Stopping caffeine in premature neonates: how long does it take for the level of caffeine to fall below the therapeutic range?

The timing of withdrawal from caffeine citrate in very preterm infants

OBJECTIVES

To study the clinical features and outcome of very preterm infants withdrawn from caffeine citrate at different time points.

METHODS

A retrospective analysis was performed on the medical data of the preterm infants with a gestational age of <32 weeks, who were hospitalized in the Division of Neonatology, the Second Xiangya Hospital of Central South University, from January 1, 2016 to November 30, 2020. According to the time of withdrawal from caffeine citrate, the infants who met the study criteria were divided into the group with withdrawal before the last week of hospitalization and the group with withdrawal within the last week of hospitalization. The two groups were compared in terms of clinical features, features of citric caffeine use, length of hospital stay and hospital costs, change in the intensity of respiratory support, and preterm complications.

RESULTS

A total of 403 preterm infants were enrolled, with 285 infants in the group with withdrawal before the last week of hospitalization and 118 infants in the group with withdrawal within the last week of hospitalization. There were no significant differences in clinical features between the two groups (P>0.05). Compared with the group with withdrawal before the last week of hospitalization, the group with withdrawal within the last week of hospitalization had a significantly longer duration of the use of caffeine citrate, a significantly shorter length of hospital stay, a significantly lower rate of increased intensity of respiratory support after withdrawal, and a significantly lower incidence rate of moderate or severe bronchopulmonary dysplasia (P<0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

A relatively long course of caffeine citrate treatment is more beneficial to the short-term clinical outcome of very preterm infants.

Are we over-treating hypoxic spells in preterm infants?

A frequent challenge in Neonatology is the high frequency of spontaneously occurring hypoxemic events, a majority of which are associated with apnea or hypoventilation. These episodes present a challenge for caregivers and families as they frequently delay discharge of preterm infants. Supplemental oxygen, respiratory support, and caffeine therapy are widely used as therapeutic approaches, but challenges remain regarding their precise indications. Future clinical practice should be directed by an evidence-based approach including automated supplemental oxygen, minimizing the use of medications for gastroesophageal reflux, optimal timing and dosage of caffeine therapy, and standardization of alarm limits and discharge monitoring protocols.

Immature control of breathing and apnea of prematurity: the known and unknown

This narrative review provides a broad perspective on immature control of breathing, which is universal in infants born premature. The degree of immaturity and severity of clinical symptoms are inversely correlated with gestational age. This immaturity presents as prolonged apneas with associated bradycardia or desaturation, or brief respiratory pauses, periodic breathing, and intermittent hypoxia. These manifestations are encompassed within the clinical diagnosis of apnea of prematurity, but there is no consensus on minimum criteria required for diagnosis. Common treatment strategies include caffeine and noninvasive respiratory support, but other therapies have also been advocated with varying effectiveness. There is considerable variability in when and how to initiate and discontinue treatment. There are significant knowledge gaps regarding effective strategies to quantify the severity of clinical manifestations of immature breathing, which prevent us from better understanding the long-term potential adverse outcomes, including neurodevelopment and sudden unexpected infant death.

When to start and stop caffeine and why respiratory status matters

Caffeine as tested in the CAP trial is safe and effective for preterm infants with birthweights less than 1250 g. Evidence for its use beyond the indications and timing used in this trial is of low quality and conflicting. Some studies suggest that earlier use of caffeine increases the risk of mortality while others suggest it has important benefits. It appears that infants with apnea of prematurity and those receiving assisted ventilation are the most likely to benefit from caffeine. Based on currently available evidence, routine early prescription of caffeine does not appear to be indicated. Infants continue to have potentially damaging episodes of hypoxia secondary to apnea beyond 34 weeks' postmenstrual age. It is unclear whether prolonged use of caffeine improves outcomes in these infants. Randomized trials to resolve these uncertainties are required. They need to be large, at least the size of the CAP trial, and include neurodevelopmental outcomes.