Placenta accreta spectrum in subsequent pregnancy following myomectomy

Uterine Artery Embolization before Myomectomy: Is It Worth the Trouble?

OBJECTIVES

This study compared patients who underwent myomectomy with preoperative uterine artery embolization (UAE) to those who underwent surgery without UAE. The primary objective was to analyze whether preoperative embolization reduces perioperative blood loss and other related complications. The secondary objective was to analyze the long-term outcomes of the 2 techniques in terms of fertility and obstetrical complications.

DESIGN

Observational cohort retrospective study approved by the Brugmann University Hospital's ethics committee (CE2023/79).

SETTING

The department of gynecology database was used to extract all myomectomy cases between January 2011 and December 2021. Hysteroscopic myomectomies were excluded.

PATIENTS

192 patients were included.

INTERVENTIONS

The population was divided according to the presence or absence of preoperative UAE. The UAE and myomectomy group comprised 95 cases between 2011 and 2020, while the myomectomy-only group consisted of 97 cases between 2014 and 2021.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Blood loss was significantly lower when preoperative UAE was performed (175.9 [308.5] mL versus 623.3 [697.5] mL, p-value <.0001). However, there was no significant difference in postoperative haemoglobin, blood transfusion rate or emergent hysterectomy conversions compared to myomectomy as the only treatment. UAE was associated with complications that may result in infertility, such as adhesions (15.3% UAE group vs. 2.2% non-UAE group, p-value .02) and an increased incidence of miscarriage in pregnancies (53.5% UAE group vs. 22.3% non-UAE group, p-value = .01). Furthermore, in cases where a pregnancy did progress following UAE, later obstetrical complications such as abnormal placentation or uterine rupture were common in the series (21.7% UAE group vs. 0% non-UAE group, p-value = .03).

CONCLUSION

The findings of our study indicate that, other than a lower estimated blood loss (EBL), preoperative UAE does not appear to improve the outcome of myomectomies, while potentially increasing the risk of fertility and pregnancy related complications.

Risk of placenta accreta spectrum following myomectomy: a nationwide cohort study

BACKGROUND

Whether myomectomy increases the risk of placenta accreta spectrum in the following pregnancies remains controversial.

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to investigate the effect of myomectomy on the risk of placenta accreta spectrum in the following pregnancies. Moreover, different methods of myomectomy on the risk of placenta accreta spectrum were explored.

STUDY DESIGN

A nationwide cohort study was conducted using data from the Taiwan National Health Insurance Research Database, including all pregnant patients in Taiwan who gave birth between January 2008 and December 2017. A 1:1 propensity score estimation matching was performed for the analysis of myomectomy on the risk of placenta accreta spectrum. Among pregnant patients who received myomectomy, different methods of myomectomy on the risk of placenta accreta spectrum were compared with the control group.

RESULTS

Among the 1,371,458 pregnant patients in this study, 11,255 pregnant patients had a history of myomectomy. The risk of placenta accreta spectrum was higher in pregnant patients with a history of myomectomy than in pregnant patients without a history of myomectomy (incidence: 0.96% vs 0.20%; adjusted odds ratio, 2.28; 95% confidence interval, 1.85-2.81; P<.01). Among pregnant patients with a history of myomectomy, 5045 (46.87%) received laparotomic myomectomy, 3973 (36.93%) received laparoscopic myomectomy, and 1742 (16.20%) received hysteroscopic myomectomy. The incidence of placenta accreta spectrum was higher in the hysteroscopic group than in the laparotomic group or the laparoscopic group (1.89% [hysteroscopic group] vs 0.71% [laparotomic group] and 0.81% [laparoscopic group]; P<.05). Compared with patients without a history of myomectomy, the adjusted odds ratio for placenta accreta spectrum was 3.88 (95% confidence interval, 2.68-5.63; P<.05) in the hysteroscopic group.

CONCLUSION

Myomectomy, especially hysteroscopic myomectomy, is associated with an increased risk of placenta accreta spectrum in the subsequent pregnancy.

Influence of Uterine Cavity Breach in Laparoscopic Myomectomy on the Risk of Obstetric Complications

Objectives

Prepregnancy myomectomy is effective for the treatment of infertility or prevention of obstetric complications and is usually performed with laparoscopy. However, pregnancies following myomectomy have risks of obstetric complications, especially in cases with uterine cavity breaches, but the evidence remains unclear. We investigated how uterine cavity breach in laparoscopic myomectomy influenced the occurrence of obstetric complications.

Patients and Methods

One hundred and eighty women who underwent a cesarean section from 2014 to 2020 in pregnancies following laparoscopic myomectomy were included. They were divided into two groups: 25 women in the uterine cavity breach group and 155 in the nonbreach group. Obstetric complications, including placenta accreta spectrum (PAS), uterine rupture, placental malposition, abruption placenta, preterm delivery, threatened premature labor, premature rupture of membranes, and massive intrapartum hemorrhage, were assessed.

Results

Multivariate analysis revealed that the frequency of PAS in the breach group (24.0%) was statistically significantly higher than in the nonbreach group (5.2%, P < 0.05).

Conclusion

This study demonstrated that women who experienced uterine cavity breach in laparoscopic myomectomy had an increased risk of PAS in subsequent pregnancies.

Myomectomy scar pregnancy ‒ a serious, but scarcely reported entity: literature review and an instructive case

Objectives

Uterine myomas are a frequent finding in reproductive age women with an estimated incidence 12–25%. 1. Treatment of uterine myomas to facilitate good pregnancy rates and outcome, such as hysteroscopic, laparoscopic, abdominal resection uterine artery embolization among others were evaluated in terms of pregnancy outcome. While the literature is replete of the pregnancy complication of uterine rupture after myomectomies, 2–4 there are very few publications evaluate a relatively rare pregnancy complication associated with placental implantation within the uterine cavity at the site of the previous myomectomy, namely the myomectomy scar pregnancy (MSP). Despite their relative rarity, this type of pathologically adherent placenta rightfully belongs to the well-known entity of placenta accreta spectrum (PAS).

Case presentation

We present a complicated case of MSP and review the available literature to raise attention to its clinical appearance, its prenatal diagnosis so appropriate intrapartum management can be planned.

Conclusions

Despite the rarity of MSP, continuous attention should be given at every single routinely scheduled or indication driven obstetrical US scan following myomectomies to evaluate the placental site implantation regardless of the route and technique of their initial surgical procedure.

Uterine exteriorization versus in situ repair in Cesarean delivery: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

We conducted an updated systematic review and meta-analysis on maternal outcomes associated with uterine exteriorization compared with in situ repair in women undergoing Cesarean delivery.

METHODS

We searched for randomized controlled trials comparing uterine exteriorization with in situ repair during Cesarean delivery. Primary outcomes were intraoperative nausea and vomiting (IONV) and perioperative decrease in hemoglobin concentration. Secondary outcomes were postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV), estimated blood loss, fever, endometritis, wound infection, intraoperative and postoperative pain, postoperative analgesic use, duration of surgery and hospital stay, and time to return of bowel function.

RESULTS

Twenty studies with 20,909 parturients were included. Exteriorization was associated with higher risk of IONV (odds ratio [OR], 2.09; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.66 to 2.63; I² = 0%), with no difference in perioperative hemoglobin concentration decrease (mean difference, - 0.06 g·dL^-1; 95% CI, - 0.20 to 0.08; I² = 97%) compared with in situ repair. There were no significant differences in estimated blood loss, transfusion requirement, PONV, duration of surgery, duration of hospital stay, time to return of bowel function, fever, endometritis, or wound infection. Postoperative pain (incidence of pain graded > 5/10) at six hours (OR, 1.64; 95% CI, 1.31 to 2.03; I² = 0%) was higher with exteriorization, but there was no difference in need for rescue analgesia (OR, 2.48; 95% CI, 0.89 to 6.90; I² = 94%) or pain scores at 24 hr compared with in situ repair.

CONCLUSIONS

In this updated systematic review and meta-analysis, uterine exteriorization was associated with an increased risk of IONV but no significant change in perioperative hemoglobin decrease compared with in situ repair.

STUDY REGISTRATION

PROSPERO (CRD42020190074); registered 5 July 2020.

Ultrasound detection rates of the placenta accreta spectrum with prior myomectomy

OBJECTIVE

To describe the performance of ultrasound in detecting placenta accreta spectrum (PAS) in patients with history of prior myomectomy.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort study of patients who were referred for sonographic evaluation of the placenta and delivered at a tertiary academic center from 2012 to 2019. Demographic, obstetric, sonographic findings, and pathology information were collected and analyzed using Chi-square, t-tests, and ANOVA analysis.

RESULTS

640 patients met inclusion criteria, including 46 (7.2%) with histologically confirmed PAS. Groups for comparison included those with C-section only (CS), CS-Myomectomy, and Myomectomy-only. Those with CS-Myomectomy were older (38.7 years vs. 35.7 years or 35.5 years, p = .003) and those with CS only were more likely to have an anterior placenta (63.4% vs. 54.5% or 41.8%, p = .005). The rate of PAS was highest in those with Myomectomy only (14.5% vs. 6.1% or 11.4%, p = 0.04). Sensitivity, Specificity, and Predictive Values were lowest in the CS-Myomectomy group, with detection rate and PPV of only 40%. Accuracy, defined as the rate of clinical outcome consistent with imaging, was significantly higher in those with CS only compared to the CS with myomectomy or myomectomy-only groups. Of the histologically confirmed PAS, 11 (23.9%) did not have a placenta previa, and the majority of these occurred in women with prior myomectomy. In the cohort with CS only, the proportion of cases with PAS without placenta previa was 5 of 33 (15.2%) compared to 6 of 13 (46.2%) of PAS in those with prior myomectomy, with or without CS (p = .05).

CONCLUSION

In patients with prior uterine surgery referred for sonographic evaluation of the placenta, rates of histology-confirmed PAS were highest in those with prior myomectomy, though ultrasound accuracy was lower in these patients. As ultrasound findings of PAS may be clearer in the presence of placenta previa, the absence of previa in a higher proportion of PAS with prior myomectomy may be related to the observed lower sonographic accuracy in these patients.