Imaging in the diagnosis of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies; indications and utility

Muscle biopsy practices in the evaluation of idiopathic inflammatory myopathies: An international survey of expert clinicians

BACKGROUND

Muscle biopsy is an important test in the evaluation of individuals with suspected myopathy, including those with suspected idiopathic inflammatory myopathy (IIM). Various approaches, including open surgical biopsy, needle biopsy and conchotome forceps, have been reported. However the real-world utilisation of these approaches remains unclear. There are no established guidelines for the use of muscle biopsy, or selection of biopsy technique, in investigating IIM and international practices are not well-documented. This study describes current approaches to muscle biopsy amongst clinicians with expertise in IIM.

METHODS

A survey regarding muscle biopsy practices was disseminated among members of the International Myositis Assessment and Clinical Studies (IMACS) group. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

One-hundred and sixteen clinicians completed the survey, primarily rheumatologists. Open surgical biopsy was the most commonly employed technique (74.5 %), followed by needle (11.3 %) and conchotome (9.4 %) approaches. Clinical examination was the most common method of muscle selection, with 85.2 % of respondents reporting they 'always or almost always' relied on it. MRI and electromyography were also frequently utilised for muscle selection (51.9 %, 45.4 % respectively). There was variability in the perceived utility of muscle biopsy in certain clinical contexts, such as presence of myositis specific antibodies or cutaneous manifestations of dermatomyositis. While respondents generally reported low complication rates following muscle biopsy, non-diagnostic histopathology was commonly reported, regardless of procedural approach.

CONCLUSION

Clinicians managing IIM report muscle biopsy to be well tolerated however, non-diagnostic results are common. Substantial heterogeneity regarding perceived indications for biopsy, procedural approaches, and muscle selection strategies were observed within this expert group. Future research is needed to establish best practice and determine the role of muscle biopsy in the context of continued advancements in serological profiling of IIM.

Imaging biomarkers in the idiopathic inflammatory myopathies

Idiopathic inflammatory myopathies (IIMs) are a group of acquired muscle diseases with muscle inflammation, weakness, and other extra-muscular manifestations. IIMs can significantly impact the quality of life, and management of IIMs often requires a multi-disciplinary approach. Imaging biomarkers have become an integral part of the management of IIMs. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), muscle ultrasound, electrical impedance myography (EIM), and positron emission tomography (PET) are the most widely used imaging technologies in IIMs. They can help make the diagnosis and assess the burden of muscle damage and treatment response. MRI is the most widely used imaging biomarker of IIMs and can assess a large volume of muscle tissue but is limited by availability and cost. Muscle ultrasound and EIM are easy to administer and can even be performed in the clinical setting, but they need further validation. These technologies may complement muscle strength testing and laboratory studies and provide an objective assessment of muscle health in IIMs. Furthermore, this is a rapidly progressing field, and new advances are going to equip care providers with a better objective assessment of IIMS and eventually improve patient management. This review discusses the current state and future direction of imaging biomarkers in IIMs.

Using magnetic resonance imaging to map the hidden burden of muscle involvement in systemic sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Skeletal muscle can be directly affected by systemic sclerosis (SSc); however, a significant burden of SSc-associated myopathy is undetected because clinical parameters such as weakness and creatine kinase (CK) are unreliable biomarkers of muscle involvement. This study presents qualitative and quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) findings that quantify the prevalence of myopathy and evaluate any association between skeletal and cardiac muscle involvement in SSc.

METHODS

Thirty-two patients with SSc who fulfilled the 2013 American College of Rheumatology/European League Against Rheumatism classification criteria underwent skeletal muscle MRI in addition to cardiac MRI. Skeletal muscles were independently assessed by two musculoskeletal radiologists for evidence of oedema, fatty infiltration and atrophy. Skeletal muscle T2 mapping times and percentage fat fraction were calculated. Linear regression analysis was used to evaluate the clinical and myocardial associations with skeletal muscle oedema and fatty infiltration. Cardiac MRI was performed using post gadolinium contrast imaging and parametric mapping techniques to assess focal and diffuse myocardial fibrosis.

RESULTS

Thirteen participants (40.6%) had MRI evidence of skeletal muscle oedema. Five (15.6%) participants had fatty infiltration. There was no association between skeletal muscle oedema and muscle strength, creatine kinase, inflammatory markers or fibroinflammatory myocardial disease. Patients with skeletal muscle oedema had higher T2-mapping times; there was a significant association between subjective assessments of muscle oedema and T2-mapping time (coef 2.46, p = 0.02) and percentage fat fraction (coef 3.41, p = 0.02). Diffuse myocardial fibrosis was a near-universal finding, and one third of patients had focal myocardial fibrosis. There was no association between skeletal myopathy detected by MRI and burden of myocardial disease.

CONCLUSIONS

MRI is a sensitive measure of muscle oedema and systematic assessment of SSc patients using MRI shows that myopathy is highly prevalent, even in patients without symptoms or other signs of muscle involvement. Similarly, cardiac fibrosis is highly prevalent but occurs independently of skeletal muscle changes. These results indicate that novel quantitative MRI techniques may be useful for assessing sub-clinical skeletal muscle disease in SSc.

The value of qualitative muscle MRI in the diagnostic procedures of myopathies: a biopsy-controlled study in 191 patients

Background and aims

The role of muscle magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in the diagnostic procedures of myopathies is still controversially discussed. The current study was designed to analyze the status of qualitative muscle MRI, electromyography (EMG), and muscle biopsy in different cases of clinically suspected myopathy.

Methods

A total of 191 patients (male: n = 112, female: n = 79) with suspected myopathy who all received muscle MRI, EMG, and muscle biopsy for diagnostic reasons were studied, with the same location of biopsy and muscle MRI (either upper or lower extremities or paravertebral muscles). Muscle MRIs were analyzed using standard rating protocols by two different raters independently.

Results

Diagnostic findings according to biopsy results and genetic testing were as follow: non-inflammatory myopathy: n = 65, inflammatory myopathy (myositis): n = 51, neurogenic: n = 18, unspecific: n = 23, and normal: n = 34. The majority of patients showed myopathic changes in the EMG. Edema, atrophy, muscle fatty replacement, and contrast medium enhancement (CM uptake) in MRI were observed across all final diagnostic groups. Only 30% of patients from the myositis group (n = 15) showed CM uptake.

Discussion and conclusion

The study provides guidance in the definition of the impact of muscle MRI in suspected myopathy: despite being an important diagnostic tool, qualitative MRI findings could not distinguish different types of neuromuscular diagnostic groups in comparison with the gold standard histopathologic diagnosis and/or genetic testing. The results suggest that neither muscle edema nor gadolinium enhancement are able to secure a diagnosis of myositis. The current results do not support qualitative MRI as aiding in the diagnostic distinction of various myopathies. Quantitative muscle MRI is, however, useful in the diagnostic procedure of a suspected neuromuscular disease, especially with regard to assessing progression of a chronic myopathy by quantification of the degree of atrophy and fatty replacement and in exploring patterns of muscle group involvements in certain genetic myopathies.

Conventional ultrasound and elastography as imaging outcome tools in autoimmune myositis: A systematic review by the OMERACT ultrasound group

AIMS

To analyze whether there is sufficient data from published literature to demonstrate that ultrasound, including elastography, present good metric properties (truth, discrimination and feasibility) in autoimmune myositis (AIM).

METHODS

A population, intervention, comparator and outcome-structured (PICO) search was performed in Medline, Cochrane Library and Embase database from 01/01/1973 to 08/05/2019. The inclusion criteria required original research involving adult humans, reported in English, assessing ultrasound and elastography in patients with an AIM. Conference abstracts and computer-assisted diagnostics that focused on technique and not ultrasound domains were excluded.

RESULTS

Approximately 2670 articles were identified. Forty-one full-text articles were included in the final analysis. There were 551 AIM patients studied. Eighteen studies (43.9%) had a control group, of which 15 (63.3%) were healthy controls. The age of participants (including controls) varied from 18 to 86 years, and most were females (59%). Diagnosis of AIM was largely biopsy-proven, although some were derived through clinical presentation, positive clinical imaging (ultrasound or otherwise) and/or electromyography and steroid responsiveness. The features examined with ultrasound in the 41 included articles consisted of: muscle echogenicity, bulk, atrophy, architecture, power Doppler, perfusion characteristics, shear wave modulus, shear wave velocity, elasticity index and fasciculations. Twelve studies (29.2%) used quantitative methods to assess these characteristics, whilst others used semi-quantitative, dichotomous/binary and descriptive scoring systems. Criterion validity was met in 14 studies (12/14, 85.7%) and construct validity in 22 studies (22/25, 88.0%). Most published articles reported Level 3b to Level 5 evidence with varying degrees of bias. There was only one longitudinal study examining discrimination. Reliability and feasibility were under-reported.

CONCLUSION

This is the first systematic review studying the utility of ultrasound, including elastography, in AIM. There is some evidence for criterion and construct validity, suggesting that ultrasound may be a promising outcome measurement instrument in AIM. Agreement on the standardization of acquisition, and the definitions of target domains, is required. Additionally, further validation studies are required to determine discrimination, reliability and feasibility.