McDonald versus Shirodkar cervical cerclage for the prevention of preterm birth: impact of body mass index

Effect of different surgical routes on pregnancy outcome of history-indicated cervical cerclage

OBJECTIVE

To study the guiding significance of medical history on laparoscopic and vaginal cervical cerclage in the treatment of cervical incompetence and its influence on pregnancy outcome.

METHODS

A total of 53 cases by laparoscopic abdominal cervical cerclage (LAC group) before pregnancy and 73 cases by transvaginal cervix cerclage (TVC group) at 12-14 weeks of pregnancy were collected. Multivariate logistic regression analysis was performed on the influencing factors of delivery gestational weeks. Furthermore, the gestational weeks after cervical cerclage were compared between the two groups with high- and low-risk grades.

RESULTS

The number of previous uterine cavity operations in LAC group was more than that TVC group, and the costs of operation were more than TVC group. At the same time, the hospitalization days and operation time were longer than those in TVC group, and the delivery rate of cesarean section was higher than TVC group, but the total hospitalization times were less than TVC group (P < 0.05). The rate of delivery before 34 weeks of pregnancy and the incidence of premature rupture of membranes or premature labor in LAC group were lower than those in TVC group (P < 0.05). In TVC group, the increased number of prior PTB or STL and the history of cervical cerclage failure would increase the risk of premature delivery before 34 weeks of pregnancy. There was no increased risk of preterm delivery before 34 weeks of pregnancy in LAC group (P > 0.05). According to the risk level, in the high-risk group, the delivery rate of LAC group at gestational weeks < 37 weeks, < 34 weeks and < 28 weeks was lower than that of TVC group.

CONCLUSION

Laparoscopic cervical cerclage might be more effective in preventing premature delivery before 34 weeks of gestation, and its influence on delivery gestational weeks was not affected by related medical history. For high-risk patients with the history of prior PTB or STL and failed cerclage, laparoscopic cervical cerclage might be more effective than vaginal cervical cerclage in preventing extremely preterm before 28 weeks, premature delivery before 34 weeks and premature delivery before 37 weeks. Therefore, our limited experience suggested that LAC can be a recommended option for patients with high-risk history.

Comparison of two emergency cervical cerclage techniques in twin pregnancies: A retrospective cohort study matched with cervical dilation

OBJECTIVES

This retrospective cohort study aimed to assess the efficacy of emergency cervical cerclage (ECC) performed with the combined McDonald-Shirodkar technique in twin pregnancies between 18 and 26 weeks of pregnancy with painless cervical dilation 1 to 6 cm.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study matched with the degree of cervical dilation was conducted. The study group (case group) included women with twin pregnancies undergoing combined McDonald-Shirodkar approach with cervical dilation ≥1 cm between 18 to 26 weeks of gestation at four institutions, from December 2015 to December 2022. To minimize confounding factors, we elucidated the causality structure using a directed acyclic graph and performed 1:1 case-control matching. A control group underwent the McDonald approach. The primary outcome was gestational age (GA) at delivery. The secondary outcomes were pregnancy latency; the rates of spontaneous preterm birth at <28, <30, <32, and <34 weeks; and neonatal outcomes. Additional subanalysis was performed by dividing the patients into two subgroups of women with cervical dilation ≥3 cm and <3 cm.

RESULTS

A total of 84 twin pregnancies were managed with either the combined McDonald-Shirodkar approach (case group: n = 42) or the McDonald approach (control group: n = 42). Demographic characteristics were not significantly different in the two groups (P > 0.05). After adjusting for confounders that were represented by a directed acyclic graph, median GA at delivery was significantly higher (30.5 vs 27 weeks; Bate: 3.40 [95% confidence interval (CI), 2.13-4.67], P < 0.001) and median pregnancy latency was significantly longer (56 vs 28 days; Bate: 24.04 [95% CI, 13.31-34.78], P < 0.001) in the case group compared with the control group. Rates of spontaneous preterm birth at <28, <30, <32, and <34 weeks were significantly lower in the case group than in the control group. For neonatal outcomes, there was higher birth weight (1543.75 vs 980 g; Bate: 420.08 [95% CI, 192.18-647.98], P < 0.001) and significantly lower overall perinatal mortality (7.1% vs 31%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.16 [95% CI, 0.04-0.70], P = 0.014) in the case group compared with the control group. When cervical dilation was ≥3 cm, the combined McDonald-Shirodkar procedure can significantly reduce perinatal mortality (8.3% vs 46.7%; adjusted odds ratio, 0.09 [95% CI, 0.01-0.77], P = 0.028), significantly decrease the risk of delivery at <28 and <30 weeks, and prolong GA at delivery and pregnancy latency compared with the McDonald procedure.

CONCLUSIONS

ECC performed with the combined McDonald-Shirodkar procedure in women with twin pregnancies who have cervical dilation 1 to 6 cm in midtrimester pregnancy may reduce the rate of spontaneous preterm birth and improve perinatal and neonatal outcomes compared with the McDonald procedure, especially for twin pregnancies in women with cervical dilation of 3 to 6 cm and prolapsed membranes.

Impact of maternal obesity on preterm delivery in patients with cervical cerclage

BACKGROUND

Maternal obesity has risen in the United States in recent decades.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to evaluate the impact of maternal obesity on the risk for spontaneous preterm delivery and the risk for overall preterm delivery among patients with cervical cerclage placement.

STUDY DESIGN

This was a retrospective study in which data from the California Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development linked birth file from 2007 to 2012 were used, yielding a total of 3654 patients with and 2,804,671 patients without cervical cerclage placement. Exclusion criteria included patients with missing information on body mass index, multiple gestation, anomalous pregnancies, and gestations <20 weeks or >42 weeks. Patients in each group were identified and were further categorized based on body mass index with the nonobese group defined as having a body mass index of <30 kg/m², the obese group defined as having a body mass index of 30 to 40 kg/m², and the morbidly obese group defined as having a body mass index >40 kg/m². The risks for overall and spontaneous preterm delivery were compared between patients without obesity and those with obesity or those with morbid obesity patients. The analysis was stratified by cerclage placement.

RESULTS

Among patients who underwent cerclage placement, the risk for spontaneous preterm delivery was not significantly different in the obese and morbidly obese group when compared with the nonobese group (24.2% vs 20.6%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.18; 95% confidence interval, 0.97-1.43; and 24.5% vs 20.6%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.12; 0.78-1.62, respectively). However, among patients without cerclage placement, the obese and morbidly obese groups had a higher risk for spontaneous preterm delivery than the nonobese group (5.1% vs 4.4%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.04; 1.02-1.05; and 5.9% vs 4.4%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.03; 1.00-1.07, respectively). The risks for overall preterm delivery at <37 weeks' gestation were higher for the obese and morbidly obese groups than for the nonobese group among patients with cerclage (33.7% vs 28.2%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.23; 1.03-1.46; and 32.1% vs 28.2%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.01; 0.72-1.43, respectively). Similarly, among patients without cerclage placement, the risks for preterm delivery at <37 weeks' gestation were higher for the obese and morbidly obese groups than for the nonobese group (7.9% vs 6.8%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.05; 1.04-1.06; and 9.3% vs 6.8%; adjusted odds ratio, 1.10; 1.08-1.13, respectively).

CONCLUSION

Among patients who received a cervical cerclage for the prevention of preterm birth, obesity was not associated with an increased risk for spontaneous preterm delivery. However, it was associated with an overall increased risk for preterm delivery.

Comparison of pregnancy outcomes of triangular 3-bites and mcdonald techniques of cervical cerclage in women with cervical insufficiency: A pilot study

Background

Cervical cerclage is the procedure of choice for preventing preterm birth due to cervical insufficiency. Despite the simplicity of the McDonald's method of cerclage application, it is still technically difficult to take four bites around the cervix before knotting. There is a need to develop a simpler method of cervical cerclage application with similar or improved pregnancy outcomes.

Aim

This is to compare the ease/duration of application and pregnancy outcomes of the new triangular three-bite cervical cerclage technique and McDonald's technique in women with cervical insufficiency.

Patients and Methods

This is a pilot study with 20 participants that met the inclusion criteria. They were randomly grouped into triangular three-bite method (n = 10) and McDonald's method (n = 10). The pregnancy outcomes were compared between the groups with the Chi-square test and student's t-test. A P value of <.05 was set as level of significance.

Results

The sociodemographic characteristics of the two groups were similar. There was no statistically significant difference between the two groups regarding the pregnancy outcome (spontaneous miscarriage P = 1.00, preterm delivery P = 0.61, and neonatal birthweight P = 0.96). However, the duration of cerclage application (5.98 ± 1.79 minutes vs. 14.25 ± 7.5 minutes; P <.002) and estimated blood loss (29 ± 9.94 mls vs. 48.5 ± 25.82 mls; P = .04) were significantly lower in the triangular three-bite arm than in the McDonald's arm.

Conclusion

The new triangular three-bite technique has similar pregnancy outcomes with the conventional McDonald's technique and has shown a lower duration of procedure and blood loss. Since this is a pilot study, a well-structured randomized control trial to compare the two methods is recommended.

McDonald versus Shirodkar cerclage technique in the prevention of preterm birth: A systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

Cervical cerclage has been used for decades to reduce preterm birth. The Shirodkar and McDonald cerclage are the most commonly used techniques with no current consensus on the preferred technique.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the efficacy of the Shirodkar and McDonald cerclage techniques in preventing preterm birth.

SEARCH STRATEGY

Studies were sourced from six electronic databases and reference lists.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Studies including women with a singleton pregnancy, requiring a cervical cerclage, using either the Shirodkar or McDonald technique that ran comparative analyses between the two techniques.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The primary outcome was preterm birth before 37 weeks, with analyses at 28, 32, 34 and 35 weeks. Secondary data were also collected on neonatal, maternal and obstetric outcomes.

MAIN RESULTS

Seventeen papers were included: 16 were retrospective cohort studies and one was a randomised controlled trial. The Shirodkar technique was significantly less likely to result in preterm birth before 37 weeks than the McDonald technique (relative risk [RR] 0.91, 95% CI 0.85-0.98). This finding was supported by a statistically significant reduction in rates of preterm birth before 35, 34 and 32 weeks, PPROM, difference in cervical length, cerclage to delivery interval, and an increase in birthweight in the Shirodkar group. No difference was seen in preterm birth rates <28 weeks, neonatal mortality, chorioamnionitis, cervical laceration or caesarean section rates. The RR for preterm birth prior to 37 weeks was no longer significant when sensitivity analyses were performed removing studies with a serious risk of bias. However, similar analyses removing studies that utilised adjunctive progesterone strengthened the primary outcome (RR 0.83, 95% CI 0.74-0.93).

CONCLUSION

Shirodkar cerclage reduces the rate of preterm birth prior to 35, 34 and 32 weeks' gestation when compared with McDonald cerclage; however, the overall quality of the studies in this review is low. Further, large, well-designed randomised controlled trials are required to address this important question to optimise care for women who may benefit from cervical cerclage.

Cervical Cerclage: A Review and Rethinking of Current Practice

Importance

Cervical insufficiency (CI) is a serious complication of pregnancy, which can cause preterm birth. Identifying how to most effectively treat CI has the potential to maximize neonatal survival in this population of women.

Objective

To determine whether transabdominal cervical cerclage should be offered as a first-line treatment option in high-risk women.

Evidence Acquisition

An electronic literature search for relevant studies was conducted using keywords (CI, cervical cerclage) on the MEDLINE database.

Results

Although transabdominal cerclage (TAC) is reserved as a second-line treatment option over transvaginal cerclage (TVC), it has some advantages over TVC: a higher placement of the suture at the level of the cervicoisthmic junction; avoidance of placement of foreign material in the vagina, in turn, reducing risk of infection and inflammation, which can propagate preterm labor; and the option to leave the suture in place for future pregnancies. Systematic review evidence offers TAC as a more effective procedure to TVC in reducing preterm birth and maximizing neonatal survival. Although TAC is a slightly more complex procedure compared with TVC, advances in minimally invasive surgery now allow gynecologists to perform this more effective procedure laparoscopically and therefore without the added morbidity of open surgery but with the same if not better outcomes.

Conclusions

Laparoscopic TAC can provide a more effective treatment option for CI without the added burdens of open abdominal surgery.

Relevance

Our article highlights future directions for study in the area of cervical cerclage and refinement of existing practices.

Body mass index and adverse outcomes among singletons with cerclage

OBJECTIVE

To compare the neonatal and maternal adverse outcomes among women with cerclage and prepregnancy body mass index (BMI) < versus > 30 kg/m² STUDY DESIGN: This retrospective cohort study utilized the U.S. Vital Statistics Datasets from 2011-2013. Inclusion criteria were women with non-anomalous singletons, with cerclage placement, without diabetes or hypertensive disorders, and who delivered at 20-41 weeks. The primary outcome was the composite neonatal adverse outcome (Apgar score below 5 at 5 min, birth injury, assisted ventilation for more than 6 h, neonatal seizure, or neonatal death). The secondary outcomes included the composite maternal adverse outcome (admission to intensive care unit, maternal transfusion, ruptured uterus, unplanned hysterectomy, or unplanned operating room procedure), chorioamnionitis, and cesarean delivery. Multivariable Poisson regression models with robust error variance were used, while adjusting for confounders. Adjusted relative risk with 95 % confidence intervals were calculated.

RESULTS

Of the 22,466 live births that met the inclusion criteria during the study period, 6427 (28.6 %) had cerclage and prepregnancy BMI ≥ 30 kg/m². The composite neonatal adverse outcome was significantly increased (aRR 1.45; 95 % CI 1.33-1.60) among women with cerclage and BMI ≥ 30 kg/m² when compared to those with BMI < 30 kg/m². The composite maternal adverse outcome was similar (aRR 0.93; 95 % CI 0.72-1.20) among the two groups. Chorioamnionitis (aRR 1.46; 95 % CI 1.24-1.72) and cesarean delivery (aRR 1.24; 95 % CI 1.19-1.29) were higher in women with cerclage and BMI ≥ 30 kg/m².

CONCLUSION

Among pregnancies with cerclage and delivery at 20-41 weeks, the risk of the composite neonatal adverse outcome was modestly increased in newborns delivered by women with BMI ≥ 30 kg/m² than those delivered by women with BMI < 30 kg/m². No significant difference was found in the risk of the composite maternal adverse outcome.

McDonald versus Shirodkar cervical cerclage for prevention of preterm birth: a systematic review and meta-analysis of pregnancy outcomes

OBJECTIVE

To compare pregnancy outcomes of patients undergoing either McDonald or Shirodkar cervical cerclage.

METHODS

PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and Google scholar were systematically searched up to June 2020. Inter-study heterogeneity was assessed using Cochrane's Q test and the I² statistic. Data were pooled using the fixed- or random-effects model and expressed as relative risk (RR) or weighted mean difference (WMD) as appropriately.

RESULTS

A total of eight observational studies, reporting data on 724 pregnancies, were included in this meta-analysis. As compared to the Shirodkar cerclage, the pooled findings showed that the gestational age at delivery (WMD = -1.95, 95% CI: -2.89 to -1.01, p < .001; I² = 57.5%) and birth weight (WMD = -355.69, 95% CI: -413.76 to -297.62, p < .001; I² = 28.8%) were significantly lower in McDonald cerclage. The risk of preterm premature rupture of the membranes (PPROM) (RR = 1.76; 95% CI: 1.14 - 2.71; I² = 0.0%) and neonatal intensive care unit (NICU) admission (RR = 1.61; 95% CI: 1.09 - 2.39; I² = 62.1%) were also higher for McDonald group. However, no significant difference was observed between both groups in terms of cesarean delivery and perinatal/neonatal death.

CONCLUSION

McDonald cerclage is associated with a shorter duration of pregnancy, lower mean birth weight and increased risk of PPROM and NICU admission compared to the Shirodkar procedure.

Shirodkar cerclage: Obstetrical and neonatal outcomes in a single-center cohort of 55 cases

BACKGROUND

Cervical insufficiency is thought to be responsible for 10% of preterm deliveries. Shirodkar cerclage is among the available techniques ranging from McDonald's to definitive procedures, however the indications for the prevention of preterm births and mid-trimester miscarriages are still poorly delineated.

OBJECTIVE

To describe the characteristics, obstetrical and neonatal outcomes of pregnancies with Shirodkar cerclage procedures.

METHOD

We performed a descriptive retrospective single-center study, including all patients who had a Shirodkar cerclage between January 1, 2008 and December 31, 2020. The main outcomes measured were delivery at or beyond 24 and 32 weeks of gestations (WG).

RESULTS

55 Shirodkar cerclages were performed over the period studied. 7.3% of patients had a uterine malformation, 9% had a history of cervical conization. 74.5% had history of one or more mid-trimester miscarriages. 63.6% had a history of a failed emergency or prophylactic cerclage. The median gestational age (GA) at cerclage placement was 14 WG. There were 4 deliveries before 24 WG, 8 before 32 WG and 16 before 37 WG. Overall neonatal survival was 48/53 (90.6%). The median GA at delivery was 38 weeks (IQR 35-39), with 70.3% of vaginal deliveries.

CONCLUSION

Shirodkar cerclage was successful in more than 90% of patients, despite their obstetric history. Shirodkar cerclage may be indicated in the event of prior cerclage failure using the McDonald technique or in order to allow for correct stitch placement in very short cervixes. Its advantage over definitive cerclage is to allow for vaginal delivery.

Severe maternal morbidity associated with cerclage use in pregnancy

OBJECTIVE

To quantify the frequency of serious maternal complications associated with cerclage use during pregnancy.

STUDY DESIGN

We performed a retrospective population-based cohort study of all live births in Ohio from 2006 to 2015. Maternal sociodemographic, medical, and obstetric characteristics were compared for births in which cerclage was utilized during the pregnancy versus those without cerclage. The primary outcome for the study was a composite of adverse outcome including maternal intensive care unit (ICU) admission, blood product transfusion, uterine rupture and unplanned hysterectomy in all births. Secondary outcomes included each of the individual adverse outcomes as well as maternal hospital transfer to a tertiary facility, unplanned operation after delivery and chorioamnionitis. Each outcome was also analyzed separately in singleton and twin births. Generalized linear modeling was used to estimate the relative risk of adverse maternal outcomes associated with cerclage placement after adjustment for coexisting risk factors.

RESULTS

Of the 1,428,655 singleton and twin live births in Ohio from 2006 to 2015, 4595 [0.3%] were recorded on the birth certificate as having cerclage during pregnancy. Of those, 11.7% experienced a serious adverse maternal outcome, compared to 3.7% without cerclage, adjRR 2.7 [95% CI 2.5, 3.0]. The rate of the composite maternal adverse outcome was significantly increased for pregnancies with cerclage versus those without overall, and in singleton and twin pregnancies when measured individually [all p ≤ .001]. Even after adjustment for coexisting risk factors, cerclage remained significantly associated with composite adverse outcome in each of these groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Over 1 in 10 women with cerclage experience an adverse maternal outcome. Even after adjusting for gestational age at delivery and other risk factors, maternal risk for serious adverse event remains over twofold increased for pregnancies with cerclage. This information may be helpful in counseling women regarding potential maternal risk when considering neonatal benefit of cerclage in pregnancies at high risk of preterm birth.

Prevention of preterm delivery by cervical cerclage; a comparison of prophylactic and emergency procedures

Objective:

Prophylactic or emergency type cervical cerclage procedures are being used for treatment of cervical insufficiency. The aim was to review and compare the outcomes of these cerclage types and identify factors affecting outcomes.

Material and Methods:

Retrospective review of seventy-five patients in whom transvaginal cervical cerclage procedures were performed over a seven-year period in a tertiary referral center.

Results:

Twenty seven of 75 (36%) patients were in the emergency cerclage group and 48 (64%) of them were in the prophylactic group. Mean body mass index (BMI), hospitalization time and gestational week at cerclage were significantly higher, whereas latency period was significantly shorter for the emergency group. Mean gestational ages at delivery were 35.6±4.5 and 33.6±5.9 weeks in the prophylactic and emergency groups, respectively (p=0.117). Delivery rates under 34^th gestational week were 20.8% and 37.0% in the prophylactic and emergency groups, respectively (p=0.175). Birthweight, and delivery ≥34^th gestational week was higher in the prophylactic group, whereas complication rate was higher in the emergency group, but these differences were not significant. High BMI was associated with more deliveries before 34-week in the prophylactic group. Pre-cerclage cervical length was shorter in patients who delivered before 34 gestational weeks at delivery.

Conclusion:

Prophylactic and emergency cerclage procedures have comparable results regarding gestational week at delivery. High BMI and low pre-cerclage cervical length may have adverse effects on success of cerclage procedures.