1
|
Hamlin I, Bolger F, Vasilichi A, Belton I, Crawford MM, Sissons A, Taylor Browne Lūka C, Wright G. Structured groups make more accurate veracity judgements than individuals. APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY 2021. [DOI: 10.1002/acp.3892] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Affiliation(s)
- Iain Hamlin
- Management Science University of Strathclyde Glasgow UK
| | - Fergus Bolger
- Management Science University of Strathclyde Glasgow UK
| | | | - Ian Belton
- Management Science University of Strathclyde Glasgow UK
| | | | | | | | - George Wright
- Management Science University of Strathclyde Glasgow UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mac Giolla E, Luke TJ. Does the cognitive approach to lie detection improve the accuracy of human observers? APPLIED COGNITIVE PSYCHOLOGY 2020. [DOI: 10.1002/acp.3777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/21/2023]
Affiliation(s)
- Erik Mac Giolla
- Department of Psychology University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden
| | - Timothy J. Luke
- Department of Psychology University of Gothenburg Gothenburg Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Colwell K, James-Kangal N, Hiscock-Anisman C, Phelan V. Should Police Use ACID? Training and Credibility Assessment Using Transcripts Versus Recordings. JOURNAL OF FORENSIC PSYCHOLOGY PRACTICE 2015. [DOI: 10.1080/15228932.2015.1035187] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/23/2022]
|
4
|
Street CNH, Richardson DC. Descartes Versus Spinoza: Truth, Uncertainty, and Bias. SOCIAL COGNITION 2015. [DOI: 10.1521/soco.2015.33.2.2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022] Open
|
5
|
Zhou L, Zhang D, Sung YW. The Effects of Group Factors on Deception Detection Performance. SMALL GROUP RESEARCH 2013. [DOI: 10.1177/1046496413484178] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
Abstract
Deception has been an important problem in interactive groups, impeding effective group communication and group work, yet deception detection in such a context remains understudied. Extrapolated from the interpersonal deception theory (IDT) and group composition research in cooperative contexts, this research proposes that group factors, including diversity and familiarity, have influence on the performance of deception detection. The measurement of group performance was not limited to success, as previous deception studies did, but included efficiency as well because it is fundamental to the effectiveness of deception detection. An analysis of data collected from a real-world online community found that behavioral familiarity had a positive effect, and gender diversity had a negative effect, on group success in deception detection. In addition, behavioral familiarity had a negative effect and functional diversity had a positive effect on the group efficiency of deception detection. The findings not only extend IDT in several important ways but also suggest the need to distinguish between noncooperative and cooperative groups, an important theoretical implication for group composition research.
Collapse
|