What factors influence the introduction of a national undergraduate general practice curriculum in the UK?

European standards for undergraduate medical education in general practice; a blueprint - for action

There is compelling evidence that general practice (GP) is the most effective form of healthcare. However, healthcare policy appears independent of evidence and GP is woefully under-resourced in all countries, and this affects recruitment. Recruitment to GP is proportional to the quantity and quality of undergraduate experience and national and transnational guidelines can improve undergraduate experiences by defining both the desired quantity and quality. There is good evidence that these professionally developed guidelines can be effective in changing Government policy if they are used as a touchstone to collaborate with policymakers.EURACT (European Academy of Teachers in General Practice / Family Medicine) have therefore developed transnational guidelines covering the European region. The guidelines cover the desired quantity, quality and support for undergraduate experience. Three main design principles have been used. Firstly, it is democratic. Secondly it is evidence-based, using extensive literature searching, situational analysis and surveys. Finally, it adopts a 'principles-based approach'. Generalist medicine is articulated as a series of interconnected principles that integrate and then re-focus specialist medicine to achieve the enhanced patient-orientated outcomes of primary-care. This way of articulating generalist practice delivers general principles, which can be used as learning outcomes, that are adaptable to a wide range of learning environments. Most clinical learning documents are irrelevant and are destined for dusty drawers or forgotten digital files. We therefore encourage primary care educators to use these guidelines to work with policy-makers at all levels to advocate for change, strengthening primary care education at local, national and international levels.

How does the introduction of a new year three GP curriculum affect future commitment to teach? An evaluation using a realist approach

In western countries, there is a trend towards increasing amounts of undergraduate medical education being delivered in General Practice (GP). However, many medical schools report difficulties with the recruitment and retainment of GP clinical teachers. Newcastle University recently introduced a new year three GP curriculum, involving an increased quantity of community-based teaching and changes to the responsibilities of GP clinical teachers. We sought to explore and explain how this curricular change affects the future teaching commitment of year three GP clinical teachers. We adopted a realist approach. We firstly developed a candidate theory of how the new curriculum may affect future teaching commitment. Data collection and analysis then involved interviews of 10 GP teachers to refine this theory and produce a final Programme Theory. The results suggest that different teachers are affected in different ways, influenced by practice and individual contexts. Some parts of the new curriculum tend to reduce future teaching commitment, whereas other aspects tend to increase commitment. Mechanisms include changes to autonomy and sense of value. The results allow medical schools to better understand how GP teacher retention can be facilitated during curricular change. We make numerous recommendations, including advocating a team-based approach to teaching, paying attention to teacher autonomy, and considering patient contact in relation to generalist, primary care-orientated medicine as a core component of GP teaching.