Real-world evidence of the efficacy and tolerability of trabectedin in patients with advanced soft-tissue sarcoma

Trabectedin use in soft-tissue sarcoma patients in a real-world setting: Data from an Italian national drug-access registry

Trabectedin is a marine-derived anticancer drug approved for the treatment of patients with advanced soft-tissue sarcomas (STS). Here, we aimed to analyze its use in a large cohort of STS patients treated in Italy in a real-world setting. Data on STS patients treated with trabectedin in Italy were prospectively collected from January 2013 to December 2019 by the national drug regulator, the Italian Medicines Agency (AIFA). Time-to-off-treatment (TToT) was defined as the time between the initial prescription of trabectedin and the date of treatment discontinuation for any cause. The impact of the different baseline covariates, including the initial prescribed dose of trabectedin, on TToT was evaluated using an accelerated failure time (AFT) models with log-logistic distribution. In total, we analyzed data from 2633 sarcoma patients and 14 950 individual cycles of trabectedin. The median number of cycles of trabectedin received per patient was 3 (interquartile range 2-7). The labeled 1.5 mg/sqm dose was used in 27.3% of all first prescriptions. Overall, the median TToT was 93 days. In the final AFT model, the variables significantly associated to longer TToT were female gender (+13% increase in TToT); ECOG performance status 0 (+50%); histological diagnosis of leiomyosarcoma (+22%), well-differentiated/dedifferentiated liposarcoma (+72%) or myxoid liposarcoma (+61%); receiving treatment in a high-volume center (+23%). In this large real-world cohort of STS patients treated with trabectedin, our findings support the use of trabectedin in STS patients, in particular in leiomyosarcoma and liposarcoma patients, and highlight the role of treatment center volume in their management.

A review of the efficacy of trabectedin as second-line treatment of advanced soft tissue sarcoma

The goal of second-line therapy for most patients with advanced soft tissue sarcoma is long-term tumor control without detriment to quality of life. Clinical practice guidelines recommend trabectedin as a second-line option for advanced soft tissue sarcoma as it can provide the necessary balance between these interwoven goals. Cumulative experience with trabectedin in clinical trials and clinical practice has informed its usage such that greater benefit can be derived. In particular, use in earlier lines allows more patients to achieve prolonged tumor control (six or more cycles). Efficacy outcomes are superior when trabectedin is administered as second- versus later-line therapy and when it is used continuously until disease progression.

Immune checkpoints in osteosarcoma: Recent advances and therapeutic potential

Osteosarcoma is the most common primary malignant bone tumor and is associated with a high risk of recurrence and distant metastasis. Effective treatment for osteosarcoma, especially advanced osteosarcoma, has stagnated over the past four decades. The advent of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) has transformed the treatment paradigm for multiple malignant tumor types and indicated a potential therapeutic strategy for osteosarcoma. In this review, we discuss recent advances in immune checkpoints, including programmed cell death protein-1 (PD-1), programmed cell death protein ligand-1 (PD-L1), and cytotoxic T lymphocyte-associated antigen-4 (CTLA-4), and their related ICIs for osteosarcoma treatment. We present the main existing mechanisms of resistance to ICIs therapy in osteosarcoma. Moreover, we summarize the current strategies for improving the efficacy of ICIs in osteosarcoma and address the potential predictive biomarkers of ICIs treatment in osteosarcoma.

Single-Center Experience with Trabectedin for the Treatment of Non-L-sarcomas

INTRODUCTION

The effectiveness of trabectedin for the treatment of leiomyosarcoma and liposarcoma (commonly referred to as L-sarcomas) has been widely evidenced in clinical trials and real-world studies. Nevertheless, available literature on non-L-sarcomas is less abundant. The objective of the present study is to evaluate the effectiveness and safety of trabectedin in a cohort of patients with non-L-sarcomas in the real-world setting.

METHODS

This retrospective, observational study included 34 patients who received trabectedin in the Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau (Barcelona, Spain) between October 2013 and July 2020.

RESULTS

The most frequent histologic subtypes were undifferentiated spindle cell/pleomorphic sarcoma (n = 11, 32.4%), synovial sarcoma (n = 6, 17.7%), myxofibrosarcoma (n = 5, 14.7%), and malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor (n = 4, 11.8%). The mean number of cycles with trabectedin was 5.5 (range 2-28). Three patients achieved partial response (8.8%) and eight patients showed stable disease (23.5%). The objective response rate and disease control rate were 8.8% (95% confidence interval (CI), 95% CI 1.9-23.7) and 32.4% (95% CI 17.4-50.5), respectively. Overall, progression-free survival was 2.9 months (95% CI 2.1-3.4). The overall survival was 7.3 months (95% CI 4.7-12.8). The most common trabectedin-related grade 3 adverse events were observed in 10 patients (26.5%), mostly being neutropenia (14.7%) and elevated transaminases (5.9%), whereas one patient (2.9%) reported grade 4 febrile neutropenia that required hospitalization.

CONCLUSIONS

The findings of this real-life study consistently support that trabectedin is an effective and safe option for the treatment of patients with non-L-sarcoma after failure of anthracyclines and ifosfamide, or in patients who are unsuited to receive these agents.

Toward a Personalized Therapy in Soft-Tissue Sarcomas: State of the Art and Future Directions

Soft-tissue sarcomas are rare tumors characterized by pathogenetic, morphological, and clinical intrinsic variability. Median survival of patients with advanced tumors are usually chemo- and radio-resistant, and standard treatments yield low response rates and poor survival results. The identification of defined genomic alterations in sarcoma could represent the premise for targeted treatments. Summarizing, soft-tissue sarcomas can be differentiated into histotypes with reciprocal chromosomal translocations, with defined oncogenic mutations and complex karyotypes. If the latter are improbably approached with targeted treatments, many suggest that innovative therapies interfering with the identified fusion oncoproteins and altered pathways could be potentially resolutive. In most cases, the characteristic genetic signature is discouragingly defined as "undruggable", which poses a challenge for the development of novel pharmacological approaches. In this review, a summary of genomic alterations recognized in most common soft-tissue sarcoma is reported together with current and future therapeutic opportunities.