'Knowledge leech' to 'part of the team': students' learning in rural communities of practice

'It's a gamble': A phenomenological exploration of medical students' learning experiences as newcomers to clinical communities of practice

BACKGROUND

Medical students become members of the clinical team through participation in their activities, as described by Lave and Wenger's situated learning theory. While there is research into how medical students cognitively engage in clinical learning, there is limited work on clinical experiences using a social theoretical lens such as situated learning theory.

METHOD

This study explored third year medical students' lived experience as newcomers to clinical teams using a qualitative phenomenological approach. Medical students completed in-depth, semi-structured interviews in 2021. Interpretive phenomenological analysis (IPA) using Lave and Wenger's theory of situated learning was applied to understand students' experiences.

RESULTS

Seven students discussed their variable placement experiences. Learning related to three elements: conditions for participation, modes of participation and products of participation. When certain conditions were met relating to student, clinician and activity, students learned. This drove identity and relationship formation. The findings related and led to a self-perpetuating cycle with potential to advance student learning. When the conditions for participation were not met, the cycle stopped, leading to student disengagement.

CONCLUSION

Passivity in students is a result of modifiable factors in the workplace. To encourage proactivity, clinicians must enable students to move from observation to participation as their competence increases. Participation should be supervised, challenging and should contribute to patient care. Time pressures can make this difficult; one solution is to nominate a clinician to direct students and account for this in their workload or to employ a clinical fellow to assist with student training.

Communities of practice: A theoretical framework for undergraduate longitudinal placements

BACKGROUND

There has been a global shift towards longitudinal placements in undergraduate medicine, which are believed to play an important role in supporting medical student learning and professional identity formation. A better understanding of how learning occurs on such placements is needed, and community of practice (CoP), a social learning theory, has been proposed to form their pedagogical foundations. However, empirical research exploring learning through CoPs on longitudinal placements is limited.

METHODS

Case study methodology triangulating data from interviews, written reflections and routine evaluations was undertaken to explore how second-year students on an undergraduate longitudinal General Practice placement participated within CoPs and the factors enabling this participation.

FINDINGS

Routine evaluation data were available for 57% (n239) of students and in-depth interviews were carried out with five students and three tutors across eight placements. Themes identified through inductive thematic analysis were (i) participation within CoPs, (ii) enablers of legitimate peripheral participation and (iii) socialising agents. Student legitimate peripheral participation was greatly facilitated by making contributions to patient care, a welcoming clinical environment, access to the informal spaces and repertoires of the practice and effective brokerage of educational activities by tutors.

DISCUSSION

CoP is a theory that allows us to make tangible the somewhat abstract when deepening our understanding of how students learn on longitudinal placements. The extent to which students become legitimate peripheral participants varies, and this theoretical framework allows us to consider the factors that can enable such participation, with implications for how educators design curricula and placement infrastructure.

Identifying features of quality in rural placements for health students: scoping review

OBJECTIVES

To explore and synthesise the evidence relating to features of quality in rural health student placements.

DESIGN

Scoping review.

DATA SOURCES

MEDLINE, CINAHL, Embase, ProQuest, Informit, Scopus, ERIC and several grey literature data sources (1 January 2005 to 13 October 2020).

STUDY SELECTION

The review included peer-reviewed and grey literature from Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development listed countries that focused on quality of health student placements in regional, rural and remote areas.

DATA EXTRACTION

Data were extracted regarding the methodological and design characteristics of each data source, and the features suggested to contribute to student placement quality under five categories based on a work-integrated learning framework.

RESULTS

Of 2866 resulting papers, 101 were included for data charting and content analysis. The literature was dominated by medicine and nursing student placement research. No literature explicitly defined quality in rural health student placements, although proxy indicators for quality such as satisfaction, positive experiences, overall effectiveness and perceived value were identified. Content analysis resulted in four overarching domains pertaining to features of rural health student placement quality: (1) learning and teaching in a rural context, (2) rural student placement characteristics, (3) key relationships and (4) required infrastructure.

CONCLUSION

The findings suggest that quality in rural health student placements hinges on contextually specific features. Further research is required to explore these findings and ways in which these features can be measured during rural health student placements.

Longitudinal integrated clerkship evaluations in UK medical schools: a narrative literature review

PURPOSE

Longitudinal Integrated Clerkships (LICs) are a recognised model of curriculum design used internationally as an alternative to traditional block rotations in medical schools that have been shown to offer a multitude of educational benefits. As a relatively new development in the United Kingdom (UK), it is not yet clear whether these benefits will translate into a UK healthcare context. This article provides an early review of evaluations of UK LIC programmes.

METHODS

A narrative literature review of LIC programme evaluations in UK medical schools.

RESULTS

UK students and faculty found value in the LIC programmes with reported benefits including continuity of relationships, increased responsibility and purpose for students, a patient-centred approach and development of professional skills. However, students and GP tutors expressed initial anxieties adapting to the newness of the programme design and preparedness for exams.

CONCLUSIONS

UK LIC programmes appear to be offering benefits for UK medical students and faculty members including personal and professional development in line with international literature. However, the current data is limited with significant gaps that need addressing for the impacts to be fully realised.

The do's, don'ts and don't knows of establishing a sustainable longitudinal integrated clerkship

INTRODUCTION

The longitudinal integrated clerkship is a model of clinical medical education that is increasingly employed by medical schools around the world. These guidelines are a result of a narrative review of the literature which considered the question of how to maximize the sustainability of a new longitudinal integrated clerkship program.

METHOD

All four authors have practical experience of establishing longitudinal integrated clerkship programs. Each author individually constructed their Do's, Don'ts and Don't Knows and the literature that underpinned them. The lists were compiled and revised in discussion and a final set of guidelines was agreed. A statement of the strength of the evidence is included for each guideline.

RESULTS

The final set of 18 Do's, Don'ts and Don't Knows is presented with an appraisal of the evidence for each one.

CONCLUSION

Implementing a longitudinal integrated clerkship is a complex process requiring the involvement of a wide group of stakeholders in both hospitals and communities. The complexity of the change management processes requires careful and sustained attention, with a particular focus on the outcomes of the programs for students and the communities in which they learn. Effective and consistent leadership and adequate resourcing are important. There is a need to select teaching sites carefully, involve students and faculty in allocation of students to sites and support students and faculty though the implementation phase and beyond. Work is needed to address the Don't Knows, in particular the question of how cost-effectiveness is best measured.

Twelve tips for expanding undergraduate clinical teaching capacity

Undergraduate medical education has expanded substantially in recent years, through both establishing new programs and increasing student numbers in existing programs. This expansion has placed pressure on the capacity for training students in clinical placements, raising concerns about the risk of dilution of experience, and reducing work readiness. The concerns have been greatest in more traditional environments, where clinical placements in large academic medical centers are often the "gold standard". However, there are ways of exposing medical students to patient interactions and clinical supervisors in many other contexts. In this paper, we share our experiences and observations of expanding clinical placements for both existing and new medical programs in several international locations. While this is not necessarily an easy task, a wide range of opportunities can be accessed by asking the right questions of the right people, often with only relatively modest changes in resource allocation.

Stakeholder views of rural community-based medical education: a narrative review of the international literature

CONTEXT

Rural community-based medical education (RCBME), in which medical student learning activities take place within a rural community, requires students, clinical teachers, patients, community members and representatives of health and government sectors to actively contribute to the educational process. Therefore, academics seeking to develop RCBME need to understand the rural context, and the views and needs of local stakeholders.

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this review is to examine stakeholder experiences of RCBME programmes internationally.

METHODS

This narrative literature review of original research articles published after 1970 utilises Worley's symbiosis model of medical education as an analysis framework. This model proposes that students experience RCBME through their intersection with multiple clinical, social and institutional relationships. This model seeks to provide a framework for considering the intersecting relationships in which RCBME programmes are situated.

RESULTS

Thirty RCBME programmes are described in 52 articles, representing a wide range of rural clinical placements. One-year longitudinal integrated clerkships for penultimate-year students in Anglosphere countries were most common. Such RCBME enables students to engage in work-integrated learning in a feasible manner that is acceptable to many rural clinicians and patients. Academic results are not compromised, and a few papers demonstrate quality improvement for rural health services engaged in RCBME. These programmes have delivered some rural medical workforce outcomes to communities and governments. Medical students also provide social capital to rural communities. However, these programmes have significant financial cost and risk student social and educational isolation.

CONCLUSIONS

Rural community-based medical education programmes are seen as academically acceptable and can facilitate symbiotic relationships among students, rural clinicians, patients and community stakeholders. These relationships can influence students' clinical competency and professional identity, increase graduates' interest in rural careers, and potentially improve rural health service stability. Formal prospective stakeholder consultations should be published in the literature.