Protein interactions study through proximity-labeling

Revealing protein trafficking by proximity labeling-based proteomics

Protein trafficking is a fundamental process with profound implications for both intracellular and intercellular functions. Proximity labeling (PL) technology has emerged as a powerful tool for capturing precise snapshots of subcellular proteomes by directing promiscuous enzymes to specific cellular locations. These enzymes generate reactive species that tag endogenous proteins, enabling their identification through mass spectrometry-based proteomics. In this comprehensive review, we delve into recent advancements in PL-based methodologies, placing particular emphasis on the label-and-fractionation approach and TransitID, for mapping proteome trafficking. These methodologies not only facilitate the exploration of dynamic intracellular protein trafficking between organelles but also illuminate the intricate web of intercellular and inter-organ protein communications.

From Affinity to Proximity Techniques to Investigate Protein Complexes in Plants

The study of protein–protein interactions (PPIs) is fundamental in understanding the unique role of proteins within cells and their contribution to complex biological systems. While the toolkit to study PPIs has grown immensely in mammalian and unicellular eukaryote systems over recent years, application of these techniques in plants remains under-utilized. Affinity purification coupled to mass spectrometry (AP-MS) and proximity labeling coupled to mass spectrometry (PL-MS) are two powerful techniques that have significantly enhanced our understanding of PPIs. Relying on the specific binding properties of a protein to an immobilized ligand, AP is a fast, sensitive and targeted approach used to detect interactions between bait (protein of interest) and prey (interacting partners) under near-physiological conditions. Similarly, PL, which utilizes the close proximity of proteins to identify potential interacting partners, has the ability to detect transient or hydrophobic interactions under native conditions. Combined, these techniques have the potential to reveal an unprecedented spatial and temporal protein interaction network that better understands biological processes relevant to many fields of interest. In this review, we summarize the advantages and disadvantages of two increasingly common PPI determination techniques: AP-MS and PL-MS and discuss their important application to plant systems.

Interconnection of the mycobacterial heparin-binding hemagglutinin with cholesterol degradation and heme/iron pathways identified by proximity-dependent biotin identification in Mycobacterium smegmatis

Deciphering protein-protein interactions is a critical step in the identification and the understanding of biological mechanisms deployed by pathogenic bacteria. The development of in vivo technologies to characterize these interactions is still in its infancy, especially for bacteria whose subcellular organization is particularly complex, such as mycobacteria. In this work, we used the proximity-dependent biotin identification (BioID) to define the mycobacterial heparin-binding hemagglutinin (HbhA) interactome in the saprophytic bacterium Mycobacterium smegmatis. M. smegmatis is a commonly used model to study and characterize the physiology of pathogenic mycobacteria, such as Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Here, we adapted the BioID technology to in vivo protein-protein interactions studies in M. smegmatis, which presents several advantages, such as maintaining the complex organization of the mycomembrane, offering the possibility to study membrane or cell wall-associated proteins, including HbhA, in the presence of cofactors and post-translational modifications, such as the complex methylation pattern of HbhA. Using this technology, we found that HbhA is interconnected with cholesterol degradation and heme/iron pathways. These results are in line with previous studies showing the dual localization of HbhA, associated with the cell wall and intracytoplasmic lipid inclusions, and its induction under high iron growth conditions.

Proximity labeling: an emerging tool for probing in planta molecular interactions

Protein-protein interaction (PPI) networks are key to nearly all aspects of cellular activity. Therefore, the identification of PPIs is important for understanding a specific biological process in an organism. Compared with conventional methods for probing PPIs, the recently described proximity labeling (PL) approach combined with mass spectrometry (MS)-based quantitative proteomics has emerged as a powerful approach for characterizing PPIs. However, the application of PL in planta remains in its infancy. Here, we summarize recent progress in PL and its potential utilization in plant biology. We specifically summarize advances in PL, including the development and comparison of different PL enzymes and the application of PL for deciphering various molecular interactions in different organisms with an emphasis on plant systems.

FKBP4 connects mTORC2 and PI3K to activate the PDK1/Akt-dependent cell proliferation signaling in breast cancer

Purpose: Among the FKBP family members, FKBP4 has been described to have a potential role in tumorigenesis, and as a putative tissue marker. We previously showed that FKBP4, an HSP90-associated co-chaperone, can elicit immune response as a tumor-specific antigen, and are overexpressed in breast cancer. Experimental design: In this study, we examined how loss of FKBP4 affect breast cancer progression and exploited protein interactomics to gain mechanistic insight into this process. Results: We found that FKBP4 expression is associated with breast cancer progression and prognosis, especially of ER-negative breast cancer. Furthermore, FKBP4 depletion specifically reduces cell growth and proliferation of triple negative breast cancer cell model and xenograft tumor model. Using specific protein interactome strategy by BirA proximity-dependent biotin identification, we demonstrated that FKBP4 is a novel PI3K-Akt-mTOR proximal interacting protein. Conclusion: Our results suggest that FKBP4 interacts with PI3K and can enhance Akt activation through PDK1 and mTORC2.