Profile of the therascreen® EGFR RGQ PCR kit as a companion diagnostic for gefitinib in non-small cell lung cancer

'Plasma first' approach for detecting epidermal growth factor receptor mutation in advanced non-small cell lung carcinoma

INTRODUCTION

The treatment approach for recently diagnosed advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with EGFR mutations primarily relies on confirming the tissue diagnosis as non-squamous NSCLC. This routine clinical practice of tissue diagnosis imposes several barriers and delays in turnaround time (TAT) for biomarker testing, significantly delaying the time to treatment. The objective of this study is to investigate the 'plasma first' approach for detection of EGFR mutation in advanced stage treatment naïve NSCLC patients.

METHODS

We prospectively collected blood samples of treatment naïve patients with clinical and radiological suspicion of advanced stage NSCLC prior to obtaining tissue biopsy. Plasma cfDNA was tested for EGFR mutation using two different methods. We compared the sensitivity and TAT of liquid biopsy with tissue biopsy.

RESULTS

In total, we analyzed plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) of 236 patients suspected of having advanced NSCLC for EGFR mutations. We observed a notably shorter turnaround time (TAT) of 3 days, which was significantly quicker compared to the 12-day TAT for tissue biopsy (p < 0.05). The ddPCR method had a sensitivity of 82.8%, which was higher than 66.34% sensitivity of ARMS-PCR. The current study also highlights that there is no significant difference in the clinical outcome of the patients whether treated based on liquid biopsy only or tissue biopsy (median progression-free survival of 11.56 vs. 11.9 months; p = 0.94).

CONCLUSIONS

Utilizing a 'plasma first' strategy, given its shorter turnaround time, strong positive concordance and comparable outcomes to tissue biopsy, emerges as a highly specific and reliable method for detecting EGFR mutations in advanced-stage NSCLC.

Current status and breakthroughs in treating advanced non-small cell lung cancer with EGFR exon 20 insertion mutations

Recently, targeted therapy and immunotherapy have emerged as effective treatment options for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This progress has been facilitated by the rapid development of diagnostic and therapeutic technologies and the continuous research and development of new drugs, leading to a new era in precision medicine for NSCLC. This is a breakthrough for patients with common mutations in the human epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) gene in NSCLC. Consequently, the use of targeted drugs has significantly improved survival. Nevertheless, certain rare genetic mutations are referred to as EGFR exon 20 insertion (ex20ins) mutations, which differ in structure from conventional EGFR gene mutations, namely, exon 19 deletion mutations (19-Del) and exon 21 point mutations. Owing to their distinct structural characteristics, patients harboring these EGFR ex20ins mutations are unresponsive to traditional tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy. This particular group of patients did not fall within the scope of their applicability. However, the activating A763_Y764insFQEA mutation elicits a more pronounced response than mutations in the near and far regions of the C-helix immediately following it and should, therefore, be treated differently. Currently, there is a lack of effective treatments for EGFR ex20ins mutations NSCLC. The efficacy of chemotherapy has been relatively favorable, whereas the effectiveness of immunotherapy remains ambiguous owing to inadequate clinical data. In addition, the efficacy of the first- and second-generation targeted drugs remains limited. However, third-generation and novel targeted drugs have proven to be effective. Although novel EGFR-TKIs are expected to treat EGFR ex20ins mutations in patients with NSCLC, they face many challenges. The main focus of this review is on emerging therapies that target NSCLC with EGFR ex20ins and highlight major ongoing clinical trials while also providing an overview of the associated challenges and research advancements in this area.

EGFR exon20 insertion mutations in non-small cell lung cancer: Clinical implications and recent advances in targeted therapies

The advent of targeted therapies for oncogenic mutations has led to a major paradigm shift in the management of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Molecular targets, such as epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-activating mutations in the region of exons 18 through 21 are the most common oncogenic driver in NSCLC. Classical activating mutations, such as in-frame deletions in exon 19 and point mutations in exon 21 (L858R), are strong predictors for good clinical response to the approved EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs). However, low frequency mutations occurring within exon 20 (ex20ins) have poorer responses to first/second generation EGFR-TKIs. Moreover, patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR ex20ins are known to have poorer prognosis than those with other EGFR-TKI sensitive mutations, leading to unmet clinical need of novel specific therapeutic options. Rapid changes in molecular diagnostics identifying specific causes have hastened the translation of diagnostic recommendations into clinical practice. Emergence of treatment strategies targeting EGFR ex20ins, such as newer EGFR-TKIs with increased specificity and novel approaches using bispecific monoclonal antibodies, may hold promising therapeutic options in the near future. In this review, we describe the structural, molecular characteristics, and detection strategies of EGFR ex20ins mutations and summarize the latest clinical data on approved treatments and emerging therapies for patients with NSCLC harboring EGFR ex20ins mutations. Further, we will discuss the response heterogeneity of ex20ins mutations to new drugs and acquired drug resistance mechanisms.

Response to Rucaparib in BRCA-Mutant Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer Identified by Genomic Testing in the TRITON2 Study

PURPOSE

The PARP inhibitor rucaparib is approved in the United States for patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC) and a deleterious germline and/or somatic BRCA1 or BRCA2 (BRCA) alteration. While sequencing of tumor tissue is considered the standard for identifying patients with BRCA alterations (BRCA+), plasma profiling may provide a minimally invasive option to select patients for rucaparib treatment. Here, we report clinical efficacy in patients with BRCA+ mCRPC identified through central plasma, central tissue, or local genomic testing and enrolled in TRITON2.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Patients had progressed after next-generation androgen receptor-directed and taxane-based therapies for mCRPC and had BRCA alterations identified by central sequencing of plasma and/or tissue samples or local genomic testing. Concordance of plasma/tissue BRCA status and objective response rate and prostate-specific antigen (PSA) response rates were summarized.

RESULTS

TRITON2 enrolled 115 patients with BRCA+ identified by central plasma (n = 34), central tissue (n = 37), or local (n = 44) testing. Plasma/tissue concordance was determined in 38 patients with paired samples and was 47% in 19 patients with a somatic BRCA alteration. No statistically significant differences were observed between objective and PSA response rates to rucaparib across the 3 assay groups. Patients unable to provide tissue samples and tested solely by plasma assay responded at rates no different from patients identified as BRCA+ by tissue testing.

CONCLUSIONS

Plasma, tissue, and local testing of mCRPC patients can be used to identify men with BRCA+ mCRPC who can benefit from treatment with the PARP inhibitor rucaparib.

Technical aspects of the use of cytopathological specimens for diagnosis and predictive testing in malignant epithelial neoplasms of the lung

Lung cancer is a leading cause of cancer mortality worldwide but recent years have seen a rapidly rising proportion of cases of advanced non-small cell carcinoma amenable to increasingly targeted therapy, initially based on the differential response to systemic treatment of tumours of squamous or glandular differentiation. In two-thirds of the cases, where patients present with advanced disease, both primary pathological diagnosis and biomarker testing is based on small biopsies and cytopathological specimens. The framework of this article is an overview of the technical aspect of each stage of the specimen pathway with emphasis on maximising potential for success when using small cytology samples. It brings together the current literature addressing pre-analytical and analytical aspects of specimen acquisition, performing rapid onsite evaluation, and undertaking diagnostic and predictive testing using immunocytochemistry and molecular platforms. The advantages and drawbacks of performing analysis on cell block and non-cell block specimen preparations is discussed.

Clinical characteristics of advanced non-small cell lung cancer patients with EGFR exon 20 insertions

Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) exon 20 insertion mutations (Exon20ins) account for 4–12% of all EGFR mutations in non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. Data on the differences in clinical characteristics between patients with Exon20ins and major mutations (M-mut) such as exon 19 deletion and L858R are limited. We retrospectively reviewed advanced NSCLC patients with EGFR mutations, who were treated with systemic therapy between January 2011 and December 2019. We identified 23 patients with Exon20ins and 534 patients with M-mut. In Exon20ins patients, the median age was 60 (range 27–88) years, and females and never-smokers were predominant. Clinical characteristics were similar in the two groups. In Exon20ins patients, 17 patients received platinum doublet as first-line therapy, and the overall response rate (ORR) and median progression-free survival (mPFS) were 11.8% and 8.9 months. Additionally, seven patients received conventional EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs), and eight patients anti-PD-1 antibodies in any-line therapy. ORR and mPFS of EGFR-TKIs and anti-PD-1 antibodies were 0%, 2.2 months and 25%, 3.1 months, respectively. Overall survival was significantly shorter in Exon20ins patients than in M-mut patients (29.3 vs. 43.4 months, p = 0.04). The clinical outcomes in Exon20ins patients were not satisfactory compared to M-mut patients.

Detection of EGFR mutations in liquid biopsy samples using allele-specific quantitative PCR: A comparative real-world evaluation of two popular diagnostic systems

PURPOSE

The detection of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA) is an auxiliary tool for the molecular diagnosis of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), especially when an adequate tumor tissue specimen cannot be obtained. We compared the diagnostic accuracy of two commonly used in vitro diagnostic-certified allele-specific quantitative PCR assays for detecting plasma cfDNA EGFR mutations.

METHODS

We analyzed EGFR mutations in plasma cfDNA from 90 NSCLC patients (stages I-IV) before treatment (n ​= ​60) and after clinical progression on EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (n ​= ​30) using the cobas EGFR mutation test v2 (Roche Molecular Systems, Inc.) and therascreen EGFR Plasma RGQ PCR kit (Qiagen GmbH).

RESULTS

There was higher concordance between plasma cfDNA and matched tumor tissue EGFR mutations with cobas (66.67%) compared with therascreen (55.93%). The concordance rate increased to 90.00% with cobas (Cohen's kappa coefficient, κ ​= ​0.80; p ​< ​0.0001) and 73.33% with therascreen (κ ​= ​0.49; p ​= ​0.0009) in advanced NSCLC patients. In treatment-naïve patients, cobas was superior to therascreen (sensitivity: 82.35% vs. 52.94%; specificity: 100% vs. 100%). In patients with clinical progression on EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors, EGFR exon 20 p.T790M was detected in 30% and 23% of cfDNA samples by cobas and therascreen, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

Cobas was superior to therascreen for detection of plasma EGFR mutations in advanced NSCLC. Plasma cfDNA EGFR mutation analysis is complex; therefore, the diagnostic accuracy of commercially available assays should be validated.

Clinical influence of switching companion diagnostic tests for EGFR-TKs from Therascreen to Cobas v2

Background

Several companion diagnostic (CDx) tests for epidermal growth factor receptor tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR‐TKIs) have been approved. In our institute, the CDx test for EGFR‐TKIs was changed from the Therascreen test (Therascreen) to the Cobas EGFR v2 test (Cobas) because only Cobas was approved for the use of osimertinib in patients with EGFR‐mutated non‐small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with T790M mutations. The clinical influence of switching the CDx test has not yet been examined comprehensively.

Methods

All serial patients with lung cancer tested for EGFR mutations with CDx tests between February 2014 and February 2016 at the Cancer Institute Hospital of the Japanese Foundation for Cancer Research (JFCR) were enrolled in this analysis.

Results

Therascreen was used as a CDx test for EGFR‐TKI therapy in 607 patients between February 2014 and January 2015, and Cobas was used in 621 patients between February 2015 and February 2016. EGFR mutations were detected in 218 patients (35.9%) and 244 patients (39.3%) tested with Therascreen and Cobas, respectively. At the initial diagnosis, 400 and 459 patients were tested with Therascreen and Cobas, respectively. EGFR mutation subtypes, including del19, L858R, and others, were detected in 13.0%, 17.0%, and 2.5% of patients using Therascreen and 17.4%, 14.4%, and 1.5% of patients using Cobas, respectively.

Conclusions

No significant impact of switching from Therascreen to Cobas as the CDx test for EGFR mutations in clinical practice was observed. However, the detection pattern of the EGFR mutation subtypes between the two CDx tests was slightly different.

Key points

Significant findings of the study

We examined the influence of changing the EGFR test in 1228 patients in total. The detection rate of EGFR mutations was similar. However, the detection pattern for EGFR subtype mutations was slightly different between the two tests.

What this study adds

Switching CDx tests from target polymerase chain reaction (PCR)‐ to next‐generation sequencing (NGS)‐based methods may lead to obvious changes in clinical practice. When the CDx test is required to change, the investigation of this influence is warranted in future studies.

Spectrum of uncommon and compound epidermal growth factor receptor mutations in non-small-cell lung carcinomas with treatment response and outcome analysis: A study from India

INTRODUCTION

Mutations in the tyrosine kinase domain of the epidermal growth factor receptor gene (EGFR) are key driver alterations in lung adenocarcinomas (ADCAs). Exon 19 deletions (exon19del) and exon 21 L858R (L858R) mutations account for 70-90 % of all such alterations and predict sensitivity to EGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs). However, the predictive value of uncommon and compound EGFR mutations for TKIs has not been clearly established.

OBJECTIVE

To assess the spectrum of EGFR mutations in non-small-cell lung carcinoma (NSCLC), and to compare the treatment responses and outcomes among single common, single uncommon, and compound mutations.

METHOD

The study was of combined retrospective (January 2010-December 2015) and prospective (January 2016-February 2020) design spanning 10 years. Tumor samples from TKI-naive NSCLC patients were tested for EGFR mutations by a qPCR-based method. Objective response rates (ORRs) and survival outcomes were analyzed.

RESULT

In total, 1227 tumor samples were tested. EGFR mutations were detected in 391 samples (31.8 %), and included 79.5 % (311/391) single common (exon19del/L858R), 6.6 % (26/391) single uncommon (non-exon19del/L858R), and 13.8 % (54/391) compound mutations. Exon 20 T790M mutations were most prevalent among uncommon/compound mutations (40/391, 10.2 %). Overall, patients with single uncommon/compound mutations responded poorly to both EGFRTKI (47 % ORR) and chemotherapy (43 % ORR), with significantly shorter time to progression (median 7 months) compared to those with exon19del/L858R mutations (median 14.7 months). Patients with baseline T790M mutations (single/compound) were least responsive to EGFR TKIs (11 % ORR) and chemotherapy (27 % ORR) and showed the shortest progression-free survival compared to other uncommon and compound mutations.

CONCLUSION

Approximately one fifth of EGFR-mutant patients harbor uncommon and compound mutations. Unlike those with exon19del/L858R, these patients-particularly those with baseline T790M mutations-show significantly inferior response rates to treatment (EGFR TKI or chemotherapy) and early disease progression.

Clinical performance evaluation of the Idylla™ EGFR Mutation Test on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue of non-small cell lung cancer

BACKGROUND

Detection of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in exons 18-21 is recommended in all patients with advanced Non-small-cell lung carcinoma due to the demonstrated efficiency of the standard therapy with tyrosine kinase inhibitors in EGFR-mutated patients. Therefore, choosing a suitable technique to test EGFR mutational status is crucial to warrant a valid result in a short turnaround time using the lowest possible amount of tissue material. The Idylla™ EGFR Mutation Test is a simple, fast and reliable method designed for the detection of EGFR mutations from formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples. The aim of this study was the Clinical Performace Evaluation of the Idylla™ EGFR Mutation Test on the Idylla™ System.

METHODS

EGFR mutational status was determined on 132 archived formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded tissue sections with Idylla™ technology. Results were compared with the results previously obtained by routine method in the reference lab (Therascreen® EGFR RGQ PCR v2, Qiagen in Molecular Pathology lab, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío de Sevilla).

RESULTS

The overall agreement between results obtained with the Idylla™ EGFR Mutation Test and the Comparator test method was 95.38% (with 1-sided 95% lower limit of 91.7%) showing Positive Diagnostic Agreement of 93.22% and Negative Diagnostic Agreement of 97.18%, with a Limit Of Detection ≤5%.

CONCLUSIONS

The Idylla™ EGFR Mutation Test passed its clinical validity performance characteristics for accuracy.

Justification of direct Sanger sequencing application for detection of KIT and PDGFRα gene mutations in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples from gastrointestinal stromal tumours

AIMS

The knowledge concerning genetic background of gastrointestinal stromal tumours (GISTs) is well recognised, and the accurate detection of KIT and PDGFRα mutations is of great importance for the process of disease diagnosis and patient's treatment. In this study, we compare the usefulness of real-time PCR-based techniques and Sanger sequencing to detect mutations of both genes in 41 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded GIST samples.

METHODS

The analysis encompassed most frequently mutated coding regions of KIT (exons 9, 11, 13 and 17) and PDGFRα (exons 12, 14 and 18) genes. The GIST Mutation Detection Kit (EntroGen), direct Sanger sequencing and high-resolution melting (HRM) analysis were applied to conduct the study.

RESULTS

With the application of EntroGen kit, we found alterations in 22/38 samples, with Sanger sequencing variants were found in 36/41 samples. The concordant results for both methods were observed in 19/38 samples. With subsequently applied HRM analysis, we have confirmed that all samples, except one, harboured alterations in the regions indicated by Sanger sequencing.

CONCLUSIONS

Our results show that in GIST samples, carrying a broad spectrum of deletions, Sanger sequencing is a better, more sensitive method for mutational analysis of KIT and PDGFRα genes.

Opportunities of circulating tumor DNA in lung cancer

Current classification and treatment of lung cancer rely increasingly on molecular and genetic testing. Obtaining tumor tissue is not always feasible and multiple biopsies are undesirable. In response to the demand for non-invasive molecular and genetic testing in cancer care, several liquid biopsy technologies, including circulating DNA (ctDNA), have been developed. ctDNA analysis is now technically feasible to be carried out in large scales and integrated into clinical practice owing to the advances in technology. Despite the challenges in improving test accuracy and cost-effectiveness, there are huge potentials for ctDNA analysis in lung cancer management. This review focuses on the clinical utility of ctDNA analysis in lung cancer, including early detection, monitoring treatment response and detecting residual disease, identification of genetic determinants for targeted therapy, and predicting efficacy of immune checkpoint blockade.

Circulating free tumor-derived DNA to detect EGFR mutations in patients with advanced NSCLC: French subset analysis of the ASSESS study

Background

The non-interventional ASSESS study (NCT01785888) evaluated the utility of circulating free tumor-derived DNA (ctDNA) from plasma for epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutation testing in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), in a real-world setting across 56 centers in Europe and Japan. The high mutation status concordance between 1162 matched tissue/cytology and plasma samples (89%, sensitivity =46%, specificity =97%) suggested that ctDNA is a feasible sample for EGFR mutation analysis. We report data for the French subset of patients (pre-planned analysis).

Methods

Eligible patients (stage IIIA/B/IV locally advanced/metastatic treatment-naive advanced NSCLC) provided diagnostic tissue/cytology and plasma samples. DNA extracted from tissue/cytology samples was subjected to EGFR mutation testing as per local practice; a designated laboratory performed ctDNA extraction/mutation testing of plasma samples. The primary outcome was EGFR mutation status concordance between matched tumor and plasma samples.

Results

Of the 1,311 patients enrolled in the ASSESS trial, 145 were recruited from 9 centers in France. Tumor samples from 130 patients were collected and 126 were evaluable for EGFR mutation analysis. Activating EGFR mutations were identified in 13 of the 126 patient tumor samples (EGFR mutation frequency 10.3%). For plasma testing, 10 of the 145 samples tested were positive for EGFR mutations (EGFR mutation frequency 6.9%). EGFR mutation rate was significantly higher in never- versus ever-smokers (stepwise logistic regression: tumor, P<0.0001; plasma, P=0.0008). Mutation status concordance between 126 matched patient samples was 96.0% [121/126; 95% confidence intervals (CI), 91.0-98.7]. Of the 113 EGFR mutation-negative patient tissue samples, one tested plasma-positive; reanalysis of plasma via two different techniques confirmed the presence of a L858R mutation, indicating a tissue false-negative result. Based on these data, sensitivity of plasma testing was 64.3% (9/14; 95% CI, 35.1-87.2%) and its specificity was 100.0% (112/112; 95% CI, 96.8-100.0%).

Conclusions

Data confirm ctDNA as an alternative sample for EGFR mutation analysis in patients with advanced NSCLC.

Best Response According to RECIST During First-line EGFR-TKI Treatment Predicts Survival in EGFR Mutation-positive Non-Small-cell Lung Cancer Patients

INTRODUCTION

The association between the response to first-line epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKIs) and survival in EGFR mutation-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) remains unclear. We studied the association between the response to first-line EGFR-TKIs and survival using Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) and maximal tumor shrinkage.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We analyzed data from patients with advanced EGFR mutation-positive NSCLC enrolled in first-line gefitinib and afatinib trials. A total of 98 patients who achieved a response or stable disease and had ≥ 1 measurable target lesion were included. The association between the best response by RECIST or maximal tumor shrinkage and survival was analyzed in Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression models with the landmark method. The specified landmark time points were 8 weeks, the median time to maximal tumor shrinkage (16.5 weeks), and median progression-free survival (PFS; 56 weeks).

RESULTS

A total of 76 patients (77%) responded to gefitinib or afatinib. Of these 76 patients, 49 (64%) and 75 (99%) had achieved a response at 8 and 16.5 weeks, respectively. All responders had achieved a response by 56 weeks. The responders had a significantly longer PFS and overall survival (OS) compared with those with stable disease at 16.5 weeks (PFS, P = .003; OS, P < .001) and 56 weeks (PFS, P = .026; OS, P = .016) but not at 8 weeks (PFS, P = .104; OS, P = .313). Among the responders, greater tumor shrinkage was not associated with longer PFS or OS.

CONCLUSION

Those with a response to first-line gefitinib or afatinib had more favorable PFS and OS compared with those with stable disease. A sufficient observation period was required for the response to occur and predict outcomes. Greater maximal tumor shrinkage in the responders was not predictive of survival.

Precision oncology: neither a silver bullet nor a dream

Precision oncology is not an illusion, nor is it the magic bullet that will eradicate all cancers. Precision oncology is simply another weapon in our growing armament against cancer. Rather than honing in on the failures of a relatively young field, one should advocate for integrating its successes into widespread clinical practice, especially for indications, such as: ABL, ALK, BRAF, BRCA1, BRCA2, EGFR, KIT, KRAS, PDGFRA, PDGFRB, ROS1, BCR-ABL, FLT3 and ROS1, where aberrations have been shown to alter responses to US FDA approved drugs - that is, level 1 data. Moreover, to truly assess the promise of precision oncology, we must first begin by defining our expectations for this field. Importantly, we must recognize that the conception of precision oncology arose as an antithesis of the 'one-size fits all' cancer therapeutics approach. Consequently, tools used for evaluating these conventional, large-scale trials, are not directly transferable for assessing nonconventional, smaller-scale trials needed for evaluating precision oncology. Hence, a thorough vetting of precision oncology as another tool of the trade, must first begin by reassessing our expectations for this field, as well as current clinical trial designs and end point measurements. Importantly, we must recognize that most targeted therapy approaches are in their infancy, with only monotherapy approaches being assessed and combination therapies likely being necessary to fulfill the promise of precision oncology.

Guide to detecting epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations in ctDNA of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer

Cancer treatment is evolving towards therapies targeted at specific molecular abnormalities that drive tumor growth. Consequently, to determine which patients are eligible, accurate assessment of molecular aberrations within tumors is required. Obtaining sufficient tumor tissue for molecular testing can present challenges; therefore, circulating free tumor-derived DNA (ctDNA) found in blood plasma has been proposed as an alternative source of tumor DNA. The diagnostic utility of ctDNA for the detection of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) mutations harbored in tumors of patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is supported by the results of several large studies/meta-analyses. However, recent real-world studies suggest that the performance of ctDNA testing varies between geographic regions/laboratories, demonstrating the need for standardized guidance. In this review, we outline recommendations for obtaining an accurate result using ctDNA, relating to pre-analytical plasma processing, ctDNA extraction, and appropriate EGFR mutation detection methods, based on clinical trial results. We conclude that there are several advantages associated with ctDNA, including the potential for repeated sampling - particularly following progression after first-line tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI) therapy, as TKIs targeting resistance mutations (eg T790M) are now approved for use in the USA/EU/Japan (at time of writing). However, evidence suggests that ctDNA does not allow detection of EGFR mutations in all patients with known mutation-positive NSCLC. Therefore, although tumor tissue should be the first sample choice for EGFR testing at diagnosis, ctDNA is a promising alternative diagnostic approach.