1
|
Filippi R, Leone F, Fornaro L, Aprile G, Casadei-Gardini A, Silvestris N, Palloni A, Satolli MA, Scartozzi M, Russano M, Lutrino SE, Lombardi P, Frega G, Garattini SK, Vivaldi C, Spadi R, Giulia O, Fenocchio E, Brunetti O, Aglietta M, Brandi G. Clinical insights and prognostic factors from an advanced biliary tract cancer case series: a real-world analysis. J Chemother 2021; 34:123-132. [PMID: 34313188 DOI: 10.1080/1120009x.2021.1953887] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
Advanced biliary tract cancer (aBTC) comprises a heterogeneous group of rare malignancies with dismal prognosis. Given the scarcity of prospective evidence, the aim of this study was to derive clinically useful insights and prognostic factors from a large, real-world series of aBTC. Clinicopathologic variables and treatment outcomes were retrospectively collected involving 940 patients diagnosed with aBTC between 2001 and 2017, and treated with first-line chemotherapy (CT1) at 14 Italian medical oncology institutions. Median overall survival (OS) was 10.3 months (CI95% 9.5-11.1). CT1 with gemcitabine-Platinum salts doublets achieved OS of 11.7 months vs 7.5 with gemcitabine alone (HR 0.67, p < 0.001). However, a clear temporal trend towards improved OS could not be demonstrated. Radical surgery of recurrent disease achieved a relapse-free survival of 5.9 months. A substantial minority (44.5%) of patients were able to receive a second-line chemotherapy, which achieved a response rate of 7.6%, and disease control in 30% of patients with no significant differences between combination regimens and monotherapies. In a large retrospective series of real-world aBTC, outcomes of standard CT1 closely resembled those of the registrational trials. A limited set of easily retrievable independent prognostic factors was defined. Further research is needed on second-line regimens.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto Filippi
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Torino, Italy.,Division of Medical Oncology, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO - IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy.,Division of Medical Oncology 1, Centro Oncologico Ematologico Subalpino, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Francesco Leone
- Division of Medical Oncology, ASL BI, Nuovo Ospedale degli Infermi, Ponderano, Italy
| | - Lorenzo Fornaro
- Unit of Medical Oncology 2, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy
| | - Giuseppe Aprile
- Department of Oncology, University Hospital of Udine, Udine, Italy.,Department of Oncology, San Bortolo General Hospital, Vicenza, Italy
| | - Andrea Casadei-Gardini
- Department of Medical Oncology, Istituto Scientifico Romagnolo per lo Studio e la Cura dei Tumori, Meldola, Italy.,Department of Oncology and Haematology, University Hospital of Modena, Italy
| | - Nicola Silvestris
- Medical Oncology Unit, IRCCS Cancer Institute "Giovanni Paolo II", Bari, Italy
| | - Andrea Palloni
- Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Speciality Medicine, University Hospital S. Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy
| | - Maria Antonietta Satolli
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Torino, Italy.,Division of Medical Oncology 1, Centro Oncologico Ematologico Subalpino, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Mario Scartozzi
- Department of Medical Oncology, University Hospital, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Marco Russano
- Department of Medical Oncology, Campus Bio-Medico University, Roma, Italy
| | | | - Pasquale Lombardi
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Torino, Italy.,Division of Medical Oncology, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO - IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy
| | - Giorgio Frega
- Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Speciality Medicine, University Hospital S. Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy
| | | | - Caterina Vivaldi
- Unit of Medical Oncology 2, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy.,Department of Translational Research and New Technologies in Medicine and Surgery, University of Pisa, Italy
| | - Rosella Spadi
- Division of Medical Oncology 1, Centro Oncologico Ematologico Subalpino, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Città della Salute e della Scienza di Torino, Torino, Italy
| | - Orsi Giulia
- Department of Oncology and Haematology, University Hospital of Modena, Italy
| | - Elisabetta Fenocchio
- Multidisciplinary Outpatient Oncology Clinic, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO-IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy
| | - Oronzo Brunetti
- Medical Oncology Unit, IRCCS Cancer Institute "Giovanni Paolo II", Bari, Italy
| | - Massimo Aglietta
- Department of Oncology, University of Turin, Torino, Italy.,Division of Medical Oncology, Candiolo Cancer Institute, FPO - IRCCS, Candiolo, Italy
| | - Giovanni Brandi
- Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Speciality Medicine, University Hospital S. Orsola-Malpighi, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Zhang W, Shi J, Wang Y, Zhou H, Zhang Z, Han Z, Li G, Yang B, Cao G, Ke Y, Zhang T, Song T, QiangLi. Next-generation sequencing-guided molecular-targeted therapy and immunotherapy for biliary tract cancers. Cancer Immunol Immunother 2020; 70:1001-1014. [PMID: 33095329 DOI: 10.1007/s00262-020-02745-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/08/2020] [Accepted: 10/12/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Chemotherapy is a standard regimen for advanced or relapsed biliary tract cancer (BTC) with a 5-year overall survival (OS) rate of approximately 5% and a median OS of less than a year. Targeted therapies and immunotherapy aimed at providing more personalized treatments for BTCs have been tested. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effects of targeted therapy and immunotherapy on advanced BTC patients. METHODS Twenty-four advanced/relapsed BTC patients were enrolled and examined with next-generation sequencing (NGS). Eight of them received NGS-guided targeted or immunotherapy, and the other 16 patients underwent routine chemotherapy. Comparison analysis of OS and objective response rate (ORR) was performed. RESULTS IDH1, BRCA2, MAP2K1, and BRAF (V600E) were the major actionable genes mutated in this cohort. Patients who received NGS-guided therapy exhibited higher OS (not achieved vs. 6.5 months, p < 0.001) and ORR (87.5% vs. 25%, p < 0.001) than those without targetable mutations and who received first-line chemotherapy. BTCs harboring mutations in IDH1, ATM/BRCA2, or MAP2K1/BRAF (V600E) received treatment with dasatinib, olaparib, or trametinib, respectively. Three of the patients had high tumor mutation burden (TMB-H) and were treated with immune-checkpoint inhibitors and chemotherapy. All these patients achieved complete response or partial response. CONCLUSIONS NGS-guided targeted therapy and immunotherapy are promising personalized therapies for advanced or relapsed BTCs. TMB is a useful biomarker for predicting immunotherapy efficacy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Huan Hu Xi Road, Tianjin, 300060, People's Republic of China. .,National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Huan Hu Xi Road, Tianjin, 300060, People's Republic of China.
| | | | - Yingying Wang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Huan Hu Xi Road, Tianjin, 300060, People's Republic of China
| | - Hongyuan Zhou
- Department of Hepatobiliary Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Huan Hu Xi Road, Tianjin, 300060, People's Republic of China.,National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Huan Hu Xi Road, Tianjin, 300060, People's Republic of China
| | - Zewu Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Huan Hu Xi Road, Tianjin, 300060, People's Republic of China
| | - Zhiqiang Han
- Department of Hepatobiliary Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Huan Hu Xi Road, Tianjin, 300060, People's Republic of China
| | - Guanghao Li
- Department of Hepatobiliary Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Huan Hu Xi Road, Tianjin, 300060, People's Republic of China
| | - Bo Yang
- Department of Pathology, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Tianjin, China
| | - Guangtai Cao
- Department of Hepatobiliary Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Huan Hu Xi Road, Tianjin, 300060, People's Republic of China
| | - Yan Ke
- OrigiMed, Shanghai, China
| | - Ti Zhang
- Department of Hepatobiliary Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Huan Hu Xi Road, Tianjin, 300060, People's Republic of China.,National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Huan Hu Xi Road, Tianjin, 300060, People's Republic of China
| | - Tianqiang Song
- Department of Hepatobiliary Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Huan Hu Xi Road, Tianjin, 300060, People's Republic of China.,National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Huan Hu Xi Road, Tianjin, 300060, People's Republic of China
| | - QiangLi
- Department of Hepatobiliary Cancer, Tianjin Medical University Cancer Institute and Hospital, Huan Hu Xi Road, Tianjin, 300060, People's Republic of China.,National Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Key Laboratory of Cancer Prevention and Therapy, Tianjin's Clinical Research Center for Cancer, Huan Hu Xi Road, Tianjin, 300060, People's Republic of China
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Wu CE, Pan YR, Yeh CN, Lunec J. Targeting P53 as a Future Strategy to Overcome Gemcitabine Resistance in Biliary Tract Cancers. Biomolecules 2020; 10:biom10111474. [PMID: 33113997 PMCID: PMC7690712 DOI: 10.3390/biom10111474] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/28/2020] [Revised: 10/20/2020] [Accepted: 10/21/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
Gemcitabine-based chemotherapy is the current standard treatment for biliary tract cancers (BTCs) and resistance to gemcitabine remains the clinical challenge. TP53 mutation has been shown to be associated with poor clinicopathologic characteristics and survival in patients with BTCs, indicating that p53 plays an important role in the treatment of these cancers. Herein, we comprehensively reviewed previous BTC preclinical research and early clinical trials in terms of p53, as well as novel p53-targeted treatment, alone or in combination with either chemotherapy or other targeted therapies in BTCs. Preclinical studies have demonstrated that p53 mutations in BTCs are associated with enhanced gemcitabine resistance, therefore targeting p53 may be a novel therapeutic strategy for treatment of BTCs. Directly targeting mutant p53 by p53 activators, or indirectly by targeting cell cycle checkpoint proteins (Chk1, ataxia telangiectasia related (ATR), and Wee1) leading to synthetic lethality, may be potential future strategies for gemcitabine-resistant p53 mutated BTCs. In contrast, for wild-type p53 BTCs, activation of p53 by inhibition of its negative regulators (MDM2 and wild-type p53-induced phosphatase 1 (WIP1)) may be alternative options. Combination therapies consisting of standard cytotoxic drugs and novel small molecules targeting p53 and related signaling pathways may be the future key standard approach to beat cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiao-En Wu
- Division of Hematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan;
| | - Yi-Ru Pan
- Department of General Surgery and Liver Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou branch, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan;
| | - Chun-Nan Yeh
- Department of General Surgery and Liver Research Center, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital, Linkou branch, Chang Gung University, Taoyuan 333, Taiwan;
- Correspondence: (C.-N.Y.); (J.L.); Tel.: +886-3-3281200 (ext. 3219) (C.-N.Y.); +44-(0)-191-208-4420 (J.L.); Fax: +886-3-3285818 (C.-N.Y.); +44-(0)-191-208-4301 (J.L.)
| | - John Lunec
- Newcastle University Cancer Centre, Bioscience Institute, Medical Faculty, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE2 4HH, UK
- Correspondence: (C.-N.Y.); (J.L.); Tel.: +886-3-3281200 (ext. 3219) (C.-N.Y.); +44-(0)-191-208-4420 (J.L.); Fax: +886-3-3285818 (C.-N.Y.); +44-(0)-191-208-4301 (J.L.)
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Rizzo A, Ricci AD, Tavolari S, Brandi G. Circulating Tumor DNA in Biliary Tract Cancer: Current Evidence and Future Perspectives. Cancer Genomics Proteomics 2020; 17:441-452. [PMID: 32859625 PMCID: PMC7472453 DOI: 10.21873/cgp.20203] [Citation(s) in RCA: 80] [Impact Index Per Article: 16.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2020] [Revised: 05/19/2020] [Accepted: 05/29/2020] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Peripheral blood of cancer patients "physiologically" presents cells and cellular components deriving from primary or metastatic sites, including circulating tumor cells (CTCs), circulating free DNA (cfDNA) and exosomes containing proteins, lipids and nucleic acids. The term circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) indicates the part of cfDNA which derives from primary tumors and/or metastatic sites, carrying tumor-specific genetic or epigenetic alterations. Analysis of ctDNA has enormous potential applications in all stages of cancer management, including earlier diagnosis of cancer, identification of driver alterations, monitoring of treatment response and detection of resistance mechanisms. Thus, ctDNA has the potential to profoundly change current clinical practice, by moving from tissue to peripheral blood as a source of information. Herein, we review current literature regarding the potential role for ctDNA in biliary tract cancer (BTC) patients, with a particular focus on state-of-the-art techniques and future perspectives of this highly aggressive disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alessandro Rizzo
- Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Angela Dalia Ricci
- Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Simona Tavolari
- Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| | - Giovanni Brandi
- Department of Experimental, Diagnostic and Specialty Medicine, S. Orsola-Malpighi University Hospital, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Ulusakarya A, Karaboué A, Ciacio O, Pittau G, Haydar M, Biondani P, Gumus Y, Chebib A, Almohamad W, Innominato PF. A retrospective study of patient-tailored FOLFIRINOX as a first-line chemotherapy for patients with advanced biliary tract cancer. BMC Cancer 2020; 20:515. [PMID: 32493242 PMCID: PMC7268699 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-07004-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/07/2020] [Accepted: 04/16/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND FOLFIRINOX is a pillar first-line regimen in the treatment of pancreatic cancer. Historically, biliary tract cancer (BTC) and pancreatic cancer have been treated similarly with gemcitabine alone or combined with a platinum compound. With growing evidence supporting the role of fluoropyrimidines in the treatment of BTC, we aimed at assessing the outcomes of patients (pts) with BTC on frontline FOLFIRINOX. METHODS We retrospectively analyzed data of all our consecutive patients with locally advanced (LA) or metastatic (M) BTC who were registered to receive FOLFIRINOX as a first-line therapy between 12/2013 and 11/2017 at Paul Brousse university hospital. The main endpoints were Overall Survival (OS), Time-to-Progression (TTP), best Objective Response Rate (ORR), Disease Control rate (DCR), secondary macroscopically-complete resection (res) and incidence of severe (grade 3-4) toxicity (tox). RESULTS There were 17 male (40%) and 25 female (60%) pts. aged 36 to 84 years (median: 67). They had PS of 0 (55%) or 1 (45%), and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) (21 pts., 50%), gallbladder carcinoma (8 pts., 19%), perihilar CCA (7 pts., 17%), distal CCA (4 pts., 10%) and ampulloma (2 pts., 5%). BTC was LA or M in 10 (24%) and 32 pts. (76%) respectively. Biliary stent was placed in 14 pts. (33%). A median of 10 courses was given with median treatment duration of 6 months. There were no untoward toxicity issues, with no febrile neutropenia, emergency admission for toxicity or toxic death. We observed 12 partial responses (29%) and 19 disease stabilisations (45%). Six patients (14%) underwent secondary R0-R1 resection. Median TTP was 8 months [95%CL, 6-10] and median OS was 15 months [13-17]. Patients undergoing secondary resection displayed a 3-y disease-free rate of 83%. CONCLUSIONS First-line FOLFIRINOX offers promising results in patients with LA and M-BTC. It deserves prospective evaluation to further improve outcomes for advanced BTC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ayhan Ulusakarya
- Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Department of Medical Oncology, Paul Brousse Hospital, 12-14 Avenue Paul Vaillant Couturier, 94800, Villejuif, France. .,INSERM U935 Campus CNRS, Villejuif, France.
| | - Abdoulaye Karaboué
- INSERM U935 Campus CNRS, Villejuif, France.,Medical oncology unit, GHI Le Raincy-Montfermeil, Montfermeil, France
| | - Oriana Ciacio
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Department of Surgery, Paul Brousse Hospital, Centre Hépato-Biliaire, Villejuif, France
| | - Gabriella Pittau
- Assistance Publique-Hôpitaux de Paris, Department of Surgery, Paul Brousse Hospital, Centre Hépato-Biliaire, Villejuif, France
| | - Mazen Haydar
- Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Department of Medical Oncology, Paul Brousse Hospital, 12-14 Avenue Paul Vaillant Couturier, 94800, Villejuif, France
| | - Pamela Biondani
- Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Department of Medical Oncology, Paul Brousse Hospital, 12-14 Avenue Paul Vaillant Couturier, 94800, Villejuif, France
| | - Yusuf Gumus
- Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Department of Medical Oncology, Paul Brousse Hospital, 12-14 Avenue Paul Vaillant Couturier, 94800, Villejuif, France
| | - Amale Chebib
- Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Department of Medical Oncology, Paul Brousse Hospital, 12-14 Avenue Paul Vaillant Couturier, 94800, Villejuif, France
| | - Wathek Almohamad
- Assistance Publique-Hopitaux de Paris, Department of Medical Oncology, Paul Brousse Hospital, 12-14 Avenue Paul Vaillant Couturier, 94800, Villejuif, France
| | - Pasquale F Innominato
- INSERM U935 Campus CNRS, Villejuif, France.,North Wales Cancer Centre, Ysbyty Gwynedd, Betsi Cadwaladr University Health Board, Bangor, UK.,Cancer Chronotherapy Team, Cancer Research Centre, Division of Biomedical Sciences, Warwick Medical School, Coventry, UK
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Oneda E, Abu Hilal M, Zaniboni A. Biliary Tract Cancer: Current Medical Treatment Strategies. Cancers (Basel) 2020; 12:E1237. [PMID: 32423017 PMCID: PMC7281170 DOI: 10.3390/cancers12051237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/01/2020] [Revised: 05/05/2020] [Accepted: 05/12/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Biliary tract cancers (BTCs) include cholangiocarcinomas and gallbladder cancers usually present at an advanced stage, which are considered resectable in less than 20% of cases and characterised by poor prognosis. METHODS In this review, we discussed the most recent therapeutic options on the basis of the most updated and complete reviews and recent prospective studies in selected BTC patients. RESULTS Due to the high recurrence rate of BTCs, we suggest the new recommendations that have been made on adjuvant chemotherapy and radiotherapy treatment after surgery. New chemotherapy combinations in advanced-stage patients allow a better survival benefit than the standard treatment. Furthermore, the revelation of complex molecular events and their interactions and relationships with some risk factors allowed the development of targeted/toxic agents alone or combination with chemotherapy that is really promising. In unresectable patients, hepatic arterial infusion of high-dose chemotherapy or selective internal radiotherapy could offer a primary mass volume reduction or its resection with the maintenance of liver function. CONCLUSIONS The therapeutic landscape for BTCs is blooming again, the knowledge of their biology is still growing, but the available data on chemotherapy, radiotherapy, locoregional treatments, and target therapies have added hopes to improve patient survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ester Oneda
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Fondazione Poliambulanza, 25124 Brescia, Italy;
| | | | - Alberto Zaniboni
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Fondazione Poliambulanza, 25124 Brescia, Italy;
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Wu CE, Chou WC, Hsieh CH, Chang JWC, Lin CY, Yeh CN, Chen JS. Prognostic and predictive factors for Taiwanese patients with advanced biliary tract cancer undergoing frontline chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin: a real-world experience. BMC Cancer 2020; 20:422. [PMID: 32410631 PMCID: PMC7227306 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-020-06914-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/05/2019] [Accepted: 04/30/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Chemotherapy with gemcitabine and cisplatin has been the standard of care in first-line chemotherapy for advanced biliary tract cancer (BTC) since the trial ABC-02 was published in 2010. We aimed to investigate the prognostic and predictive factors of this regimen in a cohort of Taiwanese patients with advanced BTC. Methods A total of 118 patients with histologically confirmed BTC treated at Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou from 2012 to 2017 were retrospectively reviewed. Results The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were 3.6 months and 8.4 months, respectively. In the multivariate analysis, neutrophil to lymphocyte ratio (NLR) > 7.45, biliary drainage requiring both percutaneous transhepatic cholangiography drainage (PTCD) and internal stenting, and tumor responses with progressive diseases and not assessed were independent poor prognostic factors for PFS. Male sex, NLR > 7.45, alkaline phosphatase> 94 U/L, biliary drainage requiring both PTCD and internal stenting, and tumor responses with stable disease, progressive diseases and not assessed were independent poor prognostic factors for OS. Monocyte to lymphocyte ratio (MLR) ≤ 0.28 was the only significant predictive factor for the tumor response. Patients with complete response/partial response had significantly lower MLR than patients with other tumor responses. Conclusion We identified three important prognostic factors, namely tumor response, NLR, and biliary drainage requiring both PTCD and internal stenting for both PFS and OS. MLR was the only significant predictive factor for the tumor response. These findings could provide physicians with more information to justify the clinical outcomes in patients with advanced BTC in real-world practice.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiao-En Wu
- Division of Haematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, 5, Fu-Hsing Street, Kwei-Shan, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Wen-Chi Chou
- Division of Haematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, 5, Fu-Hsing Street, Kwei-Shan, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Chia-Hsun Hsieh
- Division of Haematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, 5, Fu-Hsing Street, Kwei-Shan, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - John Wen-Cheng Chang
- Division of Haematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, 5, Fu-Hsing Street, Kwei-Shan, Taoyuan, Taiwan
| | - Cheng-Yu Lin
- Department of Gastroenterology, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, 5, Fu-Hsing Street, Taoyuan, Kwei-Shan, Taiwan
| | - Chun-Nan Yeh
- Department of General Surgery, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, 5, Fu-Hsing Street, Kwei-Shan, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
| | - Jen-Shi Chen
- Division of Haematology-Oncology, Department of Internal Medicine, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Chang Gung University College of Medicine, 5, Fu-Hsing Street, Kwei-Shan, Taoyuan, Taiwan.
| |
Collapse
|