Selpercatinib in RET-fusion positive metastatic non-small cell lung cancer: achievements and gray areas

Small bowel edema and lymphocytic duodenitis as severe reversible gastrointestinal toxicity of selpercatinib in RET fusion-positive non-small cell lung cancer: a case report

Introduction

Rearranged during transfection (RET) gene rearrangements occur in 1%-2% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Because of the results of the study LIBRETTO-001, selpercatinib has been approved as the first-line treatment for patients with RET fusion-positive advanced NSCLC. Selpercatinib demonstrated to be well tolerated. Despite this, gastrointestinal adverse events (AEs) are frequently reported, and no clinical-radiological and endoscopic features and their impact in terms of treatment discontinuations, interruptions, and dose reductions have been described so far.

Case report

A 37-year-old never-smoker woman was treated in our institution with selpercatinib for a RET fusion-positive NSCLC. After 9 months of treatment, the patient referred abdominal pain of grade (G) 2, associated with nausea of G2, bilious vomiting of G3, and weight loss of G1. At computed tomography scan, the presence of important bowel wall thickening, free ascitic fluid, mesenteric congestion, and stranding was detected. The patient underwent an anterograde enteroscopy extended to jejunum with detection of lymphocytic duodenitis with sub-mucosal edema. Selpercatinib treatment was temporary interrupted with complete resolution of the symptoms and then re-administered with dose reduction, without relapsed of the gastrointestinal toxicity after 120 days.

Conclusion

To our knowledge, this is the first case report of a patient with NSCLC treated with selpercatinib outside a clinical study who developed severe gastrointestinal toxicity characterized by small bowel edema and lymphocytic duodenitis, leading to treatment interruption and dose reduction. The gastrointestinal AE has been described by a radiological, endoscopic, and histopathological point of view. Further investigations are needed to better identify pathological mechanisms of gastrointestinal toxicity for an appropriate AE management.

Willingness, preferences, barriers, and facilitators of a multimodal supportive care intervention including exercise, nutritional and psychological approach in patients with cancer: a cross-sectional study

PURPOSE

Supportive care, including exercise, nutritional and psychological support, is becoming increasingly important in cancer given their impact on 'patients' quality and quantity of life. The purpose of this study was to explore willingness, preferences barriers and facilitators for a multimodal intervention in patients with cancer.

METHODS

An anonymous questionnaire was proposed on randomly selected days to the patients visiting the cancer outpatients' facilities at the Oncology Unit of the University Hospital of Verona. The questionnaire investigated willingness, preferences, barriers, and facilitators associated with participation in a multimodal program designed for patients with cancer. Exercise level was estimated using two open questions, nutritional risk was identified using the Nutritional Risk Screening 2002, while distress was evaluated with the Distress Thermometer.

RESULTS

Based on 324 participants, 65% were interested in starting a multimodal intervention. Patients declared to prefer to receive instructions from dedicated experts, with a face-to-face approach, and during the anticancer treatment. Treatment-related side effects were the major obstacles for a multimodal program, while the availability of a specialized staff as exercise kinesiologists, dietitians, and psycho-oncologists was found to be an important facilitator for increasing 'patients' participation.

CONCLUSION

Patients patients with cancer are interested in participating in a multimodal supportive care program specifically designed for them. Information from this study may help to design a tailored multimodal intervention for patients with cancer.