TNRT profiles with the nucleus research platform 8 system

[Threshold dynamics of the auditory nerve electrically evoked compound action potential in implanted children]

OBJECTIVE

To study the dynamics of thresholds of the electrically evoked compound action potential of the auditory nerve (ECAP) during neural responce telemetry (NRT) intraoperatively, at the time of activation of the cochlear implantation system (CI) and after 3 and 6 months.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

The study included 50 children aged 1 year to 4 years with bilateral sensorineural deafness, operated on by Nucleus CI512 Profile + CP900 CI systems («Cochlear», Australia). In all patients, the electrode array was fully inserted. The dynamics and thresholds of ECAP were recorded and assessed in dynamics: when performing NRT intraoperatively, when the CI system was activated, and after 3 and 6 months. To assess the thresholds, the 1st, 6th, 11th, 16th and 22nd electrodes of the multichannel electrode array were selected.

RESULTS

The average threshold values and the NRT threshold profile determined intraoperatively and during measurements at different times after the activation of the CI system were significantly different (p<0.001), while the average postoperative results were characterized by relative stability. It was shown that the thresholds determined on the electrodes located in the middle of the electrode lattice are more stable than the thresholds determined on the apical and basal electrodes. In most patients, the NRT threshold values determined at the time of the activation of the CI system and after 3 and 6 months were significantly lower than the thresholds determined intraoperatively. The data obtained allow us to conclude that NRT is a stable and accurate technique that allows you to objectify the process of setting up an individual card for the stimulation of the speech processor at the rehabilitation stage after cochlear implantation.

The Precision of eCAP Thresholds Derived From Amplitude Growth Functions

OBJECTIVE

An amplitude growth function (AGF) shows the amplitude of an electrically evoked compound action potential (eCAP) as a function of the stimulation current. AGFs can be used to derive the eCAP threshold, which represents the minimum amount of current needed to elicit a measurable eCAP. eCAP thresholds have been widely used clinically to, for example, assist with sound processor programming. However, no eCAP precision has been included to date. The aim of this study was to investigate the precision of eCAP thresholds and determine whether they are precise enough for clinical use.

DESIGN

The study is retrospective, and the data comprised 826 AGFs, intraoperatively measured in 111 patients implanted with a HiRes90K cochlear implant (Advanced Bionics). For each AGF, the eCAP threshold was determined using two commonly used methods: linear extrapolation (LE) toward the x axis and detection of the last visible (LV) eCAP. Subsequently, the threshold confidence interval (TCI) of each eCAP threshold was calculated to serve as a metric for precision, whereby a larger TCI means a lower precision or reliability. Additionally, the eCAP thresholds results were compared with most recent behavioral fitting thresholds (T profile) to put the eCAP threshold analysis in clinical context. Thereby, the association between eCAP and behavioral thresholds was calculated, both for all subjects together (group analysis) and, in contrast to previous studies, within individual subjects.

RESULTS

Our data show that the TCIs were larger with the LE method than with the LV method. The eCAP thresholds estimated by the LE method were systematically smaller than those estimated by the LV method, while the LE thresholds with the smallest TCIs correlated best with the LV thresholds. Correlation analysis between eCAP and behavioral thresholds revealed correlation coefficients of r = 0.44 and r = 0.54 for the group analysis of LE and LV thresholds, respectively. Within individual subjects, however, the correlation coefficients varied from approximately -1 to +1 for both LE and LV thresholds. Further analysis showed that across subjects, the behavioral thresholds fell within the TCIs of the eCAP threshold profiles.

CONCLUSION

This study shows that eCAP thresholds have an uncertainty that can be estimated using TCIs. The size of the TCI depends on several factors, for example, the threshold estimation method and measurement conditions, but it is often larger than one would expect when just looking at the threshold values. Given these large TCIs, future research on eCAP thresholds should be accompanied by a measure of precision to correctly apply eCAP thresholds in clinical practice. Comparing our eCAP threshold results with T profiles indicates that the eCAP thresholds are possibly not precise enough to predict T profiles.

Intracochlear Position of Cochlear Implants Determined Using CT Scanning versus Fitting Levels: Higher Threshold Levels at Basal Turn

OBJECTIVES

In this study, the effects of the intracochlear position of cochlear implants on the clinical fitting levels were analyzed.

DESIGN

A total of 130 adult subjects who used a CII/HiRes 90K cochlear implant with a HiFocus 1/1J electrode were included in the study. The insertion angle and the distance to the modiolus of each electrode contact were determined using high-resolution CT scanning. The threshold levels (T-levels) and maximum comfort levels (M-levels) at 1 year of follow-up were determined. The degree of speech perception of the subjects was evaluated during routine clinical follow-up.

RESULTS

The depths of insertion of all the electrode contacts were determined. The distance to the modiolus was significantly smaller at the basal and apical cochlear parts compared with that at the middle of the cochlea (p < 0.05). The T-levels increased toward the basal end of the cochlea (3.4 dB). Additionally, the M-levels, which were fitted in our clinic using a standard profile, also increased toward the basal end, although with a lower amplitude (1.3 dB). Accordingly, the dynamic range decreased toward the basal end (2.1 dB). No correlation was found between the distance to the modiolus and the T-level or the M-level. Furthermore, the correlation between the insertion depth and stimulation levels was not affected by the duration of deafness, age at implantation or the time since implantation. Additionally, the T-levels showed a significant correlation with the speech perception scores (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

The stimulation levels of the cochlear implants were affected by the intracochlear position of the electrode contacts, which were determined using postoperative CT scanning. Interestingly, these levels depended on the insertion depth, whereas the distance to the modiolus did not affect the stimulation levels. The T-levels increased toward the basal end of the cochlea. The level profiles were independent of the overall stimulation levels and were not affected by the biographical data of the patients, such as the duration of deafness, age at implantation or time since implantation. Further research is required to elucidate how fitting using level profiles with an increase toward the basal end of the cochlea benefits speech perception. Future investigations may elucidate an explanation for the effects of the intracochlear electrode position on the stimulation levels and might facilitate future improvements in electrode design.

Population-based prediction of fitting levels for individual cochlear implant recipients

OBJECTIVES

This study analyzed the predictability of fitting levels for cochlear implant recipients based on a review of the clinical levels of the recipients.

DESIGN

Data containing threshold levels (T-levels) and maximum comfort levels (M-levels) for 151 adult subjects using a CII/HiRes 90K cochlear implant with a HiFocus 1/1 J electrode were used. The 10th, 25th, 50th, 75th and 90th percentiles of the T- and M-levels are reported. Speech perception of the subjects, using a HiRes speech coding strategy, was measured during routine clinical follow-up.

RESULTS

T-levels for most subjects were between 20 and 35% of their M-levels and were rarely (<1/50) below 10% of the M-levels. Furthermore, both T- and M-levels showed an increase over the first year of follow-up. Interestingly, levels expressed in linear charge units showed a clear increase in dynamic range (DR) over 1 year (29.8 CU; SD 73.0), whereas the DR expressed in decibels remained stable. T-level and DR were the only fitting parameters for which a significant correlation with speech perception (r = 0.34, p < 0.01, and r = 0.33, p < 0.01, respectively) could be demonstrated. Additionally, analysis showed that T- and M-level profiles expressed in decibels were independent of the subjects' across-site mean levels. Using mixed linear models, predictive models were obtained for the T- and M-levels of all separate electrode contacts.

CONCLUSIONS

On the basis of the data set from 151 subjects, clinically applicable predictive models for T- and M-levels have been obtained. Based on one psychophysical measurement and a population-based T- or M-level profile, individual recipients' T- and M-levels can be approximated with a closed-set formula. Additionally, the analyzed fitting level data can serve as a reference for future patients.