GAD65: a prospective vaccine for treating Type 1 diabetes?

Immunomodulatory agents and cell therapy for patients with type 1 diabetes

Type 1 diabetes (TID) is a chronic disease caused by autoimmune destruction of pancreatic β-cells, that progresses in three stages: 1) stage 1: β-cell autoimmunity + normoglycemia; 2) stage 2: β-cell autoimmunity + mild dysglycemia; 3) stage 3: symptomatic disease + hyperglycemia. Interventions to prevent or cure T1D in the various stages of the disease have been pursued and may target the prevention of the destruction of β cells, regression of insulitis, preservation or recovery of β cells residual mass. Some therapies show promising results that might change the natural history and the approach to patients with T1D in the next few years. Teplizumab, a humanized monoclonal antibody that binds to CD3, was recently approved in the USA to delay Stage 3 T1D in individuals ≥ 8 years of age. Other non-cellular immunomodulatory therapies, both antigen-specific and non-specific, have shown interesting results either in patients with stage 2 or recent onset stage 3 T1D. Cell therapies such as non-myeloablative transplantation of autologous hematopoietic stem cells, mesenchymal stem cells, and tolerogenic dendritic cells have been also studied in these individuals, aiming immunomodulation. Stem cell-derived islet replacement therapy is promising for patients with long- standing T1D, especially with asymptomatic hypoglycemia not resolved by technology. This review aimed to provide updated information on the main immunomodulatory agents and cell therapy options for type 1 diabetes.

Comparative Ability of Various Immunosuppressants as Adjuvants on the Activity of T1D Vaccine

Background: Type 1 diabetes (T1D) is an autoimmune disorder characterised by the destruction of insulin-producing beta cells in the pancreatic islets, resulting from a breakdown in immunological tolerance. Currently, T1D treatment primarily relies on insulin replacement or immunosuppressive therapies. However, these approaches often have significant drawbacks, including adverse effects, high costs, and limited long-term efficacy. Consequently, there is a pressing need for innovative immunotherapeutic strategies capable of inducing antigen-specific tolerance and protecting beta cells from autoimmune destruction. Among the various antigens, β-cell antigens like 65 kDa glutamic acid decarboxylase (GAD65) have been explored as vaccine candidates for T1D. Despite their potential, their effectiveness in humans remains modest, necessitating the use of appropriate adjuvants to enhance the vaccine's protective effects. Methods: In this study, we evaluated the therapeutic potential of kynurenine (KYN), dexamethasone (DXMS), tacrolimus (FK506), and aluminium hydroxide (Alum) in combination with the GAD65 phage vaccine as adjuvants. Results: Our findings demonstrate that KYN, when used in conjunction with the GAD65 vaccine, significantly enhances the vaccine's immunosuppressive effects. Compared to dexamethasone, FK506, and Alum adjuvants, KYN more effectively reduced the incidence and delayed the onset of T1D, preserved β-cell function, and promoted the induction of regulatory T cells and antigen-specific tolerance. These results suggest that KYN combined with vaccines could offer superior preventive and therapeutic benefits for T1D compared to existing treatments. Additionally, we investigated the dose-dependent effects of the GAD65 vaccine by including a low-dose group in our study. The results indicated that reducing the vaccine dose below 1010 plaque-forming units (pfu) did not confer any protective advantage or therapeutic benefit in combination with KYN. This finding underscores that 1010 pfu is the minimum effective dose for the GAD65 vaccine in achieving a protective response. In conclusion, KYN shows considerable promise as an adjuvant for the GAD65 vaccine in T1D therapy, potentially offering a more effective and durable treatment option than current immunosuppressive strategies.

The role of islet autoantigen-specific T cells in the onset and treatment of type 1 diabetes mellitus

Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM), a complex chronic disease with an intricate etiology and pathogenesis, involves the recognition of self-antigens by pancreatic islet autoantigen-specific T cells and plays crucial roles in both early- and late-stage destruction of beta cells, thus impacting disease progression. Antigen-specific T cells regulate and execute immune responses by recognizing particular antigens, playing broad roles in the treatment of various diseases. Immunotherapy targeting antigen-specific T cells holds promising potential as a targeted treatment approach. This review outlines the pathogenesis of diabetes, emphasizing the pivotal role of pancreatic islet autoantigen-specific T cells in the progression and treatment of T1DM. Exploring this avenue in research holds promise for identifying novel therapeutic targets for effectively managing diabetes.

Assessing effector T cells in type 1 diabetes

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

The role of T cells specific for islet autoantigens is proven in pathogenesis of type 1 diabetes. Recently, there has been rapid expansion in the number of T-cell subsets identified, this has coincided with an increase in the repertoire of reported islet antigens mainly through the discovery of novel epitopes. A discussion of how these marry together is now warranted and timely.

RECENT FINDINGS

In this review, we will discuss the autoreactivity against neo-epitopes. We then explore the growing array of T-cell subsets for both CD4 T cells, including follicular and peripheral T helper cells, and CD8 T cells, discussing evolution from naïve to exhausted phenotypes. Finally, we detail how subsets correlate with disease stage and loss of β-cell function and are impacted by immunotherapy.

SUMMARY

The expanding list of T-cell subsets may be potentially encouraging in terms of elucidating disease mechanisms and have a role as biomarkers for disease progression. Furthermore, T-cell subsets can be used in stratifying patients for clinical trials and for monitoring immunotherapy outcomes. However, the definition of subsets needs to be refined in order to ensure that there is a uniform approach in designating T-cell subset attributes that is globally applied.

Time for a paradigm shift in treating type 1 diabetes mellitus: coupling inflammation to islet regeneration

Type 1 diabetes mellitus (T1DM) is an autoimmune disease that targets the destruction of islet beta-cells resulting in insulin deficiency, hyperglycemia and death if untreated. Despite advances in medical devices and longer-acting insulin, there is still no robust therapy to substitute and protect beta-cells that are lost in T1DM. Attempts to refrain from the autoimmune attack have failed to achieve glycemic control in patients highlighting the necessity for a paradigm shift in T1DM treatment. Paradoxically, beta-cells are present in T1DM patients indicating a disturbed equilibrium between the immune attack and beta-cell regeneration reminiscent of unresolved wound healing that under normal circumstances progression towards an anti-inflammatory milieu promotes regeneration. Thus, the ultimate T1DM therapy should concomitantly restore immune self-tolerance and replenish the beta-cell mass similar to wound healing. Recently the agonistic activation of the nuclear receptor LRH-1/NR5A2 was shown to induce immune self-tolerance, increase beta-cell survival and promote regeneration through a mechanism of alpha-to-beta cell phenotypic switch. This trans-regeneration process appears to be facilitated by a pancreatic anti-inflammatory environment induced by LRH-1/NR5A2 activation. Herein, we review the literature on the role of LRH1/NR5A2 in immunity and islet physiology and propose that a cross-talk between these cellular compartments is mandatory to achieve therapeutic benefits.

Nanoparticles versus Dendritic Cells as Vehicles to Deliver mRNA Encoding Multiple Epitopes for Immunotherapy

The efficacy of antigen-specific immunotherapy relies heavily on efficient antigen delivery to antigen-presenting cells and engagement of as many disease-relevant T cells as possible in various lymphoid tissues, which are challenging to achieve. Here, we compared two approaches to deliver mRNA encoding multiple epitopes targeting both CD4⁺ and CD8⁺ T cells: a lipid-based nanoparticle platform to target endogenous antigen-presenting cells in vivo versus ex vivo mRNA-electroporated dendritic cells. After intraperitoneal injection, the nanoparticle platform facilitated efficient entry of mRNA into various endogenous antigen-presenting cells, including lymph node stromal cells, and elicited robust T cell responses within a wider network of lymphoid tissues compared with dendritic cells. Following intravenous injection, mRNA-electroporated dendritic cells and the nanoparticle platform localized primarily in lung and spleen, respectively. When administered locally via an intradermal route, both platforms resulted in mRNA expression at the injection site and in robust T cell responses in draining lymph nodes. This study indicates that multiple epitopes, customizable for specific patient populations and encoded by mRNA, can be targeted to different lymphoid tissues based on delivery vehicle and route, and constitute the groundwork for future studies using mRNA to reprogram exogenous or endogenous APCs for immunotherapy.