Introduction of standardized, cumulative quantitative measurement of blood loss into routine maternity care

Hemorrhage risk score and peripartum quantified blood loss

Background

Risk assessment tools are used by clinicians to predict which patients might have excessive bleeding. We studied the association between a peripartum hemorrhage risk assessment score using peripartum quantified blood loss (QBL) among those with vaginal deliveries who are often at lower risk for peripartum hemorrhage.

Methods

In this retrospective analysis of 1221 patients with term vaginal deliveries at a public New York City hospital, the Association of Women's Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses (AWOHNN) risk assessment tool was used to categorize patients as low risk, medium risk, or high risk for postpartum hemorrhage.

Results

Low-risk scores were present in 925 (75.8%) patients, medium-risk scores in 268 (21.9%) patients, and high-risk scores in 28 (2.3%) patients. Outcome variables consisted of QBL (M = 213.8, SD = 215.00 mL), QBL ≥ 500 mL (n = 89, 7.3%), and ratio of postdelivery hematocrit to predelivery hematocrit (M = 0.9, SD = 0.08). High-risk score (B = 0.14, SE = 0.07, P = 0.04) but not medium-risk score was significantly associated with increased QBL as compared to low-risk score. Body mass index (BMI) measured as a continuous variable was significantly associated with increased QBL (B = 0.004, SE = 0.002, P = 0.049). However, BMI measured as a categorical variable using the AWOHNN cutoff score of >35 was not significantly associated with QBL. AWOHNN score was not significantly associated with QBL ≥ 500 mL or with the ratio of postdelivery hematocrit with predelivery hematocrit.

Conclusion

We recommend revising the AWOHNN measure to better reflect medium risk and to consider a different approach for BMI use as part of the AWOHNN risk score.

Ability of an obstetric hemorrhage risk assessment tool to predict quantitative peripartum blood loss

OBJECTIVES

Hemorrhage risk assessment tools have been studied using estimated blood loss. We study the association between peripartum hemorrhage risk assessment score and peripartum quantified blood loss (QBL) in term vaginal and cesarean deliveries.

METHODS

This is a retrospective analysis conducted on 3,657 patients who underwent term vaginal and cesarean deliveries at a public hospital in New York City. Utilizing the risk assessment tool developed by the Association of Women's Health, Obstetric and Neonatal Nurses (AWHONN), patients were categorized into low-, medium-, or high-risk groups for postpartum hemorrhage.

RESULTS

Medium-risk (B=0.08, SE=0.01, p<0.001) and high-risk (B=0.12, SE=0.02, p<0.001) AWHONN scores were associated with significantly higher QBL as compared to low-risk AWHONN score. Medium-risk approached significance (OR: 1.67, 95 % CI: 1.00, 2.79, p=0.050) and high-risk AWHONN score was significantly associated (OR: 1.95, 95 % CI: 1.09, 3.48, p=0.02) with increased odds for postpartum hemorrhage (≥1,000 mL). Each individual factor comprising the AWHONN score whose percentage in our sample was seen in greater than 2.7 % of patients was independently significantly associated with increased QBL (six of nine factors) and postpartum hemorrhage (four of nine factors).

CONCLUSIONS

The AWHONN measure previously validated with estimated blood loss predicted obstetric blood loss with QBL. Although not on the basis of the data shown in our study, we believe that QBL should be routinely used to measure obstetric blood loss.

Quantitative blood loss measurement methods for early detection of primary postpartum haemorrhage following vaginal birth: A scoping review

AIM

To map the commonly used quantitative blood loss measurement methods in clinical practice and provide a solid foundation for future studies.

DESIGN AND METHOD

This study adhered to the JBI methodology for scoping reviews and preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses extension for scoping reviews. We conducted a literature search using five databases to retrieve articles published between January 2012 and September 2022. The search was repeated on 29 February 2024. Data extraction and verification were carried out by two independent researchers using a self-designed data extraction form.

RESULTS

Ultimately, 26 studies published between 2012 and 2024 were considered eligible for inclusion. Six categories of methods were identified from the 26 articles. Among the included studies, only two involved randomized controlled trials, with the majority being observational studies. The World Health Organization (2012) version of the postpartum haemorrhage diagnostic criteria was predominantly used in most studies. Gravimetric and volumetric methods emerged as the most commonly used methods for quantifying postpartum haemorrhages. The timing of blood collection was inconsistent among the included studies. Only 12 studies mentioned measures for the management of amniotic fluid.

CONCLUSIONS

This scoping review supports the replacement of the visual estimation of blood loss with quantitative assessment methods. Supporting a specific assessment approach is not feasible due to the variability of the study. Future research should focus on establishing the best practices for specific quantitative methods to standardize the management of postpartum haemorrhage and reduce the incidence of postpartum haemorrhage-related adverse outcomes.

RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE

Healthcare professionals need to acknowledge the low accuracy of visual estimation methods and implement quantitative methods to assess postpartum blood loss. Given the limitations inherent in each assessment method, quantification of blood loss should be combined with assessment of maternal vital signs, physiologic indicators and other factors.

Early viscoelastometric guided fibrinogen replacement combined with escalation of clinical care reduces progression in postpartum haemorrhage: a comparison of outcomes from two prospective observational studies

BACKGROUND

Viscoelastometric haemostatic assays (VHA) give rapid information on coagulation status, allowing individualised resuscitation.

METHODS

This paper compares outcomes from two observational studies of postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) in the same institution, before and after practice changed from fixed ratio empirical transfusion of coagulation products with laboratory coagulation testing to VHA-guided fibrinogen replacement incorporated into an enhanced PPH care bundle. In both studies, all blood samples were taken near 1000 mL qualitative blood loss (QBL). In Study One, QBL started once PPH was identified, and resuscitation with coagulation blood products was empirical or based on laboratory tests of coagulation. In Study Two, QBL started at delivery and VHA was used to guide fibrinogen replacement if FIBTEM A5 was <12 mm (Claus fibrinogen ≤2 g/L) or to withhold coagulation products if FIBTEM A5 was >12 mm.

RESULTS

Improved PPH outcomes were observed in Study Two, with rates of measured blood loss ≥2500 mL, ≥4 units red blood cell (RBC) transfusion, fresh frozen plasma transfusion and ≥8 units of any blood product transfusion all reduced (P < 0.01). Clinically significant improvements occurred in women with fibrinogen ≤2 g/L at study entry, where the proportion of women who received ≥4 units RBC transfusion fell from 67% in Study One to 0% in Study Two (P = 0.0007).

CONCLUSIONS

These results suggest that use of VHA as part of an early bundle of PPH care targeting fibrinogen ≤2 g/L with fibrinogen concentrate reduces PPH progression. The greatest benefit was seen when fibrinogen levels were ≤2 g/L at first testing.

Postpartum haemorrhage in high-resource settings: Variations in clinical management and future research directions based on a comparative study of national guidelines

OBJECTIVE

To compare guidelines from eight high-income countries on prevention and management of postpartum haemorrhage (PPH), with a particular focus on severe PPH.

DESIGN

Comparative study.

SETTING

High-resource countries.

POPULATION

Women with PPH.

METHODS

Systematic comparison of guidance on PPH from eight high-income countries.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Definition of PPH, prophylactic management, measurement of blood loss, initial PPH-management, second-line uterotonics, non-pharmacological management, resuscitation/transfusion management, organisation of care, quality/methodological rigour.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study highlights areas where strong evidence is lacking. There is need for a universal definition of (severe) PPH. Consensus is required on how and when to quantify blood loss to identify PPH promptly. Future research may focus on timing and sequence of second-line uterotonics and non-pharmacological interventions and how these impact maternal outcome. Until more data are available, different transfusion strategies will be applied. The use of clear transfusion-protocols are nonetheless recommended to reduce delays in initiation. There is a need for a collaborative effort to develop standardised, evidence-based PPH guidelines.

RESULTS

Definitions of (severe) PPH varied as to the applied cut-off of blood loss and incorporation of clinical parameters. Dose and mode of administration of prophylactic uterotonics and methods of blood loss measurement were heterogeneous. Recommendations on second-line uterotonics differed as to type and dose. Obstetric management diverged particularly regarding procedures for uterine atony. Recommendations on transfusion approaches varied with different thresholds for blood transfusion and supplementation of haemostatic agents. Quality of guidelines varied considerably.

Acute obstetric coagulopathy during postpartum hemorrhage is caused by hyperfibrinolysis and dysfibrinogenemia: an observational cohort study

BACKGROUND

Postpartum hemorrhage (PPH) may be exacerbated by hemostatic impairment. Information about PPH-associated coagulopathy is limited, often resulting in treatment strategies based on data derived from trauma studies.

OBJECTIVES

To investigate hemostatic changes associated with PPH.

PATIENTS/METHODS

From a population of 11 279 maternities, 518 (4.6%) women were recruited with PPH ≥ 1000 mL or placental abruption, amniotic fluid embolism, or concealed bleeding. Routine coagulation and viscoelastometric results were collated. Stored plasma samples were used to investigate women with bleeds > 2000 mL or those at increased risk of coagulopathy defined as placenta abruption, amniotic fluid embolism, or need for blood components. Procoagulant factors were assayed and global hemostasis was assessed using thrombin generation. Fibrinolysis was investigated with D-dimer and plasmin/antiplasmin complexes. Dysfibrinogenemia was assessed using the Clauss/antigen ratio.

RESULTS

At 1000 mL blood loss, Clauss fibrinogen was ≤2 g/L in 2.4% of women and 6/27 (22.2%) cases of abruption. Women with very large bleeds (>3000 mL) had evidence of a dilutional coagulopathy, although hemostatic impairment was uncommon. A subgroup of 12 women (1.06/1000 maternities) had a distinct coagulopathy characterized by massive fibrinolysis (plasmin/antiplasmin > 40 000 ng/mL), increased D-dimer, hypofibrinogenemia, dysfibrinogenemia, reduced factor V and factor VIII, and increased activated protein C, termed acute obstetric coagulopathy. It was associated with fetal or neonatal death in 50% of cases and increased maternal morbidity.

CONCLUSIONS

Clinically significant hemostatic impairment is uncommon during PPH, but a subgroup of women have a distinct and severe coagulopathy characterized by hyperfibrinolysis, low fibrinogen, and dysfibrinogenemia associated with poor fetal outcomes.

Optimizing systems to manage postpartum hemorrhage

Systems to optimize the management of postpartum hemorrhage must ensure timely diagnosis, rapid hemodynamic and hemostatic resuscitation, and prompt interventions to control the source of bleeding. None of these objectives can be effectively completed by a single clinician, and the management of postpartum hemorrhage requires a carefully coordinated interprofessional team. This article reviews systems designed to standardize hemorrhage diagnosis and response.

Emergencies in obstetric anaesthesia: a narrative review

We conducted a narrative review in six areas of obstetric emergencies: category-1 caesarean section; difficult and failed airway; massive obstetric haemorrhage; hypertensive crisis; emergencies related to neuraxial anaesthesia; and maternal cardiac arrest. These areas represent significant research published within the last five years, with emphasis on large multicentre randomised trials, national or international practice guidelines and recommendations from major professional societies. Key topics discussed: prevention and management of failed neuraxial technique; role of high-flow nasal oxygenation and choice of neuromuscular drug in obstetric patients; prevention of accidental awareness during general anaesthesia; management of the difficult and failed obstetric airway; current perspectives on the use of tranexamic acid, fibrinogen concentrate and cell salvage; guidance on neuraxial placement in a thrombocytopenic obstetric patient; management of neuraxial drug errors, local anaesthetic systemic toxicity and unusually prolonged neuraxial block regression; and extracorporeal membrane oxygenation use in maternal cardiac arrest.

Reduction in massive postpartum haemorrhage and red blood cell transfusion during a national quality improvement project, Obstetric Bleeding Strategy for Wales, OBS Cymru: an observational study

Background

Postpartum haemorrhage (PPH) is a major cause of maternal morbidity and mortality and its incidence is increasing in many countries despite management guidelines. A national quality improvement programme called the Obstetric Bleeding Strategy for Wales (OBS Cymru) was introduced in all obstetric units in Wales. The aim was to reduce moderate PPH (1000 mL) progressing to massive PPH (> 2500 mL) and the need for red cell transfusion.

Methods

A PPH care bundle was introduced into all 12 obstetric units in Wales included all women giving birth in 2017 and 2018 (n = 61,094). The care bundle prompted: universal risk assessment, quantitative measurement of blood loss after all deliveries (as opposed to visual estimation), structured escalation to senior clinicians and point-of-care viscoelastometric-guided early fibrinogen replacement. Data were submitted by each obstetric unit to a national database. Outcome measures were incidence of massive PPH (> 2500 mL) and red cell transfusion. Analysis was performed using linear regression of the all Wales monthly data.

Results

Uptake of the intervention was good: quantitative blood loss measurement and risk assessment increased to 98.1 and 64.5% of all PPH > 1000 mL, whilst ROTEM use for PPH > 1500 mL increased to 68.2%. Massive PPH decreased by 1.10 (95% CI 0.28 to 1.92) per 1000 maternities per year (P = 0.011). Fewer women progressed from moderate to massive PPH in the last 6 months, 74/1490 (5.0%), than in the first 6 months, 97/1386 (7.0%), (P = 0.021). Units of red cells transfused decreased by 7.4 (95% CI 1.6 to 13.2) per 1000 maternities per year (P = 0.015). Red cells were transfused to 350/15204 (2.3%) and 268/15150 (1.8%) (P = 0.001) in the first and last 6 months, respectively. There was no increase in the number of women with lowest haemoglobin below 80 g/L during this time period. Infusions of fresh frozen plasma fell and there was no increase in the number of women with haemostatic impairment.

Conclusions

The OBS Cymru care bundle was feasible to implement and associated with progressive, clinically significant improvements in outcomes for PPH across Wales. It is applicable across obstetric units of widely varying size, complexity and staff mixes.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12884-021-03853-y.