1
|
Wong DD, Ho SA, Domazetovska A, Yong MK, Rawlinson WD. Evidence supporting the use of therapeutic drug monitoring of ganciclovir in transplantation. Curr Opin Infect Dis 2023; 36:505-513. [PMID: 37729654 DOI: 10.1097/qco.0000000000000965] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 09/22/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW This review describes current knowledge of ganciclovir (GCV) and valganciclovir (ValGCV) pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic characteristics, highlighting the likely contribution from host genetic factors to interpatient variability. The evidence and challenges surrounding optimization of drug dosing through therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) are examined, with recommendations made. RECENT FINDINGS Pharmacokinetic studies of current dosing guidelines have shown high interindividual and intraindividual variability of GCV concentrations. This is sometimes associated with a slow decline in cytomegalovirus (CMV) viral load in some transplant recipients. A high incidence of GCV-associated myelosuppression has limited the use of this drug in the transplant setting. Patient groups identified to benefit from GCV TDM include pediatric patients, cystic fibrosis with lung transplantation, obese with kidney transplantation, and patients with fluctuating renal function or on hemodialysis. The emergence of refractory resistant CMV, particularly in immune compromised patients, highlights the importance of appropriate dosing of these antivirals. Host genetic factors need to be considered where recently, two host genes were shown to account for interpatient variation during ganciclovir therapy. Therapeutic Drug Monitoring has been shown to improve target antiviral-level attainment. The use of TDM may guide concentration-based dose adjustment, potentially improving virological and clinical outcomes. However, evidence supporting the use of TDM in clinical practice remains limited and further study is needed in the transplant cohort. SUMMARY Further studies examining novel biomarkers are needed to guide target concentrations in prophylaxis and treatment. The use of TDM in transplant recipients is likely to improve the clinical efficacy of current antivirals and optimize outcomes in transplant recipients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Diana D Wong
- National Measurement Institute, Lindfield, Sydney, New South Wales
| | - Su Ann Ho
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
- Sir Peter MacCallum Department of Oncology, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Victoria
| | - Ana Domazetovska
- Serology and Virology Division, NSW Health Pathology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales
| | - Michelle K Yong
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre
- Department Infectious Diseases, Royal Melbourne Hospital
- National Centre for Infections in Cancer, Parkville
| | - William D Rawlinson
- Serology and Virology Division, NSW Health Pathology, Prince of Wales Hospital, Sydney, New South Wales
- Schools of Biomedical Sciences, Biotechnology and Biomolecular Sciences, Clinical Sciences, University of NSW, Sydney New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Tverdek F, Escobar ZK, Liu C, Jain R, Lindsay J. Antimicrobials in patients with hematologic malignancies and recipients of hematopoietic cell transplantation and other cellular therapies. Transpl Infect Dis 2023; 25 Suppl 1:e14129. [PMID: 37594221 DOI: 10.1111/tid.14129] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/15/2023] [Revised: 07/28/2023] [Accepted: 08/07/2023] [Indexed: 08/19/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Appropriate use of antimicrobials for hematologic malignancy, hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients, and other cellular therapies is vital, with infection causing significant morbidity and mortality in this unique population of immunocompromised hosts. However, often in this population the choice and management of antimicrobial therapy is complex. When selecting an antimicrobial agent, key considerations include the need for dose adjustments due to renal or hepatic impairment, managing drug interactions, the potential for additive drug toxicity among those receiving polypharmacy and therapeutic drug monitoring. Other factors include leveraging pharmacodynamic principles to enable optimization of directed therapy against challenging pathogens, as well as judicious use of antimicrobials to limit drug resistance and adverse drug reactions. SUMMARY This review summarizes the clinical considerations for commonly used antimicrobials in this setting, including antibacterial, antiviral, and antifungal agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Frank Tverdek
- Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Washington Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
- School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Zahra Kassamali Escobar
- Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Washington Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
- School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Catherine Liu
- Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Division of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Rupali Jain
- Department of Pharmacy, University of Washington Medicine, Seattle, Washington, USA
- School of Pharmacy, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
- Division of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA
| | - Julian Lindsay
- Vaccine and Infectious Disease Division, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington, USA
- National Centre for Infection in Cancer and Transplantation (NCICT), Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Li QY, van den Anker J, Wu YE, Hao GX, Zhao W. Optimizing ganciclovir and valganciclovir dosing regimens in pediatric patients with cytomegalovirus infection: a spotlight on therapeutic drug monitoring. Expert Rev Clin Pharmacol 2023; 16:727-739. [PMID: 36794592 DOI: 10.1080/17512433.2023.2181161] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/12/2022] [Accepted: 02/13/2023] [Indexed: 02/17/2023]
Abstract
INTRODUCTION Infants and immunocompromised children with cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection have significant morbidity and mortality. Ganciclovir (GCV) and its oral prodrug valganciclovir (VGCV) are the major antiviral options of choice for the prophylaxis and treatment of CMV infection. However, with the currently recommended dosing regimens used in pediatric patients, large intra- and inter-individual variability of pharmacokinetic (PK) parameters and exposure are observed. AREAS COVERED This review describes the PK and pharmacodynamic (PD) characteristics of GCV and VGCV in pediatrics. Moreover, the role of therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) and current clinical practice for GCV and VGCV dosing regimens optimization in pediatrics are discussed. EXPERT OPINION GCV/VGCV TDM has shown the potential value to improve the benefit/risk ratio in pediatrics when using the therapeutic ranges derived from adults. However, well-designed studies are required to evaluate the relationship of TDM with clinical outcomes. Furthermore, studies to explore the children-specific dose-response-effect relationships will be helpful to facilitate the TDM practice. In the clinical setting, optimal sampling methods such as limited sampling strategies for pediatrics can be used in TDM and intracellular ganciclovir triphosphate may be used as an alternative TDM marker.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Qiu-Yue Li
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Key Laboratory of Chemical Biology (Ministry of Education), School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - John van den Anker
- Division of Clinical Pharmacology, Children's National Medical Center, Washington, DC, USA
- Departments of Pediatrics, Pharmacology & Physiology, George Washington University, School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Washington, DC, USA
- Department of Paediatric Pharmacology and Pharmacometrics, University Children's Hospital Basel, Basel, Switzerland
| | - Yue-E Wu
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Key Laboratory of Chemical Biology (Ministry of Education), School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Guo-Xiang Hao
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Key Laboratory of Chemical Biology (Ministry of Education), School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| | - Wei Zhao
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy, Key Laboratory of Chemical Biology (Ministry of Education), School of Pharmaceutical Sciences, Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China
- NMPA Key Laboratory for Clinical Research and Evaluation of Innovative Drug, Qilu Hospital of Shandong University, Shandong University, Jinan, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Selby PR, Heffernan AJ, Yeung D, Warner MS, Peake SL, Hahn U, Wallis SC, Mcwhinney B, Ungerer JPJ, Shakib S, Roberts JA. Population Pharmacokinetics of Ganciclovir in Allogeneic Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant Patients. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2023; 67:e0155022. [PMID: 36815858 PMCID: PMC10019199 DOI: 10.1128/aac.01550-22] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/07/2022] [Accepted: 01/26/2023] [Indexed: 02/24/2023] Open
Abstract
Treatment of cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection in allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation (alloHCT) patients with ganciclovir is complicated by toxicity and resistance. This study aimed to develop an intravenous ganciclovir population pharmacokinetic model for post-alloHCT patients and to determine dosing regimens likely to achieve suggested therapeutic exposure targets. We performed a prospective observational single-center pharmacokinetic study in adult alloHCT patients requiring treatment with intravenous ganciclovir for CMV viremia or disease. Samples were analyzed using a validated ultraperformance liquid chromatography method. Population pharmacokinetic analysis and Monte Carlo simulations (n = 1000) were performed using Pmetrics for R. Twenty patients aged 18 to 69 years were included in the study. A 2-compartment model with linear elimination from the central compartment and between occasion variability best described the data. Incorporating creatinine clearance (CLCR) estimated by the Chronic Kidney Disease Epidemiology Collaboration (CKD-EPI) equation and presence of continuous renal replacement therapy as covariates for ganciclovir clearance improved the model. Compared to current dosing recommendations, simulations demonstrated loading doses were required to achieve a target AUC24 of 80 to 120 mg.h/L on day 1 of induction therapy. Increased individualization of post-loading induction and maintenance doses based on CLCR is required to achieve the suggested exposures for efficacy (AUC24 >80/>40 mg.h/L for induction/maintenance) while remaining below the exposure thresholds for toxicity (AUC24 <120/<60 mg.h/L for induction/maintenance). Intravenous ganciclovir dosing in alloHCT patients can be guided by CLCR estimated by CKD-EPI. Incorporation of loading doses into induction dosing regimens should be considered for timely achievement of currently suggested exposures.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Philip R. Selby
- School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
- Pharmacy Department, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Aaron J. Heffernan
- School of Medicine and Dentistry, Griffith University, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia
- University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - David Yeung
- School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
- SA Pathology, Adelaide, Australia
- Haematology Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
- Cancer Theme, South Australian Health and Medical Research Institute, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Morgyn S. Warner
- School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
- SA Pathology, Adelaide, Australia
- Infectious Diseases Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Sandra L. Peake
- School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
- Department of Intensive Care Medicine, The Queen Elizabeth Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Uwe Hahn
- School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
- SA Pathology, Adelaide, Australia
- Haematology Unit, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Steven C. Wallis
- University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
| | - Brett Mcwhinney
- Pathology Queensland, Queensland Health, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Jacobus P. J. Ungerer
- Pathology Queensland, Queensland Health, Brisbane, Australia
- Faculty of Health and Behavioural Science, University of Queensland, Brisbane, Australia
| | - Sepehr Shakib
- School of Medicine, University of Adelaide, Adelaide, Australia
- Department of Clinical Pharmacology, Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, Australia
| | - Jason A. Roberts
- University of Queensland Centre for Clinical Research, Faculty of Medicine, The University of Queensland, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Herston Infectious Diseases Institute (HeIDI), Metro North Health, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Departments of Pharmacy and Intensive Care Medicine, Royal Brisbane and Women’s Hospital, Brisbane, Queensland, Australia
- Division of Anaesthesiology Critical Care Emergency and Pain Medicine, Nîmes University Hospital, University of Montpellier, Nîmes, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Honeycomb resin-based spin-column solid-phase extraction for efficient determination of alectinib and its metabolite in human urine. J Chromatogr A 2023; 1690:463787. [PMID: 36652815 DOI: 10.1016/j.chroma.2023.463787] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/25/2022] [Revised: 12/17/2022] [Accepted: 01/08/2023] [Indexed: 01/11/2023]
Abstract
Alectinib and its metabolite, M4, have demonstrated a satisfactory clinical therapeutic effect in the treatment of anaplastic lymphoma kinase-positive advanced non-small-cell lung cancer. Due to individual differences among patients, therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) is critical for guaranteeing appropriate clinical drug use. To realize TDM for alectinib and its metabolite, M4, a honeycomb phenol-formaldehyde resin (PFR) with excellent hydrophilic properties, abundant adsorption force, and a stable porous structure was synthesized by modifying the porogens F127 and P123. The prepared PFR was employed as an adsorbent in a simple and efficient spin-column solid-phase extraction (SPE) process. A rapid method for detecting alectinib and its metabolite M4 in urine was thereby established. The established method showed a linear range of 0.0200 μg mL-1-5.00 μg mL-1 and the recovery range of 98.8-103% for spiked urine samples, with relative standard deviations of ≤ 4.87% (n = 3). Our results proved the practicability of the proposed honeycomb-PFR spin-column SPE method in TDM for alectinib and its metabolite, M4.
Collapse
|
6
|
Ganciclovir Pharmacokinetics and Individualized Dosing Based on Covariate in Lung Transplant Recipients. Pharmaceutics 2022; 14:pharmaceutics14020408. [PMID: 35214140 PMCID: PMC8877499 DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics14020408] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2022] [Revised: 02/09/2022] [Accepted: 02/11/2022] [Indexed: 02/04/2023] Open
Abstract
The aim of this prospective study was to evaluate the pharmacokinetics of ganciclovir in lung transplant recipients, to explore its covariates, and to propose an individualized dosing regimen. Ganciclovir was administered according to the protocol in a standardized intravenous dose of 5 mg/kg twice daily. Serum ganciclovir concentrations were monitored as a trough and at 3 and 5 h after dosing. Individual ganciclovir pharmacokinetic parameters were calculated in a two-compartmental pharmacokinetic model, while regression models were used to explore the covariates. Optimal loading and maintenance doses were calculated for each patient. In lung transplant recipients (n = 40), the median (IQR) ganciclovir total volume of distribution and clearance values were 0.65 (0.52–0.73) L/kg and 0.088 (0.059–0.118) L/h/kg, respectively. We observed medium-to-high inter-individual but negligible intra-individual variability in ganciclovir pharmacokinetics. The volume of distribution of ganciclovir was best predicted by height, while clearance was predicted by glomerular filtration rate. Bodyweight-normalized clearance was significantly higher in patients with cystic fibrosis, while distribution half-life was reduced in this subgroup. On the basis of the observed relationships, practical nomograms for individualized ganciclovir dosing were proposed. The dosing of ganciclovir in patients with cystic fibrosis requires special caution, as their daily maintenance dose should be increased by approximately 50%.
Collapse
|
7
|
Märtson AG, Sturkenboom MGG, Knoester M, van der Werf TS, Alffenaar JWC, Hope W. Standard ganciclovir dosing results in slow decline of cytomegalovirus viral loads. J Antimicrob Chemother 2022; 77:466-473. [PMID: 35107143 PMCID: PMC8809194 DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkab419] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/25/2021] [Accepted: 10/14/2021] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Cytomegalovirus (CMV) can cause severe disease, including rejection in transplant recipients. Ganciclovir and its oral prodrug valganciclovir have been used as first-line therapy for CMV disease in transplant recipients. The exposure targets of ganciclovir are not exactly known, and toxicity and resistance have interfered with ganciclovir therapy. OBJECTIVES To evaluate the pharmacokinetics (PK) and pharmacodynamics (PD) of ganciclovir in transplant recipients. METHODS We used patient data from a previous observational study on ganciclovir therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) in prophylaxis and therapy. The ganciclovir concentrations and CMV viral loads were determined during routine clinical care. The PK/PD population modelling and simulations were done with non-parametric methodology using the Pmetrics program. RESULTS Eighty-five patients were included in the PK modelling. The final PK model was a two-compartment model with first-order absorption and elimination. A subset of 17 patients on CMV therapy were included in the PD modelling. A median of 4 (range 2-8) viral loads were obtained per patient. A simulation of 10 000 patients showed that an approximately 1 log10 reduction of CMV viral load will be observed after 12.5 days at the current recommended dose. CONCLUSIONS The developed linked PK/PD population model and subsequent PD simulations showed slow decline of CMV viral load and it appears that dosing of (val)ganciclovir in this study might have been inadequate to achieve fast reduction of viral load. It is clear that further studies are needed to specify the PD effects of ganciclovir by performing systematic measurements of both ganciclovir concentrations and CMV viral loads.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne-Grete Märtson
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Marieke G G Sturkenboom
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Marjolein Knoester
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Tjip S van der Werf
- Department of Internal Medicine, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.,Department of Pulmonary Diseases and Tuberculosis, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Jan-Willem C Alffenaar
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University Medical Center Groningen, University of Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands.,Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia.,Marie Bashir Institute of Infectious Diseases and Biosecurity, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - William Hope
- Antimicrobial Pharmacodynamics and Therapeutics, Department of Molecular and Clinical Pharmacology, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK
| | | |
Collapse
|
8
|
Märtson AG, Edwina AE, Kim HY, Knoester M, Touw DJ, Sturkenboom MGG, Alffenaar JWC. Therapeutic Drug Monitoring of Ganciclovir: Where Are We? Ther Drug Monit 2022; 44:138-147. [PMID: 34610621 PMCID: PMC8746890 DOI: 10.1097/ftd.0000000000000925] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 8.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/30/2021] [Accepted: 08/07/2021] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Ganciclovir is the mainstay of therapy for the prophylaxis and treatment of Cytomegalovirus. However, therapy with this antiviral agent is hindered by side effects such as myelosuppression, which often leads to therapy cessation. Underdosing, as an attempt to prevent side effects, can lead to drug resistance and therapy failure. Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) has been used to overcome these problems. The purpose of this narrative review was to give an overview of ganciclovir TDM, available assays, population pharmacokinetic models, and discuss the current knowledge gaps. METHODS For this narrative review, a nonsystematic literature search was performed on the PubMed database in April 2021. The following search terms were used: ganciclovir, valganciclovir, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, population pharmacokinetics, therapeutic drug monitoring, bioassay, liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry, liquid chromatography, chromatography, spectrophotometry, and toxicity. In addition, the reference lists of the included articles were screened. RESULTS The most common bioanalysis method identified was liquid chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry. There are different models presenting ganciclovir IC50; however, establishing a pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic target for ganciclovir based on preclinical data is difficult because there are no studies combining dynamic drug exposure in relation to inhibition of viral replication. The data on ganciclovir TDM show large interindividual variability, indicating that TDM may play a role in modifying the dose to reduce toxicity and prevent treatment failure related to low concentrations. The main hurdle for implementing TDM is the lack of robust data to define a therapeutic window. CONCLUSIONS Although the pharmacokinetics (PK) involved is relatively well-described, both the pharmacodynamics (PD) and pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic relationship are not. This is because the studies conducted to date have mainly focused on estimating ganciclovir exposure, and owing to the limited therapeutic options for CMV infections, future studies on ganciclovir are warranted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne-Grete Märtson
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Angela E. Edwina
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Hannah Yejin Kim
- Sydney Pharmacy School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- Department of Pharmacy, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW, Australia
- Marie Bashir Institute of Infectious Diseases and Biosecurity, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| | - Marjolein Knoester
- Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands; and
| | - Daan J. Touw
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
- Department of Pharmaceutical Analysis, Groningen Research Institute of Pharmacy, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Marieke G. G. Sturkenboom
- Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, the Netherlands
| | - Jan-Willem C. Alffenaar
- Sydney Pharmacy School, Faculty of Medicine and Health, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
- Department of Pharmacy, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW, Australia
- Marie Bashir Institute of Infectious Diseases and Biosecurity, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Märtson AG, Edwina AE, Burgerhof JGM, Berger SP, de Joode A, Damman K, Verschuuren EAM, Blokzijl H, Bakker M, Span LF, van der Werf TS, Touw DJ, Sturkenboom MGG, Knoester M, Alffenaar JWC. Ganciclovir therapeutic drug monitoring in transplant recipients. J Antimicrob Chemother 2021; 76:2356-2363. [PMID: 34160036 PMCID: PMC8361328 DOI: 10.1093/jac/dkab195] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2021] [Accepted: 05/18/2021] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND The use of (val)ganciclovir is complicated by toxicity, slow response to treatment and acquired resistance. OBJECTIVES To evaluate a routine therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) programme for ganciclovir in a transplant patient population. METHODS An observational study was performed in transplant recipients from June 2018 to February 2020. Dose adjustments were advised by the TDM pharmacist as part of clinical care. For prophylaxis, a trough concentration (Cmin) of 1-2 mg/L and an AUC24h of >50 mg·h/L were aimed for. For treatment, a Cmin of 2-4 mg/L and an AUC24h of 80-120 mg·h/L were aimed for. RESULTS Ninety-five solid organ and stem cell transplant patients were enrolled. Overall, 450 serum concentrations were measured; with a median of 3 (IQR = 2-6) per patient. The median Cmin and AUC24h in the treatment and prophylaxis groups were 2.0 mg/L and 90 mg·h/L and 0.9 mg/L and 67 mg·h/L, respectively. Significant intra- and inter-patient patient variability was observed. The majority of patients with an estimated glomerular filtration rate of more than 120 mL/min/1.73 m2 and patients on continuous veno-venous haemofiltration showed underexposure. The highest Cmin and AUC24h values were associated with the increase in liver function markers and decline in WBC count as compared with baseline. CONCLUSIONS This study revealed that a standard weight and kidney function-based dosing regimen resulted in highly variable ganciclovir Cmin and under- and over-exposure were observed in patients on dialysis and in patients with increased renal function. Clearly there is a need to explore the impact of concentration-guided dose adjustments in a prospective study.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anne-Grete Märtson
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Groningen, The Netherlands
- Corresponding author. E-mail:
| | - Angela E. Edwina
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Johannes G. M. Burgerhof
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Epidemiology, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Stefan P. Berger
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Internal Medicine, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Anoek de Joode
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Internal Medicine, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Kevin Damman
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Cardiology, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Erik A. M. Verschuuren
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Pulmonary Diseases and Tuberculosis, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Hans Blokzijl
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Martijn Bakker
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Hematology, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Lambert F. Span
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Hematology, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Tjip S. van der Werf
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Internal Medicine, Groningen, The Netherlands
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Pulmonary Diseases and Tuberculosis, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Daan J. Touw
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Marieke G. G. Sturkenboom
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Marjolein Knoester
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - Jan W. C. Alffenaar
- University of Groningen, University Medical Center Groningen, Department of Clinical Pharmacy and Pharmacology, Groningen, The Netherlands
- University of Sydney, Faculty of Medicine and Health, School of Pharmacy, New South Wales, Sydney, Australia
- Westmead Hospital, Westmead, New South Wales, Australia
- Marie Bashir Institute of Infectious Diseases and Biosecurity, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Valganciclovir-Ganciclovir Use and Systematic Therapeutic Drug Monitoring. An Invitation to Antiviral Stewardship. Antibiotics (Basel) 2021; 10:antibiotics10010077. [PMID: 33467490 PMCID: PMC7831032 DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics10010077] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/22/2020] [Revised: 01/07/2021] [Accepted: 01/11/2021] [Indexed: 11/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Valganciclovir (VGCV) and ganciclovir (GCV) doses must be adjusted according to indication, renal function and weight. No specific therapeutic exposure values have been established. We aimed to evaluate the adequacy of VGCV/GCV doses, to assess the interpatient variability in GCV serum levels, to identify predictive factors for this variability and to assess the clinical impact. This is a prospective study at a tertiary institution including hospitalized patients receiving VGCV/GCV prophylaxis or treatment. Adequacy of the antiviral dose was defined according to cytomegalovirus guidelines. Serum levels were determined using High-Performance Liquid Chromatography. Blood samples were drawn at least 3 days after antiviral initiation. Outcome was considered favorable if there was no evidence of cytomegalovirus infection during prophylaxis or when a clinical and microbiological resolution was attained within 21 days of treatment and no need for drug discontinuation due to toxicity. Seventy consecutive patients [74.3% male/median age: 59.2 years] were included. VGCV was used in 25 patients (35.7%) and GCV in 45 (64.3%). VGCV/GCV initial dosage was deemed adequate in 47/70 cases (67.1%), lower than recommended in 7/70 (10%) and higher in 16/70 (22.9%). Large inter-individual variability of serum levels was observed, with median trough levels of 2.3 mg/L and median peak levels of 7.8 mg/L. Inadequate dosing of VGCV/GCV and peak levels lower than 8.37 or greater than 11.86 mg/L were related to poor outcome. Further studies must be performed to confirm these results and to conclusively establish if VGCV/GCV therapeutic drug monitoring could be useful to improve outcomes in specific clinical situations.
Collapse
|