Efficacy of intense pulsed light therapy for melasma

Efficacy and safety of the combination of tranexamic acid injection and electro-optical synergy (ELOS) versus tranexamic acid injection alone in the treatment of melasma

Melasma is a common, relapsing, multifactorial disease for which the treatment decision remains extremely difficult. This study was designed to compare the efficacy and safety of the combination of tranexamic acid (TA) injection and electro-optical synergy (ELOS) versus TA injection alone in treating melasma. A retrospective study was undertaken for patients with facial epidermal or mixed-type melasma to compare clinical data between 15 patients receiving a combination regimen and 15 patients with TA injection only. The study administered TA through intravenous injection to the combination group (twice weekly for 12 weeks) followed by ELOS therapy (once a month for three times). The TA group, on the other hand, received only TA injection (twice weekly for 12 weeks). The evaluation of clinical effectiveness was based on comparing the Melasma Area Severity Index (MASI) scores before and one month after treatment (at 4 months). The Physician Global Assessment (PGA) and Patient satisfaction were documented, and adverse reactions were recorded. All patients were followed up for one year to observe the relapse. After treatment, the MASI scores and melasma severity were significantly reduced in both groups. The combination group showed better efficacy than the TA only group (P < 0.05). The Physician Global Assessment (PGA) and Patient satisfaction showed superior efficacies of the combination group. No significant difference was observed between the two groups in terms of treatment-related side effects. Both groups experienced a certain degree of recurrence during the one-year follow-up, but the TA only group had a significantly higher recurrence rate than the combination group (P < 0.01). Together, the combination of TA injection and ELOS is a safe and effective treatment strategy for melasma and should be promoted.

Comparison of 1064 nm Q-switched Nd:YAG laser and Jessner peeling in melasma treatment

Melasma is an acquired hyperpigmentation disease characterized by hyperpigmented patches in sun-exposed areas that significantly impairs life quality. Topical treatments such as hydroquinone, retinoic acid, azelaic acid, chemical peels and laser treatments are among the main treatment options. In our study, we aimed to compare the effectiveness of Jessner peeling and 1064 nm Q-switched Nd:YAG laser in melasma treatment. For this purpose, Jessner peeling was applied to 20 patients and 1064 nm Q-switched Nd: YAG laser was applied to 19 patients of 39 melasma patients who applied to the cosmetology unit of Ege University department of dermatology and venereal diseases between November 2018-March 2020. Thirty seven patients completed the study. Changes in MASI, pigment and erythema scores measured by mexameter before and after treatment were compared for two groups. A statistically significant decrease in MASI scores, pigment and erythema scores was observed in both groups with no significant difference between two groups. In conclusion, in our study, it has been shown that Jessner peeling and 1064 nm Q-switched Nd:YAG laser are equally effective in treatment of melasma.

Comparison of intense pulsed light and near-infrared light in the treatment of dry eye disease: a prospective randomized study

PURPOSE

To compare the efficacy of intense pulsed light (IPL) and near-infrared light (NIL) treatments in alleviating symptoms and signs of dry eye disease (DED).

METHODS

Patients diagnosed with DED at the Peking University Third Hospital Eye Center from January 2019 to October 2019 were randomized to undergo either NIL therapy combined with meibomian gland expression (MGX; NIL Group) or IPL combined with MGX (IPL Group). Treatments were performed three times at 1-month intervals. DED signs and symptoms were evaluated before every treatment. We compared the clinical improvement within and between the groups. Additional comparisons were made according to the meibomian gland (MG) dropout grade.

RESULTS

A total of 260 eyes of 130 patients (mean age, 49.68 ± 18.01 years) were included. The dryness and total symptom scores and the MG expressibility and secretion quality (upper and lower eyelids) significantly improved after the three treatments in both groups (p < 0.05). However, IPL had superior efficacy in improving blurred vision, photophobia, burning, increased secretions and the total symptom score at 2 months in patients with more severe MG dropout.

CONCLUSIONS

Both IPL and NIL treatments were effective in the treatment of DED, but IPL provided greater symptom improvement, particularly in patients with severe MG dropout. NIL can be a new therapeutic option for the treatment of DED.

The pathogenesis of melasma and implications for treatment

BACKGROUND

Melasma is a complex and poorly understood disorder, with high rates of treatment failure and recurrences.

OBJECTIVES

We aimed to review the current knowledge of the pathogenesis of melasma and apply this knowledge to clinical implications on relevant therapeutic interventions.

METHODS

A systematic PubMed search was performed using the search term "((melasma[Text Word]) OR facial melanosis[Text Word]) AND (pathogenesis OR causality[MeSH Terms])" for articles published between 1990 and 2020. Included articles were then evaluated by two authors and assessed for relevant pathomechanistic pathways, after which they were divided into groups with minimal overlap. We then reviewed current treatment modalities for melasma and divided them according to the involved pathomechanistic pathway.

RESULTS

A total of 309 search results were retrieved among which 76 relevant articles were identified and reviewed. Five main pathomechanisms observed in melasma were identified: (1) melanocyte inappropriate activation; (2) aggregation of melanin and melanosomes in dermis and epidermis; (3a) increased mast cell count and (3b) solar elastosis; (4) altered basement membrane; and (5) increased vascularization. Treatment modalities were then divided based on these five pathways and detailed in 6 relevant tables.

CONCLUSION

The pathophysiology of melasma is multifactorial, resulting in treatment resistance and high recurrence rates. This wide variety of pathomechanisms should ideally be addressed separately in the treatment regimen in order to maximize results.

A Meta-analysis-Based Assessment of Intense Pulsed Light for Treatment of Melasma

BACKGROUND

A safe and effective treatment for melasma, an acquired refractory pigmented skin disease, remains a problem, although numerous clinical trials have explored the possibility of combined therapy involving intense pulsed light. To date, little is known regarding the efficacy of this treatment. The current study, therefore, sought to explore the effectiveness of intense pulsed light.

METHODS

We used published studies from literature databases, based on established inclusion criteria, to calculate standardized mean differences (SMDs) and risk ratio (RRs), and evaluated the effectiveness of combined therapy with intense pulsed light in melasma patients. We performed data analysis using the Review Manager 5.3 software at 95% confidence interval.

RESULTS

We obtained a total of 8 studies, involving 215 patients, from the databases and found a significant effect on efficacy following combined therapy with intense pulsed light. Specifically, the melasma area and severity index (MASI) score was significantly low (SMD = 0.61, CI [0.42, 0.80] P < 0.0001 for a fixed-effects model), while a four-point scoring scale self-assessment by patients was significantly high (RR = 1.44, CI [1.17, 1.76] P = 0.0004 for a fixed-effects model).

CONCLUSION

Our meta-analysis showed that IPL-based combination therapy for melasma can effectively reduce the MASI score and result in higher satisfaction among patients, indicating an effective method for treatment of the condition.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE III

This journal requires that authors assign a level of evidence to each article. For a full description of these Evidence-Based Medicine ratings, please refer to the Table of Contents or the online Instructions to Authors www.springer.com/00266.