Evaluation of exposure to isoflurane (Forane): environmental and biological measurements in operating room personnel

Environmental and biological measurements of isoflurane and sevoflurane in operating room personnel

PURPOSE

The present study aimed to compare the concentration of isoflurane and sevoflurane in the individual's breathing zone and ambient air of operating rooms (ORs), to investigate the correlation between breathing zone levels and urinary concentrations, and to evaluate the ORs pollution in the different working hours and weeks.

METHODS

Environmental and biological concentrations of isoflurane and sevoflurane were evaluated at 9ORs. Air samples were collected by active sampling method and urine samples were collected from each subject at the end of the work shift. All samples were analyzed using gas chromatography.

RESULTS

The geometric mean ± GSD concentration of isoflurane and sevoflurane in breathing zone air were 1.41 ± 2.27 and 0.005 ± 1.74 ppm, respectively, while in post-shift urine were 2.42 ± 2.86 and 0.006 ± 3.83 µg/l_urine, respectively. A significant positive correlation was found between the urinary and environmental concentration of isoflurane (r ² = 0.724, P < 0.0001). The geometric mean ± GSD values of isoflurane and sevoflurane in ambient air were 2.30 ± 2.43 and 0.004 ± 1.56 ppm, respectively. The isoflurane concentration was different for three studied weeks and significantly increased over time in the ambient air of ORs.

CONCLUSIONS

The occupational exposure of OR personnel to isoflurane and sevoflurane was lower than national recommended exposure limits. The urinary isoflurane could be a good internal dose biomarker for monitoring of occupational isoflurane exposure. Considering the accumulation of anesthetic waste gases in the studied ORs, real-time air monitoring is better to be done at the end of the work shift.

A longitudinal study for investigating the exposure level of anesthetics that impairs neurobehavioral performance

There is conflicting evidence on the level of anesthetics that impairs neurobehavioral performance, leading to differences in exposure standards (25 or 50 ppm for N(2)O). Thirty-eight operating room nurses and 23 unexposed nurses were asked to provide information on confounding variables: age, gender, years of schooling, alcohol and coffee consumption, smoking, length of work, symptoms (Euroquest) and results of Block Design test. Afterward, all workers were repeatedly examined (on Monday and Friday of a working week, before and after workshift) for stress and arousal (Mood Scale) and complex reaction times (Color Word Vigilance, CWV), the latter being the outcome. Individual exposure was assessed through urinary end-shift concentrations of nitrous oxide (N(2)O) and isoflurane. According to the highest value of urinary excretion of N(2)O in the week, exposed workers were subdivided in three groups (<13; > or =13 and <27; and > or = 27 microg/l). The values of 13 and 27 microg/l correspond to environmental concentrations of 25 and 50 ppm, respectively. In order to take into account the pre-existing abilities of exposed and reference workers, and investigate the neurobehavioral changes over time, longitudinal data were analyzed by a two-stage regression model and analysis of variance for repeated measures (MANOVA). The former method, controlling for confounding factors and Monday morning CWV (which conveyed the pre-existing ability of the subjects), showed that, with respect to unexposed nurses, reaction times were significantly (p<0.020) higher only in workers with urinary N(2)O> or = 27 microg/l. Therefore, at MANOVA, all subjects were categorized in two classes (N(2)O urinary concentrations<or > or = 27 microg/l), and CWV results were adjusted for the confounding variables and effects of stress and arousal, taken concurrently with CWV. CWV significantly (p<0.039) decreased over a working week (indicating a learning effect) in workers with urinary N(2)O<27 microg/l, while remained steady (indicating impairment of neurobehavioral performance) in those with urinary N(2)O> 27 microg/l.

Anesthetic in urine as biological index of exposure in operating-room personnel

The aim of this study was to determine if a relationship existed between some inhalation anesthetics airborne exposure levels (Cl) and the concentration of anesthetics in samples of urine produced throughout the exposure time (Cu). The concentrations of nitrous oxide (N2O), halothane (fluothane), enflurane (ethrane), and isoflurane (forane) in the ambient atmosphere were determined in 190 operating theaters of 41 hospitals in Italy. Nitrous oxide, halothane, enflurane and isoflurane were detected in the urine of 1521 exposed subjects (anesthetists, surgeons, and nurses). The environmental measurements were performed using personal passive samplers, and the biological measurements were performed using the head space method. Significant correlations were found between the anesthetics concentration in urine produced during the shift collected after a 4-h exposure (Cu, microgram/L) and anesthetics environmental concentration (Cl, ppm). The results show that the urinary anesthetic concentration can be used as an appropriate biological exposure index. The biological values (urinary concentration values) proposed are the following: nitrous oxide, 25 micrograms/L, for an environmental value of 50 ppm; halothane, 97 micrograms/L, corresponding to 50 ppm of environmental exposure; 6.2 micrograms/L, corresponding to 2 ppm of environmental exposure; enflurane, 145 micrograms/L for an environmental exposure of 75 ppm and 5.6 micrograms/L for an environmental exposure of 2 ppm; isoflurane, 5.3 micrograms/L for an environmental exposure of 2 ppm. The values proposed are the respectively 95% lower confidence limit and therefore should be considered as a protection for the individual, especially if each biological value is corrected according to analytical variability of the measurements. In our opinion, the method of choice in the assessment of occupational exposure to inhalation anesthetics is the measurement of the urinary anesthetic concentration.

Low flow anaesthesia reduces occupational exposure to inhalation anaesthetics. Environmental and biological measurements in operating room personnel

In the present study we evaluated the occupational exposure to N2O and isoflurane during open circuit (OC) (fresh gas flow > or = minute volume) and low flow (LF) (fresh gas flow = 1.5 l/min) anaesthesia. The effects of active scavenging and of a charcoal filter positioned on the exhausting branch of the ventilator on environmental and urinary concentrations of inhalation anaesthetics were also investigated. The study was carried out in the same operating room provided with non-recirculating air changes (10 per hour). It involved anaesthetists and nurses during routine activity. N2O and isoflurane concentrations (time-weighted average) were measured after 3-hour continuous exposure: 1) in the environment at the level of the personnel's breathing zone (Ci); 2) in the environment at the ventilator zone (C); 3) in urine (Cu). During OC anaesthesia without active scavenging the breathing zone concentration of both N2O and isoflurane was very high (194.6 +/- 15.2 and 5.0 +/- 0.4 ppm, respectively). The activation of the scavenging greatly reduced the breathing zone concentration of N2O (31.6 +/- 4.1 ppm) and isoflurane (1.7 +/- 0.2 ppm). LF anaesthesia (with active scavenging) significantly reduced the environmental concentration of both anaesthetics (Ci N2O and isoflurane 22.7 +/- 1.8 and 0.6 +/- 0.04 ppm, respectively). During LF anaesthesia the breathing zone concentration of N2O remained low, even without scavenging (22.7 +/- 1.8 ppm). Similar results were obtained by measuring N2O and isoflurane concentrations at the ventilator zone and in urine.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Biological monitoring of occupational exposure to enflurane (ethrane) in operating room personnel

Biological monitoring of occupational exposure to enflurane (ethrane) can be achieved by measuring concentrations of inorganic fluorides in the blood and urine and of enflurane in alveolar air and venous blood. Measurement of these concentrations, however, has limitations. Another method for monitoring exposure to enflurane is to measure its concentration in urine throughout the period of exposure. In this study, we measured the environmental and urinary concentrations of enflurane. Enflurane in the ambient atmosphere was determined in 18 operating theaters of eight hospitals in Italy. Ambient air concentrations exceeded the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health-recommended time-weighted average exposure level of 1 ppm (median: 1.31 ppm). Enflurane was detected in urine of 159 exposed subjects (anesthetists, surgeons, and nurses). A significant correlation was found between enflurane concentration in urine produced during the shift and environmental concentration (r = 0.77, p = .0001). The results showed that urinary enflurane concentration can be used as an appropriate biological exposure index. The biological values proposed are 153 micrograms/l, corresponding to 75 ppm of environmental exposure; 22 micrograms/l, corresponding to 10 ppm of environmental exposure; and 3.5 micrograms/l, corresponding to 1 ppm of environmental exposure. The proposed values can be regarded as time-weighted average samples, reflecting exposure for a 4-h period.

Biological monitoring of the occupational exposure to halothane (fluothane) in operating room personnel

The concentration of halothane (fluothane) in the ambient atmosphere was determined in five operating theaters of two hospitals in Italy. The concentrations of halothane in the ambient air exceeded the NIOSH recommended time-weighted average exposure levels (median value: 10.38 mg/m3). Halothane was detected in the urine of 58 exposed subjects (anesthetists, surgeons, and nurses). A significant correlation was found between the halothane concentration in urine produced during the shift (Cu, micrograms/L) and halothane environmental concentration (CI, mg/m3) (Cu = 0.242 x CI + 3.51) (N = 58; r = 0.92; p less than 0.0001). The results show that the urinary halothane concentration can be used as an appropriate biological exposure index. The biological values proposed are: 92 micrograms/L, corresponding to a 50 ppm of environmental exposure; 6.5 micrograms/L, corresponding to 2 ppm of environmental exposure and 3.9 micrograms/L, corresponding to a 0.5 ppm of environmental exposure.