Clinical characteristics of a novel "Type 3" vasa previa: case series at a single center

Incorporation of vasa previa screening into a routine anomaly scan: A single center cohort study

INTRODUCTION

Vasa previa (VP), defined as unprotected fetal vessels traversing the membranes over the cervix, is associated with a high perinatal mortality when undiagnosed prenatally. Conversely, prenatal diagnosis with ultrasound and cesarean delivery before the membranes rupture is associated with excellent outcomes. However, controversy exists regarding screening for VP. In the UK, routine screening for VP is not recommended. The objective of this study was to report the incidence of VP and our experience in the detection of VP with a universal screening protocol at the time of the second-trimester fetal anomaly scan with third-trimester confirmation in an unselected population of pregnancies.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

We performed a single-center historical cohort study of all pregnant women who underwent routine second-trimester anomaly screening scans at West Middlesex University Hospital, London, UK, between 2012 and 2016. Over 5 years, every patient undergoing routine anomaly screening was evaluated for VP using a systematic protocol during their 20-week anomaly scan. Suspected cases of VP were rescanned in the third trimester by specialist sonographers with an interest in VP. The primary outcomes were the incidence and detection of VP.

RESULTS

During the study period, 24 690 anatomy scans were performed. A total of 64 patients were identified as having potential VP at the second-trimester anomaly screening scan, of which 19 were confirmed by the specialist sonographer in the third trimester and at delivery. The screen positive rate was 0.26% (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.20%-0.32%). VP at birth was found in 19/24690 births (1:1299 [95% CI: 1:832-1:2030] births). Universal screening for VP using our protocol had a sensitivity of 100% and a specificity of 99.78% (95% CI: 99.72%-99.84%). The false-positive rate of the second-trimester screen was 0.18% (95% CI: 0.13-0.24). There were no false positives or false negatives at delivery. Of the 19 patients with confirmed VP, 17 had scheduled cesarean deliveries, and two required emergency deliveries due to antepartum hemorrhage. One baby died, giving a perinatal mortality of 5%.

CONCLUSIONS

VP complicates approximately 1:1300 pregnancies. Routine screening for VP yielded a 100% detection rate. We suggest the inclusion of structured VP assessment in standard fetal anomaly screening programs.

Vasa previa Type 3: Advocating for universal screening and investigation of risk factors: A case report

Vasa previa is a critical obstetric condition marked by unprotected fetal vessels near the cervical os, traditionally divided into Types 1 and 2, based on its association with velamentous cord insertion and accessory placental lobes, respectively. The recent introduction of Type 3 vasa previa addresses atypical cases. We report a unique intrapartum diagnosis of Type 3 vasa previa in a 39-year-old at 38 weeks of gestation, identified during labor induction without prior risk indicators. Despite lacking traditional risk factors, advanced imaging and clinical vigilance led to a primary cesarean delivery, confirming the diagnosis through intraoperative findings of three aberrant vessels with marginal cord insertion. This case emphasizes the critical importance of considering vasa previa in prenatal and intrapartum care to prevent adverse outcomes, advocating for universal screening practices to identify this rare but significant condition.

Type III Vasa Previa Associated with Resolution of a Low-Lying Placenta: Case Report and Literature Review

Vasa previa occurs when fetal vessels lie above the cervical os. A novel type of vasa previa, known as type III, is characterized by an abnormal branching of fetal vessels from the placenta in the absence of velamentous cord insertion (as seen in type I) or multilobed placenta (as seen in type II). Here, we present a case of a type III vasa previa after a resolution of a low-lying placenta. The presence of any known risk factors of vasa previa, including low-lying placenta, should prompt screening for vasa previa in the third trimester. Accurate and timely diagnosis of vasa previa will confer significant survival benefit for the neonate.

Prenatal Diagnosis of Vasa Previa in the Second Trimester of Pregnancy Based on Non-typical Ultrasound Findings: A Case Report and Mini-Review of the Literature

Vasa previa is a rare disorder of the placenta. The absence of a prenatal diagnosis is associated with increased perinatal morbidity and mortality. In our patient, ultrasound findings, although atypical, successfully established the prenatal diagnosis of vasa previa in the second trimester of pregnancy. Despite the fact that the placenta was not low-lying, that it was not possible to visualize the site of umbilical cord insertion into the placental tissue, and that vasa previa was not directly visualized, the presence of blood flow near and around the internal cervical os, as seen on transvaginal Doppler ultrasound in the second and third trimesters of pregnancy, raised serious suspicion of their presence. With the completion of the 36th gestational week, it was decided to proceed with a scheduled cesarean section. One week earlier, a course of corticosteroids was administered. The cesarean section was performed without complications. After placental delivery, the presence of velamentous umbilical cord insertion was noted, with umbilical vessels coursing unprotected by the placental tissue or umbilical cord within the fetal membranes. The puerperant and the newborn were discharged from the obstetrics clinic of the General Hospital of Trikala in excellent condition. This paper highlights the importance of transvaginal color Doppler ultrasound in the prenatal diagnosis of vasa previa, which, while posing little risk to the mother, can often be fatal to the fetus.

Prenatal diagnosis and postnatal outcome of Type-III vasa previa: systematic review of literature

OBJECTIVE

Type-III vasa previa (VP) is a rare form of VP, not necessarily associated with other placental or vascular anomalies, in which aberrant vessels run from the placenta to the amniotic membranes, near the internal cervical os, before returning to the placenta. Early diagnosis of Type-III VP is important but technically challenging. The objective of this study was to gather the current available evidence on the perinatal diagnosis and outcome of Type-III VP.

METHODS

A systematic review of the literature on the perinatal diagnosis of atypical Type-III VP was carried out in PubMed, MEDLINE and EMBASE accordingto PRISMA guidelines from inception to March 2023. Data extraction and tabulation were performed by two operators and checked by a third senior author. The quality of the included studies was evaluated using the National Institutes of Health tool for the quality assessment of case-series studies. Our local ultrasound database was searched for previously unreported recent cases. Characteristics of prenatally and postnatally diagnosed Type-III VP, including clinical features and perinatal outcomes, were summarized using descriptive statistics.

RESULTS

Eighteen cases of Type-III VP were included, of which 16 were diagnosed prenatally (14 cases were retrieved from 10 publications and two were unpublished cases from our center) and two were diagnosed postnatally (retrieved from two publications). All prenatal cases were diagnosed on transvaginal ultrasound at a mean gestational age of 29 weeks (median, 31 weeks; range, 19-38 weeks). Conception was achieved with in-vitro fertilization in 4/16 (25.0%) cases. There were no prenatal symptoms in 15/18 (83.3%) cases, while in two (11.1%) cases there was vaginal bleeding and in one (5.6%) preterm labor occurred. In 15/18 (83.3%) cases, at least one placental abnormality was observed, including low-lying insertion (9/17), succenturiate or accessory lobe (1/17), velamentous cord insertion (3/18) and marginal insertion (9/18). All prenatally diagnosed cases were liveborn and were delivered by Cesarean section before rupture of membranes at a median gestational age of 35 weeks (range, 32-38 weeks) without neonatal complications. Emergency Cesarean section was performed in 2/16 (12.5%) cases with a prenatal diagnosis and 1/2 (50.0%) cases with a postnatal diagnosis (P = 0.179). Among those with data available, an Apgar score of ≤ 7 was observed in the prenatally vs postnatally diagnosed group in 5/13 vs 1/1 cases, respectively, at the 1-min evaluation and 3/13 vs 1/1 cases, respectively, at the 5-min evaluation.

CONCLUSIONS

The prenatal diagnosis of Type-III VP is challenging, with few cases reported in the literature; however, it is crucial for minimizing the risk of adverse outcome by enabling early-term elective Cesarean delivery prior to rupture of membranes. Given that clinical manifestations and risk factors are non-specific, and that Type-III VP cannot be excluded when there is a normal cord insertion or a singular placental mass, systematic screening by transvaginal ultrasound in the general pregnant population is recommended, particularly in those with a low-lying or morphologically abnormal placenta and those who conceived using assisted reproductive technology. © 2023 The Authors. Ultrasound in Obstetrics & Gynecology published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd on behalf of International Society of Ultrasound in Obstetrics and Gynecology.

Incidence and causes of perinatal death in prenatally diagnosed vasa previa: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVE

This study aimed to estimate the perinatal mortality associated with prenatally diagnosed vasa previa and to determine what proportion of those perinatal deaths are directly attributable to vasa previa.

DATA SOURCES

The following databases have been searched from January 1, 1987, to January 1, 2023: PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and Embase.

STUDY ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA

Our study included all studies (cohort studies and case series or reports) that had patients in which a prenatal diagnosis of vasa previa was made. Case series or reports were excluded from the meta-analysis. All cases in which prenatal diagnosis was not made were excluded from the study.

METHODS

The programming language software R (version 4.2.2) was used to conduct the meta-analysis. The data were logit transformed and pooled using the fixed effects model. The between-study heterogeneity was reported by I2. The publication bias was evaluated using a funnel plot and the Peters regression test. The Newcastle-Ottawa scale was used to assess the risk of bias.

RESULTS

Overall, 113 studies with a cumulative sample size of 1297 pregnant individuals were included. This study included 25 cohort studies with 1167 pregnancies and 88 case series or reports with 130 pregnancies. Moreover, 13 perinatal deaths occurred among these pregnancies, consisting of 2 stillbirths and 11 neonatal deaths. Among the cohort studies, the overall perinatal mortality was 0.94% (95% confidence interval, 0.52-1.70; I2=0.0%). The pooled perinatal mortality attributed to vasa previa was 0.51% (95% confidence interval, 0.23-1.14; I2=0.0%). Stillbirth and neonatal death were reported in 0.20% (95% confidence interval, 0.05-0.80; I2=0.0%) and 0.77% (95% confidence interval, 0.40-1.48; I2=0.0%) of pregnancies, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Perinatal death is uncommon after a prenatal diagnosis of vasa previa. Approximately half of the cases of perinatal mortality are not directly attributable to vasa previa. This information will help in guiding physicians in counseling and will provide reassurance to pregnant individuals with a prenatal diagnosis of vasa previa.

Type 3 vasa previa with no low-lying placenta, with central umbilical cord insertion at the upper uterine segment, and with aberrant vessels on the broad membrane: A case report

Type 3 vasa previa is a new concept. Herein, a case is reported of a 35-year-old woman, pregnant following in vitro fertilization, in whom vasa previa was detected on color Doppler ultrasound at 26 weeks, with no finding of a low-lying placenta. A cesarean section was performed at 34 weeks and 3 days. Gross examination of the placenta showed Type 3 vasa previa with findings somewhat different from previous reports: two aberrant fetal vessels with branching on the broad membrane, and central cord insertion which was farther from the longitudinal center of the placenta than were the running vessels on the membrane. Vasa previa cannot be excluded due to normal cord insertion at the upper uterine segment, absence of placenta previa, or a low-lying placenta in the second trimester. Careful ultrasound screening can promote neonatal survival in patients with Type 3 vasa previa.

Incidence of vasa praevia: a systematic review and meta-analysis

OBJECTIVES

To derive accurate estimates of the incidence of vasa praevia (VP) in a routine population of unselected pregnancies.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCES

A search of MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and the Cochrane database was performed to review relevant citations reporting outcomes in pregnancies with VP from January 2000 until 5 April 2023.

ELIGIBILITY CRITERIA FOR SELECTION OF STUDIES

Prospective or retrospective cohort or population studies that provided data regarding VP cases in routine unselected pregnancies during the study period. We included studies published in the English language after the year 2000 to reflect contemporary obstetric and neonatal practice.

DATA EXTRACTION AND SYNTHESIS

Two reviewers independently screened the retrieved citations and extracted data. The methodological quality of studies was assessed using the Newcastle-Ottawa Scale, and Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses was used to ensure standardised reporting of studies.

RESULTS

A total of 3847 citations were screened and 82 full-text manuscripts were retrieved for analysis. There were 24 studies that met the inclusion criteria, of which 12 studies reported prenatal diagnosis with a systematic protocol of screening. There were 1320 pregnancies with VP in a total population of 2 278 561 pregnancies; the weighted pooled incidence of VP was 0.79 (95% CI: 0.59 to 1.01) per 1000 pregnancies, corresponding to 1 case of VP per 1271 (95% CI: 990 to 1692) pregnancies. Nested subanalysis of studies reporting screening for VP based on a specific protocol identified 395 pregnancies with VP in a population of 732 654 pregnancies with weighted pooled incidence of 0.82 (95% CI: 0.53 to 1.18) per 1000 pregnancies (1 case of VP per 1218 (95% CI: 847 to 1901) pregnancies).

CONCLUSION

The incidence of VP in unselected pregnancies is 1 in 1218 pregnancies. This is higher than is previously reported and can be used as a basis to assess whether screening for this condition should be part of routine clinical practice. Incorporation of strategies to screen for VP in routine clinical practice is likely to prevent 5% of stillbirths.

PROSPERO REGISTRATION NUMBER

CRD42020125495.

Vasa Previa

Vasa previa refers to unprotected fetal vessels running through the membranes over the cervix. Until recently, this condition was associated with an exceedingly high perinatal mortality rate attributable to fetal exsanguination when the membranes ruptured. However, ultrasonography has made it possible to diagnose the condition prenatally, allowing cesarean delivery before labor or rupture of the membranes. Several recent studies have indicated excellent outcomes with prenatally diagnosed vasa previa. However, outcomes continue to be dismal when vasa previa is undiagnosed before labor. Risk factors for vasa previa include second-trimester placenta previa and low-lying placentas, velamentous cord insertion, placentas with accessory lobes, in vitro fertilization, and multifetal gestations. Recognition of individuals who are at risk and screening them will greatly decrease the mortality rate from this condition. Because of the relative rarity of vasa previa, there are no randomized controlled trials to guide management. Therefore, recommendations on the diagnosis and management of vasa previa are based largely on cohort studies and expert opinion. This Clinical Expert Series review addresses the epidemiology, pathophysiology, natural history, diagnosis and management of vasa previa, as well as innovative treatments for the condition.

Guideline No. 439: Diagnosis and Management of Vasa Previa

OBJECTIVE

To summarize the current evidence and to make recommendations for diagnosis and classification of vasa previa and for management of women with this diagnosis.

TARGET POPULATION

Pregnant women with vasa previa or low-lying fetal vessels.

OPTIONS

To manage vasa previa in hospital or at home, and to perform a cesarean delivery preterm or at term, or to allow a trial of labour when a diagnosis of vasa previa or low-lying fetal vessels is suspected or confirmed.

OUTCOMES

Prolonged hospitalization, preterm birth, rate of cesarean delivery, and neonatal morbidity and mortality.

BENEFITS, HARMS, AND COSTS

Women with vasa previa or low-lying fetal vessels are at an increased risk of maternal and fetal or postnatal adverse outcomes. These outcomes include a potentially incorrect diagnosis, need for hospitalization, unnecessary restriction of activities, an early delivery, and an unnecessary cesarean delivery. Optimization of diagnostic and management protocols can improve maternal and fetal or postnatal outcomes.

EVIDENCE

Medline, Pubmed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library were searched from inception to March 2022, using medical subject headings (MeSH) and keywords related to pregnancy, vasa previa, low-lying fetal vessels, antepartum hemorrhage, short cervix, preterm labour, and cesarean delivery. This document presents an abstraction of the evidence rather than a methodological review.

VALIDATION METHODS

The authors rated the quality of evidence and strength of recommendations using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach. See online Appendix A (Tables A1 for definitions and A2 for interpretations of strong and weak recommendations).

INTENDED AUDIENCE

Obstetric care providers, including obstetricians, family physicians, nurses, midwives, maternal-fetal medicine specialists, and radiologists.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

Unprotected fetal vessels in placental membranes and cord that are close to the cervix, including vasa previa, need careful characterization by sonographic examination and evidence-based management to reduce risks to the baby and the mother during pregnancy and delivery.

SUMMARY STATEMENTS

RECOMMENDATIONS.

Relationship between Abnormal Placenta and Obstetric Outcomes: A Meta-Analysis

The placenta has several crucial physiological functions that help maintain a normal pregnancy. Although approximately 2-4% of pregnancies are complicated by abnormal placentas, obstetric outcomes remain understudied. This study aimed to determine the outcomes and prevalence of patients with abnormal placentas by conducting a systematic review of 48 studies published between 1974 and 2022. The cumulative prevalence of circumvallate placenta, succenturiate placenta, multilobed placenta, and placenta membranacea were 1.2%, 1.0%, 0.2%, and 0.004%, respectively. Pregnancies with a circumvallate placenta were associated with an increased rate of emergent cesarean delivery, preterm birth (PTB), and placental abruption compared to those without a circumvallate placenta. The succenturiate lobe of the placenta was associated with a higher rate of emergent cesarean delivery, whereas comparative results were observed in terms of PTB, placental abruption, and placenta previa in comparison to those without a succenturiate lobe of the placenta. A comparator study that examined the outcomes of multilobed placentas found that this data is usually unavailable. Patient-level analysis (n = 15) showed high-rates of abortion (40%), placenta accreta spectrum (40%), and a low term delivery rate (13.3%) in women with placenta membranacea. Although the current evidence is insufficient to draw a robust conclusion, abnormal placentas should be recognized as a high-risk factor for adverse outcomes during pregnancy.

Directive clinique no 439: Diagnostic et prise en charge du vasa prævia

OBJECTIF

Résumer les données probantes actuelles et énoncer des recommandations pour le diagnostic et la classification du vasa prævia et pour la prise en charge des femmes ayant reçu ce diagnostic.

POPULATION CIBLE

Femmes enceintes présentant un vasa prævia ou des vaisseaux ombilicaux péricervicaux.

OPTIONS

En cas de diagnostic soupçonné ou confirmé de vasa prævia ou de vaisseaux ombilicaux péricervicaux, prendre en charge la patiente à l'hôpital ou à domicile, puis pratiquer une césarienne avant terme ou à terme ou entreprendre une épreuve de travail. RéSULTATS: Hospitalisation prolongée, accouchement prématuré, césarienne et morbidité et mortalité néonatales. BéNéFICES, RISQUES ET COûTS: Les femmes ayant un vasa prævia ou des vaisseaux ombilicaux péricervicaux présentent un risque accru d'issues défavorables maternelles, fœtales ou postnatales, à savoir un diagnostic potentiellement erroné, un besoin d'hospitalisation, une restriction inutile des activités, un accouchement précoce et une césarienne inutile. L'optimisation des protocoles de diagnostic et de prise en charge peut améliorer les issues maternelles, fœtales et postnatales. DONNéES PROBANTES: Des recherches ont été effectuées dans les bases de données Medline, PubMed, Embase et Cochrane Library, de leur création jusqu'à mars 2022, à partir de termes MeSH et de mots clés liés à la grossesse, au vasa prævia, aux vaisseaux prævia, à l'hémorragie ante partum, au col court, au travail prématuré et à la césarienne. Le présent document est un résumé des données probantes et non pas une revue méthodologique. MéTHODES DE VALIDATION: Les auteurs ont évalué la qualité des données probantes et la force des recommandations en utilisant le cadre méthodologique GRADE (Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation). Voir l'annexe A en ligne (tableau A1 pour les définitions et tableau A2 pour l'interprétation des recommandations fortes et faibles). PROFESSIONNELS CONCERNéS: Fournisseurs de soins obstétricaux, y compris obstétriciens, médecins de famille, infirmières, sages-femmes, spécialistes en médecine fœto-maternelle et radiologistes. RéSUMé POUR TWITTER: En cas de cordon et de vaisseaux ombilicaux non protégés dans les membranes près du col (vasa prævia y compris), une caractérisation échographique et une prise en charge avisée s'imposent pour réduire les risques pour le bébé et la mère pendant la grossesse et l'accouchement.

The Characteristics and Obstetric Outcomes of Type II Vasa Previa: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Vasa previa is a rare fetal life-threatening obstetric disease classified into types I and II. This study aimed to examine the characteristics and obstetric outcomes of type II vasa previa. A systematic review was performed, and 20 studies (1998-2022) were identified. The results from six studies showed that type II vasa previa accounted for 21.3% of vasa previa cases. The characteristics and obstetric outcomes (rate of assisted reproductive technology (ART), antenatal diagnosis, emergent cesarean delivery, maternal transfusion, gestational age at delivery, and neonatal mortality) were compared between type I and II vasa previa, and all outcomes of interest were similar. The association between ART and abnormal placenta (bilobed placenta or succenturiate lobe) was examined in three studies, and the results were as follows: (i) increased rate of succenturiate lobes (ART versus non-ART pregnancy; OR (odds ratio) 6.97, 95% confidence interval (CI) 2.45-19.78); (ii) similar rate of abnormal placenta (cleavage-stage versus blastocyst embryo transfer); (iii) increased rate of abnormal placenta (frozen versus fresh embryo transfer; OR 2.97, 95%CI 1.10-7.96). Although the outcomes of type II vasa previa appear to be similar to those of type I vasa previa, the current evidence is insufficient for a robust conclusion.

The Diagnostic Accuracy of Transabdominal and Transvaginal Color Doppler Ultrasound for Pregnant Women with Vasa Previa and Velamentous Cord Insertion

Objective

The objective of this study is to evaluate feasibility and accuracy of transabdominal color Doppler ultrasound (TA-CDUS) and transvaginal color Doppler ultrasound (TV-CDUS) as screening methods for pregnant women with vasa previa (VP) and velamentous cord insertion (VCI).

Methods

A retrospective diagnostic accuracy study was performed on 5,434 pregnant women from 2018 to 2021, who underwent both TA-CDUS and TV-CDUS. Diagnostic performance of TA-CDUS and TV-CDUS was determined using specificity, positive predictive value (PPV), negative predictive value (NPV), accuracy, and positive and negative likelihood ratios (LR+ and LR-), using the delivery information (gross examination) as the "Gold-standard". Patient records were reviewed for demographics and diagnosis.

Results

The combination of VP and VCI was diagnosed in 37/5434 (0.68%) women at delivery. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV, NPV, and overall test accuracy of TA-CDUS were 72.97%, 99.85%, 77.14%, 99.81%, and 99.67%, respectively, for diagnosing VP with VCI. The corresponding values for TV-CDUS were 89.19%, 99.87%, 82.50%, 99.93%, and 99.80%, respectively. Moreover, the sensitivity of combination of TA-CDUS and TA-CDUS in determining VP with VCI was 97.30%, specificity 99.98%, PPV 97.30%, NPV 99.98%, and accuracy 99.96%. No significant difference in the misdiagnosis and missed diagnosis was found between the examination by TA-CDUS and TV-CDUS.

Conclusions

Both TA-CDUS and TV-CDUS can be acceptable diagnostic tools for assessment of pregnant women with VP and VCI, with a better application of TV-CDUS with higher accuracy. The combination of TA-CDUS and TV-CDUS could provide an objective imaging basis for choosing clinical treatment strategies and predicting prognosis.