Evolution of hybrid interventions for congenital heart disease

German Registry for Cardiac Operations and Interventions in Patients with Congenital Heart Disease: Report 2021 and 9 Years' Longitudinal Observations on Fallot and Coarctation Patients

BACKGROUND

 The annual report of the German Quality Assurance of Congenital Heart Disease displays a broad overview on outcome of interventional and surgical treatment with respect to patient's age and risk categorization. Particular features of the German all-comers registry are the inclusion of all interventional and surgical procedures, the possibility to record repeated treatments with distinct individual patient assignment, and to record various procedures within one case.

METHODS

 International Pediatric and Congenital Cardiac Code terminology for diagnoses and procedures as well as classified adverse events, also recording of demographic data, key procedural performance indicators, and key quality indicators (mortality, adverse event rates). Surgical and interventional adverse events were classified according to the Society of Thoracic Surgeons and to the Congenital Heart Disease Adjustment for Risk Method of the congenital cardiac catheterization project on outcomes. Annual analysis of all cases and additional long-term evaluation of patients after repair of Fallot and primary treatment of native coarctation of the aorta were performed.

RESULTS

 In 2020, 5,532 patients with 6,051 cases (hospital stays) with 6,986 procedures were treated in 23 German institutions. Cases dispense on 618 newborns (10.2%), 1,532 infants (25.3%), 3,077 children (50.9%), and 824 adults (13.6%). Freedom from adverse events was 94.5% in 2,795 interventional cases, 67.9% in 2,887 surgical cases, and 42.9% in 336 cases with multiple procedures (without considering the 33 hybrid interventions). In-hospital mortality was 0.5% in interventional, 1.6% in surgical, and 5.7% in cases with multiple treatments. Long-term observation of 1,632 patient after repair of Fallot depicts the impact of previous palliation in 18% of the patients on the rate of 20.8% redo cases. Differentiated analysis of 1,864 patients with native coarctation picture clear differences of patient, age, and procedure selection and outcome. The overall redo procedure rate in this patient population is high with 30.8%.

CONCLUSION

 Improvement in quality of care requires detailed analysis of risks, performance indicators, and outcomes. The high necessity of redo procedures in patients with complex congenital heart disease underlines the imperative need of long-term observations.

Hybrid Procedures. Opening Doors for Surgeon and Cardiologist Close Collaboration

Background: Collaboration between cardiac surgeons and cardiologists can offer interventions that each specialist may not be able to offer on their own. This type of collaboration has been demonstrated with the hybrid Stage I in patients with hypoplastic heart syndrome. Since that time, a hybrid approach to cardiac interventions has been expanded to an incredible variety of potential indications. Methods: Seventy-one patients were scheduled for a hybrid procedure along 8 years. This was defined as close collaboration between surgeon and cardiologist working together in the same room, either cath-lab (27 patients) or theater (44 patients). Results: Six groups were arbitrarily defined. A: vascular cut-down in the cath-lab (27 neonates); B: bilateral banding (plus ductal stent) in hypoplastic left heart syndrome or alike (15 children); C: perventricular closure of muscular ventricular septal defect (10 cases); D: balloon/stenting of pulmonary branches along with major surgical procedure (12 kids); E: surgical implantation of Melody valve (six patients) and others (F, one case). Two complications were recorded: left ventricular free wall puncture and previous conduit tearing. Both drawbacks were successfully sort out under cardiopulmonary by-pass. Conclusion: Surgeon and cardiologist partnership can succeed where their isolated endeavors are not enough. Hybrid procedures keep on spreading, overcoming initial expectations. As a bridge to biventricular repair or transplant, bilateral banding plus ductal stent sounds interesting. Novel indications can be classified into different groups. Hybrid procedures are not complication-free.

Clinical outcomes of transcatheter versus surgical pulmonary valve replacement: a meta-analysis

Background

Transcatheter pulmonary valve replacement (TPVR) has currently been a well-established alternative operation method to surgical pulmonary valve replacement (SPVR) in patients with pulmonary valve dysfunction in the form of stenosis and/or regurgitation. We conducted a meta-analysis to evaluate the main clinical outcomes after TPVR and SPVR.

Methods

We systematically searched the references of relevant literatures from PubMed and the Cochrane Library published between January 2000 and December 2018 and followed The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-analysis (PRISMA) for this study.

Results

Eleven studies with 4,364 patients were included in the study. Compared with SPVR, TPVR results in a significant decreased in-hospital mortality [odds ratio (OR): 0.18; 95% confidence interval (CI): 0.03-0.98] and mortality at the longest reported follow-up time point (OR: 0.43; 95% CI: 0.22-0.87), though 30-day mortality (OR: 0.38; 95% CI: 0.11-1.33) has no significant difference between groups. Days of hospital stay [(mean difference (MD): -4.38; 95% CI: -6.24--2.53] is shorter with TPVR than SPVR. Besides, rates of 30-day readmission (OR: 0.67; 95% CI: 0.50-0.91) and recurrent pulmonary regurgitation (OR: 0.17; 95% CI: 0.07-0.42) are lower with TPVR, whereas postprocedural infective endocarditis (IE) (OR: 4.56; 95% CI: 2.03-10.26) are higher with TPVR. SPVR carries a decreased risk of re-operation (OR: 2.19; 95% CI: 0.62-7.76) though without statistically significance.

Conclusions

In conclusion, TPVR is associated with a significantly decreased mortality, a shorter length of hospital-stay, a lower rate of 30-day readmission and recurrent pulmonary regurgitation as compared to SPVR throughout the follow-up duration, whereas SPVR results in a significantly lower rate of postprocedural IE than TPVR. In addition, SPVR carries a decreased risk of re-operation with statistically insignificance.

Transcatheter ductus arteriosus stenting in paediatric cardiology: Indications, results and perspectives

Stenting the arterial duct emerged in the early 1990s as an alternative to a variety of surgical interventions in neonates with a duct-dependent pulmonary or systemic circulation complex defect. Furthermore, palliative ductal stenting has been applied in older children with severe suprasystemic pulmonary arterial hypertension, as an alternative to surgical shunts, such as Potts anastomosis. Early results of this technique were discouraging, but by learning from the failures of the past, ductal stenting has become a reliable palliative therapy. In this review, we aim to describe the historical evolution of ductal stenting, its different clinical applications and outcomes, and future perspectives for this strategy in congenital cardiac catheterization.

Hybrid procedure of right ventricle outflow tract stenting in small infants with pulmonary atresia and ventricular septal defect: early and mid-term results from a single centre

IntroductionPulmonary atresia, ventricular septal defect, major aorto-pulmonary collateral arteries, and pulmonary arteries hypoplasia are rare and complex congenital defects that require early interventions to relieve cyanosis and enhance the growth of native pulmonary arteries. The treatment of these patients is still controversial. Surgical techniques require cardiopulmonary bypass which is poorly tolerated by small infants. Percutaneous techniques such as radiofrequency perforation can be challenging. The hybrid technique consists of perventricular stenting of the right ventricle outflow tract through medial sternotomy, to restore native pulmonary flow.

METHODS

We retrospectively reviewed the cardiovascular database of our centre in order to analyse our experience in hybrid procedure. We detected six patients who underwent hybrid first approach between November 2007 and December 2015. We report our early results and mid-term outcomes.

RESULTS

Median age at the procedure was 26 days, median weight was 3150 g, and median Nakata index was 52 mm2/m2. All procedures were successful except for one: this patient underwent a surgical shunt. No immediate and early deaths or major complications occurred and oxygen saturation levels increased in all the patients. Patients were followed up for a period of 12-103 months, and four of them underwent a procedure of unifocalisation at the mean age of 12.5 months.

CONCLUSIONS

We reported data from the largest series of patients who underwent this hybrid procedure. Our experience demonstrated encouraging results to expand the use of this approach to bridge high-risk patients with diminutive pulmonary arteries to a second step of surgical repair.

Image quality and radiation dose of ECG-triggered High-Pitch Dual-Source cardiac computed tomography angiography in children for the evaluation of central vascular stents

Assess image quality and radiation dose of ECG-triggered High-Pitch Dual-Source CTA for the evaluation central vascular stents in children. We included all children ≤ 21 years old with one or more central vascular stents and available prospective ECG-triggered High-Pitch Dual-Source CTA performed at our institution between January 2015 and August 2017. Demographic and scanner information was retrieved. Two board-certified pediatric radiologists blinded to the clinical data, independently reviewed and scored each case using a four-point quality score. Scores 1, 2 and 3 were considered of diagnostic image quality. Inter-observer agreement and non-parametric test were used. 18 patients (10 girls, 8 boys) with a mean age of 9.47 ± 7.38 years (mean ± SD) met inclusion criteria. Thirty-two central vascular stents were evaluated. Mean quality score was 2.07 ± 0.94 with 12.5% (4/32) of the cases classified as unevaluable. Interobserver agreement was excellent (k = 0.86). There is no significant difference between quality score and stent location (p = 0.07). There is a significant difference with stent material as all non-diagnostic scores were only seen in covered stents made of platinum-iridium (p < 0.001). There was no association between image quality and age, height, weight, BSA, heart rate, radiation dose or stent lumen size (p > 0.05). ECG-triggered high-pitch spiral DS-CTA offers appropriate image quality for assessment of central vascular stents in children.