normal mice. In addition, in vitro enzyme tests showed that the two compounds could effectively and competitively inhibit α-glucosidase, with the IC50 values of 3.01 and 7.75 μM, respectively, indicating that vateriferol and trans-ε-viniferin could be therapeutic potential agents for hyperglycemia and diabetes mellitus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Weidong Wang
- Qinghai Provincial Key Laboratory of Tibetan Medicine Research and Key Laboratory of Tibetan Medicine Research, Northwest Institute of Plateau Biology, CAS, Xining 810001, China.
| | - Zenggen Liu
- Qinghai Provincial Key Laboratory of Tibetan Medicine Research and Key Laboratory of Tibetan Medicine Research, Northwest Institute of Plateau Biology, CAS, Xining 810001, China.
| | - Fan Kong
- Key Laboratory of Plant Resources and Beijing Botanical Garden, Institute of Botany, CAS, Beijing 100093, China.
| | - Lixia He
- Forestry Sci-tech Extension Station of Gansu Province, Lanzhou 730046, China
| | - Linghao Fang
- Ruilaiyin (Beijing) Biotechnology Co., Ltd, Beijing 100094, China
| | - Qingyan Shu
- Key Laboratory of Plant Resources and Beijing Botanical Garden, Institute of Botany, CAS, Beijing 100093, China.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Nahas SJ, Naegel S, Cohen JM, Ning X, Janka L, Campos VR, Krasenbaum LJ, Holle-Lee D, Kudrow D, Lampl C. Efficacy and safety of fremanezumab in clinical trial participants aged ≥60 years with episodic or chronic migraine: pooled results from 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 studies. J Headache Pain 2021; 22:141. [PMID: 34819017 PMCID: PMC8903616 DOI: 10.1186/s10194-021-01351-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/09/2021] [Accepted: 10/31/2021] [Indexed: 01/17/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Although migraine is less common in older people, preventive treatment of migraine in these individuals may be more challenging due to the presence of multiple comorbidities and polypharmacy. Additionally, evidence for migraine treatment efficacy, safety, and tolerability is limited in this population. We evaluated efficacy, safety, and tolerability of fremanezumab, a fully humanized monoclonal antibody (IgG2Δa) that selectively targets calcitonin gene–related peptide (CGRP), in clinical trial participants aged ≥60 years with episodic migraine (EM) or chronic migraine (CM). Methods This analysis included data from 3 randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 studies: the HALO EM study, HALO CM study, and FOCUS study in participants with EM or CM and prior inadequate response to 2–4 migraine preventive medication classes. Participants in all studies were randomized 1:1:1 to receive 12 weeks of subcutaneous treatment with quarterly fremanezumab (Months 1/2/3: EM/CM, 675 mg/placebo/placebo), monthly fremanezumab (Months 1/2/3: EM, 225 mg/225 mg/225 mg; CM, 675 mg/225 mg/225 mg), or matched monthly placebo. Results These pooled analyses included 246 participants aged ≥60 years. Reductions in monthly migraine days from baseline over 12 weeks were significantly greater with fremanezumab (least-squares mean change from baseline [standard error]: quarterly fremanezumab, − 4.3 [0.59]; monthly fremanezumab, − 4.6 [0.54]) versus placebo (placebo, − 2.3 [0.57]; both P < 0.01 vs placebo). As early as Week 1, significant reductions from baseline in weekly migraine days were observed with fremanezumab versus placebo (both P < 0.01). With fremanezumab treatment versus placebo, a significantly higher proportion of participants achieved ≥50% reduction in monthly migraine days, and significant improvements in disability and quality-of-life outcomes were observed (P < 0.05). Proportions of participants experiencing serious adverse events and adverse events leading to discontinuation were low and similar in the fremanezumab and placebo groups. Efficacy and safety results were comparable to the overall pooled population (N = 2843). Conclusions This pooled subgroup analysis demonstrates that fremanezumab treatment is efficacious and well-tolerated over 12 weeks in participants aged ≥60 years with EM or CM. These data may help healthcare providers with clinical decision making and preventive treatment selection for older patients with migraine. Trial registration ClinicalTrials.gov identifiers: HALO CM: NCT02621931; HALO EM: NCT02629861; FOCUS: NCT03308968. Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s10194-021-01351-2.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephanie J Nahas
- Department of Neurology, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
| | - Steffen Naegel
- Department of Neurology, University Hospital Halle (Saale) and University Halle-Wittenberg, Halle, Germany
| | | | - Xiaoping Ning
- Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, West Chester, PA, USA
| | - Lindsay Janka
- Teva Pharmaceutical Industries, West Chester, PA, USA
| | | | | | - Dagny Holle-Lee
- Department of Neurology and Westgerman Headache Center Essen, University Hospital, Essen, Germany
| | - David Kudrow
- California Medical Clinic for Headache, Santa Monica, CA, USA
| | - Christian Lampl
- Headache Medical Centre, Linz, Austria.,Department of Neurology, Konventhospital Barmherzige Brüder, Linz, Austria
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Soni PP, Lee M, Shadbehr N, Ahmed ZA. Recent Advances in the Management of Migraine in Older Patients. Drugs Aging 2020; 37:463-468. [PMID: 32578024 DOI: 10.1007/s40266-020-00776-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/24/2022]
Abstract
Although the prevalence of migraine tends to decrease in the fifth to sixth decades of life, there are still a significant number of patients > 65 years of age who experience migraine or have new-onset migraine. Because these older patients are often excluded from clinical trials, there are fewer evidence-based treatment guidelines for them. Migraine treatment in the older population requires careful consideration of changes in medication metabolism and increased medical comorbidities. Furthermore, older patients can present with an atypical migraine phenotype and have a higher rate of secondary headache, which may lead to a delay in diagnosis and subsequent treatment. Classic preventive treatments for migraine, including tricyclic antidepressants, antiepileptic drugs, and beta blockers, often have intolerable side effects. In addition, the presence of coronary artery disease, stroke, and peripheral arterial disease precludes the use of typical rescue medications such as triptans. As such, there has been a dire need for novel acute and preventive treatments for older adults. The purpose of this review is to provide an update on novel acute and preventive treatments for migraine in the older population. The advantages of these therapies include their efficacy, favorable side-effect profile, particularly in patients with atherosclerotic disease, as well as their tolerability.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Payal P Soni
- Center for Neurologic Restoration, Headache Section, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Neurological Institute, 9500 Euclid Ave, Desk C21, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - Michelle Lee
- Center for Neurologic Restoration, Headache Section, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Neurological Institute, 9500 Euclid Ave, Desk C21, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - Nasima Shadbehr
- Center for Neurologic Restoration, Headache Section, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Neurological Institute, 9500 Euclid Ave, Desk C21, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA
| | - Zubair A Ahmed
- Center for Neurologic Restoration, Headache Section, Cleveland Clinic Foundation, Neurological Institute, 9500 Euclid Ave, Desk C21, Cleveland, OH, 44195, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Curto M, Cipolla F, Cisale GY, Capi M, Spuntarelli V, Guglielmetti M, Martelletti P, Lionetto L. Profiling lasmiditan as a treatment option for migraine. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2020; 21:147-153. [PMID: 31766908 DOI: 10.1080/14656566.2019.1694004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/03/2019] [Accepted: 11/13/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
Introduction: In recent years, research into acute migraine treatment has aimed to develop molecules capable of inhibiting trigeminal pathways, mediated by agonism to 5-HT1F receptors in order to avoid the vasoconstrictive action due to the stimulation of 5-HT 1B/1D receptors. A novel migraine drug class, called 'neurally acting anti-migraine agents', has been developed for the management of acute migraine attacks. Lasmiditan is the only compound of this drug class that has been evaluated in Phase III clinical trials.Areas covered: This review discusses lasmiditan including its pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, efficacy and safety profile. Original research and review articles, relative to the period 2010-2019, were included in the reviewed literature.Expert opinion: The most recent phase III trials have demonstrated the efficacy of lasmiditan for acute migraine treatment, even if compared only with placebo. Nevertheless, the low rate of cardiovascular side effects with lasmiditan might offer a potential therapeutic option for migraine patients with cardiovascular disorders. With the lack of data on lasmiditan's pharmacokinetic features, several phase I clinical trials are still ongoing in order to evaluate half-life, metabolism, excretion and the potential production of active metabolites. Possible pharmacodynamic interaction with drugs acting on central nervous system should be evaluated in future studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Martina Curto
- Department of Human Neurosciences, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
- International Mood & Psychotic Disorders Research Consortium, Mailman Research Center, Belmont, MA, USA
- Department of Mental Health, ASL Roma 5, Colleferro (RM), Italy
| | - Fabiola Cipolla
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Giusy Ylenia Cisale
- Department of Physiology and Pharmacology, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Matilde Capi
- Mass Spectrometry Laboratory Unit, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Valerio Spuntarelli
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Martina Guglielmetti
- Department of Medical, Surgical and Experimental Sciences, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy
- Regional Referral Headache Center, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Martelletti
- Department of Clinical and Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy
- Regional Referral Headache Center, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Luana Lionetto
- Mass Spectrometry Laboratory Unit, Sant'Andrea University Hospital, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Borro M, Guglielmetti M, Simmaco M, Martelletti P, Gentile G. The future of pharmacogenetics in the treatment of migraine. Pharmacogenomics 2019; 20:1159-1173. [PMID: 31637960 DOI: 10.2217/pgs-2019-0069] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/22/2022] Open
Abstract
Migraine is considered one of the most disabling neurological disorder with a high socioeconomic burden. Pharmacological management includes many classes of drugs which in the most cases, are administrated in polytherapy. The therapeutic scheme of migraineurs is often affected by comorbidities which need concomitant medications, thus increasing the risk of side effects related to drug-drug interactions. Pharmacogenetics is a promising tool to achieve a personalized cure based on individual genetic profile while the availability of free online knowledge bases allows to check the potential DDIs of selected medications. Combining, these approaches may offer to clinicians a useful tool to improve the appropriateness of migraine polytherapy choice, aiming to increase the efficacy and reduce the toxicity of pharmacological treatments.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marina Borro
- Department of Neurosciences, Mental Health & Sensory Organs (NESMOS), Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.,Laboratory of Clinical Chemistry, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Martina Guglielmetti
- Department of Clinical & Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.,Regional Referral Headache Centre, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy.,Department of Clinical Pathology, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy
| | - Maurizio Simmaco
- Department of Neurosciences, Mental Health & Sensory Organs (NESMOS), Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.,Laboratory of Clinical Chemistry, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Paolo Martelletti
- Department of Clinical & Molecular Medicine, Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.,Regional Referral Headache Centre, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy
| | - Giovanna Gentile
- Department of Neurosciences, Mental Health & Sensory Organs (NESMOS), Sapienza University of Rome, Rome, Italy.,Laboratory of Clinical Chemistry, Sant'Andrea Hospital, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|