1
|
Schütte A, Stüben PE, Astrin JJ. Molecular Weevil Identification Project: A thoroughly curated barcode release of 1300 Western Palearctic weevil species (Coleoptera, Curculionoidea). Biodivers Data J 2023; 11:e96438. [PMID: 38357418 PMCID: PMC10865102 DOI: 10.3897/bdj.11.e96438] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/18/2022] [Accepted: 12/08/2022] [Indexed: 01/25/2023] Open
Abstract
The Molecular Weevil Identification project (MWI) studies the systematics of Western Palearctic weevils (superfamily Curculionoidea) in an integrative taxonomic approach of DNA barcoding, morphology and ecology. This barcode release provides almost 3600 curated CO1 sequences linked to morphological vouchers in about 1300 weevil species. The dataset is presented in statistical distance tables and as a Neighbour-Joining tree. Bayesian Inference trees are computed for the subfamilies Cryptorhynchinae, Apioninae and Ceutorhynchinae. Altogether, 18 unresolved taxonomic issues are discussed. A new barcode primer set is presented. Finally, we establish group-specific genetic distances for many weevil genera to serve as a tool in species delineation. These values are statistically based on distances between "good species" and their congeners. With this morphologically calibrated approach, we could resolve most alpha-taxonomic questions within the MWI project.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- André Schütte
- Leibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change, Museum Koenig, Bonn, Germany Leibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change, Museum Koenig Bonn Germany
| | - Peter E Stüben
- Curculio Institute, Mönchengladbach, Germany Curculio Institute Mönchengladbach Germany
| | - Jonas J Astrin
- Leibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change, Museum Koenig, Bonn, Germany Leibniz Institute for the Analysis of Biodiversity Change, Museum Koenig Bonn Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Costa HC. Clarifying the type locality of Liotyphlops wilderi (Garman, 1883) (Serpentes, Anomalepididae), with comments on other reptiles from São Cyriaco, Minas Gerais. ZOOSYST EVOL 2022. [DOI: 10.3897/zse.98.80418] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
The snake species Typhlops wilderi (today Liotyphlops wilderi) was described in 1883 based on specimens from São Cyriaco, in Minas Gerais, Brazil. The name of this type locality has been cited in different ways in the literature, making its geographic location confusing. Solving this question is an important issue for future taxonomy and systematic studies. After searching for information on the collector of the type series of L. wilderi (John Casper Branner) using the Google Scholar database, I found that São Cyriaco was a gold mining company located in the current municipality of Alvorada de Minas. Besides elucidating the type locality of L. wilderi, I searched for reptile specimens collected by Branner, deposited in collections registered at the VertNet Portal and SpeciesLink, and personally examined the extant material from Minas Gerais.
Collapse
|
3
|
Mulcahy DG, Ibáñez R, Jaramillo CA, Crawford AJ, Ray JM, Gotte SW, Jacobs JF, Wynn AH, Gonzalez-Porter GP, McDiarmid RW, Crombie RI, Zug GR, de Queiroz K. DNA barcoding of the National Museum of Natural History reptile tissue holdings raises concerns about the use of natural history collections and the responsibilities of scientists in the molecular age. PLoS One 2022; 17:e0264930. [PMID: 35245325 PMCID: PMC8896674 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0264930] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2021] [Accepted: 02/22/2022] [Indexed: 01/09/2023] Open
Abstract
Natural history collections are essential to a wide variety of studies in biology because they maintain large collections of specimens and associated data, including genetic material (e.g., tissues) for DNA sequence data, yet they are currently under-funded and collection staff have high workloads. With the advent of aggregate databases and advances in sequencing technologies, there is an increased demand on collection staff for access to tissue samples and associated data. Scientists are rapidly developing large DNA barcode libraries, DNA sequences of specific genes for species across the tree of life, in order to document and conserve biodiversity. In doing so, mistakes are made. For instance, inconsistent taxonomic information is commonly taken from different lending institutions and deposited in data repositories, such as the Barcode of Life Database (BOLD) and GenBank, despite explicit disclaimers regarding the need for taxonomic verification by the lending institutions. Such errors can have profound effects on subsequent research based on these mis-labelled sequences in data repositories. Here, we present the production of a large DNA barcode library of reptiles from the National Museum of Natural History tissue holdings. The library contains 2,758 sequences (2,205 COI and 553 16S) from 2260 specimens (four crocodilians, 37 turtles, and 2,219 lizards, including snakes), representing 583 named species, from 52 countries. In generating this library, we noticed several common mistakes made by scientists depositing DNA barcode data in public repositories (e.g., BOLD and GenBank). Our goal is to raise awareness of these concerns and offer advice to avoid such mistakes in the future to maintain accurate DNA barcode libraries to properly document Earth’s biodiversity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel G. Mulcahy
- Division of Amphibians and Reptiles, Department of Vertebrate Zoology, National Museum of Natural History, Washington, DC, United States of America
- * E-mail:
| | - Roberto Ibáñez
- Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Panama City, Republic of Panama
- Sistema Nacional de Investigación, SENACYT, Panamá City, República de Panamá
- Departamento de Zoología, Universidad de Panamá, Panamá City, República de Panamá
| | - Cesar A. Jaramillo
- Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Panama City, Republic of Panama
- Departamento de Histología y Neuroanatomía, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Panamá, Panamá City, República de Panamá
| | - Andrew J. Crawford
- Smithsonian Tropical Research Institute, Panama City, Republic of Panama
- Department of Biological Sciences, Museo de Historia Natural C.J. Marinkelle, Universidad de los Andes, Bogotá, Colombia
| | - Julie M. Ray
- Department of Biology, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada, United States of America
| | - Steve W. Gotte
- Division of Amphibians and Reptiles, Department of Vertebrate Zoology, National Museum of Natural History, Washington, DC, United States of America
| | - Jeremy F. Jacobs
- Division of Amphibians and Reptiles, Department of Vertebrate Zoology, National Museum of Natural History, Washington, DC, United States of America
| | - Addison H. Wynn
- Division of Amphibians and Reptiles, Department of Vertebrate Zoology, National Museum of Natural History, Washington, DC, United States of America
| | | | - Roy W. McDiarmid
- Division of Amphibians and Reptiles, Department of Vertebrate Zoology, National Museum of Natural History, Washington, DC, United States of America
| | - Ronald I. Crombie
- Department of Herpetology, California Academy of Sciences, San Francisco, California, United States of America
| | - George R. Zug
- Division of Amphibians and Reptiles, Department of Vertebrate Zoology, National Museum of Natural History, Washington, DC, United States of America
| | - Kevin de Queiroz
- Division of Amphibians and Reptiles, Department of Vertebrate Zoology, National Museum of Natural History, Washington, DC, United States of America
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Leveraging natural history biorepositories as a global, decentralized, pathogen surveillance network. PLoS Pathog 2021; 17:e1009583. [PMID: 34081744 PMCID: PMC8174688 DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1009583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 10.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
The Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) pandemic reveals a major gap in global biosecurity infrastructure: a lack of publicly available biological samples representative across space, time, and taxonomic diversity. The shortfall, in this case for vertebrates, prevents accurate and rapid identification and monitoring of emerging pathogens and their reservoir host(s) and precludes extended investigation of ecological, evolutionary, and environmental associations that lead to human infection or spillover. Natural history museum biorepositories form the backbone of a critically needed, decentralized, global network for zoonotic pathogen surveillance, yet this infrastructure remains marginally developed, underutilized, underfunded, and disconnected from public health initiatives. Proactive detection and mitigation for emerging infectious diseases (EIDs) requires expanded biodiversity infrastructure and training (particularly in biodiverse and lower income countries) and new communication pipelines that connect biorepositories and biomedical communities. To this end, we highlight a novel adaptation of Project ECHO’s virtual community of practice model: Museums and Emerging Pathogens in the Americas (MEPA). MEPA is a virtual network aimed at fostering communication, coordination, and collaborative problem-solving among pathogen researchers, public health officials, and biorepositories in the Americas. MEPA now acts as a model of effective international, interdisciplinary collaboration that can and should be replicated in other biodiversity hotspots. We encourage deposition of wildlife specimens and associated data with public biorepositories, regardless of original collection purpose, and urge biorepositories to embrace new specimen sources, types, and uses to maximize strategic growth and utility for EID research. Taxonomically, geographically, and temporally deep biorepository archives serve as the foundation of a proactive and increasingly predictive approach to zoonotic spillover, risk assessment, and threat mitigation.
Collapse
|
5
|
Otero A, Fernández-Mazuecos M, Vargas P. Evolution in the Model Genus Antirrhinum Based on Phylogenomics of Topotypic Material. FRONTIERS IN PLANT SCIENCE 2021; 12:631178. [PMID: 33643359 PMCID: PMC7907437 DOI: 10.3389/fpls.2021.631178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/19/2020] [Accepted: 01/06/2021] [Indexed: 06/12/2023]
Abstract
Researchers in phylogenetic systematics typically choose a few individual representatives of every species for sequencing based on convenience (neighboring populations, herbarium specimens, samples provided by experts, garden plants). However, few studies are based on original material, type material or topotypic material (living specimens from the locality where the type material was collected). The use of type or topotypic material in phylogenetic studies is paramount particularly when taxonomy is complex, such as that of Antirrhinum (Plantaginaceae). In this paper, we used topotypic materials of Antirrhinum at the species level (34 species proposed by previous authors), 87 specimens representing the species distributions and >50,000 informative nucleotide characters (from ∼4,000 loci) generated by the genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) technique: (i) to test two explicit taxonomic hypotheses widely followed by local taxonomic treatments; (ii) to robustly estimate phylogenetic relationships; (iii) to investigate the evolution of key morphological characters and biogeographic centers of differentiation. Two GBS phylogenies based on two datasets (87 localities and 34 topotypic specimens) revealed that: (1) Sutton's (1988) taxonomic account is the most congruent with phylogenetic results, whereas division of Antirrhinum into three major clades disagrees with Rothmaler's (1956) infrageneric classification; (2) monophyly of populations currently included in the same species is primarily supported; (3) the historically recognized Antirrhinum majus group is not monophyletic; (4) sister-group relationships are robust for eight species pairs; (5) the evolutionary radiation of 26 species since the Pliocene is underpinned given a high rate of diversification (0.54 spp. Myr-1); (6) a geographic pattern of speciation is reconstructed, with northern Iberia as the center of early diversification followed by more recent speciation in southeastern Iberia; and (7) multiple acquisitions of key taxonomic characters in the course of Antirrhinum diversification are strongly supported, with no evidence of hybridization between major clades. Our results also suggest incipient speciation in some geographic areas and point to future avenues of research in evolution and systematics of Antirrhinum.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Otero
- Real Jardín Botánico (RJB-CSIC), Madrid, Spain
| | | | | |
Collapse
|