Intramuscular Midazolam for treatment of Status Epilepticus

Evaluating the effectiveness of the maximum permitted dose of midazolam in seizure termination: Insights from New South Wales, Australia

OBJECTIVE

Out-of-hospital seizures demand rapid management. Midazolam plays a key role in stopping seizures. At times the first dose of midazolam proves insufficient, necessitating additional doses. Within the New South Wales Ambulance (NSWA) service, the upper limit for midazolam administration is set at 15 mg. However, the outcomes and safety of using midazolam at this maximum dosage have not been thoroughly investigated.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis of out of hospital electronic health records from New South Wales, Australia, over the year 2022, was conducted. The study manually reviewed cases where adult patients received the maximum dose of midazolam for seizure management by paramedics. It focused on seizure cessation success rates and the incidence of adverse effects to evaluate the clinical implications of high-dose midazolam administration.

RESULTS

Of 818 790 individual attendances by NSWA clinicians, a total of 11 392 (1.4%) adults had seizures noted, of which midazolam was administered in 2565 (22.5%). An algorithm shows that in 2352 (91.7%) instances the midazolam was associated with the apparent termination of seizures. Analysis revealed that 176 (1.5%) proportion of all adult's seizure patients required the maximum dose of midazolam for seizure control. These higher doses successfully terminate seizures in about half of the instances. AEs following the maximum dose of midazolam included hypoxia in 26.7% of patients and respiratory depression in 9.7%, indicating significant side effects at higher dosages.

CONCLUSION

In New South Wales, Australia, administering the maximum dose of midazolam to seizure patients is rare but proves effective in approximately half of the refractory seizure cases. Therefore, assessing the potential for additional doses of midazolam or the use of a second-line agent is advisable.

Time Is Brain: Acute Control of Repetitive Seizures and Status Epilepticus Using Alternative Routes of Administration of Benzodiazepines

Time plays a major role in seizure evaluation and treatment. Acute repetitive seizures and status epilepticus are medical emergencies that require immediate assessment and treatment for optimal therapeutic response. Benzodiazepines are considered the first-line agent for rapid seizure control. Thus, various routes of administration of benzodiazepines have been studied to facilitate a quick, effective, and easy therapy administration. Choosing the right agent may vary based on the drug and route properties, patient’s environment, caregiver’s skills, and drug accessibility. The pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic aspects of benzodiazepines are essential in the decision-making process. Ultimately, agents and routes that give the highest bioavailability, fastest absorption, and a modest duration are preferred. In the outpatient setting, intranasal and buccal routes appear to be equally effective and more rapidly administered than rectal diazepam. On the other hand, in the inpatient setting, if available, the IV route is ideal for benzodiazepine administration to avoid any potential absorption delay. In this article, we will provide an overview and comparison of the various routes of benzodiazepine administration for acute control of repetitive seizures and status epilepticus.

Ganaxolone treatment for epilepsy patients: from pharmacology to place in therapy

Introduction: Nonsulfated neurosteroids can provide phasic and tonic inhibition through activation of synaptic and extra-synaptic γ-aminobutyric acid (GABA)_A receptors, exhibiting a greater potency for the latter. These actions occur by interacting with modulatory sites that are distinct from those bound by benzodiazepines and barbiturates. Ganaxolone (GNX) is a synthetic analog of the endogenous neurosteroid allopregnanolone and a member of a novel class of neuroactive steroids called epalons.Areas covered: The authors review the pharmacology of GNX, summarize the main clinical evidence about its antiseizure efficacy and tolerability, and suggest implications for clinical practice and future research.Expert opinion: The clinical development of GNX is mainly oriented to target unmet needs and focused on status epilepticus and rare genetic epilepsies that have few or no treatment options.The availability of oral and intravenous formulations allows reaching adult and pediatric patients in acute and chronic care settings. Further evidence will complement the understanding of the potentialities of GNX and possibly lead to indications for use in clinical practice.