The role of the NxTAG® respiratory pathogen panel assay and other multiplex platforms in clinical practice

Design, optimization, and application of multiplex rRT-PCR in the detection of respiratory viruses

Viral respiratory infections are common and serious diseases. Because there is no effective treatment method or vaccine for respiratory tract infection, early diagnosis is vital to identify the pathogen so as to determine the infectivity of the patient and to quickly take measures to curb the spread of the virus, if warranted, to avoid serious public health problems. Real-time reverse transcriptase PCR (rRT-PCR), which has high sensitivity and specificity, is the best approach for early diagnosis. Among rRT-PCR methods, multiplex rRT-PCR can resolve issues arising from various types of viruses, high mutation frequency, coinfection, and low concentrations of virus. However, the design, optimization, and validation of multiplex rRT-PCR are more complicated than singleplex rRT-PCR, and comprehensive research on multiplex rRT-PCR methodology is lacking. This review summarizes recent progress in multiplex rRT-PCR methodology, outlines the principles of design, optimization and validation, and describes a scheme to help diagnostic companies to design and optimize their multiplex rRT-PCR detection panel and to assist laboratory staff to solve problems in their daily work. In addition, the analytical validity, clinical validity and clinical utility of multiplex rRT-PCR in viral respiratory tract infection diagnosis are assessed to provide theoretical guidance and useful information for physicians to understand the test results.

Respiratory viral infections are underdiagnosed in patients with suspected sepsis

The study aim was to investigate the prevalence and clinical relevance of viral findings by multiplex PCR from the nasopharynx of clinically septic patients during a winter season. During 11 weeks of the influenza epidemic period in January–March 2012, consecutive adult patients suspected to be septic (n = 432) were analyzed with cultures from blood and nasopharynx plus multiplex PCR for respiratory viruses on the nasopharyngeal specimen. The results were compared with those from microbiology analyses ordered as part of standard care. During the winter season, viral respiratory pathogens, mainly influenza A virus, human metapneumovirus, coronavirus, and respiratory syncytial virus were clinically underdiagnosed in 70% of patients positive by the multiplex PCR assay. During the first four weeks of the influenza epidemic, few tests for influenza were ordered by clinicians, indicating low awareness that the epidemic had started. Nasopharyngeal findings of Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenzae by culture correlated to pneumonia diagnosis, and in those patients laboratory signs of viral co-infections were common but rarely suspected by clinicians. The role of respiratory viral infections in patients presenting with a clinical picture of sepsis is underestimated. Specific antiviral treatment might be beneficial in some cases and may reduce spread in a hospital setting. Diagnosing viral infections may promote reduction of unnecessary antibiotic use. It can also be a tool for decisions concerning patient logistics, in order to minimize exposure of susceptible patients and personnel.