Preterm premature rupture of membranes: is home care acceptable?

Outpatient versus inpatient management of preterm prelabor rupture of membranes: A systematic review and meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION

To compare neonatal, obstetrical, and maternal outcomes associated with outpatient versus inpatient management of pregnancies with preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

A search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, the Cochrane Database and Central Register from January 1, 1990 to July 31, 2023 identified randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and cohort studies comparing outpatient with inpatient management for pregnant persons diagnosed with PPROM before 37 weeks' gestation. No language restriction was applied. We applied a random effects model for meta-analysis. Trustworthiness was assessed using recently published guidance and Risk of bias using the RoB 2.0 tool for RCTs and ROBINS-I tool for cohort studies. The Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluations (GRADE) approach was used to assess the certainty of evidence (COE). Outcomes of interest included perinatal mortality, neonatal morbidities, latency and gestational age at delivery, and maternal morbidities. RCTs and cohort studies were analyzed separately. This study was registered in the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviewsr: CRD42022295275.

RESULTS

From 2825 records, two RCTs and 10 cohort studies involving 1876 patients were included in the review and meta-analysis. Outpatient management protocols varied but generally included brief initial hospitalization, strict eligibility criteria, and surveillance with laboratory and ultrasound investigations. Outpatient management showed lower rates of neonatal respiratory distress syndrome (cohort: RR 0.63 [0.52-0.77, very low COE]), longer latency to delivery (RCT: MD 7.43 days [1.14-13.72 days, moderate COE], cohort: MD 8.78 days [2.29-15.26 days, low COE]), higher gestational age at birth (cohort: MD 7.70 days [2.02-13.38 days, low COE]), lower rates of Apgar scores <7 at 5 min of life (cohort: RR 0.66 [0.50-0.89, very low COE]), and lower rates of histological chorioamnionitis (cohort: RR 0.74 [0.62-0.89, low COE]) without increased risks of adverse neonatal, obstetrical, or maternal outcomes.

CONCLUSIONS

Meta-analysis of data from RCTs and cohort studies with very low-to-moderate certainty of evidence indicates that further high-quality research is needed to evaluate the safety and potential benefits of outpatient management for selected PPROM cases, given the moderate-to-high risk of bias in the included studies.

Statement of the Obstetrics and Prenatal Medicine Working Group (AGG - Preterm Birth Section) on "Outpatient Management for Pregnant Women with Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes (PPROM)"

Preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) is one of the leading causes of perinatal morbidity and mortality. After a PPROM, more than 50% of pregnant women are delivered within 7 days. Fetal and maternal risks are primarily due to infection and inflammation, placental abruption, umbilical cord complications and preterm birth. Standard care usually consists of an expectant approach. Management includes the administration of antenatal steroids and antibiotic therapy. Patients with PPROM require close monitoring. The management of pregnant women with PPROM (inpatient vs. outpatient) is still the subject of controversial debate. The international guidelines also do not offer a clear stance. The statement presented here discusses the current state of knowledge.

FIGO good practice recommendations for preterm labor and preterm prelabor rupture of membranes: Prep-for-Labor triage to minimize risks and maximize favorable outcomes

Preterm labor occurs in around 10% of pregnancies worldwide. Once diagnosed, significant efforts must be made to reduce the likelihood of morbidity and mortality associated with preterm birth. In high-resource settings, access to hospitals with a neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) is readily available, whereas access to NICU care is limited in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and many rural settings. Use of FIGO's Prep-for-Labor triage method rapidly identifies low- and high-risk patients with preterm labor to enable clinicians to decide whether the patient can be managed on site or if transfer to a level II-IV facility is needed. The management steps described in this paper aim to minimize the morbidity and mortality associated with preterm labor and in the setting of preterm labor with preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM). The methods for accurate diagnosis of PPROM and chorioamnionitis are described. When the risk of preterm birth is high, antenatal corticosteroids should be administered for lung maturation combined with limited tocolysis for 48 hours to permit the corticosteroid course to be completed. Magnesium sulfate is also administered for fetal neuroprotection. Implementation of FIGO's Prep-for-Labor triage method in an LMIC setting will help improve maternal and neonatal outcomes.

Conservative management of preterm premature rupture of membranes < 30 weeks of gestational age: Effectiveness of clinical guidelines implementation strategies

Objective

To compare obstetrical and neonatal outcomes in patients with p-PROM (preterm premature rupture of membranes) at less than 30 weeks of gestational age before and after the application of protocols developed on the basis of international guidelines and to identify local barriers and strategies for their implementation.

Study design

Single and twin pregnancies with p-PROM < 30 weeks of gestation without signs of infection were retrospectively collected. The population was divided in two groups. Group A contained patients treated before the introduction of the protocol, hospitalized from the day of the p-PROM to delivery and treated according to clinicians' practice. Group B included patients managed according to a standardized protocol, treated with home care management under strict surveillance, after 48 h of hospitalization.

Results

19 women with 21 newborns in group A and 22 women with 26 newborns in group B were enrolled. Maternal characteristics and p-PROM gestational age were comparable. In group A we observed minor latency time from diagnosis to delivery (1.6 vs 6.5 weeks, p < 0.001) with lower gestational age at delivery (25.8 ± 2 vs 30.7 ± 4.2 weeks, p = 0.00) and lower newborn weight (859 ± 268 vs 1511 ± 917 g, p = 0.002). Concerning neonatal outcomes, in group A there were lower Apgar score at 1 min (4.0 ± 2.1vs 6.3 ± 2, p = 004), longer hospitalization (42 ± 38 vs 68 ± 38 days, p = 0.05) and, even if non statistically significant, major rate of neonatal mortality (11,5% vs 19%, p = 1.00) and of neonatal complications (need of neonatal intensive care unit, sepsis, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, retinopathy of prematurity, mechanical ventilation). Postnatal follow-up showed comparable outcomes at 24 months of correct age.

Conclusions

Educational and interdisciplinary meetings, along with group performance audit and standardization of procedures are successful strategies to implement guidelines application. Applying this strategy, we developed a protocol according to international guidelines for the treatment of early onset p-PROM based on a standardized conservative management at home, achieving better results compared to hospital management in terms of latency, gestational age at delivery, neonatal weight and neonatal hospitalization.

The Management of Pregnancy Complicated with the Previable Preterm and Preterm Premature Rupture of the Membranes: What about a Limit of Neonatal Viability?-A Review

Preterm premature rupture of the membranes (PPROM) at the limit of viability is associated with low neonatal survival rates and a high rate of neonatal complications in survivors. It carries a major risk of maternal morbidity and mortality. The limit of viability can be defined as the earliest stage of fetal maturity when a fetus has a reasonable chance, although not a high likelihood, for extra-uterine survival. The study reviews available data on preventing preterm delivery caused by the previable PPROM, pregnancy latency, therapeutic options including the use of antibiotics and steroids, neonatal outcomes, and future directions and opportunities.

Preterm Premature Rupture of Membranes – Inpatient Versus Outpatient Management: an Evidence-Based Review

According to current guidelines, inpatient management until birth is considered standard in pregnant women with preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM). With the increasing burden on obstetric departments and the growing importance of satisfaction and right to self-determination in pregnant women, outpatient management in PPROM is a possible alternative to inpatient monitoring. The most important criterion for this approach is to ensure the safety of both the mother and the child. Due to the small number of cases (n = 116), two randomised controlled trials (RCTs) comparing inpatient and outpatient management were unable to draw any conclusions. By 2020, eight retrospective comparative studies (cohort/observational studies) yielded the following outcomes: no significant differences in the rate of maternal complications (e.g., chorioamnionitis, premature placental abruption, umbilical cord prolapse) and in neonatal morbidity, significantly prolonged latency period with higher gestational age at birth, higher birth weight of neonates, and significantly shorter length of stay of preterm infants in neonatal intensive care, shorter hospital stay of pregnant women, and lower treatment costs with outpatient management. Concerns regarding this approach are mainly related to unpredictable complications with the need for rapid obstetric interventions, which cannot be performed in time in an outpatient setting. Prerequisites for outpatient management are the compliance of the expectant mother, the adherence to strict selection criteria and the assurance of adequate monitoring at home. Future research should aim at more accurate risk assessment of obstetric complications through studies with higher case numbers and standardisation of outpatient management under evidence-based criteria.

Home management by remote self-monitoring in intermediate- and high-risk pregnancies: A retrospective study of 400 consecutive women

INTRODUCTION

Home management in general is considered to improve patient well-being, patient involvement and cost-effectiveness, for obstetric patients as well. But concerns regarding inclusion of intermediate- and high-risk pregnant women are an issue and a limitation for clinical implementation. This retrospective study evaluated the outcome and safety of extended remote self-monitoring of maternal and fetal health in intermediate- and high-risk pregnancies.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study reports on 400 singleton pregnancies complicated by preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM), fetal growth restriction, preeclampsia, gestational diabetes mellitus, high-risk of preeclampsia, or a history of previous fetal or neonatal loss. Remote self-monitoring was performed by pregnant women and included C-reactive protein, non-stress test by cardiotocography, temperature, blood pressure, heart rate, and a questionnaire concerning maternal and fetal wellbeing. Data were transferred to the hospital using a mobile device platform and evaluated by healthcare professionals. In case of non-reassuring registrations, the pregnant women were invited for assessment at the hospital. Primary outcome was perinatal death. Secondary outcomes were other maternal and perinatal complications.

RESULTS

No severe maternal complications were observed. Nine fetal or neonatal deaths occurred, all secondary to malformations, severe fetal growth restriction, extreme prematurity or lung hypoplasia in cases of PPROM before 24 weeks. Even in the latter group, fetal and neonatal survival was 78% (18/23) and rose to 97% (60/62) when PPROM occurred after a gestational age 23+6 weeks. None of the fetal or neonatal deaths were attributable to the home-management setting.

CONCLUSIONS

Home-monitoring including remote self-monitoring of fetal and maternal well-being in intermediate- and high-risk pregnancies seems to be a safe alternative to inpatient or frequent outpatient care, which sets the stage for a new way of thinking of hospital care. The implementation process included staff training workshops and development of patient enrollment practice with clarification of expectations and responsibilities, which can be crucial to the results.

Risk factors associated with shortened latency before delivery in outpatients managed for preterm prelabor rupture of membranes

INTRODUCTION

Preterm prelabor rupture of membranes (PPROM) occurs in 3% of pregnancies and is the main cause (~30%) of premature delivery. Home care seems to be a safe alternative for the management of patients with PPROM, who have a longer latency than those with PPROM managed with conventional hospitalization. We aimed to identify the risk factors associated with a shortened latency before delivery in women with PPROM managed as outpatients.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The design was a retrospective cohort study and the setting was a Monocentric Tertiary centre (Lille University Hospital, France) from 2009 to 2018. All consecutive patients in home care after PPROM at 24-36 weeks were included. For the main outcome measure we calculated the latency ratio for each patient as the ratio of the real latency period to the expected latency period, expressed as a percentage. The risk factors influencing this latency ratio were evaluated.

RESULTS

A total of 234 patients were managed at home after PPROM. Mean latency was 35.5 ± 20.7 days, corresponding to an 80% latency ratio. In 196 (83.8%) patients the length of home care was more than 7 days. A lower latency ratio was significantly associated with oligohydramnios (p < 0.001), gestational age at PPROM (p = 0.006), leukocyte count at PPROM more than 12 × 10⁹ /L (p = 0.025), and C-reactive protein concentration more than 5 mg/L at 7 days after PPROM (p = 0.046). Cervical length was not associated with a lower latency ratio.

CONCLUSIONS

Women with PPROM managed with home care are stable. The main risk factor associated with a reduced latency is oligohydramnios. Outpatients with oligohydramnios should be informed of the probability of a shortened latency period.

Is homecare management associated with longer latency in preterm premature rupture of membranes?

PURPOSE

According to national guidelines, conventional management of preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM) is hospitalization until induction. Outpatient management could be another option. Our objective was to compare latency period between patients managed in hospital versus outpatients.

METHODS

A retrospective before/after monocentric study that occured from 2002 to 2015. Were included all patients with PPROM prior to 35 weeks with homecare inclusion criteria. The primary outcome measure was to study length of latency period (delay between PPROM and delivery). Second outcome measures were maternal and perinatal morbidities and mortalities.

RESULTS

Among the 395 women included after PPROM, 191 were managed as outpatients and 204 in hospital. In the outpatient group, the length of latency period was longer than in the inpatient group [39 (IQR 20 to 66) versus 21 (IQR 13 to 42) days; p < 0.001]. Clinical chorioamnionitis was observed in 30 (15.7%) in outpatient group versus 49 (24.0%) in inpatient group (p = 0.039). Concerning neonatal outcome, there were less neonatal transfer (49.2% versus 77.2%, p < 0.001), less respiratory distress syndrome (29.4% versus 47.5%; p < 0.001), less neonatal sepsis (13.9% versus 22.1%; p = 0.037), less bronchodysplasia (2.7% versus 9.8%; p = 0.004), and less pulmonary arterial hypertension (4.8% versus 10.3%; p = 0.040) in the outpatient group than in the inpatient group.

CONCLUSION

Home management seems to be a safe option to hospitalization in selected patients with PPROM. However, a randomized study would be required to approve those results.

[Management of preterm premature rupture of membranes (except for antibiotherapy): CNGOF preterm premature rupture of membranes guidelines]

OBJECTIVE

To review the different parts of therapeutic management of viable preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM), except the antibiotherapy and birth modalities.

METHODS

The Medline, Cochrane Library, and Google Scholar databases over a period from 1980 to September 2018 have been consulted.

RESULTS

When the diagnostic of viable PPROM is reached, the woman should be hospitalized and signs of intrauterine infection (IUI) should be sought (Professional consensus). If cervical assessment appears necessary, speculum, digital examination or cervical ultrasound may be performed (Professional consensus). It is recommended to limit cervical evaluation regardless of the method used (Professional consensus). Initial ultrasound is recommended to determine the fetal presentation, locate the placenta, estimate the fetal weight and the residual amniotic fluid volume (Professional consensus). Performing vaginal and urinary bacteriological sampling at admission is recommended before any antibiotic (Professional consensus). In the case of positive vaginal culture, an antibiogram is necessary since it can guide antibiotherapy in the case of IUI and early onset neonatal bacterial sepsis (Professional consensus). In absence of demonstrated neonatal benefit, there is insufficient evidence to recommend or to not recommend initial tocolysis in PPROM (Grade C). If tocolysis was administered, it is recommended not to prolong it for more than 48hours (Grade C). Antenatal corticosteroid administration is recommended before 34 weeks of gestation (WG) (Grade A) and magnesium sulfate administration is recommended for women at high risk of imminent preterm birth before 32 WG (Grade A). Vitamin supplementation (vitamins C and E) is not recommended (Professional consensus), and it is recommended not to impose strict bed rest in case of PPROM (Professional consensus). In case of clinical signs of IUI with cerclage, it is recommended to remove the cerclage immediately (Professional consensus). The home care management of clinically stable PPROM after 48hours of hospital observation can be considered (Professional consensus). During the monitoring of a PPROM, it is recommended to identify elements relating to the diagnosis of IUI (Professional consensus).

CONCLUSION

The level of evidence and scientific data in the literature concerning the management (except antibiotics) of PPROM are low. Initial management of viable PPROM requires hospitalization. The main objectives of the management are the detection and medical care of maternal and fetal complications.

Preterm premature rupture of membranes: Which criteria contraindicate home care management?

INTRODUCTION

Home care management offers a suitable alternative to hospitalization for management of preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM). Eligibility criteria have not been clearly established. Our aim was to determine predictive factors of complication during home care management of PPROM in order to define optimal eligibility criteria.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Retrospective cohort study of all women with singleton pregnancies with PPROM managed as outpatients between 2009 and 2015. Complications were defined as the occurrence of one of these events: fetal death, placental abruption, umbilical cord prolapse, delivery outside maternity hospital, neonatal death.

RESULTS

In all, 187 women with PPROMs were managed as outpatients, of whom 12 had a complication (6.4%). In the "complication" group, gestational age at diagnosis (P = 0.006) and at delivery (P < 0.001) were lower, with no difference in latency between these two events. Three criteria significantly increased the risk for a severe complication: PPROM occurring before 26 weeks (P = 0.008), non-cephalic fetal presentation (P = 0.02) and oligoamnios (P = 0.02). When unfavorable criteria were associated with PPROM, the risk was increased (1 criterion, odds ratio [OR] 1.6; 2 criteria, OR 6.9 and 3 criteria, OR 32.8).

CONCLUSIONS

Combination of these three criteria is an indication for conventional hospitalization to limit maternal and fetal morbidity. When two criteria are combined, home care should be discussed for each case. If only one unfavorable criteria is present, outpatient management is suitable. To validate these results, a prospective randomized study should be conducted.