1
|
Meng Y, Tan M, Yan Jiang X, Wang T, Li Shen H. Gabapentin alleviates peripheral nerve sensitization induced by inflammatory arthritis via ionotropic glutamate receptor NR2B subunit. Neuroscience 2024; 556:1-13. [PMID: 39094822 DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2024.07.047] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/05/2024] [Revised: 07/23/2024] [Accepted: 07/25/2024] [Indexed: 08/04/2024]
Abstract
Inflammatory arthritis leads to peripheral nerve sensitization, but the therapeutic effect is often unsatisfactory. Our preliminary studies have found that in mice with inflammatory arthritis, the use of ionotropic glutamate receptor antagonists can produce a good analgesic effect without altering foot swelling, suggesting that pain relief may be related to the improvement of neuropathic pain. However, the underlying mechanisms remain unclear. To further investigate the effects of neuropathic pain medications on inflammatory arthritis and the impact of the ionotropic glutamate receptor NR2B subunit (NR2B) on inflammatory arthritis, this study employed gabapentin (GBP) treatment on the inflammatory arthritis mouse model (the adjuvant induced arthritis, AIA), and we found a significant reduction in pain. Further studies revealed that in AIA, the expression levels of NR2B, TRPV1, pain-related molecules (substance P, PGE2), inflammatory cytokines (IL-1, IL-6, TNF-α, and GM-CSF) and Ca2+ were elevated in the foot and dorsal root ganglia (DRG). GBP treatment was able to influence the downregulation of the expression levels of NR2B, TRPV1, pain-related molecules, inflammatory cytokines and Ca2+. Mechanistic studies have shown that GBP treatment affects the downregulation of NR2B, and the downregulation of NR2B expression leads to the downregulation of TRPV1, pain-related molecules and inflammatory cytokines, thereby alleviating pain. These results suggest that in peripheral sensitization caused by AIA, GBP can play a role in improving pain, and NR2B may be a key target of peripheral nerve sensitization induced by inflammatory arthritis. GBP provides a theoretical basis for the clinical treatment of inflammatory arthritis.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu Meng
- Department of Pain, The Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, PR China
| | - Min Tan
- Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, The Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, PR China
| | - Xiang Yan Jiang
- Department of General Surgery, The Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, PR China
| | - Tao Wang
- Department of General Surgery, The Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, PR China
| | - Hai Li Shen
- Department of Rheumatology and Immunology, The Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou, PR China.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
D'Alessandro F, Cazzato M, Laurino E, Morganti R, Bardelli M, Frediani B, Buongarzone C, Moroncini G, Guiducci S, Cometi L, Benucci M, Ligobbi F, Marotto D, Mosca M. ToRaRI (Tofacitinib in Rheumatoid Arthritis a Real-Life experience in Italy): Effectiveness, safety profile of tofacitinib and concordance between patient-reported outcomes and physician's global assessment of disease activity in a retrospective study in Central-Italy. Clin Rheumatol 2024; 43:657-665. [PMID: 38135860 PMCID: PMC10834550 DOI: 10.1007/s10067-023-06836-w] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/21/2023] [Revised: 11/21/2023] [Accepted: 11/26/2023] [Indexed: 12/24/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION The use of Janus Kinase Inhibitors (JAK-Is) in rheumatoid arthritis (RA) has entered in daily practice. In consideration of ORAL-Surveillance trial and the new EULAR recommendations, real-world data are needed to assess Jak-Is safety and effectiveness. The multicenter study presented here aimed to evaluate effectiveness and safety of tofacitinib in a real-life cohort. METHODS A retrospective analysis was performed from September 2021 to December 2022. Data were collected when tofacitinib was started (T0) and after 3 (T3), 6 (T6) and 12 (T12) months of treatment. The primary objective was to analyze the efficacy and safety of tofacitinib. Safety was assessed by recording adverse events (AEs) with and without discontinuation. The secondary objective was to assess the difference between Patient-Reported Outcomes (PROs) and Physician's Global Assessment of disease activity (PhGA). RESULTS 122 patients were included in the study from the following rheumatology Centers: Pisa, Ancona, Florence (two Centers), Siena, and Sardinia. A statistically significant improvement in DAS-28-CRP, CDAI and SDAI score was observed at T3, T6, compared to baseline (p < 0.001). Improvement was confirmed in patients who reach T12. Patients naïve to bDMARDs showed a shorter remission time and higher remission rates. There was also a statistically significant improvement in PROs compared to baseline (p < 0.001). The improvement was rapid and was consistent with PhGA. The 12-month retention rate for tofacitinib was 89.35%. Reasons to stop tofacitinib were: insufficient response (7), gastrointestinal symptoms (2), infection (1), malignancy (1), Zoster (1), pruritus sine materia (1). CONCLUSIONS Tofacitinib is safe and effective in our RA cohort. It induces higher remission rates in patients naive to bDMARDs, suggesting that there may be a benefit using it as first-line therapy. Additionally, improvement in PROs was consistent with PhGA scores, demonstrating how tofacitinib affects both the objective and subjective components of disease activity. Key Points 1. JAK inhibitors are considered at a similar level as biologic agents in terms of effectiveness. 2. After ORAL-Surveillance results, real-world data are needed to assess the benefit/risk profile of Jaki. 3. Disagreement between patients and physicians has been previously reported with biologic therapy among patients with rheumatoid arthritis, with patients rating disease activity higher than physicians. 4. Jak inhibitors could reduce this discrepancy, due to their mechanism of action.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | | | | | | | - Marco Bardelli
- Rheumatology Unit-Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences-University Hospital Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Bruno Frediani
- Rheumatology Unit-Department of Medicine, Surgery and Neurosciences-University Hospital Siena, Siena, Italy
| | - Claudia Buongarzone
- Internal Medicine Residency Programme, Marche Polytechnic University, Ancona, Italy
| | | | - Serena Guiducci
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Laura Cometi
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Division of Rheumatology, University of Florence, Florence, Italy
| | - Maurizio Benucci
- Rheumatology Unit, S.Giovanni Di Dio Firenze Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | - Francesca Ligobbi
- Rheumatology Unit, S.Giovanni Di Dio Firenze Hospital, Florence, Italy
| | | | - Marta Mosca
- Rheumatology Unit, University of Pisa, Pisa, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gérard B, Bailly F, Trouvin AP. How to treat chronic pain in rheumatic and musculoskeletal diseases (RMDs) - A pharmacological review. Joint Bone Spine 2024; 91:105624. [PMID: 37495074 DOI: 10.1016/j.jbspin.2023.105624] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/27/2023] [Revised: 07/11/2023] [Accepted: 07/17/2023] [Indexed: 07/28/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Chronic pain is a common symptom of rheumatic diseases that impacts patients' quality of life. While non-pharmacological approaches are often recommended as first-line treatments, pharmacological interventions are important for pain management. However, the effectiveness and safety of different pharmacological treatments for chronic pain in rheumatic diseases are unclear. METHODS This review critically synthesizes the current evidence base to guide clinicians in selecting appropriate pharmacological treatments for their patients, considering the expected benefits and potential risks and side effects. RESULTS For osteoarthritis, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), acetaminophen, opioids, and antidepressants are commonly used, with NSAIDs being the most recommended. In addition, topical agents, such as topical NSAIDs, are recommended for localized pain relief. For fibromyalgia, amitriptyline, serotonin and noradrenaline reuptake inhibitors (SNRIs), and gabapentinoids are commonly used, with SNRIs being the most recommended. For back pain, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), acetaminophen, opioids are used only for acute of flare-up pain, whereas neuropathic pain drugs are only used for chronic radicular pain. For inflammatory rheumatic diseases, disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (DMARDs) and biological agents are recommended to slow disease progression and manage symptoms. CONCLUSION While DMARDs and biological agents are recommended for inflammatory rheumatic diseases, pharmacological treatments for other rheumatic diseases only alleviate symptoms and do not provide a cure for the underlying condition. The use of pharmacological treatments should be based on the expected benefits and evaluation of side effects, with non-pharmacological modalities also being considered, especially for fibromyalgia.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Baptiste Gérard
- Service de rhumatologie, CHU de Rouen, université de Rouen, Rouen, France
| | - Florian Bailly
- Institut Pierre-Louis d'épidémiologie et de Santé publique, Sorbonne université, Inserm UMRS 1136, Paris, France; Sorbonne université, AP-HP, Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital, Pain center, Paris, France
| | - Anne-Priscille Trouvin
- Paris Cité University, AP-HP, Cochin Hospital, Pain Medicine Department, Paris, France; Inserm U987, Boulogne-Billancourt, France.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Felis-Giemza A, Massalska M, Roszkowski L, Romanowska-Próchnicka K, Ciechomska M. Potential Mechanism of Fatigue Induction and Its Management by JAK Inhibitors in Inflammatory Rheumatic Diseases. J Inflamm Res 2023; 16:3949-3965. [PMID: 37706062 PMCID: PMC10497048 DOI: 10.2147/jir.s414739] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/28/2023] [Accepted: 07/27/2023] [Indexed: 09/15/2023] Open
Abstract
It is well known that fatigue is a highly disabling symptom commonly observed in inflammatory rheumatic diseases (IRDs). Fatigue is strongly associated with a poor quality of life and seems to be an independent predictor of job loss and disability in patients with different rheumatic diseases. Although the pathogenesis of fatigue remains unclear, indirect data suggest the cooperation of the immune system, the central and autonomic nervous system, and the neuroendocrine system in the induction and sustainment of fatigue in chronic diseases. Fatigue does not correspond with disease activity and its mechanism in IRDs. It is suggested that it may change over time and vary between individuals. Abnormal production of pro-inflammatory cytokines such as interleukin-6 (IL-6), interferons (IFNs), granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF), TNF, IL-15, IL-17 play a role in both IRDs and subsequent fatigue development. Some of these cytokines such as IL-6, IFNs, GM-CSF, and common gamma-chain cytokines (IL-15, IL-2, and IL-7) activate the Janus Kinases (JAKs) family of intracellular tyrosine kinases. Therapy blocking JAKs (JAK inhibitors - JAKi) has been recently proven to be an effective approach for IRDs treatment, more efficient in pain reduction than anti-TNF. Therefore, the administration of JAKi to IRDs patients experiencing fatigue may find rational implications as a therapeutic modulator not only of disease inflammatory symptoms but also fatigue with its components like pain and neuropsychiatric features as well. In this review, we demonstrate the latest information on the mechanisms of fatigue in rheumatic diseases and the potential effect of JAKi on fatigue reduction.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Felis-Giemza
- Biologic Therapy Center, National Institute of Geriatrics, Rheumatology, and Rehabilitation (NIGRiR), Warsaw, Poland
| | - Magdalena Massalska
- Department of Pathophysiology and Immunology, National Institute of Geriatrics, Rheumatology, and Rehabilitation (NIGRiR), Warsaw, Poland
| | - Leszek Roszkowski
- Department of Outpatient Clinics, National Institute of Geriatrics, Rheumatology, and Rehabilitation (NIGRiR), Warsaw, Poland
| | - Katarzyna Romanowska-Próchnicka
- Department of Biophysics, Physiology and Pathophysiology, Faculty of Health Sciences, Warsaw Medical University, Warsaw, Poland
| | - Marzena Ciechomska
- Department of Pathophysiology and Immunology, National Institute of Geriatrics, Rheumatology, and Rehabilitation (NIGRiR), Warsaw, Poland
| |
Collapse
|