Evaluation of the new expert consensus-based definition of selective fetal growth restriction in monochorionic pregnancies

Maternal and fetal outcomes after planned cesarean or vaginal delivery in twin pregnancy: a comparison between 2 third level birth centers

BACKGROUND

Twin pregnancy is associated with higher risks of adverse perinatal outcomes for both the mother and the babies. Among the many challenges in the follow-up of twin pregnancies, the mode of delivery is the last but not the least decision to be made, with the main influencing factors being amnionicity and fetal presentation. The aim of the study was to compare perinatal outcomes in two European centers using different protocols for twin birth in case of non-cephalic second twin; the Italian patients being delivered mainly by cesarean section with those in Belgium being routinely offered the choice of vaginal delivery (VD).

METHODS

This was a dual center international retrospective observational study. The population included 843 women with a twin pregnancy ≥ 32 weeks (dichorionic or monochorionic diamniotic pregnancies) and a known pregnancy outcome. The population was stratified according to chorionicity. Demographic and pregnancy data were reported per pregnancy, whereas neonatal outcomes were reported per fetus. We used multiple logistic regression models to adjust for possible confounding variables and to compute the adjusted odds ratio (adjOR) for each maternal or neonatal outcome.

RESULTS

The observed rate of cesarean delivery was significantly higher in the Italian cohort: 85% for dichorionic pregnancies and 94.4% for the monochorionic vs 45.2% and 54.4% respectively in the Belgian center (p-value < 0.001). We found that Belgian cohort showed significantly higher rates of NICU admission, respiratory distress at birth and Apgar score of < 7 after 5 min. Despite these differences, the composite severe adverse outcome was similar between the two groups.

CONCLUSION

In this study, neither the presentation of the second twin nor the chorionicity affected maternal and severe neonatal outcomes, regardless of the mode of delivery in two tertiary care centers, but VD was associated to a poorer short-term neonatal outcome.

Role of Lactate Dehydrogenase and Lymphocyte Count as Predictors of Poor Perinatal Outcomes in COVID-19-Infected Pregnancies Requiring Hospitalization and Delivery: A Retrospective Cohort Study

INTRODUCTION

Physiological, hormonal, or biochemical changes may be related to the increased morbidity of COVID-19 during pregnancy. Our knowledge remains limited about which pregnant women will worsen and develop complications. The aim was to evaluate the maternal, fetal, and neonatal outcomes in hospitalized pregnant women who delivered while infected with acute COVID-19 and to investigate the possible predictors of poor prognosis in a tertiary pandemic center.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study was conducted on pregnant women who required termination or delivery during a COVID-19 infection in a tertiary hospital. Serum markers were analyzed to determine any possible association and the predictive value of these markers to show poor maternal, fetal, and/or neonatal outcomes.

RESULTS

Out of 45 patients, 12 had maternal complications (Group 1) and 33 had no maternal complications (Group 2). The mean lymphocyte at hospital admission was measured as 1,175.83 ± 362.0 and 1,735.30 ± 746.1 in Groups 1 and 2, respectively (p=0.02). The lymphocyte count measured at hospital admission showed significance in predicting poor maternal outcome, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.737 (95% CI:0.578 to 0.897) and a cut-off value of 1,110 mcL with 82% sensitivity and 67% specificity. Nineteen of the 45 women had fetal complications. Receiver operating characteristic analysis showed maternal lactate dehydrogenase as a significant predictor for poor fetal outcome with a cut-off value of 213 U/L (AUC:0.719; 95% CI:0.566 to 0.872) with 85% sensitivity and 60% specificity.

CONCLUSION

The lymphocyte count can be used as a predictor of poor maternal outcome and lactate dehydrogenase demonstrates poor fetal outcome during hospitalization.

Selective Fetal Growth Restriction Type III: Application of a Recent Expert Consensus Definition

OBJECTIVES

Per a recent expert definition, diagnosis of selective fetal growth restriction (sFGR) in monochorionic diamniotic twins is based on an estimated fetal weight (EFW) <3% as sole criterion and/or combinations of 4 contributory criteria (1 twin EFW <10%; 1 twin abdominal circumference <10%; EFW discordance ≥25%; and smaller twin umbilical artery [UA] pulsatility index >95th percentile). We assessed these criteria in sFGR Type III (intermittent absent or reversed end-diastolic flow of the UA [iAREDF]) patients to test whether meeting the more stringent parameters of the consensus definition had worse outcomes, that is, progression to sFGR Type II (persistent AREDF) or twin-twin transfusion syndrome; or secondarily, decreased dual survivorship.

METHODS

This was a retrospective study of referred sFGR Type III patients (2006-2017). Patients were retrospectively categorized using consensus criteria for 2 comparisons: 1) EFW <3% versus remaining cohort; 2) EFW <3% or met all 4 contributory criteria versus remaining cohort.

RESULTS

Forty-eight patients were studied. Comparison 1: EFW <3% patients (58.3%) were not more likely to demonstrate disease progression (46.4% versus 65.0%, P = .2489) or worse dual survivorship (78.6% versus 85.0%, P = .7161). Comparison 2: EFW <3% or met all 4 contributory criteria (75.0%) patients were not more likely than the others to demonstrate progression (44.4% versus 83.3%, P = .0235) or worse dual survivorship (80.6% versus 83.3%, P = 1.0000).

CONCLUSIONS

In a referred cohort of sFGR Type III patients, there was no evidence that meeting more stringent parameters of the consensus definition was associated with disease progression or dual survivorship.

Neonatal management and outcome in complicated monochorionic twins: What have we learned in the past decade and what should you know?

Monochorionic (MC) twin pregnancies are at increased risk of neonatal morbidity and mortality due to the shared placenta with vascular connections that can give rise to various complications, including twin-twin transfusion syndrome, twin anemia polycythemia sequence (TAPS), selective fetal growth restriction, and other hematological imbalances at birth. Each complication presents its own challenges and considerations in the neonatal period. Measurement of hemoglobin levels and reticulocyte count is required to establish a correct diagnosis. Placenta dye injection is needed to properly distinguish between the various conditions. Risk factors for adverse outcome in MC twins include prematurity, severe cerebral injury, and the type of MC pregnancy complication. We, therefore, recommend cerebral ultrasound examinations in all complicated MC twins at birth to rule out a severe brain injury. Lastly, we strongly encourage screening for hearing loss using automated auditory brainstem response in all spontaneous TAPS donors to prevent permanent speech development delay.

Delayed-interval-delivery of twins in didelphys uterus complicated with chorioamnionitis: a case report and a brief review of literature

Delayed-Interval-Delivery (DID) of multiple gestations has been attempted with variable degrees of success in normal, as well as, in anomalous uteri. We describe a delayed interval delivery procedure in a dichorionic diamniotic twin pregnancy after removal of both, placenta and fetus from one horn by cesarean delivery at 25 weeks followed by spontaneous delivery of the remaining twin at 35 weeks. This was followed by a review of similar cases reported to the literature. The importance of this case resides in the success of DID in spite of chorioamnionitis. Furthermore, this was the second DID attempt where delivery of the first twin was accomplished by cesarean while that of the second one was done by vaginal route.