Prenatal diagnosis of aberrant right subclavian artery: a literature review

Prenatal cardiac findings and 22q11.2 deletion syndrome: Fetal detection and evaluation

Clinical features of 22q11.2 microdeletion syndrome (22q11.2DS) are highly variable between affected individuals and frequently include a subset of conotruncal and aortic arch anomalies. Many are diagnosed with 22q11.2DS when they present as a fetus, newborn or infant with characteristic cardiac findings and subsequently undergo genetic testing. The presence of an aortic arch anomaly with characteristic intracardiac anomalies increases the likelihood that the patient has 22q11.2 DS, but those with an aortic arch anomaly and normal intracardiac anatomy are also at risk. It is particularly important to identify the fetus at risk for 22q11.2DS in order to prepare the expectant parents and plan postnatal care for optimal outcomes. Fetal anatomy scans now readily identify aortic arch anomalies (aberrant right subclavian artery, right sided aortic arch or double aortic arch) in the three-vessel tracheal view. Given the association of 22q11.2DS with aortic arch anomalies with and without intracardiac defects, this review highlights the importance of recognizing the fetus at risk for 22q11.2 deletion syndrome with an aortic arch anomaly and details current methods for genetic testing. To assist in the prenatal diagnosis of 22q11.2DS, this review summarizes the seminal features of 22q11.2DS, its prenatal presentation and current methods for genetic testing.

Identification of copy number variations among fetuses with isolated ultrasound soft markers in pregnant women not of advanced maternal age

BACKGROUND

Pathogenic (P) copy number variants (CNVs) may be associated with second-trimester ultrasound soft markers (USMs), and noninvasive prenatal screening (NIPS) can enable interrogate the entire fetal genome to screening of fetal CNVs. This study evaluated the clinical application of NIPS for detecting CNVs among fetuses with USMs in pregnant women not of advanced maternal age (AMA).

RESULTS

Fetal aneuploidies and CNVs were identified in 6647 pregnant women using the Berry Genomics NIPS algorithm.Those with positive NIPS results underwent amniocentesis for prenatal diagnosis. The NIPS and prenatal diagnosis results were analyzed and compared among different USMs. A total of 96 pregnancies were scored positive for fetal chromosome anomalies, comprising 37 aneuploidies and 59 CNVs. Positive predictive values (PPVs) for trisomy 21, trisomy 18, trisomy 13, and sex chromosome aneuploidies were 66.67%, 80.00%, 0%, and 30.43%, respectively. NIPS sensitivity for aneuploidies was 100%. For CNVs, the PPVs were calculated as 35.59% and false positive rate of 0.57%. There were six P CNVs, two successfully identified by NIPS and four missed, of which three were below the NIPS resolution limit and one false negative. The incidence of aneuploidies was significantly higher in fetuses with absent or hypoplastic nasal bone, while that of P CNVs was significantly higher in fetuses with aberrant right subclavian artery (ARSA), compared with other groups.

CONCLUSIONS

NIPS yielded a moderate PPV for CNVs in non-AMA pregnant women with fetal USM. However, NIPS showed limited ability in identifying P CNVs. Positive NIPS results for CNVs emphasize the need for further prenatal diagnosis. We do not recommend the use of NIPS for CNVs screening in non-AMA pregnant women with fetal USM, especially in fetuses with ARSA.

Prenatal genetic analysis of fetal aberrant right subclavian artery with or without additional ultrasound anomalies in a third level referral center

To evaluate the correlation between chromosomal abnormalities and fetal aberrant right subclavian artery (ARSA) with or without additional ultrasound anomalies (UAs). A total of 340 fetuses diagnosed with ARSA by ultrasound between December, 2015, and July, 2021, were included. All cases were subdivided into three groups: (A) 121 (35.6%) cases with isolated ARSA, (B) 91 (26.8%) cases with soft markers, and (C) 128 (37.6%) cases complicated with other UAs. Invasive testing was performed via amniotic fluid or cord blood karyotyping and chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) in parallel, and pregnancy outcomes were followed. Karyotype abnormalities were identified in 18/340 (5.3%) patients. Karyotype abnormalities in Groups A, B, and C were 0/121 (0.0%), 7/91 (7.7%), and 11/128 (8.6%), respectively. CMA abnormalities with clinically significant variants were detected in 37/340 (10.9%) cases, of which 22q11.2 deletion syndrome and trisomy 21 accounted for 48.6% (18/37). The overall abnormal CMA with clinically significant variant detection rates in Groups A, B, and C were 3/121(2.5%), 13/91 (14.3%), and 21/128 (16.4%), respectively. There were significant difference in clinically significant CMA anomalies detection rate between Groups A and C (p < 0.05), as well as Groups A and B (p < 0.05). Comparing CMA to karyotyping showed a clinically significant incremental yield in Group C (7.8%, 10/128) compared to Groups A (2.5%, 3/121) and B (6.6%, 6/91) (p > 0.05). Fetal ARSA with additional UAs, concurred with cardiac and extra-cardiac anomalies, constitutes a high-risk factor for chromosomal aberrations, especially for pathogenic or likely pathogenic copy number variants.