The Safety of available immunotherapy for the treatment of glioblastoma

Gene therapy in glioblastoma multiforme: Can it be a role changer?

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is one of the most lethal cancers with a poor prognosis. Over the past century since its initial discovery and medical description, the development of effective treatments for this condition has seen limited progress. Despite numerous efforts, only a handful of drugs have gained approval for its treatment. However, these treatments have not yielded substantial improvements in both overall survival and progression-free survival rates. One reason for this is its unique features such as heterogeneity and difficulty of drug delivery because of two formidable barriers, namely the blood-brain barrier and the tumor-blood barrier. Over the past few years, significant developments in therapeutic approaches have given rise to promising novel and advanced therapies. Target-specific therapies, such as monoclonal antibodies (mAbs) and small molecules, stand as two important examples; however, they have not yielded a significant improvement in survival among GBM patients. Gene therapy, a relatively nascent advanced approach, holds promise as a potential treatment for cancer, particularly GBM. It possesses the potential to address the limitations of previous treatments and even newer advanced therapies like mAbs, owing to its distinct properties. This review aims to elucidate the current status and advancements in gene therapy for GBM treatment, while also presenting its future prospects.

Dendritic cell vaccines improve the glioma microenvironment: Influence, challenges, and future directions

INTRODUCTION

Gliomas, especially the glioblastomas, are one of the most aggressive intracranial tumors with poor prognosis. This might be explained by the heterogeneity of tumor cells and the inhibitory immunological microenvironment. Dendritic cells (DCs), as the most potent in vivo functional antigen-presenting cells, link innate immunity with adaptive immunity. However, their function is suppressed in gliomas. Therefore, overcoming the dysfunction of DCs in the TME might be critical to treat gliomas.

METHOD

In this paper we proposed the specificity of the glioma microenvironment, analyzed the pathways leading to the dysfunction of DCs in tumor microenvironment of patients with glioma, summarized influence of DC-based immunotherapy on the tumor microenvironment and proposed new development directions and possible challenges of DC vaccines.

RESULT

DC vaccines can improve the immunosuppressive microenvironment of glioma patients. It will bring good treatment prospects to patients. We also proposed new development directions and possible challenges of DC vaccines, thus providing an integrated understanding of efficacy on DC vaccines for glioma treatment.

CXCR4-targeted nitric oxide nanoparticles deliver PD-L1 siRNA for immunotherapy against glioblastoma

While immunotherapy has emerged as a promising strategy to treat glioblastoma multiforme (GBM), the limited availability of immunotherapeutic agents in tumors due to the presence of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) and immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment dampens efficacy. Nitric oxide (NO) plays a role in modulating both the BBB and tumor vessels and could thus be delivered to disrupt the BBB and improve the delivery of immunotherapeutics into GBM tumors. Herein, we report an immunotherapeutic approach that utilizes CXCR4-targeted lipid‑calcium-phosphate nanoparticles with NO donors (LCP-NO NPs). The delivery of NO resulted in enhanced BBB permeability and thus improved gene delivery across the BBB. CXCR4-targeted LCP-NO NPs delivered siRNA against the immune checkpoint ligand PD-L1 to GBM tumors, silenced PD-L1 expression, increased cytotoxic T cell infiltration and activation in GBM tumors, and suppressed GBM progression. Thus, the codelivery of NO and PD-L1 siRNA by these CXCR4-targeted NPs may serve as a potential immunotherapy for GBM.

Angiogenesis and Its Targeting in Glioblastoma with Focus on Clinical Approaches

Angiogenesis is a characteristic of glioblastoma (GBM), the most fatal and therapeutic-resistant brain tumor. Highly expressed angiogenic cytokines and proliferated microvascular system made anti-angiogenesis treatments a thoroughly plausible approach for GBM treatment. Many trials have proved to be not only as a safe but also as an effective approach in GBM retardation in a certain time window as seen in radiographic response rates; however, they have failed to implement significant improvements in clinical manifestation whether alone or in combination with radio/chemotherapy. Bevasizumab, an anti-vascular endothelial growth factor-A (VEGF-A) antibody, is the only agent that exerts meaningful clinical influence by improving progression-free survival (PFS) and partially alleviate clinical symptoms, nevertheless, it could not prolong the overall survival (OS) in patients with GBM. The data generated from phase II trials clearly revealed a correlation between elevated reperfusion, subsequent to vascular normalization induction, and improved clinical outcomes which explicitly indicates anti-angiogenesis treatments are beneficial. In order to prolong these initial benefits observed in a certain period of time after anti-angiogenesis targeting, some aspects of the therapy should be tackled: recognition of other bypass angiogenesis pathways activated following antiangiogenesis therapy, identification of probable pathways that induce insensitivity to shortage of blood supply, and classifying the patients by mapping their GBM-related gene profile as biomarkers to predict their responsiveness to therapy. Herein, the molecular basis of brain vasculature development in normal and tumoral conditions is briefly discussed and it is explained how "vascular normalization" concept opened a window to a better comprehension of some adverse effects observed in anti-angiogenesis therapy in clinical condition. Then, the most targeted angiogenesis pathways focused on ligand/receptor interactions in GBM clinical trials are reviewed. Lastly, different targeting strategies applied in anti-angiogenesis treatment are discussed.

Immunotherapy Associated Neurotoxicity in Pediatric Oncology

Novel immunotherapies are increasingly being employed in pediatric oncology, both in the upfront and relapsed/refractory settings. Through various mechanisms of action, engagement and activation of the immune system can cause both generalized and disease site-specific inflammation, leading to immune-related adverse events (irAEs). One of the most worrisome irAEs is that of neurotoxicity. This can present as a large spectrum of neurological toxicities, including confusion, aphasia, neuropathies, seizures, and/or death, with variable onset and severity. Earlier identification and treatment, generally with corticosteroids, remains the mainstay of neurotoxicity management to optimize patient outcomes. The pathophysiology of neurotoxicity varies across the different therapeutic strategies and remains to be elucidated in most cases. Furthermore, little is known about long-term neurologic sequelae. This review will focus on neurotoxicity seen with the most common immunotherapies used in pediatric oncology, including CAR T cell therapy, alternative forms of adoptive cell therapy, antibody therapies, immune checkpoint inhibitors, and tumor vaccines. Herein we will discuss the incidence, pathophysiology, symptomatology, diagnosis, and management strategies currently being utilized for immunotherapy-associated neurotoxicity with a focus on pediatric specific considerations.

The current and future aspects of glioblastoma: Immunotherapy a new hope?

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most perilous and highly malignant in all the types of brain tumor. Regardless of the treatment, the diagnosis of the patients in GBM is very poor. The average survival rate is only 21 months after multimodal combinational therapies, which include chemotherapy, radiation, and surgery. Due to the intrusive and infiltrative nature of GBM, it requires elective therapy for specific targeting of tumor cells. Tumor vaccine in a form of immunotherapy has potential to address this need. Nanomedicine-based immunotherapies have clutch the trigger of systemic and specific immune response against tumor cells, which might be the approach to eliminating the unrelieved cancer. In this mechanism, combination of immunomodulators with specific target and appropriate strategic vaccines can stifle tumor anti-immune defense system and/or increase the capabilities of the body to move up immunity against the tumor. Here, we explore the different types of immunotherapies and vaccines for brain tumor treatment and their clinical trials, which bring the feasibility of the future of personalized vaccine of nanomedicine-based immunotherapies for the brain tumor. We believe that immunotherapy could result in a significantly more stable reaction in GBM patients.

A Comparison Between Chemo-Radiotherapy Combined With Immunotherapy and Chemo-Radiotherapy Alone for the Treatment of Newly Diagnosed Glioblastoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Background

Immunotherapy for GBM is an emerging field which is increasingly being investigated in combination with standard of care treatment options with variable reported success rates.

Objective

To perform a systematic review of the available data to evaluate the safety and efficacy of combining immunotherapy with standard of care chemo-radiotherapy following surgical resection for the treatment of newly diagnosed GBM.

Methods

A literature search was performed for published clinical trials evaluating immunotherapy for GBM from January 1, 2000, to October 1, 2020, in PubMed and Cochrane using PICOS/PRISMA/MOOSE guidelines. Only clinical trials with two arms (combined therapy vs. control therapy) were included. Outcomes were then pooled using weighted random effects model for meta-analysis and compared using the Wald-type test. Primary outcomes included 1-year overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), secondary outcomes included severe adverse events (SAE) grade 3 or higher.

Results

Nine randomized phase II and/or III clinical trials were included in the analysis, totaling 1,239 patients. The meta-analysis revealed no statistically significant differences in group’s 1-year OS [80.6% (95% CI: 68.6%–90.2%) vs. 72.6% (95% CI: 65.7%–78.9%), p = 0.15] or in 1-year PFS [37% (95% CI: 26.4%–48.2%) vs. 30.4% (95% CI: 25.4%–35.6%) p = 0.17] when the immunotherapy in combination with the standard of care group (combined therapy) was compared to the standard of care group alone (control). Severe adverse events grade 3 to 5 were more common in the immunotherapy and standard of care group than in the standard of care group (47.3%, 95% CI: 20.8–74.6%, vs 43.8%, 95% CI: 8.7–83.1, p = 0.81), but this effect also failed to reach statistical significance.

Conclusion

Our results suggests that immunotherapy can be safely combined with standard of care chemo-radiotherapy without significant increase in grade 3 to 5 SAE; however, there is no statistically significant increase in overall survival or progression free survival with the combination therapy.

Synthetic and systems biology principles in the design of programmable oncolytic virus immunotherapies for glioblastoma

Oncolytic viruses (OVs) are a class of immunotherapeutic agents with promising preclinical results for the treatment of glioblastoma (GBM) but have shown limited success in recent clinical trials. Advanced bioengineering principles from disciplines such as synthetic and systems biology are needed to overcome the current challenges faced in developing effective OV-based immunotherapies for GBMs, including off-target effects and poor clinical responses. Synthetic biology is an emerging field that focuses on the development of synthetic DNA constructs that encode networks of genes and proteins (synthetic genetic circuits) to perform novel functions, whereas systems biology is an analytical framework that enables the study of complex interactions between host pathways and these synthetic genetic circuits. In this review, the authors summarize synthetic and systems biology concepts for developing programmable, logic-based OVs to treat GBMs. Programmable OVs can increase selectivity for tumor cells and enhance the local immunological response using synthetic genetic circuits. The authors discuss key principles for developing programmable OV-based immunotherapies, including how to 1) select an appropriate chassis, a vector that carries a synthetic genetic circuit, and 2) design a synthetic genetic circuit that can be programmed to sense key signals in the GBM microenvironment and trigger release of a therapeutic payload. To illustrate these principles, some original laboratory data are included, highlighting the need for systems biology studies, as well as some preliminary network analyses in preparation for synthetic biology applications. Examples from the literature of state-of-the-art synthetic genetic circuits that can be packaged into leading candidate OV chassis are also surveyed and discussed.

Recent Advances in Immune Cell Therapy for Glioblastoma

Glioblastoma (GBM) is the most malignant form of astrocytoma with short survival and a high recurrence rate and remains a global problem. Currently, surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and other comprehensive treatments are the main treatment modalities, but patients still have a poor prognosis mainly due to the infiltrative growth of GBM and the protective effect of the blood–brain barrier on tumor cells. Therefore, immunotherapy is expected to be a good option for GBM. In the immune system, different cells play varying roles in the treatment of GBM, so understanding the roles played by various immune cells in treating GBM and considering how to combine these effects to maximize the efficacy of these cells is important for the selection of comprehensive and optimal treatment plans and improving GBM prognosis. Therefore, this study reviews the latest research progress on the role of various types of immune cells in the treatment of GBM.

Take Advantage of Glutamine Anaplerosis, the Kernel of the Metabolic Rewiring in Malignant Gliomas

Glutamine is a non-essential amino acid that plays a key role in the metabolism of proliferating cells including neoplastic cells. In the central nervous system (CNS), glutamine metabolism is particularly relevant, because the glutamine-glutamate cycle is a way of controlling the production of glutamate-derived neurotransmitters by tightly regulating the bioavailability of the amino acids in a neuron-astrocyte metabolic symbiosis-dependent manner. Glutamine-related metabolic adjustments have been reported in several CNS malignancies including malignant gliomas that are considered ‘glutamine addicted’. In these tumors, glutamine becomes an essential amino acid preferentially used in energy and biomass production including glutathione (GSH) generation, which is crucial in oxidative stress control. Therefore, in this review, we will highlight the metabolic remodeling that gliomas undergo, focusing on glutamine metabolism. We will address some therapeutic regimens including novel research attempts to target glutamine metabolism and a brief update of diagnosis strategies that take advantage of this altered profile. A better understanding of malignant glioma cell metabolism will help in the identification of new molecular targets and the design of new therapies.

PD-1/PD-L1 immune checkpoint inhibitors in glioblastoma: clinical studies, challenges and potential

Immune checkpoint inhibitors (CIs) have changed the landscape of tumor immunotherapy. Glioblastoma (GBM) remains the most common primary malignant brain tumor in adults and has a very poor prognosis. Due to the high invasiveness and aggressiveness of GBM, there is considerable interest in programmed cell death-1 (PD-1)/programmed cell death ligand-1 (PD-L1) treatment. However, the immunosuppressive and immune-privileged characteristics of GBM limit the efficacy of CIs. While clinical studies of CI monotherapies have shown unsatisfactory survival benefits, new treatment strategies have received attention. Multiple clinical studies have focused on combination of standard therapy (temozolomide, radiotherapy), targeted therapy and other immunotherapies, and some have reported results. Here, we reviewed recent clinical trials of anti-PD-1/PD-L1 monotherapy, studies with neoadjuvant strategies, and preclinical and clinical studies of combination immunotherapies for GBM. The preliminary clinical reports in certain subsets of patients with hypermutated or mismatch repair system deficiency GBM are also discussed.

Non-Invasive Delivery of Therapeutics into the Brain: The Potential of Aptamers for Targeted Delivery

The blood-brain barrier (BBB) is a highly specialised network of blood vessels that effectively separates the brain environment from the circulatory system. While there are benefits, in terms of keeping pathogens from entering the brain, the BBB also complicates treatments of brain pathologies by preventing efficient delivery of macromolecular drugs to diseased brain tissue. Although current non-invasive strategies of therapeutics delivery into the brain, such as focused ultrasound and nanoparticle-mediated delivery have shown various levels of successes, they still come with risks and limitations. This review discusses the current approaches of therapeutic delivery into the brain, with a specific focus on non-invasive methods. It also discusses the potential for aptamers as alternative delivery systems and several reported aptamers with promising preliminary results.

Glioblastoma Treatments: An Account of Recent Industrial Developments

The different drugs and medical devices, which are commercialized or under industrial development for glioblastoma treatment, are reviewed. Their different modes of action are analyzed with a distinction being made between the effects of radiation, the targeting of specific parts of glioma cells, and immunotherapy. Most of them are still at a too early stage of development to firmly conclude about their efficacy. Optune, which triggers antitumor activity by blocking the mitosis of glioma cells under the application of an alternating electric field, seems to be the only recently developed therapy with some efficacy reported on a large number of GBM patients. The need for early GBM diagnosis is emphasized since it could enable the treatment of GBM tumors of small sizes, possibly easier to eradicate than larger tumors. Ways to improve clinical protocols by strengthening preclinical studies using of a broader range of different animal and tumor models are also underlined. Issues related with efficient drug delivery and crossing of blood brain barrier are discussed. Finally societal and economic aspects are described with a presentation of the orphan drug status that can accelerate the development of GBM therapies, patents protecting various GBM treatments, the different actors tackling GBM disease, the cost of GBM treatments, GBM market figures, and a financial analysis of the different companies involved in the development of GBM therapies.