The prevalence of occult obstetric anal sphincter injury following childbirth--literature review

Baiona's Consensus Statement for Fecal Incontinence. Spanish Association of Coloproctology

Faecal incontinence (FI) is a major health problem, both for individuals and for health systems. It is obvious that, for all these reasons, there is widespread concern for healing it or, at least, reducing as far as possible its numerous undesirable effects, in addition to the high costs it entails. There are different criteria for the diagnostic tests to be carried out and the same applies to the most appropriate treatment, among the numerous options that have proliferated in recent years, not always based on rigorous scientific evidence. For this reason, the Spanish Association of Coloproctology (AECP) proposed to draw up a consensus to serve as a guide for all health professionals interested in the problem, aware, however, that the therapeutic decision must be taken on an individual basis: patient characteristics/experience of the care team. For its development it was adopted the Nominal Group Technique methodology. The Levels of Evidence and Grades of Recommendation were established according to the criteria of the Oxford Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine. In addition, expert recommendations were added briefly to each of the items analysed.

Obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) in the presence of an intact perineum

Obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) in the absence of concurrent injury to the perineal skin is not a common diagnosis. A primiparous woman delivered a healthy male infant by spontaneous vertex delivery. At time of delivery, a compound presentation of the fetal hand with the head was noted. Initial examination revealed a presumed second-degree tear; however, a small laceration above the anal verge was noted, which on exploration revealed a perineal injury through the anal sphincter complex. In the operating theatre, the perineal skin was incised to reveal a 3c OASI, which was repaired appropriately. While atypical OASI has been reported previously, this specific injury has never been described in detail in the literature. Awareness of atypical perineal injuries is needed and while careful perineal examination is required in all cases, this is especially important where the perineal skin appears intact to ensure appropriate diagnosis of any concurrent OASI.

[Postpartum fecal incontinence. State of the problem]

A review of the current national and foreign literature is devoted to epidemiology, risk factors, causes, diagnosis and modern treatment approaches for fecal incontinence (FI). Incidence of FI in early and delayed period after childbirth is 30% or more. At the same time, up to 87% of postpartum injuries of anal sphincter remain undiagnosed. Importantly, routine caesarean section does not reduce the risk of incontinence. In addition to typical complaints of spontaneous gas and stool, diagnosis of FI after childbirth includes transrectal ultrasound, MRI, anorectal manometry and pudendal nerve terminal motor latency testing. Survey of proctologists from different regions of Russia revealed a high demand from medical community for educational programs devoted to diagnosis, treatment and rehabilitation of patients with postpartum perineal injuries.

Severe Perineal Trauma in a Brazilian Southeastern Tertiary Hospital: A Retrospective Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the prevalence of severe perineal trauma (obstetric and anal sphincter injury [OASIS]) in a tertiary high-risk pregnancy facility and the associated factors.

METHODS

A retrospective electronic chart review on perineal lacerations was performed from the period of April 2017 to February 2019. Obstetric and anal sphincter injury was diagnosed by a rectal examination. Primary outcome was the prevalence of OASIS (third- and fourth-degree perineal tear). Independent variables were maternal, intrapartum, and neonatal characteristics. Univariate and multivariate analyses with logistic regression models were performed. A P value lower than 0.05 was considered significant.

RESULTS

The prevalence of OASIS (third/fourth-degree laceration) was 1.51% (43/2846) in our population. Our population was mostly white (66.3%) and mostly primiparous (52.1%). By comparison, the prevalence of first/second-degree laceration was 43% (1223/2846). Selective episiotomy occurred in 18.73% (517/2761) of patients, and it was not associated with OASIS (P = 0.211). Advanced maternal age (P = 0.196), higher number of vaginal examinations (P = 0.169), fetal presentation (P = 0.533), and duration of second stage (P = 0.757) were not associated with OASIS. Univariate analysis has found that forceps delivery (odds ratio [OR], 3.68 [1.74-7.79]; P = 0.001), neonatal macrossomy (OR, 3.42 [1.02-11.43]; P = 0.045), and larger head circumference (OR, 1.15 [1.02-1.32]; P = 0.026) were risk factors for OASIS, whereas higher gravidity reduced the risk (OR, 0.61 [0.42-0.91] for OASIS. However, after multivariate analysis, only head circumference (OR, 1.86 [1.10-3.14]; P = 0.020) remained as a risk factor.

CONCLUSIONS

Larger neonatal head circumference increased in 86% the risk for severe perineal trauma in this cohort of women.

Japanese Practice Guidelines for Fecal Incontinence Part 1-Definition, Epidemiology, Etiology, Pathophysiology and Causes, Risk Factors, Clinical Evaluations, and Symptomatic Scores and QoL Questionnaire for Clinical Evaluations-English Version

Fecal incontinence (FI) is defined as involuntary or uncontrollable loss of feces. Gas incontinence is defined as involuntary or uncontrollable loss of flatus, while anal incontinence is defined as the involuntary loss of feces or flatus. The prevalence of FI in people over 65 in Japan is 8.7% in the male population and 6.6% among females. The etiology of FI is usually not limited to one specific cause, with risk factors for FI including physiological factors, such as age and gender; comorbidities, such as diabetes and irritable bowel syndrome; and obstetric factors, such as multiple deliveries, home delivery, first vaginal delivery, and forceps delivery. In the initial clinical evaluation of FI, the factors responsible for individual symptoms are gathered from the history and examination of the anorectal region. The evaluation is the basis of all medical treatments for FI, including initial treatment, and also serves as a baseline for deciding the need for a specialized defecation function test and selecting treatment in stages. Following the general physical examination, together with history taking, inspection (including anoscope), and palpation (including digital anorectal and vaginal examination) of the anorectal area, clinicians can focus on the causes of FI. For the clinical evaluation of FI, it is useful to use Patient-Reported Outcome Measures (PROMs), such as scores and questionnaires, to evaluate the symptomatic severity of FI and its influence over quality of life (QoL).

How comparable is clinical grading of obstetric anal sphincter injury with that determined by four-dimensional translabial ultrasound?

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the agreement between grading of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASI) on translabial ultrasound (TLUS), using a newly developed algorithm, and grading on postpartum examination. A secondary aim was to assess the correlation between tear severity, as defined on ultrasound, and symptoms of anal incontinence and/or fecal urgency.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of patients seen at a perineal clinic between 2012 and 2018, after recent primary repair of OASI. All patients underwent a standardized interview including the St Mark's anal incontinence test and four-dimensional TLUS. Post-processing of ultrasound volume data was performed blinded to all other data. Using tomographic ultrasound imaging, a set of eight slices was obtained, and the central six slices were evaluated for sphincter abnormalities. Slices with distortion, thinning or defects were rated as abnormal. The following algorithm was used to grade OASI: a Grade-3a tear was diagnosed if the external anal sphincter (EAS) was abnormal in < 4/6 slices; a Grade-3b tear was diagnosed if the EAS was abnormal in ≥ 4/6 slices; and a Grade-3c/4 tear was diagnosed if both the EAS and internal anal sphincter were abnormal in ≥ 4/6 slices. Clinical grading of OASI was determined according to the Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists guidelines. Agreement between clinical and TLUS diagnosis of OASI was evaluated using weighted κ.

RESULTS

Of the 260 women seen during the study period, 45 (17%) were excluded owing to missing data or a repeat OASI, leaving 215 complete datasets for analysis. The average follow-up interval was 2.4 months (range, 1-11 months) after OASI and the mean age of the women was 29 years (range, 17-42 years). One hundred and seventy-five (81%) women were vaginally primiparous. OASI was graded clinically as Grade 3a in 87 women, Grade 3b in 80, Grade 3c in 29 and Grade 4 in 19. On imaging, full agreement between clinical and TLUS grading was noted in 107 (50%) women, with a weighted κ of 0.398. In 96 (45%) women, there was disagreement by one category, with a weighted κ of 0.74 and in 12 (6%) there was disagreement by two categories. Twenty-four (11%) women were found to have a normal anal sphincter on imaging. Overall, potential clinical over-diagnosis was noted in 72 (33%) women and potential under-diagnosis in 36 (17%). The seniority of the diagnosing obstetrician did not significantly alter agreement between clinical and sonographic OASI grading (κ 0.44, 0.43, and 0.34, for specialists and senior and junior residents, respectively). The association between symptoms of anal incontinence and/or fecal urgency and TLUS grading did not reach significance (P = 0.052).

CONCLUSIONS

Clinical and TLUS-based grading of OASI showed fair agreement. Clinical over-diagnosis may be increasingly common in our population, although under-diagnosis may still occur in a significant minority. Copyright © 2020 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Risk of obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) and anal incontinence: A meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Obstetric anal sphincter injuries (OASIS) are the commonest cause of anal incontinence in women of reproductive age. We determined the risk of anal sphincter defects diagnosed by ultrasound, and the risk of anal incontinence in (i) all women who deliver vaginally, (ii) in women without clinical suspicion of OASIS, and (iii) after primary repair of sphincter injury, by systematic review.

METHODS

We searched major databases until June 2018, without language restrictions. Random effects meta-analysis was used to obtain pooled estimates of ultrasound diagnosed OASIS and risk of anal incontinence symptoms at various time points after delivery, and of persistent sphincter defects after primary repair. We reported the association between ultrasound diagnosed OASIS and anal incontinence symptoms using relative risk (RR) with 95 % CI.

RESULTS

We included 103 studies involving 16,110 women. Of all women who delivered vaginally, OASIS were diagnosed on ultrasound in 26 % (95 %CI, 21-30, I² = 91 %), and 19 % experienced anal incontinence (95 %CI, 14-25, I² = 92 %). In women without clinical suspicion of OASIS (n = 3688), sphincter defects were observed in 13 % (10-17, I² = 89 %) and anal incontinence experienced by 14 % (95 % CI: 6-24, I² = 95 %). Following primary repair of OASIS, 55 % (46-63, I² = 98 %) of 7549 women had persistent sphincter defect with 38 % experiencing anal incontinence (33-43, I² = 92 %). There was a significant association between ultrasound diagnosed OASIS and anal incontinence (RR 3.74, 2.17-6.45, I² = 98 %).

INTERPRETATION

Women and clinicians should be aware of the high risk for sphincter defects following vaginal delivery even when clinically unsuspected. This underlines the need of careful and systematic perineal assessment after birth to mitigate the risk of missing OASIS. We also noted a high rate of persistent defects and symptoms following primary repair of OASIS. This dictates the need for provision of robust training for clinicians to achieve proficiency and sustain competency in repairing OASIS.

Anal incontinence and unrecognized anal sphincter injuries after vaginal delivery- a cross-sectional study in Norway

Background

Aim of the study was to estimate the prevalence of postpartum anal incontinence among women who delivered vaginally, and to assess the extent to which obstetric injuries to the anal sphincters are missed.

Methods

All women (both primiparous and multiparous) who delivered vaginally and received any kind of sutures in the perineal area at Innlandet Hospital Trust Elverum in Norway between January 1, 2015 and June 30, 2016 were invited to answer a questionnaire on St. Mark’s incontinence score and to participate in a clinical examination of the pelvic floor including endoanal sonography.

Results

In total 52,3% (n = 207) of the 396 invited women participated in the study. Mean St. Mark’s score was 1.8 points (95% CI 1.4 to 2.1) at examination 14 months (mean) postpartum, and none of the participants suffered from weekly fecal leakage. Fecal urgency affected 11.7% (95% CI 7.1 to 16.3) of the participants, and 8.7% (95%CI 5.1 to 12.8) had weekly involuntary leakage of flatus. Nine women (9.3%, 95% CI 4.1 to 15.5) had a previously undetected third degree obstetric anal sphincter injury.

Conclusion

The prevalence of anal incontinence among women who have delivered vaginally and received sutures due to 1st and 2nd degree perineal lacerations is low. Some obstetric anal sphincter injuries remain unrecognized at the time of delivery, but the symptoms of anal incontinence due to these injuries are in the lower half of the St. Mark’s incontinence score. Women with persistent symptoms like fecal urgency or leakage of gas and/or feces should be referred to evaluation by a colorectal surgeon in order to achieve optimal treatment.

Three-Dimensional Endoanal Ultrasound Features of the Anal Sphincter in Asian Primigravidae

OBJECTIVES

The normal parameters of 3-dimensional endoanal ultrasound (3DEAUS) of the anal sphincter have not been reported for primigravidae or pregnant women at present. 3DEAUS parameters in Asian primigravidae were assessed in this study.

METHODS

We analyzed 3DEAUS data of 101 consecutives Asian primigravidae, assessed in the early third trimester. The assessment was performed with a rigid ultrasonic probe (Olympus^® RU 12M-R1 probe and EU-ME1 ultrasound system (Olympus Corp., Shinjuku, Japan). The Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to detect the differences in pressure in different quadrants.

RESULTS

The participants had a mean age of 24.7 (standard deviation [SD], 5.1) years. The Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score was normal in all participants. The anal sphincter complex had 3 characteristic segments that were identifiable: upper, middle and lower. The puborectalis muscle was identified as a striated "V"-shaped sling, and its mean thickness was 7.44 (SD, 1.41) mm. The mean thickness of internal (IAS) and external (EAS) sphincters at the mid-sphincter level were 1.78 (SD, 0.59) and 5.49 (SD, 1.21) mm, respectively. The EAS measured 6.02 (SD, 1.07) mm at the lower sphincter level. The statistically significant differences seen in the in quadrants were: the IAS was thicker anteriorly (Z = -2.642; P = .008), the EAS at both midsphincter level (Z = -3.70; P < .001) and lower sphincter level (Z = -7.712; P < .001) was thicker posteriorly, and the IAS was thicker at the 9 o'clock position (Z = -2.081; P = .037). Good symmetry at all 3 levels was seen in the EAS (including the puborectalis muscle).

CONCLUSIONS

Normal values of 3DEAUS for primigravidae have been identified and may serve as reference values for other laboratories.

Utility of Endoanal Ultrasonography in Assessment of Primary and Recurrent Anal Fistulas and for Detection of Associated Anal Sphincter Defects

BACKGROUND

Tridimensional endoanal ultrasonography (3D-EAUS) has been used for the assessment of various anorectal lesions. Previous studies have reported good accuracy of 3D-EAUS in preoperative assessment of fistula-in-ano (FIA). This study aimed to assess the diagnostic utility of 3D-EAUS in preoperative evaluation of primary and recurrent FIA and its role in detection of associated anal sphincter (AS) defects.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Prospectively collected data of patients with FIA who were investigated with 3D-EAUS were reviewed. The findings of EAUS were compared with the intraoperative findings, the reference standard, to find the degree of agreement regarding the position of the internal opening (IO) and primary tract (PT), and presence of secondary tracts using kappa (k) coefficient test. A subgroup analysis was performed to compare the accuracy and sensitivity of EAUS for primary and recurrent FIA.

RESULTS

Of the patients, 131 were included to the study. EAUS had an overall accuracy of 87, 88.5, and 89.5% in detection of IO, PT, and AS defects, respectively. There was very good concordance between the findings of EAUS and intraoperative findings for the investigated parameters (kappa = 0.748, 0.83, 0.935), respectively. Accuracy and sensitivity of EAUS in recurrent FIA were insignificantly lower than primary cases. EAUS detected occult AS defects in 5.3% of the patients studied.

CONCLUSION

The diagnostic utility of 3D-EAUS was comparable in primary and recurrent FIA. 3D-EAUS was able to detect symptomatic and occult AS defects with higher accuracy than clinical examination.

The relationship between fecal incontinence and vaginal delivery in the postmenopausal stage

OBJECTIVE

Obstetric anal sphincter injuries are one of the most significant complications of vaginal delivery that give way to fecal incontinence, which is defined as the involuntary leakage of gas, fluid or solid stool. Although sphincter injuries are seen in 0.5-9% of all deliveries. It has been reported that 20-41% of women who had vaginal deliveries had occult anal sphincter injuries as endoanal ultrasonography began to be used by physicians. The aim of our study was to investigate the relationship between fecal incontinence, whose incidence increases dramatically during the postmenopausal stage, and occult anal sphincter injuries.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Two hundred healthy female patients with no history of anal sphincter injury, aged between 18 and 70 years were included in the study. The participants were divided into 4 groups according to their menopausal stages and mode of delivery; premenopausal (group 1) and postmenopausal (group 2) vaginal delivery, and premenopausal (group 3) and postmenopausal (group 4) cesarean section. Wexner incontinence scores were determined. The participants' defects were assessed using endoanal ultrasound and their status of fecal incontinence using anorectal manometric measurements.

RESULTS

Anorectal manometric measurement results were found significantly lower in group 1 than in group 3 (p<0.01). The Wexner scores of groups 1 and 3 were similar. The anorectal manometric measurement results of group 2 were significantly lower than those of group 4, and the Wexner score of group 2 was significantly higher than other groups (p=0.03).

CONCLUSION

Anal sphincter injuries formed after vaginal delivery may be one of the reasons that increase the incidence of postmenopausal fecal incontinence and cause the formation of fecal incontinence symptoms in women.

Is obstetric anal sphincter injury a risk factor for levator ani muscle avulsion in vaginal delivery?

OBJECTIVE

To analyze whether women who sustain obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) in their first vaginal delivery have a higher incidence of levator ani muscle (LAM) avulsion than do women without OASI.

METHODS

We conducted a prospective observational cohort study of 80 primiparous women who gave birth at our tertiary obstetric unit between September 2011 and July 2013. The women were divided into two groups: women diagnosed with OASI during vaginal delivery (n = 40) and women without OASI (n = 40), matched by mode of delivery and newborn birth weight. Four-dimensional (4D) transperineal ultrasound was performed in all participants at 6-12 months after delivery to assess for integrity or avulsion of the LAM. Ultrasound images were evaluated by two observers who were blinded to group assignment and clinical data. Interobserver agreement was assessed to determine the reproducibility of 4D transperineal ultrasound for diagnosing LAM avulsion.

RESULTS

We found no statistically significant differences between the two groups. The incidence of LAM avulsion was 24.3% in the OASI group and 34.2% in the control group (P = 0.448). Interobserver agreement in the diagnosis of LAM avulsion in the study population using 4D transperineal ultrasound was 89.5%, with a kappa index of 0.76.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings do not support OASI as a risk factor for LAM avulsion. Prospective studies in larger populations are needed to establish the biomechanical relationships of the pelvic floor structures involved in vaginal delivery. Copyright © 2015 ISUOG. Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Non-surgical intrapartum practices for the prevention of severe perineal trauma: a systematic review protocol

REVIEW QUESTION/OBJECTIVE

The objective of this review is to determine the effectiveness of non-surgical intrapartum practices in reducing the incidence of severe perineal trauma (third and fourth degree tears) during childbirth.

The immediate effect of vaginal and caesarean delivery on anal sphincter measurements

Objective

This study evaluated the effects of vaginal and caesarean delivery on internal and external anal sphincter muscle thickness using translabial ultrasonography (TL-US).

Methods

This prospective cohort study enrolled nulliparous women who either had vaginal or caesarean deliveries. The thickness of the hypoechoic internal anal sphincter (IAS) and hyperechoic external anal sphincter (EAS) at the 12, 3, 6, and 9 o’clock positions at the distal level were measured before delivery and within 24–48 h after delivery.

Results

A total 105 consecutive women were enrolled in the study: 60 in the vaginal delivery group and 45 in the caesarean delivery group. The IAS muscle thickness at the 12 o’clock position in the vaginal delivery group was significantly thicker before compared with after delivery (mean ± SD: 2.31 ± 0.74 mm versus 1.81 ± 0.64 mm, respectively). The EAS muscle thickness at the 12 o’clock position in the vaginal delivery group was significantly thicker before compared with after delivery (mean ± SD: 2.42 ± 0.64 mm versus 1.97 ± 0.85, respectively).

Conclusions

There was significant muscle thinning of both the IAS and EAS at the 12 o’clock position after vaginal delivery, but not after caesarean delivery.

The impact of obstetric gel on the second stage of labor and perineal integrity: a randomized controlled trial

OBJECTIVE

Dianatal® is a bioadhesive gliding film which reduces the opposing force to vaginal childbirth. We aimed to investigate the safety, applicability, and impact of Dianatal® obstetric gel on second stage of labor and perineal integrity.

METHODS

Low-risk singleton pregnancies at term were prospectively enrolled. Eligible women were randomly assigned to either labor management without using obstetric gel, or labor management using intermittent application of obstetric gel into the birth canal during vaginal examinations, starting at active phase of labor (≥4 cm dilation). The primary measured outcome was the length of second stage of labor.

RESULTS

Overall, 200 cases were analyzed. Demographic, obstetrical, and labor characteristics were similar between the groups. Neither adverse events nor maternal or neonatal side effects were observed. The mean lengths of the active and second stages of labor were comparable between the obstetric gel-treated and the control groups (157 versus 219 min and 48 versus 56 min, respectively). None of the women had grade III/IV perineal tears. Maternal and neonatal outcomes were not negatively influenced by using obstetric gel. No difference was found after sub-group analysis for spontaneous vaginal delivery.

CONCLUSION

Dianatal® obstetric gel is safe in terms of maternal or neonatal use. Albeit a trend toward shorter labor stages using Dianatal® obstetric gel, no significant differences were noted among the groups. In order to further investigate the influence of the obstetric gel on labor stage interval, perineal integrity and maternal and neonatal outcomes, larger randomized clinical trials are needed to be carried out.

Use of endoanal ultrasound for reducing the risk of complications related to anal sphincter injury after vaginal birth

BACKGROUND

During childbirth, many women sustain trauma to the perineum, which is the area between the vaginal opening and the anus. These tears can involve the perineal skin, the pelvic floor muscles, the external and internal anal sphincter muscles as well as the rectal mucosa (lining of the bowel). When these tears extend beyond the external anal sphincter they are called 'obstetric anal sphincter injuries' (OASIS). When women sustain an OASIS, they are at increased risk of developing anal incontinence either immediately following birth or later in life. Anal incontinence is associated with significant medical, hygiene and social problems. Endoanal ultrasound (EAUS) can be performed with a bedside scanner by inserting a small probe into the anus and the structures of the anal canal and perineum can be reviewed in real-time. We proposed that by examining the perineum with EAUS after the birth of the baby and before the tear has been repaired, there would be an increase in detection of OASIS. This increased detection could lead to improved primary repair of the external and internal anal sphincter resulting in reduced rates of anal incontinence and improved quality of life for women. EAUS may also have a role after perineal repair in the evaluation of residual injury and may help guide a woman's management in subsequent pregnancies and allow for early referral to specialised units, minimising long-term complications.

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness of EAUS in the detection of OASIS following vaginal birth and in reducing the risk of anal sphincter complications related to OASIS.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the Cochrane Pregnancy and Childbirth Group's Trials Register (31 August 2015) and reference list of the one retrieved study.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Randomised control trials (RCTs) comparing EAUS versus no ultrasound in women prior to repair of perineal trauma and EAUS performed after perineal repair. RCTs published in abstract form only and trials using a cluster-randomised design were eligible for inclusion, but none were identified.Trials using a cross-over design and quasi-RCTs were not eligible for inclusion.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The two review authors independently assessed the single trial for inclusion and assessed trial quality. Both review authors independently extracted data. Data were checked for accuracy.

MAIN RESULTS

We included one trial that randomised 752 primiparous women with clinically detectable second-degree perineal tears to either further assessment with EAUS prior to perineal repair or standard care. We assessed this trial as being at a low risk of bias. The trial reported women's anal incontinence at three and 12 months as well as their pain scores and quality of life assessment. The trial authors reported outcomes at three months for 719 women (364 in the experimental group, 355 in the control group, 4% loss to follow-up), and an outcome at 12 months for 684 women (342 in the experimental group, 342 in the control group, 9% loss to follow-up). Primary outcomeCompared with clinical examination (routine care), the use of EAUS prior to perineal repair was associated with a reduction in the rate of severe anal incontinence (defined as involuntary loss of faeces or flatus that constitutes social and/or hygiene problems, or as defined by authors), at greater than six months postpartum (risk ratio (RR) 0.48, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.24 to 0.97, 684 women at the 12-month time point). Secondary outcomes Severe anal incontinence at less than six months was reduced with the use of EAUS prior to repair when compared with clinical examination (routine care) (RR 0.38, 95% CI 0.20 to 0.72, 719 women). However, increased perineal pain at three months was associated with the use of EAUS prior to perineal repair when compared with routine care (RR 5.86, 95% CI 1.74 to 19.72, 684 women). There was no clear difference in the number of women who reported any anal incontinence at either less than six months or equal to or greater than six months (outcomes not prespecified in our published protocol). Similarly, there was no clear difference between groups in terms of faecal incontinence, flatal incontinence, faecal urgency, or maternal quality of life. The study did not report any data on the need for secondary repair of external anal sphincter, dyspareunia, women's satisfaction with care or the planned or actual mode of birth in any subsequent pregnancy. We were unable to assess the detection rates of OASIS with EAUS from the included study because women with clinically-detected OASIS were excluded from randomisation.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

There is some evidence to suggest that EAUS prior to perineal repair is associated with reduced risk of severe anal incontinence but an increase in the incidence of perineal pain at three months postpartum. However, these results are based on one small study involving 752 women. The study took place in a large teaching hospital with an average to busy labour ward. The trial participants were similar to those found in most large obstetric units in developed countries, thus increasing applicability of the evidence, but were restricted to primiparous women.More research is needed to further evaluate the effectiveness of EAUS in the detection of OASIS following vaginal birth and in reducing the risk of anal sphincter complications related to OASIS. More high-quality RCTs are needed to fully evaluate the intervention before the routine use of EAUS on the labour ward could be supported. It would be particularly useful if future trials could assess detection rates of OASIS with EAUS versus clinical examination alone as this is the basis of the theory for improved outcomes with this intervention. Cost and the training required to implement EAUS should be considered, along with maternal quality of life and individual symptoms experienced by postnatal women . It would also be useful to follow up women after their subsequent vaginal births to determine if subsequent mode of delivery affects long-term outcomes. Future studies in multiparous women may also be useful.

Correlation of three dimensional anorectal manometry and three dimensional endoanal ultrasound findings in primi gravida: a cross sectional study

Background

3-dimensional anorectal manometry (3DARM) and 3-dimensional endoanal ultrasound (3DEAUS) have not been used to assess the anal sphincter complex (ASC) in primi gravida. This study was conducted to identify any correlation that may exist between 3DARM and 3DEAUS.

Methods

We analyzed 3DARM and 3DEAUS data of 101 consecutive primi mothers assessed in the late second trimester or early 3rd trimester. 3DARM was performed using the Given Imaging^® Manoscan system and 3DEAUS was performed with the Olympus^® RU 12M-R1 probe and EU-ME1 ultrasound system.

Results

The mean age was 24.7 (SD—5.1) years. All patients had a normal Cleveland Clinic Incontinence Score. The mean resting pressure (RP) was 87.02 (SD—18.43) mmHg and the maximum squeeze pressure (SP) was 179.21 (SD—52.96) mmHg. The mean length of the high pressure zone was 3.67 (SD—0.52) cm. On 3DEAUS, there were three characteristic segments of the ASC that were identified; upper, middle and lower. Mean thicknesses for both internal anal sphincter (IAS) and external anal sphincter (EAS) were identified for primi gravida. IAS was thicker anteriorly and at 9 o’ clock positions and EAS was thicker posteriorly. There was good correlation in the length of the ASC at each quadrant between 3DARM and 3DEAUS. There was no correlation between either RP or SP thickness of IAS or EAS at each level and quadrant.

Conclusion

Correlation is seen only in the length of ASC at each quadrant. No correlation exist between RP or SP and thickness of IAS and EAS.

Does preoperative anal physiology testing or ultrasonography predict clinical outcome with sacral neuromodulation for fecal incontinence?

INTRODUCTION AND HYPOTHESIS

To determine the value of preoperative anal physiology testing and transanal ultrasonography in predicting clinical response to sacral neuromodulation for fecal incontinence.

METHODS

We report a retrospective study of all patients treated with sacral neuromodulation for fecal incontinence in a single practice between 2011 and 2014 was performed. Patient demographics included age, gender, comorbidities, presence of an ultrasound-defined external sphincter defect, and history of prior anal sphincter repair. Cleveland Clinic Florida (CCF) scores were used to assess the severity of fecal incontinence at baseline, and at 3, 6 and 12 months. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the relationship between preoperative physiology testing and ultrasonography and patient outcome.

RESULTS

Sacral neuromodulation was trialed in 60 patients, of whom 31 had anorectal physiology testing and 29 did not. Patients who were tested were younger (60.9 vs. 71.4 years, p = 0.013) and more likely to have had a prior overlapping sphincteroplasty (40.5% vs. 15%, p = 0.043). Among patients who progressed to complete system implantation, CCF scores at 3 and 12 months were similar whether they had physiology testing or not. Likewise, patient outcome did not correlate with the finding of an ultrasound-defined external sphincter defect. Pearson's correlation coefficient was used to evaluate the relationship between the test results and the 3-month CCF scores. CCF scores 3 months after full system implantation did not correlate with the presence or size of an external sphincter defect, resting or squeeze pressure, pudendal nerve terminal motor latency, rectoanal inhibitory reflex, or minimum detectable volume.

CONCLUSIONS

Anal physiology testing and ultrasonography were not predictive of clinical outcomes among patients treated with sacral neuromodulation for fecal incontinence.

Long-term outcome of obstetric anal sphincter injury repaired by experienced obstetricians

OBJECTIVE

To examine the long-term outcomes of women with obstetric anal sphincter injury (OASI) repaired by obstetricians without the involvement of colorectal surgeons.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was undertaken of women who had been admitted for delivery between 2004 and 2012. All OASIs had been repaired by experienced obstetricians using the end-to-end technique. An unexposed group (no OASI) was matched at a ratio of 1:1. Fecal incontinence was graded using a modified Wexner questionnaire.

RESULTS

Overall, 113 OASIs were recorded. Sixty-seven (59.3%) and 71 (62.8%) women from the exposed and unexposed groups, respectively, agreed to participate in the study (P=0.9). Continence to both stool and gas was reported by 48 (71.6%) and 64 (90.1%) women in the exposed and unexposed groups, respectively (P=0.03). The incidence of urgency, dyspareunia, and use of a pad or constipating agents was the same in both groups.

CONCLUSION

The long-term outcome of OASI repair performed by experienced obstetricians is comparable to that reported in the literature. Some women who did not sustain an OASI reported fecal incontinence, which suggests that only a proportion of fecal incontinence can be attributed to OASI.

Long-term outcome after obstetric injury: a retrospective study

OBJECTIVE

To examine problems experienced by women after vaginal delivery with and without a sphincter tear and compare those with less and more severe injuries.

DESIGN

Retrospective questionnaire study. Setting. Regional hospital in Sweden.

SAMPLE

A total of 324 women with and 309 without sphincter tears.

METHODS

Questionnaires were sent out four to eight years after delivery enquiring about the existence and time course of gas incontinence, fecal incontinence, dyspareunia and perineal pain. A question about vacuum delivery was also included.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Prevalence of persisting symptoms.

RESULTS

The reply rate was 77%. About 10% of the women with a sphincter tear had fecal incontinence initially, compared with 3% among those without a sphincter tear. In women with moderate or severe tears, 20 and 31%, respectively, had gas incontinence, compared with 6% of women without a tear. Dyspareunia and perineal pain were present 18-23% of women in the tear groups compared with 9-12% of those without a tear. Almost 45% of women with initial symptoms had remaining problems after four to eight years. There was a significantly higher risk for symptoms after vacuum extraction (p < 0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

Gas incontinence, fecal incontinence, dyspareunia and perineal pain were common problems after delivery. The prevalence of persisting symptoms was high even among women without a tear. The higher prevalence after vacuum extraction delivery indicates that there are more complications associated with this mode of delivery than previously thought.