The yield of chromosomal microarray analysis among pregnancies terminated due to fetal malformations

The Role of Preprocedure Genetic Counseling in Pregnancies Interrupted for Fetal Abnormalities

OBJECTIVE

 Congenital birth defects affect 3 to 5% of pregnancies. Genetic counseling can help patients navigate the testing process and understand results. The study objective was to identify predictors and utility of genetic counseling at the time of pregnancy termination. Additionally, we aimed to see what proportion of patients would benefit from additional testing based on the results of the genetic testing.

STUDY DESIGN

 This was a retrospective cohort review of all terminations performed for fetal anomalies by an academic center from July 2016 to May 2020. Indications were stratified by abnormal serum screening or types of abnormal ultrasound findings. Data were abstracted regarding uptake of genetic counseling and testing results. Abnormal results that warranted additional testing regarding recurrence risks were noted. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to identify predictors of receipt of genetic counseling and testing.

RESULTS

 Of 387 patients, 57% (n = 220) received preprocedure genetic counseling and 43% (n = 167) did not. Among patients who received diagnostic testing, 62% (n = 194) had genetic counseling compared with 38% (n = 121) without counseling (adjusted odds ratio 2.46, 95% confidence interval [1.41-4.29], p < 0.001). Among the entire cohort, 38% (n = 148) had suspected aneuploidy based on serum screening. Of these, 89% (n = 132/148) had definitive testing, 92% (n = 122/132) confirming the aneuploidy. Among the other 68% (n = 239) with structural anomalies, 76% (n = 183) had diagnostic testing with 29% (n = 53) yielding an abnormal result. Among those fetuses with structural anomalies, 36% (n = 19/53) of genetic diagnoses warranted additional parental testing because of risk of recurrence compared with only 2% (n = 2/122) of patients with abnormal serum screening results alone.

CONCLUSION

 Genetic counseling was associated with increased uptake of diagnostic testing, which yielded useful information and prompted additional testing. This is important for determining etiology and recurrence risk and should be offered to patients presenting for termination for fetal indications, as well as providing diagnostic closure for patients.

KEY POINTS

· Genetic counseling increases the uptake of diagnostic testing in patients with fetal anomalies.. · Patients with ultrasound anomalies received less diagnostic testing despite actionable results 36% of the time.. · Genetic testing is invaluable for recurrence risk counseling even if patients chose to terminate..

Collaborative efforts to improve genetic testing in the neonatal intensive care unit

OBJECTIVE

To reduce unnecessary simultaneous karyotype analysis and chromosomal microarray (CMA) testing in the neonatal intensive care unit (NICU).

STUDY DESIGN

This quality improvement study investigated the effect of collaborative efforts between the NICU, cytogenetics, and clinical genetics on numbers of genetic tests, rates of abnormal tests, and number of genetics consults comparing baseline and 5-month intervention periods.

RESULTS

Simultaneous karyotype analyses and CMAs decreased due to a decrease in karyotype testing (11.3% [68/600] vs. 0.98% [6/614], p < 0.01). Karyotype analyses were more likely to be abnormal (13.8% [12/87] vs. 64.0% [16/25], p < 0.01). Frequency of genetics consultation did not change (7.0% [42/600] vs. 9.4% [58/614], p = 0.12).

CONCLUSION

Collaborative efforts between the NICU, cytogenetics, and clinical genetics decreased redundant genetic testing, which demonstrated potential cost savings to our institution. Ongoing collaborative efforts could facilitate genetic testing practices in the NICU that readily evolve in tandem with genetic testing recommendations.

Evaluation of chromosomal abnormalities and copy number variations in fetuses with ultrasonic soft markers

Background

Some ultrasonic soft markers can be found during ultrasound examination. However, the etiology of the fetuses with ultrasonic soft markers is still unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the genetic etiology and clinical value of chromosomal abnormalities and copy number variations (CNVs) in fetuses with ultrasonic soft markers.

Methods

Among 1131 fetuses, 729 had single ultrasonic soft marker, 322 had two ultrasonic soft markers, and 80 had three or more ultrasonic soft markers. All fetuses underwent conventional karyotyping, followed by single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) array analysis.

Results

Among 1131 fetuses with ultrasonic soft markers, 46 had chromosomal abnormalities. In addition to the 46 fetuses with chromosomal abnormalities consistent with the results of the karyotyping analysis, the SNP array identified additional 6.1% (69/1131) abnormal CNVs. The rate of abnormal CNVs in fetuses with ultrasonic soft marker, two ultrasonic soft markers, three or more ultrasonic soft markers were 6.2%, 6.2%, and 5.0%, respectively. No significant difference was found in the rate of abnormal CNVs among the groups.

Conclusions

Genetic abnormalities affect obstetrical outcomes. The SNP array can fully complement conventional karyotyping in fetuses with ultrasonic soft markers, improve detection rate of chromosomal abnormalities, and affect pregnancy outcomes.