Rivaroxaban in patients with atrial fibrillation: from ROCKET AF to everyday practice

Clinical Associations with the differences in rivaroxaban dosing in patients with atrial fibrillation stratified by three renal function formulae

Background

Clinical trials used Cockcroft-Gault (CG) formula to calculate the estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) in order to dose rivaroxaban for patients with atrial fibrillation (AF).

Objectives

The aim of this study is to evaluate rivaroxaban dosing appropriateness in patients with AF with or without renal impairment based on the CG formula and other formulae, including Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation and the isotope dilution mass spectrometry (IDMS) traceable Modification of Diet in Renal Disease (MDRD) Study equation and the associated clinical outcomes.

Methodology

A retrospective cohort study conducted at Sultan Qaboos University Hospital (SQUH) from 1st January 2016 to 31st December 2020, included all adult patients (≥ 18 years) treated with rivaroxaban for AF and followed up for one year after starting the treatment.

Results

Based on the CG formula, the rivaroxaban dose was inappropriately prescribed in 27% of the patients (21% overdosed and 6% underdosed). Higher baseline creatinine (P=0.0014) and concurrent use of antiplatelet therapy (P<0.001) were associated with the tendency to rivaroxaban overdosing. Higher Body Mass Index (BMI) (P=0.002), female sex (P=0.032), and CKD (P=0.003) were associated with rivaroxaban underdosing. The degree of agreement between the renal function tests when comparing MDRD vs CG and CKD-EPI vs CG in terms of estimated glomerular filtration rate/creatine clearance (eGFR/CrCl) calculation was moderate (κ=0.46) and poor (κ=0.00), respectively, while, in terms of rivaroxaban dose appropriateness was almost perfect (κ=0.82) and substantial (κ=0.77). Clinical outcomes measured by stroke and bleeding events were not significantly different according to the appropriateness of the rivaroxaban dose.

Conclusion

This study has shown a relatively high consistency with the gold standard in dosing rivaroxaban in AF patients using CG formula. Treatment efficiency and safety were not affected by the proportion of dose inappropriateness found in this cohort.

Rivaroxaban for the prevention of outcomes in patients with atrial fibrillation in clinical practice: an indirect comparison of national and international registries

Objective: To analyze the effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban in patients with atrial fibrillation (AF). Methods: The clinical profile and outcomes of the EMIR study were indirectly compared with those of ROCKET-AF, eight other Spanish observational studies and XANTUS. Results: In EMIR, mean age was 74.2 years and CHA₂DS₂-VASc was 3.5. In the rivaroxaban arm of the ROCKET-AF trial, mean age was 73 years and CHADS₂ was 3.5, whereas in the Spanish studies mean age ranged from 74.9 years to 78.4 years and CHA₂DS₂-VASc from 3.5 to 4.3. In EMIR, rates of stroke/systemic embolism, major adverse cardiovascular events, cardiovascular death and major bleeding were 0.57, 1.07, 0.63 and 1.04 events/100 patient-years, respectively. In ROCKET-AF, these numbers were 1.7, 3.91, 1.53 and 3.6 events/100 patient-years, respectively. In the Spanish studies, rates of stroke and major bleeding were 0-1.8 and 0.22-4.2 events/100 patient-years, respectively. In XANTUS, rates of stroke, major adverse cardiovascular events and major bleeding were 0.7, 1.8 and 2.1 events/100 patient-years, respectively. Conclusion: Despite the fact that rivaroxaban is prescribed for elderly patients with a high thromboembolic risk, rates of outcomes remain low.

Thromboembolic and bleeding events with rivaroxaban in clinical practice in Spain: impact of inappropriate doses (the EMIR study)

Aim: To analyze the frequency and variables related to inappropriate rivaroxaban dosage in clinical practice and its impact on outcomes after 2 years. Materials & methods: Postauthorization, observational, multicenter study, in which atrial fibrillation patients, treated with rivaroxaban ≥6 months were included. Results: A total of 1421 patients (74.2 ± 9.7 years, CHA₂DS₂-VASc 3.5 ± 1.6) were included. Overall, 22.9% received rivaroxaban 15 mg. The proper dose of rivaroxaban was taken by 83.3% (9.7% underdosed, 7.0% overdosed). Older age and renal insufficiency were associated with inadequate rivaroxaban dosage. There was a trend toward higher all-cause mortality among underdosed patients (adjusted hazard ratio 1.39; 95% CI 0.75-2.58), and more bleedings in overdosed patients (2.29 vs 0.80 events/100 patient-years; p = 0.14). Conclusion: In clinical practice, rivaroxaban is properly dosed in most patients.

Clinical profile and management of rivaroxaban in patients with atrial fibrillation in routine practice in Spain: data from six nationwide studies

AIMS

To analyze the clinical profile and management of patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation taking rivaroxaban in routine practice in Spain.

METHODS

Clinical data from the observational studies HEROIC (cardiology and hematology; n=1,727), EMIR (cardiology; n=1,493), BRONCE-AP (primary care; n=133), SILVER-AP (primary care; n=457), ALADIN (internal medicine and neurology; n=249), and ESPARTA (internal medicine; n=110) of patients taking rivaroxaban were analyzed. The clinical profile was compared with those of the XANTUS and ROCKET-AF studies.

RESULTS

Overall, mean age was 74.9±9.4 years, CHA₂DS₂-VASc score was 3.7±1.5, and 43.2% had a HAS-BLED score ≥3. Patients included in the HEROIC and EMIR studies were older and more frequently had a creatinine clearance <50 mL/min and a higher thromboembolic risk than those in the XANTUS study, and patients included in the ALADIN study were older and had more prior cerebrovascular disease, but a lower thromboembolic risk than those in the ROCKET-AF trial. In those studies with available data, medication adherence and satisfaction with rivaroxaban were high.

CONCLUSION

Bearing in mind differences according to the clinical setting of each study, atrial fibrillation patients taking rivaroxaban in Spain were elderly and had a high thromboembolic risk. Medication adherence and satisfaction with rivaroxaban were high.

Facing real-life with direct oral anticoagulants in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: outcomes from the first observational and prospective study in a Spanish population

Aim: To analyze the effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) in atrial fibrillation (AF) patients attended in clinical practice. Methods: Observational and prospective study of AF patients that started treatment with DOACs. Results: 1443 patients (age 77.2 ± 9.7 years, CHA2DS2-VASc = 4.1 ± 1.5) were included. 46.0% were taking rivaroxaban, 24.4% dabigatran, 22.5% apixaban and 7.1% edoxaban. Patients taking dabigatran were younger, had lower CHA2DS2-VASc and lesser renal insufficiency. Patients taking apixaban had higher CHA2DS2-VASc and more renal insufficiency. Rates of stroke/major bleeding/intracranial bleeding were 0.7/1.3/0.2 events/100 patient-years, respectively. Conclusion: This was the first prospective study that analyzed the use of all DOACs in AF patients in Spain, showing a good profile in terms of safety and effectiveness in accordance with pivotal studies.

Has the clinical profile of patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation treated with rivaroxaban changed in the last 5 years of use?

AIM

To analyze the evolution of clinical profile of patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation treated with rivaroxaban.

METHODS

Retrospective study in which patients treated with rivaroxaban were divided into two groups according to the data in which the initial prescription was performed (November 2012-December 2013 and January 2014-January 2017).

RESULTS

211 patients (mean age 76.7 ± 9.2 years; CHA₂DS₂-VASc 3.8 ± 1.5; HAS-BLED 2.0 ± 0.8.) were included. Age and bleeding risk were higher in those subjects in which the prescription started earlier. Rates of stroke/TIA, major bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage were 2.3/4.2/0.6 events/100 patient-years, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Although, the initial prescription of rivaroxaban was mainly performed in very elderly patients and/or with a higher bleeding risk, this has been extended to the overall nonvalvular atrial fibrillation population.

Effectiveness and safety of rivaroxaban in a cohort of 142 patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation treated with rivaroxaban for the prevention of stroke

Aim: To evaluate the clinical profile and effectiveness/safety of patients taking rivaroxaban in clinical practice. Methods: Retrospective study that included patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation treated with rivaroxaban for the prevention of stroke between January 2012 and December 2016 in a tertiary hospital in Spain. Results: A total of 142 patients (median age 78 years, 40.1% men, 32.4% creatinine clearance <50 ml/min; 96.5% CHA2DS2-VASc ≥2; 44.3% HAS-BLED ≥3) were included. Only two patients had a thromboembolic event (in both cases ischemic stroke) and three patients had major bleeding (rates of 1.3 and 1.9 events/100 patient years, respectively). Conclusion: Data regarding effectiveness and safety in our cohort were consistent with previous studies, showing that rivaroxaban can be effective and safely used in our setting.

Clinical profile, adequacy of dosage and thromboembolic and bleeding outcomes in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation treated with rivaroxaban in a regional hospital of Asturias, Spain

Aim: To analyze the clinical profile and outcomes of patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation treated with rivaroxaban in a regional hospital. Methods: Retrospective study of patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation that started treatment with rivaroxaban between July 2013 and May 2017 in a regional hospital. Results: 189 patients (age 76.0 ± 9.4 years; CHA2DS2-VASc 4.1 ± 1.7; HAS-BLED 2.1 ± 0.9) were included. Rivaroxaban 20 mg was taken by 74.1% of patients. Among patients treated with rivaroxaban 20 and 15 mg, only 3.6 and 22.5%, respectively, received an inadequate dose. After 26.6 ± 11.6 months of treatment, annual discontinuation rate was 1%. Rates of stroke, major bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage were 0.45, 0.22 and 0.22 events/100 patient years, respectively. Conclusion: In our practice of regional hospital, rates of discontinuation, thromboembolic and bleeding outcomes are low.

Use of rivaroxaban for the prevention of stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in Spain

Aim: To analyze the clinical profile and rates of stroke, major bleeding and intracranial hemorrhage of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) treated with rivaroxaban in clinical practice. Methods: Retrospective study of AF patients anticoagulated with rivaroxaban in a Healthcare Area of Valencia, Spain. Patients started treatment with rivaroxaban from July 2012 to December 2015. Results: A total of 230 patients (mean age 76.9 ± 9.9 years; CHA2DS2-VASc 4.3 ± 1.7; HAS-BLED 1.7 ± 0.9) were included. Rates of stroke, major bleeding and intracranial bleeding were 0.4, 1.9 and 0.5 events per 100 patient-years, respectively. Conclusion: In this cohort of AF patients anticoagulated with rivaroxaban, despite patients being older and having a high thromboembolic risk, rates of stroke, major bleeding and intracranial bleeding were low.

Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Vitamin K Antagonists in Real-life Patients With Atrial Fibrillation. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants vs vitamin K antagonists in real-life patients with atrial fibrillation.

METHODS

A systematic review was performed according to Cochrane methodological standards. The results were reported according to the PRISMA statement. The ROBINS-I tool was used to assess risk of bias.

RESULTS

A total of 27 different studies publishing data in 30 publications were included. In the studies with a follow-up up to 1 year, apixaban (HR, 0.93; 95%CI, 0.71-1.20) and dabigatran (HR, 0.95; 95%CI, 0.80-1.13) did not significantly reduce the risk of ischemic stroke vs warfarin, whereas rivaroxaban significantly reduced this risk (HR, 0.83; 95%CI, 0.73-0.94). Apixaban (HR, 0.66; 95%CI, 0.55-0.80) and dabigatran (HR, 0.83; 95%CI, 0.70-0.97) significantly reduced the major bleeding risk vs warfarin, but not rivaroxaban (HR, 1.02; 95%CI, 0.95-1.10), although with a high statistical heterogeneity among studies. Apixaban (HR, 0.56; 95%CI, 0.42-0.73), dabigatran (HR, 0.45; 95%CI, 0.39-0.51), and rivaroxaban (HR, 0.66; 95%CI, 0.49-0.88) significantly reduced the risk of intracranial bleeding vs warfarin. Reduced doses of direct oral anticoagulants were associated with a slightly better safety profile, but with a marked reduction in stroke prevention effectiveness.

CONCLUSIONS

Data from this meta-analysis suggest that, vs warfarin, the stroke prevention effectiveness and bleeding risk of direct oral anticoagulants may differ in real-life patients with atrial fibrillation.