Optimizing maps for electric acoustic stimulation users

An overview of factors affecting bimodal and electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) speech understanding outcomes

Improvements in device technology, surgical technique, and patient outcomes have resulted in a broadening of cochlear implantation criteria to consider those with increasing levels of useful low-to-mid frequency residual acoustic hearing. Residual acoustic hearing allows for the addition of a hearing aid (HA) to complement the cochlear implant (CI) and has demonstrated enhanced listening outcomes. However, wide inter-subject outcome variability exists and thus identification of contributing factors would be of clinical interest and may aid with pre-operative patient counselling. The optimal fitting procedure and frequency assignments for the two hearing devices used in combination to enhance listening outcomes also remains unclear. The understanding of how acoustic and electric speech information is fundamentally combined and utilised by the listener may allow for the optimisation of device fittings and frequency allocations to provide best bimodal and electric-acoustic stimulation (EAS) patient outcomes. This article will provide an overview of contributing factors to bimodal and EAS listening outcomes, explore areas of contention, and discuss common study limitations.

Acoustic component programming in children with cochlear implants using electrocochleography

OBJECTIVE

Objective measurements improve reliability and effectiveness of hearing assessment and cochlear implant (CI) programming in young children. In CI recipients with acoustic hearing in the implanted ear, electrocochleography (ECochG) can be conducted using intracochlear electrodes. The cochlear microphonic (CM) portion of ECochG has been shown to correlate with pure-tone audiometric thresholds in adult and paediatric CI recipients. Our goal was to determine if ECochG thresholds can be used to appropriately fit the acoustic component to the implanted ear in children.

DESIGN

Prospective.

STUDY SAMPLE

Eight children (aged 3.5-15.5 years, 10 ears) implanted with Advanced Bionics HiFocus Mid-Scala electrode array were recruited. CI ear acoustic thresholds were measured behaviourally and via ECochG. Two acoustic component enabled CI programs were created using the two sets of thresholds. Age and language appropriate speech outcomes and subjective feedback were obtained.

RESULTS

Speech scores were equivalent with the behavioural and ECochG thresholds programs. Subjectively, the ECochG thresholds program was preferred by 7/8 subjects. One subject preferred to use an electric only program.

CONCLUSION

Our data suggest that ECochG thresholds can be used to supplement the behavioural clinical methods and aid the reliable fitting of the acoustic component in paediatric CI recipients.