Comparative effectiveness of tenofovir in HIV-infected treatment-experienced patients: systematic review and meta-analysis

Indirect Treatment Comparisons of Lenacapavir Plus Optimized Background Regimen Versus Other Treatments for Multidrug-Resistant Human Immunodeficiency Virus

BACKGROUND/AIMS

Heavily treatment-experienced (HTE) people with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) (PWH) may not achieve virologic suppression (VS) with combination antiretroviral therapy due to multidrug resistance (MDR), intolerance, and safety concerns. These PWH often receive highly individualized treatment regimens, but these regimens may not enable PWH to achieve VS, thereby halting disease progression. Novel medications are required for treating individuals with MDR HIV. Lenacapavir (LEN), a first-in-class HIV capsid inhibitor, is under investigation for the treatment of HTE individuals with MDR HIV in the phase 2/3 CAPELLA study. This study aimed to compare LEN plus optimized background regimen (OBR) with fostemsavir (FTR) + OBR, ibalizumab (IBA) + OBR, and OBR alone in terms of VS, CD4 cell count change from baseline, immunologic recovery, and discontinuation due to adverse events, using indirect treatment comparisons.

METHODS

A systematic review identified clinical evidence on HIV-1 treatments in HTE PWH. A feasibility assessment evaluated the identified studies for indirect treatment comparison analyses based on population characteristics, interventions, comparators, and outcomes of interest. Unanchored simulated treatment comparisons of LEN + OBR versus comparators were conducted.

RESULTS

LEN + OBR had 6.57 times higher odds of VS at weeks 24 to 28 than FTR + OBR (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.34-32.28), 8.93 times higher odds of VS than IBA + OBR (95% CI 2.07-38.46), and 12.74 times higher odds of VS than OBR alone (95% CI 1.70-95.37). Change from baseline in CD4 cell count was similar across LEN + OBR, FTR + OBR, and IBA + OBR.

CONCLUSION

LEN + OBR has statistically significantly greater odds of VS at weeks 24 to 28 than its comparators and represents a novel treatment for people with MDR HIV.

Adipocyte differentiation of 3T3-L1 cells under tenofovir alafenamide, tenofovir disoproxil fumarate, and integrase strand transfer inhibitors selective challenge: an in-vitro model

OBJECTIVE

Integrase strand transfer inhibitors (INSTIs) are a class of antiretroviral therapy (ART) medications with a good tolerability profile and a high genetic barrier to HIV drug resistance. However, several studies report significant weight gain among persons receiving INSTI-based ART regimens compared with other regimens.

DESIGN

In-vitro model of adipogenesis.

METHODS

We used 3T3-L1 cells to investigate the effects of the nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors (NRTIs) tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) and tenofovir alafenamide (TAF), alone or in combination with INSTIs: raltegravir (RAL), elvitegravir (ELV), dolutegravir (DTG), and bictegravir (BIC) on adipose differentiation. To monitor adipocyte differentiation, expression levels of PPARɣ and C/EBPα and the intracellular lipid accumulation by Red Oil staining were used. Furthermore, we evaluated the immunohistochemical expression of ER-TR7, a fibroblastic marker, after INSTIs treatment.

RESULTS

Compared with control, INSTIs were able to increase adipogenesis, especially RAL and ELV. TAF and TDF inhibited adipogenesis alone and in combination with INSTIs. This ability was more evident when TAF was used in combination with DTG and BIC. Finally, INSTIs increased the expression of ER-TR7 compared with control and cells treated with TAF or TDF.

CONCLUSION

Our data support the evidence that in-vitro challenge of 3T3-L1 cells with INSTIs is able to increase adipocytic differentiation and to drive a number of these cells toward the expression of fibroblastic features, with a different degree according to the various drugs used whereas TAF and TDF have an antagonistic role on this phenomenon.

Quadruple versus triple combination antiretroviral therapies for treatment naive people with HIV: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the effects of four drug (quadruple) versus three drug (triple) combination antiretroviral therapies in treatment naive people with HIV, and explore the implications of existing trials for clinical practice and research.

DESIGN

Systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

DATA SOURCES

PubMed, EMBASE, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health Literature from March 2001 to December 2016 (updated search in PubMed and EMBASE up to June 2018); and reference lists of eligible studies and related reviews.

STUDY SELECTION

Randomised controlled trials comparing quadruple with triple combination antiretroviral therapies in treatment naive people with HIV and evaluating at least one effectiveness or safety outcome.

REVIEW METHODS

Outcomes of interest included undetectable HIV-1 RNA, CD4 T cell count, virological failure, new AIDS defining events, death, and severe adverse effects. Random effects meta-analyses were conducted.

RESULTS

Twelve trials (including 4251 people with HIV) were eligible. Quadruple and triple combination antiretroviral therapies had similar effects on all relevant effectiveness and safety outcomes, with no point estimates favouring quadruple therapy. With the triple therapy as the reference group, the risk ratio was 0.99 (95% confidence interval 0.93 to 1.05) for undetectable HIV-1 RNA, 1.00 (0.90 to 1.11) for virological failure, 1.17 (0.84 to 1.63) for new AIDS defining events, 1.23 (0.74 to 2.05) for death, and 1.09 (0.89 to 1.33) for severe adverse effects. The mean difference in CD4 T cell count increase between the two groups was -19.55 cells/μL (-43.02 to 3.92). In general, the results were similar, regardless of the specific regimens of combination antiretroviral therapies, and were robust in all subgroup and sensitivity analyses.

CONCLUSION

In this study, effects of quadruple combination antiretroviral therapy were not better than triple combination antiretroviral therapy in treatment naive people with HIV. This finding lends support to current guidelines recommending the triple regimen as first line treatment. Further trials on this topic should be conducted only when new research is justified by adequate systematic reviews of the existing evidence. However, this study cannot exclude the possibility that quadruple cART would be better than triple cART when new classes of antiretroviral drugs are made available.

Tenofovir Causes Bone Loss via Decreased Bone Formation and Increased Bone Resorption, Which Can Be Counteracted by Dipyridamole in Mice

Osteopenia and fragility fractures have been associated with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection. Tenofovir, a common antiviral in HIV treatment, also leads to increases in bone catabolism markers and decreased BMD in children and young adults. In murine models and human cell lines, tenofovir inhibits adenosine triphosphate release and decreases extracellular adenosine levels. Adenosine and adenosine A2A receptor inhibit osteoclast formation, and increase local adenosine concentration with dipyridamole, an agent that blocks adenosine cellular uptake and stimulates new bone formation as well as bone morphogenic protein 2. We hypothesized that tenofovir regulates bone resorption by diminishing endogenous adenosine levels and questioned whether dipyridamole may be a useful treatment to counteract the deleterous bone effects of tenofovir. Primary murine osteoclasts were induced by M-CSF/RANKL, and the number of TRAP-positive-cells was studied after challenge with tenofovir alone or in combination with dipyridamole. Differentiation markers were studied by RT-PCR and MAPK/NFkB expression by Western blot. Male C57Bl/6 mice were treated as follows: saline 0.9% (control), tenofovir 75 mg/kg/day, dipyridamole 25 mg/kg/day, combination tenofovir/dipyridamole (n = 10, 4 weeks). Calcein/Alizarin Red-labeling of newly formed bone was used, and long bones were prepared for micro-computed tomography (μCT)/histology. Tenofovir produced a dose-dependent increase in osteoclast differentiation (EC₅₀ = 44.5nM) that was reversed by dipyridamole (IC₅₀ = 0.3 μM). Tenofovir increased cathepsin K and NFATc1 mRNA levels and dipyridamole reversed the effect. Dipyridamole reversed the effect of tenofovir on pERK1/2, pp38, and NFkB nuclear translocation. Mice treated with tenofovir lost nearly 10% of their body weight (p < 0.001). μCT revealed decreased BMD and altered trabecular bone in tenofovir-treated mice, reversed by dipyridamole. TRAP-staining showed increased osteoclasts in tenofovir-treated mice (p < 0.005), an effect reversed by dipyridamole. Similar results were obtained for cathepsin K and CD68. RANKL-positive cells were increased in tenofovir-treated mice, whereas osteoprotegerin-positive cells were decreased; both effects were reversed by dipyridamole. These results suggest that treatment with agents that increase local adenosine concentrations, like dipyridamole, might prevent bone loss following tenofovir treatment. © 2019 American Society for Bone and Mineral Research.

Fixed dose darunavir boosted with cobicistat combined with emtricitabine and tenofovir alafenamide fumarate

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

In an era when virological efficacy approaches 100%, novel antiretroviral (ARV) therapies must deliver better tolerability, safety, and convenient coformulated regimens. We review the phase II and III clinical data on the fixed dose combination (FDC) darunavir (DRV) 800mg / cobicistat (COBI/C) 150 mg / emtricitabine (F/FTC) 200 mg / tenofovir alafenamide fumarate (TAF) 10mg (D/C/F/TAF) for the treatment of HIV-1 infection.

RECENT FINDINGS

In an exploratory phase II study, D/C/F/TAF FDC demonstrated similar virological efficacy to darunavir/cobicistat FDC + F /tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) FDC in treatment-naive HIV-1-infected individuals with favorable bone and renal outcomes. These findings led to two subsequent international phase III double-blind randomized controlled trials; AMBER and EMERALD. In the (treatment naïve) AMBER study, D/C/F/TAF FDC was noninferior to component regimen F/TDF + darunavir/cobicistat with favorable bone and renal outcomes at week 48. In the EMERALD study (switch study for virologically suppressed patients), D/C/F/TAF showed noninferior efficacy to F/TDF and boosted protease inhibitor (bPI) regimen at week 48 also with favorable renal and bone outcomes. No virological failure was observed, and no resistance to TDF or darunavir emerged in either study.

SUMMARY

In clinical trials, D/C/F/TAF FDC demonstrated excellent, noninferior virological efficacy, maintained a high genetic barrier and conferred the additional safety benefits of TAF. As the first one pill, once daily, protease inhibitor-based regimen, D/C/F/TAF FDC offers a new option for the treatment of HIV infection.

HIV Infection and Bone Abnormalities

More than 36 million people are living with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) infection worldwide and 50% of them have access to antiretroviral therapy (ART). While recent advances in HIV therapy have reduced the viral load, restored CD4 T cell counts and decreased opportunistic infections, several bone-related abnormalities such as low bone mineral density (BMD), osteoporosis, osteopenia, osteomalacia and fractures have emerged in HIV-infected individuals. Of all classes of antiretroviral agents, HIV protease inhibitors used in ART combination showed a higher frequency of osteopenia, osteoporosis and low BMD in HIV-infected patients. Although the mechanisms of HIV and/or ART associated bone abnormalities are not known, it is believed that the damage is caused by a complex interaction of T lymphocytes with osteoclasts and osteoblasts, likely influenced by both HIV and ART. In addition, infection of osteoclasts and bone marrow stromal cells by HIV, including HIV Gp120 induced apoptosis of osteoblasts and release of proinflammatory cytokines have been implicated in impairment of bone development and maturation. Several of the newer antiretroviral agents currently used in ART combination, including the widely used tenofovir in different formulations show relative adverse effects on BMD. In this context, switching the HIV-regimen from tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) to tenofovir alafenamide (TAF) showed improvement in BMD of HIV-infected patients. In addition, inclusion of integrase inhibitor in ART combination is associated with improved BMD in patients. Furthermore, supplementation of vitamin D and calcium with the initiation of ART may mitigate bone loss. Therefore, levels of vitamin D and calcium should be part of the evaluation of HIV-infected patients.