1
|
Kovarich S, Cappelli CI. Use of In Silico Methods for Regulatory Toxicological Assessment of Pharmaceutical Impurities. Methods Mol Biol 2022; 2425:537-560. [PMID: 35188646 DOI: 10.1007/978-1-0716-1960-5_21] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
The use of novel non-testing methodologies to support the toxicological assessment of drug impurities is having a growing impact in the regulatory framework for pharmaceutical development and marketed products. For DNA reactive (mutagenic) impurities specific recommendations for the use of in silico structure-based approaches (namely (Q)SAR methodologies) are provided in the ICH M7 guideline. In 2018 a draft reflection paper has been published by EMA addressing open issues in the qualification approach of non-genotoxic impurities (NGI) according to the ICH Q3A/Q3B guidelines, and proposing the use of alternative testing strategies, including TTC, (Q)SAR, read-across, and in vitro approaches, to gather impurity-specific safety information.In the present chapter we describe a workflow to perform the safety assessment of drug impurities based on non-testing in silico methodologies. The proposed approach consists of a stepwise decision scheme including three key phases: PHASE 1: assessment of bacterial mutagenicity and consequent classification of impurities according to ICH M7; PHASE 2: risk characterization of mutagenic impurities (Classes 1, 2 or 3); PHASE 3: qualification of non-mutagenic impurities (Classes 4 or 5). The proposed decision scheme offers the possibility to acquire impurity-specific data, also if testing is not feasible, and to decide on further in vitro testing, besides meeting 3R's principle.
Collapse
|
2
|
Wang Z, Wang YYL, Scott WC, Williams ES, Ciarlo M, DeLeo P, Brooks BW. Comparative influences of dermal and inhalational routes of exposure on hazards of cleaning product ingredients among mammalian model organisms. ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL 2021; 157:106777. [PMID: 34314977 DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2021.106777] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/05/2021] [Revised: 07/06/2021] [Accepted: 07/13/2021] [Indexed: 06/13/2023]
Abstract
Health risks resulting from dermal or inhalational exposures are frequently assessed based on rodent oral toxicity information due to a lack of species- or route-specific toxicity data. Default uncertainty factors (UFs; e.g., 10-fold) are also applied during risk assessments to account for variability such as inter-species, intra-species, exposure duration, dose-response, and route-to-route extrapolations. However, whether rodent oral data and a default UF approach can provide adequate protection for other mammalian species under dermal or inhalational exposure scenarios remains understudied, particularly for cleaning product ingredients. Therefore, we collated and examined publicly available median lethal dose (LD50), no-observed-adverse-effect level (NOAEL) and lowest-observed-adverse-effect level (LOAEL) values from different types of standard mammalian toxicity studies for rats (dermal and inhalational), mice, rabbits, guinea pigs, and dogs (oral, dermal and inhalational) using the Cleaning Product Ingredient Safety Initiative (CPISI) database. Probabilistic hazard assessments using chemical toxicity distributions (CTDs) were subsequently conducted, and threshold concentrations (TCs) and 95% confidence intervals (95% CIs) were derived to identify thresholds of toxicological concern (TTCs). Relative sensitivities among or between mammalian species, exposure routes, and chemical classes were also compared based on calculated TC5s and 95% CIs to support future toxicology studies and hazard and risk assessments. We then identified uncertainty factors (UFs) using both CTD comparisons and individual UF probability distributional approaches. Based on available rodent inhalational data, chemical category-specific UFs were derived for ethers. Additionally, we also determined whether default UFs of 10 or 100 would be protective for various distributions of cleaning product ingredients. Our novel observations among these routes of exposure and common mammalian model organisms appear particularly useful for read across and screening-level health hazard and risk assessments when limited data exists for specific chemicals.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhen Wang
- Institute of Marine Sciences and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Marine Biotechnology, Shantou University, Shantou 515063, China.
| | - Yolina Yu Lin Wang
- Institute of Marine Sciences and Guangdong Provincial Key Laboratory of Marine Biotechnology, Shantou University, Shantou 515063, China
| | - W Casan Scott
- Department of Environmental Science, Baylor University, Waco, TX, USA
| | | | - Michael Ciarlo
- EA Engineering, Science & Technology, Inc., Baltimore, MD, USA
| | - Paul DeLeo
- American Cleaning Institute, Washington, DC, USA
| | - Bryan W Brooks
- Department of Environmental Science, Baylor University, Waco, TX, USA; School of Environment, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China; Institute of Biomedical Studies, Baylor University, Waco, TX, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Schlosser O, Robert S, Noyon N. Airborne mycotoxins in waste recycling and recovery facilities: Occupational exposure and health risk assessment. WASTE MANAGEMENT (NEW YORK, N.Y.) 2020; 105:395-404. [PMID: 32126367 DOI: 10.1016/j.wasman.2020.02.031] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2019] [Revised: 01/07/2020] [Accepted: 02/23/2020] [Indexed: 05/21/2023]
Abstract
Mycotoxins are metabolites secreted by certain types of moulds, and some of them can be harmful to health. The objective of this study was to estimate the level of exposure to airborne aflatoxin B1, ochratoxin A, gliotoxin and sterigmatocystin in waste recycling and recovery facilities. An additional goal was to assess the related health risks for workers. Targeted mycotoxins were analysed quantitatively in 94 air samples collected in five sites using ultra-performance liquid chromatography coupled with high resolution mass spectrometry. The level of exposure to mycotoxin during working day scenarios was compared to benchmark values, either health-based guidelines when available or the concentration of no toxicological concern (CoNTC) when not. Eleven per cent of samples showed quantifiable measurement results. Aflatoxin B1 and sterigmatocystin were quantified at the mechanical separation area in mechanical-biological treatment (MBT) facilities and in the materials recovery facility (MRF), but not in composting plants and composting units in MBT facilities. The levels of exposure were all below 1 ng m-3. This is the first time exposure to sterigmatocystin in waste management facilities is reported and quantified. Ochratoxin A and gliotoxin were not quantified in any of the air samples. Health risk assessment approaches did not suggest a significant threat to workers' health. These data do not suggest the need for specific prevention measures in addition to those against other airborne biological agents.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Samuel Robert
- SUEZ, CIRSEE, 38 rue du Président Wilson, 78230 Le Pecq, France
| | - Naike Noyon
- SUEZ, CIRSEE, 38 rue du Président Wilson, 78230 Le Pecq, France
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
More SJ, Bampidis V, Benford D, Bragard C, Halldorsson TI, Hernández-Jerez AF, Hougaard Bennekou S, Koutsoumanis KP, Machera K, Naegeli H, Nielsen SS, Schlatter JR, Schrenk D, Silano V, Turck D, Younes M, Gundert-Remy U, Kass GEN, Kleiner J, Rossi AM, Serafimova R, Reilly L, Wallace HM. Guidance on the use of the Threshold of Toxicological Concern approach in food safety assessment. EFSA J 2019; 17:e05708. [PMID: 32626331 PMCID: PMC7009090 DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2019.5708] [Citation(s) in RCA: 92] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
The Scientific Committee confirms that the Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC) is a pragmatic screening and prioritisation tool for use in food safety assessment. This Guidance provides clear step-by-step instructions for use of the TTC approach. The inclusion and exclusion criteria are defined and the use of the TTC decision tree is explained. The approach can be used when the chemical structure of the substance is known, there are limited chemical-specific toxicity data and the exposure can be estimated. The TTC approach should not be used for substances for which EU food/feed legislation requires the submission of toxicity data or when sufficient data are available for a risk assessment or if the substance under consideration falls into one of the exclusion categories. For substances that have the potential to be DNA-reactive mutagens and/or carcinogens based on the weight of evidence, the relevant TTC value is 0.0025 μg/kg body weight (bw) per day. For organophosphates or carbamates, the relevant TTC value is 0.3 μg/kg bw per day. All other substances are grouped according to the Cramer classification. The TTC values for Cramer Classes I, II and III are 30 μg/kg bw per day, 9 μg/kg bw per day and 1.5 μg/kg bw per day, respectively. For substances with exposures below the TTC values, the probability that they would cause adverse health effects is low. If the estimated exposure to a substance is higher than the relevant TTC value, a non-TTC approach is required to reach a conclusion on potential adverse health effects.
Collapse
|
5
|
Wang Z, Brooks BW, Zeng EY, You J. Comparative mammalian hazards of neonicotinoid insecticides among exposure durations. ENVIRONMENT INTERNATIONAL 2019; 125:9-24. [PMID: 30690429 DOI: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.01.040] [Citation(s) in RCA: 32] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2018] [Revised: 01/15/2019] [Accepted: 01/15/2019] [Indexed: 06/09/2023]
Abstract
Neonicotinoid insecticides have become one of the most widely used insecticides over the past two decades. Recent studies have shown considerable risk of neonicotinoids to beneficial insects, however, their health risks to mammals are still under debate. Limited empirical mammalian toxicity information for neonicotinoids inherently presents challenges to environmental health practitioners performing health hazard and risk assessment. Therefore, we first compiled and examined publicly available hazard data for neonicotinoids, and knowledge gaps on mammals were identified. Probabilistic hazard assessment using chemical toxicity distributions (CTDs) was subsequently conducted, and initial thresholds of toxicological concern were derived for rat, dog, mouse, and rabbit under comparative experimental scenarios. Using the rat model, for example, oral 5% threshold concentrations (TC5s) of 0.11 (0.02, 0.36) and 0.23 (0.001, 3.2) mg/kg bw/day were estimated using chronic developmental and reproductive no observed adverse effect levels (NOAELs), respectively, while acute TC5 of 0.71 (0.25, 1.6) mg/kg bw/day was identified using neurological NOAELs. Comparatively, dermal and inhalational TC5s were estimated as 1583 (1172, 1777) and 451 (294, 615) mg/kg bw/day (equivalent to 486 (322, 622) mg/m3), respectively, using acute median lethal doses. Uncertainty factors (UFs) were also estimated using both CTD comparisons and individual UF probability distribution approaches to test whether rodent oral toxicity information or default 10-fold UF approach can provide sufficient protection for mammals. These initially identified UFs were generally smaller than default values (e.g., 10) employed by regulatory stakeholders, yet larger UFs were occasionally noted. Our findings appear particularly useful for environmental health practitioners when conducting screening-level risk assessment for neonicotinoids, and provide an example for health hazard assessment of pesticides with limited toxicity information.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Zhen Wang
- School of Environment, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution and Health, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Bryan W Brooks
- School of Environment, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution and Health, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China; Department of Environmental Science, Institute of Biomedical Studies, Baylor University, Waco, TX, USA
| | - Eddy Y Zeng
- School of Environment, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution and Health, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Jing You
- School of Environment, Guangdong Key Laboratory of Environmental Pollution and Health, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Chebekoue SF, Krishnan K. Derivation of Occupational Thresholds of Toxicological Concern for Systemically Acting Noncarcinogenic Organic Chemicals. Toxicol Sci 2018; 160:47-56. [PMID: 29036659 DOI: 10.1093/toxsci/kfx155] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Many substances in workplace do not have occupational exposure limits. The threshold of toxicological concern (TTC) principle is part of the hierarchy of approaches useful in occupational health risk assessment. The aim of this study was to derive occupational TTCs (OTTCs) reflecting the airborne concentrations below which no significant risk to workers would be anticipated. A reference dataset consisting of the 8-h threshold limit values-Time-Weighted Average for 280 organic substances was compiled. Each substance was classified into low (class I), intermediate (class II), or high (class III) hazard categories as per Cramer rules. For each chemical, n-octanol:water partition coefficient and vapor pressure along with the molecular weight were used to predict the blood:air partition coefficient. The blood:air partition coefficient along with data on water solubility and ventilation rate allowed the prediction of pulmonary retention factor and absorbed dose in workers. For each Cramer class, the distribution of the predicted doses was analyzed to identify the various percentile values corresponding to the OTTC. Accordingly, for Cramer classes I-III, the OTTCs derived in this study correspond to 0.15, 0.0085, and 0.006 mmol/d, respectively, at the 10th percentile level, while these values were 1.5, 0.09 and 0.03 mmol/d at the 25th percentile level. The proposed OTTCs are not meant to replace the traditional occupational exposure limits, but can be used in data-poor situations along with exposure estimates to support screening level risk assessment and prioritization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sandrine F Chebekoue
- Département de Santé Environnementale et Santé au Travail, École de Santé Publique de l'Université de Montréal, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec H3C 3J7, Canada
| | - Kannan Krishnan
- Département de Santé Environnementale et Santé au Travail, École de Santé Publique de l'Université de Montréal, Université de Montréal, Montréal, Québec H3C 3J7, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Peterson MK, Lemay JC, Pacheco Shubin S, Prueitt RL. Comprehensive multipathway risk assessment of chemicals associated with recycled ("crumb") rubber in synthetic turf fields. ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH 2018; 160:256-268. [PMID: 29031215 DOI: 10.1016/j.envres.2017.09.019] [Citation(s) in RCA: 20] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/01/2017] [Revised: 07/27/2017] [Accepted: 09/17/2017] [Indexed: 06/07/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Thousands of synthetic turf fields in the US are regularly used by millions of individuals (particularly children and adolescents). Although many safety assessments have concluded that there are low or negligible risks related to exposure to chemicals found in the recycled rubber used to make these fields, concerns remain about the safety of this product. Existing studies of recycled rubber's potential health risks have limitations such as small sample sizes and limited evaluation of relevant exposure pathways and scenarios. OBJECTIVE Conduct a comprehensive multipathway human health risk assessment (HHRA) of exposure to chemicals found in recycled rubber. METHODS All available North American data on the chemical composition of recycled rubber, as well as air sampling data collected on or near synthetic turf fields, were identified via a literature search. Ingestion, dermal contact, and inhalation pathways were evaluated according to US Environmental Protection Agency (US EPA) guidance, and exposure scenarios for adults, adolescents, and children were considered. RESULTS Estimated non-cancer hazards and cancer risks for all the evaluated scenarios were within US EPA guidelines. In addition, cancer risk levels for users of synthetic turf field were comparable to or lower than those associated with natural soil fields. CONCLUSIONS This HHRA's results add to the growing body of literature that suggests recycled rubber infill in synthetic turf poses negligible risks to human health. This comprehensive assessment provides data that allow stakeholders to make informed decisions about installing and using these fields.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Julie C Lemay
- Gradient, 20 University Road, Cambridge, MA 02138, USA
| | | | - Robyn L Prueitt
- Gradient, 600 Stewart Street, Suite 1900, Seattle, WA 98101, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Tluczkiewicz I, Kühne R, Ebert RU, Batke M, Schüürmann G, Mangelsdorf I, Escher S. Inhalation TTC values: A new integrative grouping approach considering structural, toxicological and mechanistic features. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2016; 78:8-23. [DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2016.03.022] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/17/2015] [Revised: 03/24/2016] [Accepted: 03/29/2016] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
|
9
|
Criteria for the Research Institute for Fragrance Materials, Inc. (RIFM) safety evaluation process for fragrance ingredients. Food Chem Toxicol 2015; 82 Suppl:S1-S19. [DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2014.11.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1123] [Impact Index Per Article: 112.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/04/2014] [Revised: 11/13/2014] [Accepted: 11/17/2014] [Indexed: 11/24/2022]
|
10
|
Costigan S, Meredith C. An approach to ingredient screening and toxicological risk assessment of flavours in e-liquids. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol 2015; 72:361-9. [DOI: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2015.05.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 47] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/15/2015] [Revised: 05/14/2015] [Accepted: 05/16/2015] [Indexed: 11/16/2022]
|
11
|
Scientific Opinion on Exploring options for providing advice about possible human health risks based on the concept of Threshold of Toxicological Concern (TTC). EFSA J 2012. [DOI: 10.2903/j.efsa.2012.2750] [Citation(s) in RCA: 120] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.2] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/11/2022] Open
|
12
|
Hennes E. An overview of values for the threshold of toxicological concern. Toxicol Lett 2012; 211:296-303. [DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2012.03.795] [Citation(s) in RCA: 27] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/26/2011] [Revised: 03/19/2012] [Accepted: 03/21/2012] [Indexed: 11/30/2022]
|
13
|
Becker RA, Hays SM, Robison S, Aylward LL. Development of screening tools for the interpretation of chemical biomonitoring data. J Toxicol 2012; 2012:941082. [PMID: 22518117 PMCID: PMC3306934 DOI: 10.1155/2012/941082] [Citation(s) in RCA: 10] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/26/2011] [Accepted: 12/05/2011] [Indexed: 01/27/2023] Open
Abstract
Evaluation of a larger number of chemicals in commerce from the perspective of potential human health risk has become a focus of attention in North America and Europe. Screening-level chemical risk assessment evaluations consider both exposure and hazard. Exposures are increasingly being evaluated through biomonitoring studies in humans. Interpreting human biomonitoring results requires comparison to toxicity guidance values. However, conventional chemical-specific risk assessments result in identification of toxicity-based exposure guidance values such as tolerable daily intakes (TDIs) as applied doses that cannot directly be used to evaluate exposure information provided by biomonitoring data in a health risk context. This paper describes a variety of approaches for development of screening-level exposure guidance values with translation from an external dose to a biomarker concentration framework for interpreting biomonitoring data in a risk context. Applications of tools and concepts including biomonitoring equivalents (BEs), the threshold of toxicologic concern (TTC), and generic toxicokinetic and physiologically based toxicokinetic models are described. These approaches employ varying levels of existing chemical-specific data, chemical class-specific assessments, and generic modeling tools in response to varying levels of available data in order to allow assessment and prioritization of chemical exposures for refined assessment in a risk management context.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Richard A. Becker
- Regulatory and Technical Affairs Department, American Chemistry Council, Washington, DC 20002, USA
| | | | - Steven Robison
- Central Product Safety, Procter & Gamble, Cincinnati, OH 45253, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
14
|
Williams ES, Berninger JP, Brooks BW. Application of chemical toxicity distributions to ecotoxicology data requirements under REACH. ENVIRONMENTAL TOXICOLOGY AND CHEMISTRY 2011; 30:1943-54. [PMID: 21590796 DOI: 10.1002/etc.583] [Citation(s) in RCA: 33] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/01/2011] [Revised: 02/02/2011] [Accepted: 04/21/2011] [Indexed: 05/05/2023]
Abstract
The European Union's REACH regulation has further highlighted the lack of ecotoxicological data for substances in the marketplace. The mandates under REACH (registration, evaluation, authorization, and restriction of chemicals) to produce data and minimize testing on vertebrates present an impetus for advanced hazard assessment techniques using read-across. Research in our group has recently focused on probabilistic ecotoxicological hazard assessment approaches using chemical toxicity distributions (CTDs). Using available data for chemicals with similar modes of action or within a chemical class may allow for selection of a screening point value (SPV) for development of environmental safety values, based on a probabilistic distribution of toxicity values for a specific endpoint in an ecological receptor. Ecotoxicity data for acetylcholinesterase inhibitors and surfactants in Daphnia magna and Pimephales promelas were gathered from several data sources, including the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's ECOTOX and Pesticides Ecotoxicity databases, the peer-reviewed literature, and the Human and Environmental Risk Assessment (HERA) project. Chemical toxicity distributions were subsequently developed, and the first and fifth centiles were used as SPVs for the development of screening-predicted no-effect concentrations (sPNECs). The first and fifth centiles of these distributions were divided by an assessment factor of 1,000, as recommended by REACH guidance. Use of screening values created using these techniques could support the processes of data dossier development and environmental exposure assessment, allowing for rigorous prioritization in testing and monitoring to fill data gaps.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- E Spencer Williams
- Department of Environmental Science, Center for Reservoir and Aquatic Systems Research, Baylor University, Waco, Texas, USA.
| | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Special aspects of cosmetic spray safety evaluations: Principles on inhalation risk assessment. Toxicol Lett 2011; 205:97-104. [DOI: 10.1016/j.toxlet.2011.05.1038] [Citation(s) in RCA: 134] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/27/2011] [Revised: 05/26/2011] [Accepted: 05/27/2011] [Indexed: 11/22/2022]
|
16
|
Rowbotham AL, Gibson RM. Exposure-driven risk assessment: Applying exposure-based waiving of toxicity tests under REACH. Food Chem Toxicol 2011; 49:1661-73. [DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2011.03.050] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/09/2010] [Revised: 03/22/2011] [Accepted: 03/27/2011] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
17
|
Hazardous compounds in tobacco smoke. INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESEARCH AND PUBLIC HEALTH 2011; 8:613-28. [PMID: 21556207 PMCID: PMC3084482 DOI: 10.3390/ijerph8020613] [Citation(s) in RCA: 504] [Impact Index Per Article: 36.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/28/2010] [Revised: 02/02/2011] [Accepted: 02/07/2011] [Indexed: 12/04/2022]
Abstract
Tobacco smoke is a toxic and carcinogenic mixture of more than 5,000 chemicals. The present article provides a list of 98 hazardous smoke components, based on an extensive literature search for known smoke components and their human health inhalation risks. An electronic database of smoke components containing more than 2,200 entries was generated. Emission levels in mainstream smoke have been found for 542 of the components and a human inhalation risk value for 98 components. As components with potential carcinogenic, cardiovascular and respiratory effects have been included, the three major smoke-related causes of death are all covered by the list. Given that the currently used Hoffmann list of hazardous smoke components is based on data from the 1990s and only includes carcinogens, it is recommended that the current list of 98 hazardous components is used for regulatory purposes instead. To enable risk assessment of components not covered by this list, thresholds of toxicological concern (TTC) have been established from the inhalation risk values found: 0.0018 μg day−1 for all risks, and 1.2 μg day−1 for all risks excluding carcinogenicity, the latter being similar to previously reported inhalation TTCs.
Collapse
|
18
|
Exposure based waiving: The application of the toxicological threshold of concern (TTC) to inhalation exposure for aerosol ingredients in consumer products. Food Chem Toxicol 2009; 47:1287-95. [DOI: 10.1016/j.fct.2009.02.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1150] [Impact Index Per Article: 71.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/19/2008] [Revised: 02/27/2009] [Accepted: 02/27/2009] [Indexed: 11/18/2022]
|
19
|
Hardin BD, Robbins CA, Fallah P, Kelman BJ. The concentration of no toxicologic concern (CoNTC) and airborne mycotoxins. JOURNAL OF TOXICOLOGY AND ENVIRONMENTAL HEALTH. PART A 2009; 72:585-598. [PMID: 19296408 DOI: 10.1080/15287390802706389] [Citation(s) in RCA: 9] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/27/2023]
Abstract
The threshold of toxicologic concern (TTC) concept was developed as a method to identify a chemical intake level that is predicted to be without adverse human health effects assuming daily intake over the course of a 70-yr life span. The TTC values are based on known structure-activity relationships and do not require chemical-specific toxicity data. This allows safety assessment (or prioritization for testing) of chemicals with known molecular structure but little or no toxicity data. Recently, the TTC concept was extended to inhaled substances by converting a TTC expressed in micrograms per person per day to an airborne concentration (ng/m(3)), making allowance for intake by routes in addition to inhalation and implicitly assuming 100% bioavailability of inhaled toxicants. The resulting concentration of no toxicologic concern (CoNTC), 30 ng/m(3), represents a generic airborne concentration that is expected to pose no hazard to humans exposed continuously throughout a 70-yr lifetime. Published data on the levels of mycotoxins in agricultural dusts or in fungal spores, along with measured levels of airborne mycotoxins, spores, or dust in various environments, were used to identify conditions under which mycotoxin exposures might reach the CoNTC. Data demonstrate that airborne concentrations of dusts and mold spores sometimes encountered in agricultural environments have the potential to produce mycotoxin concentrations greater than the CoNTC. On the other hand, these data suggest that common exposures to mycotoxins from airborne molds in daily life, including in the built indoor environment, are below the concentration of no toxicologic concern.
Collapse
|