The impact of vestibular status prior to cochlear implantation on postural control: A multiple case study

The effect of cochlear implant surgery on vestibular function in adults: A meta-analysis study

Issue

The findings in literature indicate inconsistency in the complications caused by the implant of electrodes in the cochlea; vestibular alterations and balance disorders are mentioned as the most likely.

Purpose

To evaluate, in literature, through the results of multiple vestibular function tests, the effects of cochlear implant surgery on postural stability in adult patients and to analyze.

Hypothesis

From the PICO strategy, where the Population focuses on adults, Intervention is cochlear implant surgery, Comparisons are between implanted patients, and Outcomes are the results of the assessment of cochlear function, the research question was formulated: Are there deficits in vestibular function in adults undergoing cochlear implant placement?

Method

Systematic review based on cohort, case–control, and cross-sectional observational studies. Information sources: Databases between 1980 and 2021, namely, PubMed, Cinahl, Web Of Science, Cochrane, and Scopus. Search strategy using Mesh terms: “Adult,” “Cochlear Implant,” “Postural Balance,” “Posturography,” “Cochlear Implant,” “Dizziness,” “Vertigo,” “Vestibular Functional Tests,”and “Caloric Tests.” Populational inclusion criteria: studies with adult patients; intervention: cochlear implant placement surgery; comparison: analysis of a vestibular function with vestibular test results and pre- and postoperative symptoms; outcome: studies with at least one of the vestibular function tests, such as computerized vectoelectronystagmography (VENG), vestibular-evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs), caloric test, video head impulse test (VHIT), head impulse test (HIT), videonystagmography, (VNG) and static and dynamic posturography. Exclusion criteria: studies without records of pre- and postoperative data collection and studies with populations under 18 years of age. Screening based on the reading of abstracts and titles was performed independently by two reviewers. In the end, with the intermediation of a third reviewer, manuscripts were included. Risk of bias analysis, performed by two other authors, occurred using the JBI “Critical Appraisal Checklist.”

Results

Of the 757 studies, 38 articles met the inclusion criteria. VEMP was the most commonly used test by the studies (44.7%), followed by the caloric test (36.8%) and vHIT (23.6%). Most studies performed more than one test to assess vestibular function.

Conclusion

Among all vestibular tests investigated, the deleterious effects on vestibular function after cochlear implant surgery were detected with statistical significance (P < 0.05) using VEMP and caloric test. Comparing abnormal and normal results after implant surgery, the vestibular apparatus was evaluated as having abnormal results after cochlear implant surgery only in the VEMP test. The other tests analyzed maintained a percentage mostly considered normal results.

Systematic review registration

identifier: CRD42020198872.

[Effects of cochlear implantation on vestibular function]

The literature review is devoted to the effects arising from the effect of a cochlear implant on the vestibular system. Due to the pronounced anatomical proximity and physiological interaction of vestibular receptors with the cochlea, the installation of a cochlear implant and its electrical activity are associated with an effect on the vestibular system. The analysis of the works of foreign and domestic researchers who carried out monitoring of vestibular function in patients after cochlear implantation using modern objective methods was carried out.

Vestibular status: A missing factor in our understanding of brain reorganization in deaf individuals

The brain of deaf people is definitely not just deaf, and we have to reconsider what we know about the impact of hearing loss on brain development in light of comorbid vestibular impairments.

An exploration of vestibular function pre and post unilateral cochlear implantation

Objectives: To examine the effects of unilateral cochlear implantation on the balance system for adult patients with bilateral severe to profound sensory neural hearing loss. Methods: 7 CI candidates. The function of the sacculus, utricle, and three semi-circular canals (SCCs) was assessed separately using air conduction cervical vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMP), vibration ocular VEMP and the video head impulse test (vHIT) respectively on each side, pre- and post-operatively. Results: The Otoliths appear more affected by implantation than SCCs. In 3 of 7 cases VEMP was affected by implantation. In 2 cases this was associated with short-term dizziness. Discussion: Differential assessment of vestibular end organ function may elucidate how cochlear implantation affects the vestibular system. As many CI candidates have some vestibular function, pre-implant vestibular assessment may help to inform which side of implantation may best preserve that function if other audiology and surgical considerations are equal. Post-implant assessment with VEMP may help to predict short-term dizziness. More work with a larger sample will be needed to make the case for routine clinical assessment. Conclusions: There is potential benefit of conducting multimodal vestibularassessment pre and post cochlear implantation. The otoliths appear more affected by implantation than the SCC.

Does cochlear implantation influence postural stability in patients with hearing loss?

BACKGROUND

Cochlear implantation (CI) procedure carries the potential risk for vestibular system insult or stimulation with resultant dysfunction due to its proximity to the cochlea. The vestibular system plays an essential role in crucial tasks such as postural control, gaze stabilization and spatial orientation.

RESEARCH QUESTION

How does standard cochlear implantation influence postural stability in patients with hearing loss?

METHODS

The study included 21 individuals (age 51 ± 18 years) qualified to undergo CI due to severe or profound hearing loss. Participants were qualified for both groups by a physician based on an interview, an otoneurological examination and vestibular tests. The first group included patients without vestibular dysfunction, whereas the other group consisted of persons with vestibular dysfunction. The research methodology included medical examinations, anthropometric measurements and stabilometry on the Biodex Balance System SD (BBS) platform. The examinations were carried out twice, i.e. prior to and 3 months post implantation. The recorded data was compared between the first and the second examination using a non-parametric Wilcoxon test. The analysis of variance (ANOVA) and Tukey's post-hoc HSD unequal sample sizes were performed for patients with and without vestibular dysfunction.

RESULTS AND SIGNIFICANCE

Study showed that 52.4% of the participants obtained results within the norm, while 47.6% scored below it. The comparison of stability indices of the examined individuals, with and without vestibular dysfunction, did not reveal statistically significant differences. The only difference was the anterior-posterior stability index assessed in static conditions. Three months after the implantation, no changes in the majority of indices were noted, with the exception of anterior-posterior stability index, which improved following the implantation. CI does not affect postural stability changes in the study participants.