Insights on different analysis techniques in the monothermal and bithermal caloric test - which parameter should we use to quantify vestibular function?

Nystagmus duration after caloric irrigations

Objective: To measure nystagmus duration after warm and cool caloric water irrigations, with the aim of providing preliminary evidence for the optimum interval between irrigation onsets; and to compare nystagmus durations between warm and cool irrigations, in addition to maximum slow phase velocity (SPV).Design: Participants underwent up to four caloric irrigations during routine appointments. Nystagmus was recorded to minimal levels (within 2°/s of subject's baseline). The nystagmus duration and maximum SPV were measured.Study Sample: 52 vestibular assessment patients (99 ears).Results: The mean nystagmus duration was 183.9 s (seconds) (3:04 min) from irrigation onset, and nystagmus became minimal after 264.8 s (4:25 min) in 97.5% of this sample. The population mean is within ±6.7 s of the sample mean (p = <0.001). There was no significant difference between warm and cool irrigation durations, and correlation and linear regression analysis showed duration cannot reliably be predicted by maximum SPV.Conclusions: Mean nystagmus duration (3 min after irrigation onset) and nystagmus duration for 97.5% of patients (<4.5 min) were substantially less than the BSA recommended 7 min between irrigations. These findings provide preliminary evidence for shortening of intervals between stimulus onsets, regardless of irrigation temperature or maximum SPV, to reduce caloric testing time and improve clinical efficiency.

Assessment of vestibular function in elderly patients

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Individuals over the age of 60 are at an increased risk of falls, even if they do not have an isolated dysfunction of the vestibular system. The aim of this article is to review the various vestibular testing currently available and its usefulness in determining the presence of vestibular dysfunction in the elderly population. The primary vestibular tests to be reviewed include: balance function testing, vestibular evoked myogenic potentials (VEMPs), and video head impulse testing (vHIT).

RECENT FINDINGS

Balance function testing is important as it evaluates the integration of vestibular information along with sensory and visual information, which may also be impaired. VEMP testing provides a small diagnostic yield as most elderly patients have absent or reduced responses. vHIT gain is reduced in this population, but will still be within the normal range for individuals with normal balance function.

SUMMARY

The combination of various vestibular tests provides complimentary information instead of redundant information on the patient's balance function. Each test evaluates various aspects of the vestibular system which are all needed to determine stable balance in the elderly population.

The Reliance on Vestibular Information During Standing Balance Control Decreases With Severity of Vestibular Dysfunction

The vestibular system is involved in gaze stabilization and standing balance control. However, it is unclear whether vestibular dysfunction affects both processes to a similar extent. Therefore, the objective of this study was to determine how the reliance on vestibular information during standing balance control is related to gaze stabilization deficits in patients with vestibular dysfunction. Eleven patients with vestibular dysfunction and twelve healthy subjects were included. Gaze stabilization deficits were established by spontaneous nystagmus examination, caloric test, rotational chair test, and head impulse test. Standing balance control was assessed by measuring the body sway (BS) responses to continuous support surface rotations of 0.5° and 1.0° peak-to-peak while subjects had their eyes closed. A balance control model was fitted on the measured BS responses to estimate balance control parameters, including the vestibular weight, which represents the reliance on vestibular information. Using multivariate analysis of variance, balance parameters were compared between patients with vestibular dysfunction and healthy subjects. Robust regression was used to investigate correlations between gaze stabilization and the vestibular weight. Our results showed that the vestibular weight was smaller in patients with vestibular dysfunction than in healthy subjects (F = 7.67, p = 0.011). The vestibular weight during 0.5° peak-to-peak support surface rotations decreased with increasing spontaneous nystagmus eye velocity (ρ = −0.82, p < 0.001). In addition, the vestibular weight during 0.5° and 1.0° peak-to-peak support surface rotations decreased with increasing ocular response bias during rotational chair testing (ρ = −0.72, p = 0.02 and ρ = −0.67, p = 0.04, respectively). These findings suggest that the reliance on vestibular information during standing balance control decreases with the severity of vestibular dysfunction. We conclude that particular gaze stabilization tests may be used to predict the effect of vestibular dysfunction on standing balance control.