Internalized stigma, self-efficacy and treatment motivation in patients with substance use disorders

Are the “Big 5” Personality Traits Associated With Substance Use Self-Stigma?

Self-stigma among individuals with substance use problems is notably high, but not all individuals with substance use problems experience elevated self-stigma. Unfortunately, there is limited research to account for such variation. A few studies have examined the association between personality traits from the five-factor model (FFM; “Big 5”) and self-stigma among those with mental illness, but no research exists among individuals with substance use disorders. Based on data from 125 individuals residing in a substance use treatment unit, the FFM personality traits collectively account for 33% to 56% of the variance across four components of self-stigma. More specifically, individuals with high neuroticism, low conscientiousness, and/or low extraversion experience greater self-stigma. The identification of at-risk individuals, via personality traits, could allow for development of targeted interventions to address self-stigma, and ultimately improve treatment retention and outcomes.

Cultural and psychosocial moderators of the association between adverse childhood experiences and alcohol and marijuana use among Latinx college students on the U.S./Mexico border

BACKGROUND

Adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) have been historically associated with negative life outcomes among the general population.

OBJECTIVE

With limited research among Latinx college students, this study assessed how specific constructs moderate the association between ACEs and alcohol and marijuana use.

PARTICIPANTS AND SETTING

Latinx participants recruited from a large U.S./Mexico border region university (Females: N = 283, Males: N = 168) completed an online survey which included: demographics, the Center for Youth Wellness Adverse Childhood Experience Questionnaire (CYW ACE-Q) Teen Self-Report, Drug Use Frequency (DUF), Experiences in Close Relationships Scale (ECR), General Self-Efficacy Scale (GSE), Attitudinal Familism Scale (AFS), The Machismo Measure or The Marianismo Beliefs Scale (MBS), and The Bicultural Self-Efficacy Scale (BSE).

METHODS

Hierarchical linear regressions were conducted to test for main and interactive effects and to determine if the individual moderators (i.e., attachment style, self-efficacy, familism, traditional gender norms, bicultural self-efficacy) affect the relationship between ACEs and alcohol and marijuana use.

RESULTS

Results indicated that among females, attachment style (β = 0.04, p = .03), MBS (β = -65.57, p = .01), and BSE (β = 0.34, p = .04) moderate the relationship between ACEs and alcohol and marijuana use. No moderation analyses were statistically significant among males.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical implications include, for both substance use and trauma treatment among Latinx college students, the assessment of ACEs and attachment style to promote greater insight into the client's inner struggles and emotional processing in relation to marianismo beliefs and bicultural self-efficacy.

Examining stigma relating to substance use and contextual factors in social media discussions

Background

Stigma associated with substance use can have severe negative consequences for physical and mental health and serve as a barrier to treatment. Yet, research on stigma processes and stigma reduction interventions is limited.

Aim

We use a social media dataset to examine: 1) the nature of stigma-related experience related to substance use; and 2) salient affective and temporal factors in the use of three substances: alcohol, cannabis, and opioids.

Methods

We harvested several years of data pertaining to three substances - alcohol, cannabis, and opioids - from Reddit, a popular social networking platform. For Part I, we selected posts based on stigma-related keywords, performed content analysis, and rendered word clouds to examine the nature of stigma associated with these substances. In Part II, we employed natural language processing in conjunction with hierarchical clustering and visualization to explore temporal and affective factors.

Results

In Part I, internalized stigma was most commonly exhibited. Anticipated and enacted stigma were less common in posts relating to cannabis compared to the other two substances. Work, home, and school were important contexts in which stigma was observed. Part II showed that temporal markers were prominent; post authors shared stories of substance use journeys, and timelines of their experience with quitting and withdrawals. Shame, sadness, anxiety, and fear were common, with shame being more prominent in alcohol-related posts.

Conclusion

Our findings highlight the importance of contextual factors in substance use recovery and stigma reduction and offer directions for future interventions.

Relapse on the Road to Recovery: Learning the Lessons of Failure on the Way to Successful Behavior Change

Among individuals seeking to change health-related behaviors, relapse is a common experience. Whether it occurs very soon after initiating a change attempt or after several years of sustained changed behavior, it can be discouraging for patients and clinicians alike. Although there is a tendency in healthcare to try to ignore failure, we posit that moving on too quickly results in missed opportunities to learn critical lessons that may promote successful change in the future. In this paper, we use addictive behavior as a lens through which to explore the phenomenon of relapse. We review key insights from the Transtheoretical Model (TTM), including the importance of debriefing failure to promote successive approximation learning while recycling through stages of change. We also offer practical, evidence-based strategies for working effectively with relapse in clinical practice, which we suggest creates a more integrated, client-centered, and personalized approach to care.