Indian consensus on the management of CRE infection in critically ill patients (ICONIC) - India

Indian consensus on the managemeNt of carbapenem-resistant enterobacterales infection in critically ill patients II (ICONIC II)

INTRODUCTION

The rising challenge of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) infections in Indian healthcare settings calls for clear clinical guidance on the management of these infections. The Indian consensus on the management of CRE infection in critically ill patients (ICONIC-II) is a follow-up of the ICONIC-I study, which was undertaken in 2019.

AREAS COVERED

A modified Delphi method was used to build expert consensus on CRE management in India, involving online surveys, face-to - face expert meetings, and a literature review. A panel of 12 experts was formed to develop potential clinical consensus statements (CCSs), which were rated through two survey rounds. The CCSs were finalized in a final face-to - face discussion. The finalized CCSs were categorized as consensus, near consensus, and no consensus.

EXPERT OPINION

The outcomes included 46 CCSs (consensus: 40; near consensus: 3; and no consensus: 3). The expert panel discussed and achieved consensus on various strategies for managing CRE infections, emphasizing the significance of existing and emerging resistance mechanisms, prompt and tailored empiric therapy, and use of combination therapies. The consensus statements based on the collective expertise of the panel can potentially assist clinicians in the management of CRE infections that lack high-level evidence.

International guidelines for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative Bacilli infections: A comparison and evaluation

OBJECTIVES

This study aimed to appraise clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) for the treatment of carbapenem-resistant Gram-negative Bacilli (CRGNB) infections and to summarise the recommendations.

METHODS

A systematic search of the literature published from January 2012 to March 2023 was undertaken to identify CPGs related to CRGNB infections treatment. The methodological and reporting quality of eligible CPGs were assessed using six domains of the Appraisal of Guidelines for Research and Evaluation (AGREE) II tool and seven domains of the Reporting Items for practice Guidelines in HealThcare (RIGHT) checklist. Basic information and recommendations of included CPGs were extracted and compared.

RESULTS

A total of 21 CPGs from 7953 relevant articles were included. The mean overall AGREE II score was 62.7%, and was highest for "clarity of presentation" (90.2%) and lowest for "stakeholder involvement" (44.8%). The overall reporting quality of all of the CPGs was suboptimal, with the proportion of eligible items ranging from 45.7 to 85.7%. The treatment of CRGNB infections is related to the type of pathogen, the sensitivity of antimicrobial agents, and the site of infection. In general, the recommended options mainly included novel β-lactam/ β-lactamase inhibitors, cefiderocol, ampicillin-sulbactam (mainly for carbapenem-resistant Acinetobacter baumannii [CRAB]), and combination therapy, involving polymyxin B/colistin, tigecycline (except for carbapenem-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa), aminoglycosides, carbapenems, fosfomycin, and sulbactam (mainly for CRAB).

CONCLUSIONS

The methodological and reporting quality of CPGs for the treatment of CRGNB infections are generally suboptimal and need further improvement. Both monotherapy with novel drugs and combination therapy play important roles in the treatment.

Ceftazidime-avibactam alone or in combination with Aztreonam versus Polymyxins in the management of carbapenem-Resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae nosocomial Infections (CAPRI study): a retrospective cohort study from South India

INTRODUCTION

Carbapenem-resistant Klebsiella pneumoniae (CRKP) infections commonly cause hospital-acquired infections. The study aimed to compare the outcomes of CRKP infections between patients receiving ceftazidime avibactam +/- aztreonam and polymyxins in a hospital setting with a high prevalence of New Delhi Metallo Beta Lactamase production.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective cohort study from January 2020 to September 2022 in critically ill adult patients admitted to a non-COVID-19 medical intensive care unit with CRKP infection. The patients were followed up for a total of 30 days or death, whichever was later.

RESULTS

Of a total of 106 patients included in the study, 65 patients received polymyxins and 41 patients received ceftazidime-avibactam +/- aztreonam. Higher 30-day mortality was noted in the polymyxin group (56.9% vs. 29.2%, P = 0.005). The mean time to event (mortality) in ceftazidime-avibactam +/- aztreonam was 23.9 + 1.5 days which was significantly higher compared to polymyxins (17.9 + 1.2 days, p = 0.006). On Cox regression analysis, after adjusting for the covariates, the hazard ratio for time to event with the use of polymyxin was 2.02 (95% CI: 1.03-3.9).

CONCLUSION

Ceftazidime-avibactam + aztreonam is possibly associated with better clinical outcomes in patients infected with CRKP.

Rapid characterization of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales by multiplex lateral flow assay and detection of ceftazidime-avibactam-aztreonam synergy

PURPOSE

The choice of antibiotics for treatment of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) is increasing becoming limited due to co-expression of Metallo-beta-lactamases (MBL) along with other carbapenemases in these isolates. The study aimed to investigate the occurrence of CRE and to determine the in-vitro synergy and clinical outcomes of Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Aztreonam combination in CRE infections in adult Intensive Care Units (ICUs).

METHODS

79 CRE isolates recovered from adult ICUs during January to March 2023 were tested by O.K.N.V.I. RESIST-5, a lateral flow multiplex assay for rapid detection of OXA-48-like, NDM, IMP, VIM, and KPC carbapenemases. Ceftazidime-Avibactam MIC was determined by microbroth dilution method and in vitro synergy between Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Aztreonam was assessed by Modified E-test/disc diffusion method for these isolates.

RESULTS

The study revealed 7.5 % occurrence of CRE in our hospital, with high occurrence of NDM (n = 42, 53.1 %) and OXA-48-like (n = 63, 79.7 %) carbapenemase. Production of more than one type of carbapenemases was found in 44 isolates. A total of 57 isolates (72 %) had Ceftazidime-Avibactam resistance and 44 of them displayed Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Aztreonam in-vitro synergy. Successful clinical outcome was observed in two patients who received Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Aztreonam combination therapy for 7 days or more.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the preponderance of Ceftazidime-Avibactam resistant CRE expressing NDM and OXA-48-like carbapenemase in our hospital, 77.2 % of them displayed in-vitro synergy of Ceftazidime-Avibactam with Aztreonam. It emphasizes the potential therapeutic utility of this combination in CRE strains showing coproduction of MBL and serine carbapenemases. Greater therapeutic potential of Ceftazidime-Avibactam and Aztreonam combination was observed with extended duration of therapy. However, further clinical evidence is needed to establish the efficacy of this combination and consider other factors that influence treatment outcomes.

Ceftazidime-avibactam with or without Aztreonam vs Polymyxin-based Combination Therapy for Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae: A Retrospective Analysis

Introduction

Gram-negative sepsis remains one of the most difficult to treat infections in intensive care units (ICUs). Carbapenems are often considered to be robust and reliable options for treating infections due to Gram-negative bacteria. The dominance of carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae (CRE) has emerged as one of the greatest challenges faced by the medical community today. Carbapenem-resistant enterobacteriaceae may be resistant to all beta lactam antimicrobials including carbapenems and often, are even resistant to other classes of drugs. There are limited studies comparing polymyxin-based therapies with ceftazidime-avibactam (CAZ-AVI)-based therapies for treating infections caused by CRE.

Methods

A retrospective study comparing outcomes between patients with bacteremia caused by CRE treated with polymyxin-based combination therapy and CAZ-AVI-based therapy (with or without aztreonam).

Results

Of total 104 patients, 78 (75%) were in the CAZ-AVI group. There was no significant difference in the underlying comorbidities between the two groups. The incidence of nephrotoxicity was significantly higher in the polymyxin group (p = 0.017). Ceftazidime-avibactam-based therapy was 66% less likely to be associated with day 14 mortality (p = 0.048) and 67% less likely to be associated with day 28 mortality (p = 0.039) as compared with polymyxin-based therapy.

Conclusion

Ceftazidime-avibactam-based therapy may be a superior option to polymyxin-based therapy for infections caused by CRE. This can have significant practical applications, in terms of optimizing therapy for the individual patient as well as sparing polymyxins and reducing the use of polymyxins in our hospitals.

How to cite this article

Prayag PS, Patwardhan SA, Panchakshari S, Sambasivam R, Dhupad S, Soman RN, et al. Ceftazidime-avibactam with or without Aztreonam vs Polymyxin-based Combination Therapy for Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae: A Retrospective Analysis. Indian J Crit Care Med 2023;27(6):444-450.

Early and Appropriate Use of Ceftazidime-Avibactam in the Management of Multidrug-Resistant Gram-Negative Bacterial Infections in the Indian Scenario

The increasing prevalence of antibiotic-resistant pathogens exerts a substantial burden on the healthcare infrastructure worldwide. The World Health Organization (WHO) has declared that multidrug-resistant (MDR) Gram-negative pathogens, especially, carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE), Acinetobacter baumannii, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa as the topmost priority while developing newer antimicrobials. The increasing prevalence of infectious diseases caused by MDR Gram-negative bacteria also poses a challenge when choosing the empiric antimicrobial therapy for seriously ill hospitalized patients. The infections caused by MDR Gram-negative organisms ultimately result in increased mortality, morbidity, prolonged hospital stay, and increased cost of management. To tackle these challenges, newer antimicrobials like ceftazidime-avibactam were explored. The article also discusses the in vitro activity and therapeutic efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam along with its pharmacokinetic properties and the role it will play in the management of MDR Gram-negative organisms in the Indian setting. Several studies have highlighted the role of early and appropriate antibiotic use in the reduction of mortality in patients with Gram-negative infections. Timely initiation of appropriate antibiotic therapy for serious infections leads to favorable clinical outcomes. Early and appropriate use of ceftazidime-avibactam while treating MDR Gram-negative infections has been associated with improved clinical outcomes. The aim of this review is to highlight the efficacy of ceftazidime-avibactam in the treatment of MDR Gram-negative infections. We have also summarized the information on outcomes achieved by early and appropriate use of ceftazidime-avibactam.

Evaluation of HiCrome KPC Agar for the Screening of Carbapenem-Resistant Enterobacterales Colonization in the ICU Setting of a Tertiary Care Hospital

Background Spread of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacterales (CRE) is a significant concern in intensive care unit (ICU) settings. Approaches to routine screening for CRE colonization in all ICU patients vary depending on institutional epidemiology and resources. The present study was aimed to evaluate the performance of HiCrome Klebsiella pneumoniae carbapenemase (KPC) agar for the detection of CRE colonization in ICU settings taking the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommended method as reference.

Methods Two-hundred and eighty rectal swabs (duplicate) from 140 patients were subjected to CRE detection in HiCrome KPC agar and MacConkey agar (CDC criteria).

Results Using CDC method, total 41 CRE isolates were recovered comprising of 29 Escherichia coli , 11 Klebsiella, and 1 Enterobacter spp. On the other hand, 49 isolates of CRE recovered from 140 rectal swabs using HiCrome KPC agar, out of which 33 were E. coli , 15 Klebsiella, and 1 Enterobacter sp.

Statistical Analysis Sensitivity, specificity, negative, and positive predictive values of CRE screening by HiCrome KPC agar were found to be 100% (91.4–100), 91.9% (84.8–95.8), 83.6% (70.9–91.4), and 100% (95.9–100), respectively, taking the CDC recommended method as reference.

Conclusion HiCrome KPC agar has high sensitivity in screening CRE colonization. Further studies are needed to establish its applicability for detecting the predominant circulating carbapenemases in the Indian setting.

Therapeutic Options for the Treatment of Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae Infections: Hope in the Times of Hype and Despair

How to cite this article: Ansari AS. Therapeutic Options for the Treatment of Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae Infections: Hope in the Times of Hype and Despair. Indian J Crit Care Med 2021;25(7):752-753.

Prevention and management of carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae in haematopoietic cell transplantation

Carbapenem-resistant Enterobacteriaceae (CRE) infections are associated with high morbidity and mortality rates in haematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) recipients. Factors like mucositis, neutropenia, prolonged hospital stay, and frequent use of prophylactic antimicrobials make HCT recipients especially susceptible to CRE infections. Low culture positivity rates, delay in microbiological diagnosis, and resistance to empirical antimicrobial therapy for febrile neutropenia are responsible for high mortality rates in HCT recipients infected with CRE. In this review we discuss the epidemiology, diagnosis, and management of CRE infections with particular emphasis on patients undergoing HCT. We emphasise the need for preventive strategies like multidisciplinary antimicrobial stewardship, and pre-emptive screening for CRE colonisation in prospective HCT patients as measures to mitigate the adverse impact of CRE on HCT outcomes. Newer diagnostic tests like polymerase chain reaction and matrix-assisted laser desorption ionisation-time of flight (MALDI-TOF) assay that enable earlier and better identification of CRE isolates are discussed. Antimicrobial agents available against CRE, including newer agents like ceftazidime-avibactam and meropenem-vaborbactam, have been reviewed. We also discuss the data on promising experimental treatments against CRE: phage therapy and healthy donor faecal microbiota transplant. Finally, this review puts forth recommendations as per existing literature on diagnosis and management of CRE infections in blood and marrow transplant (BMT) unit.