1
|
Is There an Added Neonatal Risk in Vacuum-Assisted Deliveries with Nuchal Cord? J Clin Med 2022; 11:jcm11236970. [PMID: 36498545 PMCID: PMC9739457 DOI: 10.3390/jcm11236970] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2022] [Revised: 11/16/2022] [Accepted: 11/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
This retrospective cohort study assessed the association between nuchal cord and adverse outcomes during vacuum-assisted delivery (VAD). Women with singleton pregnancies, 34−41-weeks gestation, who underwent VAD, from 2014 to 2020 were included. The primary outcome was umbilical cord pH ≤ 7.1. Secondary outcomes were neonatal intensive care unit admission, Apgar scores, pH < 7.15, subgaleal hematoma, shoulder dystocia and third/fourth-degree perineal tear. Outcomes were compared between neonates with (1059/3754, 28.2%) or without (71.8%) nuchal cord after VAD. No difference in cord pH ≤ 7.1 was found between groups. The nuchal cord group had a lower rate of nulliparity (729 (68.8%) vs. 2004 (74.4%), p = 0.001) and higher maternal BMI (23.6 ± 4.3 vs. 23.1 ± 5, p = 0.017). Nuchal cord was associated with higher rates of induction (207 (19.5%) vs. 431 (16%), p = 0.009) and lower birthweights (3185 ± 413 vs. 3223 ± 436 g, p = 0.013). The main indication for VAD in 830 (80.7%) of the nuchal cord group was non-reassuring fetal heart rate (NRFHR) vs. 1989 (75.6%) controls (p = 0.004). The second stage was shorter in the nuchal cord group (128 ± 81 vs. 141 ± 80 min, p < 0.001). Multivariate regression found nulliparity, induction and birthweight as independent risk factors for nuchal cord VAD. Although induction and NRFHR rates were higher in VAD with nuchal cord, the rate of umbilical cord acidemia was not.
Collapse
|
2
|
Bohîlțea RE, Dima V, Ducu I, Iordache AM, Mihai BM, Munteanu O, Grigoriu C, Veduță A, Pelinescu-Onciul D, Vlădăreanu R. Clinically Relevant Prenatal Ultrasound Diagnosis of Umbilical Cord Pathology. Diagnostics (Basel) 2022; 12:diagnostics12020236. [PMID: 35204327 PMCID: PMC8871173 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics12020236] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/10/2021] [Revised: 01/04/2022] [Accepted: 01/17/2022] [Indexed: 12/10/2022] Open
Abstract
Umbilical cord abnormalities are not rare, and are often associated with structural or chromosomal abnormalities, fetal intrauterine growth restriction, and poor pregnancy outcomes; the latter can be a result of prematurity, placentation deficiency or, implicitly, an increased index of cesarean delivery due to the presence of fetal distress, higher admission to neonatal intensive care, and increased prenatal mortality rates. Even if the incidence of velamentous insertion, vasa praevia and umbilical knots is low, these pathologies increase the fetal morbidity and mortality prenatally and intrapartum. There is a vast heterogeneity among societies’ guidelines regarding the umbilical cord examination. We consider the mandatory introduction of placental cord insertion examination in the first and second trimester to practice guidelines for fetal ultrasound scans. Moreover, during the mid-trimester scan, we recommend a transvaginal ultrasound and color Doppler assessment of the internal cervical os for low-lying placentas, marginal or velamentous cord insertion, and the evaluation of umbilical cord entanglement between the insertion sites whenever it is incidentally found. Based on the pathological description and the neonatal outcome reported for each entity, we conclude our descriptive review by establishing a new, clinically relevant classification of these umbilical cord anomalies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roxana Elena Bohîlțea
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest, 37 Dionisie Lupu, 020021 Bucharest, Romania; (D.P.-O.); (R.V.)
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Neonatology, Filantropia Hospital, 11–13 Ion Mihalache Blv., Sector 1, 011171 Bucharest, Romania; (B.M.M.); (A.V.)
- Correspondence: (R.E.B.); (V.D.); (A.M.I.); (C.G.)
| | - Vlad Dima
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Neonatology, Filantropia Hospital, 11–13 Ion Mihalache Blv., Sector 1, 011171 Bucharest, Romania; (B.M.M.); (A.V.)
- Correspondence: (R.E.B.); (V.D.); (A.M.I.); (C.G.)
| | - Ioniță Ducu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Emergency Hospital, 169 Splaiul Independentei Bld., Sector 5, 050098 Bucharest, Romania;
| | - Ana Maria Iordache
- Optospintronics Department, National Institute for Research and Development in Optoelectronics-INOE 2000, 409 Atomistilor, 077125 Magurele, Romania
- Correspondence: (R.E.B.); (V.D.); (A.M.I.); (C.G.)
| | - Bianca Margareta Mihai
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Neonatology, Filantropia Hospital, 11–13 Ion Mihalache Blv., Sector 1, 011171 Bucharest, Romania; (B.M.M.); (A.V.)
| | - Octavian Munteanu
- Department of Anatomy, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest, 37 Dionisie Lupu, 020021 Bucharest, Romania;
| | - Corina Grigoriu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest, 37 Dionisie Lupu, 020021 Bucharest, Romania; (D.P.-O.); (R.V.)
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Emergency Hospital, 169 Splaiul Independentei Bld., Sector 5, 050098 Bucharest, Romania;
- Correspondence: (R.E.B.); (V.D.); (A.M.I.); (C.G.)
| | - Alina Veduță
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Neonatology, Filantropia Hospital, 11–13 Ion Mihalache Blv., Sector 1, 011171 Bucharest, Romania; (B.M.M.); (A.V.)
| | - Dimitrie Pelinescu-Onciul
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest, 37 Dionisie Lupu, 020021 Bucharest, Romania; (D.P.-O.); (R.V.)
| | - Radu Vlădăreanu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, “Carol Davila” University of Medicine and Pharmacy Bucharest, 37 Dionisie Lupu, 020021 Bucharest, Romania; (D.P.-O.); (R.V.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Sherer DM, Roach C, Soyemi S, Dalloul M. Current Perspectives of Prenatal Sonographic Diagnosis and Clinical Management Challenges of Complex Umbilical Cord Entanglement. Int J Womens Health 2021; 13:247-256. [PMID: 33658863 PMCID: PMC7917470 DOI: 10.2147/ijwh.s285860] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2020] [Accepted: 01/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
Diagnosis of potential umbilical cord compromise, namely, true knots of the umbilical cord and nuchal cords has been enabled with increasing accuracy with current enhanced prenatal sonography. Often an incidental finding at delivery, the incidence of true knots of the umbilical cord has been estimated at between 0.04% and 3% of deliveries. This condition has been reported to account for a 4 to 10-fold increase of stillbirth and perinatal morbidity of 11% of cases. Nuchal cords, commonly observed at the delivery of uncompromised, non-hypoxic non-acidotic newborns occur more frequently with single nuchal cords noted in between 20% and 35% of all deliveries at term. Multiple nuchal cords are considerably less frequent, with decreasing frequencies inverse to the number of nuchal cord loops. While clearly single (and likely double) nuchal cords are almost uniformly associated with favorable neonatal outcomes, emerging data suggest that cases of ≥3 loops of nuchal cords are more likely to be associated with an increased risk of adverse perinatal outcome (either stillbirth or compromised neonatal condition at delivery). We define cases of a true knot of the umbilical cord, cases of ≥3 loops of nuchal cords, any combination of a true knot and nuchal cord, or any umbilical cord entanglement (nuchal or true knot) in the presence of a single umbilical artery, in singleton gestations as complex umbilical cord entanglement. Two concurrent developments, the increase in accuracy of prenatal sonographic diagnosis of complex umbilical cord entanglement and recent data confirming fatal compromise of the umbilical circulation in approximately 20% of cases of stillbirth, suggest that establishing governing body guidelines for reporting of potential umbilical cord compromise, and recommendation of consideration for early-term delivery of select cases, may be warranted. This commentary will address current perspectives of prenatal diagnosis and clinical management challenges of complex umbilical cord entanglement.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David M Sherer
- The Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, The Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, State University of New York (SUNY), Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Crystal Roach
- The Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, The Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, State University of New York (SUNY), Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Sarin Soyemi
- The Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, The Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, State University of New York (SUNY), Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Mudar Dalloul
- The Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, The Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, State University of New York (SUNY), Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Coblentz AC, Teixeira SR, Mirsky DM, Johnson AM, Feygin T, Victoria T. How to read a fetal magnetic resonance image 101. Pediatr Radiol 2020; 50:1810-1829. [PMID: 33252751 DOI: 10.1007/s00247-020-04768-0] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/21/2020] [Revised: 05/22/2020] [Accepted: 07/01/2020] [Indexed: 12/18/2022]
Abstract
Accurate antenatal diagnosis is essential for planning appropriate pregnancy management and improving perinatal outcomes. The provision of information vital for prognostication is a crucial component of prenatal imaging, and this can be enhanced by the use of fetal MRI. Image acquisition, interpretation and reporting of a fetal MR study can be daunting to the individual who has encountered few or none of these examinations. This article provides the radiology trainee with a general approach to interpreting a fetal MRI. The authors review the added value of prenatal MRI in the overall assessment of fetal wellbeing, discuss MRI protocols and techniques, and review the normal appearance of maternal and fetal anatomy. The paper concludes with a sample template for structured reporting, to serve as a checklist and guideline for reporting radiologists.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ailish C Coblentz
- Radiology Department, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 34th Street and Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA, 10104, USA
| | - Sara R Teixeira
- Radiology Department, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 34th Street and Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA, 10104, USA
| | - David M Mirsky
- Neuroradiology Department, Children's Hospital of Colorado, Aurora, CO, USA
| | - Ann M Johnson
- Radiology Department, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 34th Street and Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA, 10104, USA
| | - Tamara Feygin
- Radiology Department, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 34th Street and Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA, 10104, USA
| | - Teresa Victoria
- Radiology Department, The Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, 34th Street and Civic Center Boulevard, Philadelphia, PA, 10104, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Sherer DM, Ward K, Bennett M, Dalloul M. Current Perspectives of Prenatal Sonographic Diagnosis and Clinical Management Challenges of Nuchal Cord(s). Int J Womens Health 2020; 12:613-631. [PMID: 32982473 PMCID: PMC7500175 DOI: 10.2147/ijwh.s211124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/15/2020] [Accepted: 07/17/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Umbilical cord accidents preceding labor are uncommon. In contrast, nuchal cords are a very common finding at delivery, with reported incidences of a single nuchal cord of approximately between 20% and 35% of all singleton deliveries at term. Multiple loops occur less frequently, with reported incidence rates inverse to the number of nuchal cords involved. Rare cases of up to 10 loops of nuchal cord have been reported. While true knots of the umbilical cord have been associated with a 4–10-fold increased risk of stillbirth, nuchal cord(s) are most often noted at delivery of non-hypoxic non-acidotic newborns, without any evidence of subsequent adverse neonatal outcome. Prior to ultrasound, nuchal cords were suspected clinically following subtle (spontaneous or evoked) electronic fetal heart rate changes. Prenatal sonographic diagnosis, initially limited to real-time gray-scale ultrasound, currently entails additional sonographic modalities, including color Doppler, power Doppler, and three-dimensional sonography, which have enabled increasingly more accurate prenatal sonographic diagnoses of nuchal cord(s). In contrast to true knots of the umbilical cord (which are often missed at sonography, reflecting the inability to visualize the entire umbilical cord, and hence are often incidental findings at delivery), nuchal cord(s), reflecting their well-defined and sonographically accessible anatomical location (the fetal neck), lend themselves with relative ease to prenatal sonographic diagnosis, with increasingly high sensitivity and specificity rates. While current literature supports that single (and possibly double) nuchal cords are not associated with increased adverse perinatal outcome, emerging literature suggests that cases of ≥3 loops of nuchal cords or in the presence of a coexisting true knot of the umbilicus may be associated with an increased risk of stillbirth or compromised neonatal status at delivery. This commentary will address current perspectives of prenatal sonographic diagnosis and clinical management challenges associated with nuchal cord(s) in singleton pregnancies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David M Sherer
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, State University of New York (SUNY), Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Kayana Ward
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, State University of New York (SUNY), Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Michelle Bennett
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, State University of New York (SUNY), Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| | - Mudar Dalloul
- Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, State University of New York (SUNY), Downstate Health Sciences University, Brooklyn, NY, USA
| |
Collapse
|