1
|
Rasmussen KD, West NC, Bille M, Cayé-Thomasen P. Tinnitus suppression in a prospective cohort of 45 cochlear implant recipients: occurrence, degree and correlates. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2023; 280:4073-4082. [PMID: 37099145 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-023-07921-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/16/2022] [Accepted: 03/08/2023] [Indexed: 04/27/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To determine tinnitus prevalence and severity in a cohort of unselected first-time cochlear implant (CI) recipients whose primary motive for CI was sensorineural hearing loss (SNHL), and to evaluate the effect of CI on tinnitus after cochlear implantation. METHODS Prospective longitudinal study of 45 adult CI recipients with moderate to profound SNHL. Patients completed the Danish version of the Tinnitus Handicap Inventory (THI) and a visual analogue scale (VAS) for tinnitus burden before implantation, 4 months after implantation and 14 months after implantation. RESULTS The study included 45 patients, of which 29 (64%) had pre-implant tinnitus. Median THI score (IQR) significantly decreased from 20 (34) to 12 (24) at first follow-up (p < 0.05) and to 6 points (17) at second follow-up (p < 0.001). Median VAS (IQR) for tinnitus burden decreased from 33 (62) to 17 (40; p = 0.228) and 12 (27, p < 0.05) at the first and second follow-ups, respectively. Tinnitus was totally suppressed in 19% of patients, improved in 48%, remained unchanged in 19% and worsened in 6%. 2 patients reported new tinnitus. At the second follow-up, 74% of patients had slight or no tinnitus handicap, 16% had mild handicaps, 6% had moderate handicaps, and 3% had severe handicaps. High pre-implant THI and VAS scores correlated with greater decrease in THI scores over time. CONCLUSION 64% of the patients with SNHL had pre-implant tinnitus, which was decreased 4 and 14 months after implantation. Overall, 68% of patients with tinnitus improved their tinnitus handicap after CI. Patients with higher THI and VAS scores had a larger decline and the highest benefits in terms of tinnitus handicap improvement. The study findings demonstrate that the majority of patients with moderate to profound SNHL eligible for cochlear implantation benefit from complete or partial tinnitus suppression and improved quality of life after implantation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kasper Dyre Rasmussen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery and Audiology, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark.
| | - Niels Cramer West
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery and Audiology, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Michael Bille
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery and Audiology, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| | - Per Cayé-Thomasen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology Head and Neck Surgery and Audiology, Rigshospitalet, University Hospital of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
- Faculty of Health and Medical Sciences, University of Copenhagen, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cochlear implant in tinnitus management. Curr Opin Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg 2023; 31:155-157. [PMID: 36912228 DOI: 10.1097/moo.0000000000000874] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 03/14/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE OF REVIEW To evaluate whether cochlear implantation can mitigate tinnitus perception and its discomfort among patients with severe-to-profound hearing loss, in order to provide an answer on a possible treatment for a health condition with high prevalence and impact on quality of life. RECENT FINDINGS Tinnitus can develop after peripheral hearing loss and is associated with altered auditory processing. It does not only involve auditory structures but also aberrant neural activity and interaction with other regions of the Central Nervous System associated with emotion, attention, anguish, memory and motor activity. SUMMARY Recent studies investigated the changes in tinnitus perception among patients who underwent cochlear implantation and demonstrated a postoperative decrease. Hence, patients with severe-to-profound sensorineural hearing loss and tinnitus are likely to benefit from cochlear implantation.
Collapse
|
3
|
Olze H, Ketterer MC, Péus D, Häußler SM, Hildebrandt L, Gräbel S, Szczepek AJ. Effects of auditory rehabilitation with cochlear implant on tinnitus prevalence and distress, health-related quality of life, subjective hearing and psychological comorbidities: Comparative analysis of patients with asymmetric hearing loss (AHL), double-sided (bilateral) deafness (DSD), and single-sided (unilateral) deafness (SSD). Front Neurol 2023; 13:1089610. [PMID: 36712436 PMCID: PMC9877424 DOI: 10.3389/fneur.2022.1089610] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2022] [Accepted: 12/21/2022] [Indexed: 01/13/2023] Open
Abstract
Introduction Auditory rehabilitation with a cochlear implant (CI), in many cases, positively impacts tinnitus. However, it is unclear if the tinnitus-related benefit of CI is equal for patients with various indications for CI. Therefore, this study aimed to determine differences in tinnitus prevalence and distress, health-related quality of life, subjective hearing, perceived stress, and psychological comorbidities between patients diagnosed with asymmetric hearing loss (AHL), single-sided (unilateral) deafness (SSD), and double-sided (bilateral) deafness (DSD) before and six months after cochlear implantation. Methods One hundred-one CI candidates were included in this prospective study (39 AHL patients, 23 DSD patients, and 39 SSD patients). The patients completed questionnaires measuring tinnitus distress, health-related quality of life, subjective hearing, perceived stress, and psychological comorbidities before and 6 months after CI. Results The prevalence of tinnitus in the entire cohort (80.2% before CI) decreased 6 months after CI to 71.3%. The DSD group had the lowest tinnitus prevalence at both time points. The degree of tinnitus-induced distress decreased significantly in all three groups after CI. Differences in quality of life, subjective hearing, and psychological comorbidities between the groups at the study onset disappeared after CI. Significant correlations existed between anxiety, depression, and tinnitus distress in AHL and SSD but not in DSD patients before and after CI. Discussion Our results demonstrate significant differences between the three groups of CI candidates, which might affect the implantation outcome. These differences suggest a need for personalized psychological counseling during the auditory rehabilitation process, focusing on anxiety and depressive symptoms for SSD and AHL patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Heidi Olze
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany,*Correspondence: Heidi Olze ✉
| | - Manuel Christoph Ketterer
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Dominik Péus
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, University of Oldenburg, Oldenburg, Germany
| | - Sophia Marie Häußler
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Skull Base Center, University Medical Center Hamburg-Eppendorf, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Lynn Hildebrandt
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Stefan Gräbel
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| | - Agnieszka J. Szczepek
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Head and Neck Surgery, Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Berlin, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Assouly KKS, Arts RAGJ, Graham PL, van Dijk B, James CJ. Influence of tinnitus annoyance on hearing-related quality of life in cochlear implant recipients. Sci Rep 2022; 12:14423. [PMID: 36002556 PMCID: PMC9402917 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-022-18823-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/04/2022] [Accepted: 08/19/2022] [Indexed: 01/10/2023] Open
Abstract
Tinnitus is a common symptom in cochlear implant (CI) recipients. There is no clear evidence of the influence of tinnitus on hearing-related quality of life (QoL) in this population. The aim of this study was to assess the relationship between hearing-related QoL measured by the Speech, Spatial and Qualities of Hearing scale (SSQ12) and tinnitus annoyance or perceived change in tinnitus annoyance after cochlear implantation. The study sample consisted of 2322 implanted adults across France, Germany, Ireland, Italy, the Netherlands, Sweden and the United Kingdom. Information relating to QoL measured using the SSQ12 and tinnitus annoyance and change in tinnitus annoyance, assessed using single-item questions, were collected one or more years post-implantation. The relationship between SSQ12 score and tinnitus annoyance or change in tinnitus annoyance was analysed using linear models adjusted for age and unilateral versus bilateral implants. Tukey pairwise tests were used to compare mean SSQ12 scores across levels of tinnitus annoyance and changes. Tinnitus prevalence was 33.9% post-implantation. Recipients with tinnitus had a significantly lower SSQ12 score than recipients without tinnitus. SSQ scores varied significantly with tinnitus annoyance, age and unilateral versus bilateral implants. Overall, CI recipients who experienced less bothersome tinnitus reported better hearing-related QoL. Healthcare professionals should be aware of the influence of tinnitus on CI recipients’ hearing to manage patient expectations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly K S Assouly
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands. .,University Medical Center Utrecht Brain Center, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands. .,Cochlear Technology Centre Belgium, Mechelen, Belgium.
| | | | - Petra L Graham
- School of Mathematical and Physical Sciences, Macquarie University, North Ryde, NSW, Australia
| | - Bas van Dijk
- Cochlear Technology Centre Belgium, Mechelen, Belgium
| | | |
Collapse
|
5
|
Assouly KKS, Smit AL, Eikelboom RH, Sucher C, Atlas M, Stokroos RJ, Stegeman I. Analysis of a Cochlear Implant Database: Changes in Tinnitus Prevalence and Distress After Cochlear Implantation. Trends Hear 2022; 26:23312165221128431. [PMID: 36154765 PMCID: PMC9515522 DOI: 10.1177/23312165221128431] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/23/2022] Open
Abstract
The aim of this study was to estimate the prevalence and distress of tinnitus
pre- and post-cochlear implantation in patients with bilateral severe to
profound hearing loss. In this retrospective study, we included patients from a
cochlear implant clinic in Perth, Western Australia. Pre- and post-cochlear
implantation data from 300 implant recipients were collected on self-reported
presence of tinnitus, tinnitus distress using the Tinnitus Reaction
Questionnaire (TRQ), hearing-related quality of life using the Abbreviated
Profile of Hearing Aid Benefit (APHAB), and consonant-nucleus vowel-consonant
(CNC) word recognition test scores. Retrospectively, patients were grouped into
those with or without tinnitus, and the grade of tinnitus distress. The
potential factors associated with post-implantation changes in the presence of
tinnitus and its distress were evaluated. Tinnitus prevalence was 55.8%
pre-operatively and 44.3% post-implantation with a median TRQ score respectively
of 12.0 (IQR: 1.0–28.0) and 3.5 (IQR: 0.0–16.2) points. Among the 96 patients
experiencing tinnitus pre-implantation, 14.6% patients experienced moderate to
catastrophic tinnitus distress pre-implantation compared to 6.3%
post-implantation. To conclude, the pre- and post-implantation median TRQ score
for the cohort population showed that tinnitus was a “slight” handicap. Tinnitus
prevalence and its associated tinnitus distress decreased post-implantation.
Patients with tinnitus post-implantation were significantly younger and had less
severe pre-implantation hearing loss in the non-implanted ear than patients
without tinnitus. Further research is needed to understand the factors
influencing changes in tinnitus.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kelly K S Assouly
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Cochlear Technology Centre, Mechelen, Belgium
| | - Adriana L Smit
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Robert H Eikelboom
- 104182Ear Science Institute Australia, Subiaco, Western Australia.,Centre for Ear Sciences, Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia.,Department of Speech Language Pathology and Audiology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa.,Curtin Medical School, Curtin University, Bentley, Western Australia
| | - Cathy Sucher
- 104182Ear Science Institute Australia, Subiaco, Western Australia.,Centre for Ear Sciences, Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia
| | - Marcus Atlas
- 104182Ear Science Institute Australia, Subiaco, Western Australia.,Centre for Ear Sciences, Medical School, The University of Western Australia, Nedlands, Western Australia
| | - Robert J Stokroos
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - Inge Stegeman
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head & Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,UMC Utrecht Brain Center, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Department of Ophthalmology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands.,Epidemiology and Data Science, Amsterdam University Medical Center, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|