External cephalic version with an amniotic fluid index ⩽10: A systematic review

Efficacy of a second external cephalic version (ECV) after a successful first external cephalic version with subsequent spontaneous reinversion to breech presentation: a retrospective cohort study

OBJECTIVE

Determining the efficacy of performance of a second external cephalic version (ECV) following successful first ECV with subsequent spontaneous reinversion to breech presentation in reducing the rate of cesarean delivery (CD).

METHODS

Data were reviewed on healthy women with fetuses in breech presentation who underwent a first ECV after 36 weeks. Routine ultrasound study was performed at 39-week gestation, and a repeat ECV procedure was performed if the fetus had reverted to non-cephalic presentation. Obstetrical outcome measures were compared between women who underwent one successful ECV between 36- and 41-week gestation in which the fetus remained in cephalic presentation until labor and those who underwent a successful first ECV after which the fetus returned to breech and a second ECV was performed. The primary outcome was the rate of secondary CD during vaginal delivery in cephalic presentation; rate of successful second ECV was the secondary outcome.

RESULTS

Overall 250 women underwent one ECV attempt of which 169 (67%) were successful. Of them 28 reverted to breech presentation, all women underwent two attempts of which 21 (76%) were successful. A second successful ECV attempt was associated with a 33% incidence of a CD vs. 2.8% after one successful ECV in which the fetus remained in cephalic presentation.

CONCLUSION

A second ECV after a successful first ECV with subsequent spontaneous reversion to breech presentation can be expected to be successful in 76% of cases but lead to CD in 33% of cases. Our findings can be used to support patient counseling and decision-making before second ECV attempt.

Prediction of Success in External Cephalic Version for Breech Presentation at Term

OBJECTIVE

To design a clinically based predictive model for the likelihood of successful external cephalic version (ECV).

METHODS

This single-center retrospective study was conducted from February 2016 to July 2018 and included all candidates for ECV between 36 and 41 weeks of gestation. Variables with a potential effect on ECV success were collected. These variables include: body mass index, amniotic fluid index, gestational age, parity, location of placenta, fetal trunk posture, time in breech presentation before the procedure and the ultrasonographically measured size of the amniotic fluid preceding the fetal presenting part (fore-bag). Variables' association with ECV success was evaluated using a multivariate logistic regression and a decision tree predicting ECV outcome was developed using 75% of the patients and validated on the remaining 25%.

RESULTS

Overall, 250 pregnant women were identified and opted for a trial of ECV by a single operator, with a success rate of 64.8%. Body mass index, size of fore-bag, and parity were independent determinants of the version success, whereas other variables had no statistically significant effect on the success rate. Our decision tree model divided the cohort into five subgroups according to various combinations of the three variables. When evaluated on the internal validation set, the C-Index of the tree was 0.933 (0.863-1) and the prediction accuracy was 91.9% (86.5%-97.3%).

CONCLUSION

A prediction model composed of three easily measurable variables enables accurate prediction of successful ECV at term. Fore-bag was identified as the most important discriminator. Our model holds in internal validation and it can be used to support patient counseling and decision making for ECV but should be externally validated.

Reviving external cephalic version: a review of its efficacy, safety, and technical aspects

Currently, the rate of cesarean sections being performed in Korea is approximately 40%, with Korea ranking 4th among the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development countries with respect to cesarean deliveries. Breech presentation at term is an important indication for cesarean section among other factors, including medicolegal concerns and pregnancies in women of advanced maternal age. Term breech presentation is associated with a higher fetal mortality rate than that associated with a cephalic presentation. Therefore, in Korea, most of these women deliver by cesarean section to avoid the complications of vaginal breech delivery. However, cesarean section is itself associated with considerable obstetric morbidity and sometimes, mortality. External cephalic version (ECV) is a useful method to reduce the cesarean section rate in women with breech presentation and therefore to reduce the incidence of breech presentation at delivery. Studies have shown that routine use of ECV reduces the cesarean section rate by approximately two-thirds in term pregnancies with breech presentation. ECV is accepted as a safe, efficacious, and cost-effective method and is recommended by both the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists and the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists in all pregnancies with term breech presentation, if not contraindicated. In Korea, although most clinicians are aware of the option of ECV, their relative lack of experience in performing the procedure and fear of complications render them hesitant to perform ECV. This review is aimed at guiding obstetricians by describing the efficacy, safety concerns, and technical aspects of this procedure.

Fear for external cephalic version and depression: predictors of successful external cephalic version for breech presentation at term?

Background

Objective was to determine whether fear for external cephalic version (ECV) and depression are associated with the success rate of ECV in women with a breech presentation at term.

Methods

Prospective study conducted in the Catharina Hospital Eindhoven between October 2007 and May 2012. Participants fulfilled The Edinburgh Depression Scale (EDS) questionnaire and expressed their degree of fear on a visual analogue scale from one to ten before ECV. Obstetric factors were evaluated as well. Primary outcome was the relation between psychological factors (fear for ECV and depression EDS scores) and ECV success rate. Secondary outcome was a possible relation between fear for ECV and increased abdominal muscle tension.

Results

The overall success rate was 55% and was significantly lower (p < 0.001) in nulliparous women (44.3%) compared with parous women (78.0%). Fear for ECV and depression EDS-scores were not related with ECV success rate. Parity, placental location, BMI and engagement of the fetal breech were obstetric factors associated with ECV outcome. There was no relation between fear for ECV and abdominal muscle tone.

Conclusion

Fear for ECV and depression were not related with ECV success rate in this study. Engagement of the fetal breech was the most important factor associated with a successful ECV.

Trial registration

EBIS: The Eindhoven Breech Intervention Study, NCT00516555.

Borderline or marginal amniotic fluid index and peripartum outcomes: a review of the literature

The predictive accuracy of a borderline amniotic fluid index (AFI) for an adverse pregnancy outcome is uncertain. Pregnancy outcomes of a borderline versus normal AFI suggest an increased risk of meconium-stained fluid, intrauterine growth restriction, cesarean delivery for a nonreassuring fetal heart rate, low Apgar scores, and neonatal intensive care unit admission with borderline fluid. These results are inconclusive because of study design variations, the absence of receiver-operating characteristic curves, our inability to calculate likelihood ratios, and a lack of randomized trials. There is currently insufficient evidence to recommend additional antenatal testing delivery based on a borderline AFI. Sonography could be considered for evaluating fetal growth until a definitive association or lack of an association between a borderline AFI and intrauterine growth restriction/small size for gestational age can be determined.

Ultrasound factors to predict the outcome of external cephalic version: a meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

To systematically review the medical literature reporting on ultrasound factors that can be predictive for the outcome of an attempt at external cephalic version (ECV).

METHODS

MEDLINE, EMBASE and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched. Studies reporting on potential ultrasound prognosticators and ECV success rates that allowed construction of a 2x2 table were selected.

RESULTS

We selected 37 primary articles reporting on 7709 women. Posterior placental location (odds ratio (OR), 1.9; 95% CI, 1.5-2.4), complete breech position (OR, 2.3; 95% CI, 1.9-2.8) and an amniotic fluid index>10 (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.5-2.1) were predictors of successful ECV.

CONCLUSION

Success of an ECV attempt is associated with ultrasound parameters such as fetal position, amniotic fluid and placental location. This knowledge can be used to develop a prognostic model to predict successful ECV.

Clinical factors to predict the outcome of external cephalic version: a metaanalysis

OBJECTIVE

The objective of the study was to systematically review the medical literature reporting on potential clinical prognosticators for the outcome of external cephalic version (ECV).

STUDY DESIGN

Medline, EMBASE, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials were searched. Studies reporting on potential clinical prognosticators and ECV success rates that allowed construction of a 2 x 2 table were selected.

RESULTS

We detected 53 primary articles reporting on 10,149 women. Multiparity (P >/= 1.00; odds ratio [OR], 2.5; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.3-2.8), nonengagement of the breech (OR, 9.4; 95% CI, 6.3-14), a relaxed uterus (OR, 18; 95% CI, 12-29), a palpable fetal head (OR, 6.3; 95% CI, 4.3-9.2), and maternal weight less than 65 kg (OR, 1.8; 95% CI, 1.2-2.6) were predictors for successful external cephalic version.

CONCLUSION

Success of an ECV attempt is associated with clinical factors. This should be taken into account in the counseling of women prior to an ECV attempt.

Tailoring systematic reviews to meet critical priorities in maternal health in the intrapartum period

Health care practitioners and researchers commonly call for greater reliance on evidence as a means to achieve improvement in quality of care. Systematic reviews provide a means to accelerate the use of evidence-based clinical interventions and public health practices. The extent to which these time- and resource-intensive systematic reviews currently address critical maternal health priorities in the intrapartum period is unclear. This analysis summarises key maternal health and research priorities, maps these priorities to existing reviews, identifies gaps in the literature that can be addressed with systematic reviews, and highlights key methodological concerns in conducting systematic reviews. The analysis draws on published data on maternal morbidities and an overview of 108 systematic reviews in Medline in the past 5 years using the MeSH terms 'Delivery, Obstetric,' to draw the links between health priorities, research priorities, existing evidence and missing evidence. Key causes of morbidity during labour and delivery in the United States include haemorrhage, pre-eclampsia and eclampsia, obstetric trauma and infection. Analyses of maternal morbidity and mortality suggest that key concerns include racial and ethnic disparities in health outcomes and the prevention of adverse events. Systematic reviews, however, generally tend to focus on the reduction of harms associated with interventions, are frequently limited to randomised designs, and do not address issues of health disparities. The results suggest that advances in evidence-based care in maternal health require that systematic reviews address issues of prevention of adverse events, include a larger variety of study designs when necessary and pay closer attention to health disparities.