Bright-field in situ hybridization detects gene alterations and viral infections useful for personalized management of cancer patients

Prognostic and Predictive Value of CCND1/Cyclin D1 Amplification in Breast Cancer With a Focus on Postmenopausal Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND

Up to 80% of breast cancers (BCa) are estrogen receptor positive and current treatments target the estrogen receptor (endocrine therapies) and/or CDK4/6 (CDK4/6 inhibitors). CCND1 encodes the protein cyclin D1, responsible for regulation of G1 to S phase transition in the cell cycle. CCND1 amplification is common in BCa and contributes to increased cyclin D1 expression. As there are signalling interactions between cyclin D1 and the estrogen receptor, understanding the impact of CCND1 amplification on estrogen receptor positive patients' disease outcomes, is vital. This review aims to evaluate CCND1 amplification as a prognostic and predictive biomarker in BCa.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Publications were retrieved from the databases: PubMed, MEDLINE, Embase and Cochrane library. Exclusion criteria were duplication, publication type, non-English language, in vitro and animal studies, not BCa, male BCa, premenopausal BCa, cohort size <35, CCND1 amplification not reported. Publications with cohort duplication, and inadequate recurrence free survival (RFS) and overall survival (OS) data, were also excluded. Included publications were assessed for Risk of Bias (RoB) using the Quality In Prognosis Studies tool. Statistical analyses (Inverse Variance and Mantel-Haenszel) were performed in Review Manager. The PROSPERO registration number is [CRD42020208179].

RESULTS

CCND1 amplification was significantly associated with positive estrogen receptor status (OR:1.70, 95% CI:1.19-2.43, p = 0.004) and cyclin D1 overexpression (OR: 5.64, 95% CI: 2.32-13.74, p=0.0001). CCND1 amplification was significantly associated with shorter RFS (OR: 1.64, 95% CI: 1.13-2.38, p = 0.009), and OS (OR: 1.51, 95% CI: 1.19-1.92, p = 0.0008) after removal of studies with a high RoB. In endocrine therapy treated patients specifically, CCND1 amplification predicted shorter RFS (HR: 2.59, 95% CI: 1.96-3.41, p < 0.00001) and OS (HR: 1.59, 95% CI: 1.00-2.49, p = 0.05) also after removal of studies with a high RoB.

CONCLUSION

While a lack of standardised approach for the detection of CCND1 amplification is to be considered as a limitation, CCND1 amplification was found to be prognostic of shorter RFS and OS in BCa. CCND1 amplification is also predictive of reduced RFS and OS in endocrine therapy treated patients specifically. With standardised methods and cut offs for the detection of CCND1 amplification, CCND1 amplification would have potential as a predictive biomarker in breast cancer patients.

SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier CRD42020208179.

Single molecule chromogenic in situ hybridization assay for RNA visualization in fixed cells and tissues

Visualization of gene expression at single RNA molecular level represents a great challenge to both imaging technologies and molecular engineering. Here we show a single molecule chromogenic in situ hybridization (smCISH) assay that enables counting and localizing individual RNA molecules in fixed cells and tissue under bright-field microscopy. Our method is based on in situ padlock probe assays directly using RNA as a ligation template and rolling circle amplification combined with enzyme catalyzed chromogenic reaction for amplification product visualization. We show potential applications of our method by detecting gene expression variations in single cells, subcellular localization information of expressed genes, and gene expression heterogeneity in formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue sections. This facile and straightforward method can in principle be applied to any type of RNA molecules in different samples.

In situ hybridization: Introduction to techniques, applications and pitfalls in the performance and interpretation of assays

In situ hybridization (ISH) has become a common laboratory technique used for the analysis of gene expression and for the localization of specific DNA and RNA molecules in cells. Many different methods of performing ISH have been described. These techniques have evolved into important tools in basic scientific research and in clinical diagnoses. One of the goals of ISH is to localize gene sequences in situ and to visualize the products within cells while preserving cell integrity. This allows for meaningful anatomical and histological interpretation of the localized product(s) within heterogeneous tissues. Because of the possibility of false positive and false negative results that may occur with ISH assays, familiarity with the pathophysiology of the molecules that are analyzed and the cellular processes involved as well as with limitations of the assays can help to avoid erroneous diagnoses with clinical specimens.