Relations between cannabis use, socioeconomic status, and risk perceptions in a Hispanic/Latinx population

Motives, Frequency, and Consequences of Cannabis Use Among College Students

We investigated profiles of cannabis use motives among current cannabis-consuming college students. Then we assessed profile differences in demographic characteristics, social contexts of use, regulatory environment, alcohol use, negative affect, negative consequences, and cannabis use. Participants ( N = 1, 213) were from three universities in states with different cannabis legislation. Six profiles emerged: Low Motives, Low to Moderate Enhance, High Enhance, High Enhance & Social + Moderate Expand, High Enhance & Cope, and High Motives. Profiles differed in social contexts of use, sex, alcohol use, negative affect, and regulatory environment. Profiles endorsing high and multiple motives had higher cannabis use and negative consequences, relative to profiles with low or fewer motives. Profiles characterized by high avoidance motives (i.e., coping) had the highest cannabis use and consequences. Interventions targeting types and intensity of motives for cannabis-use may help reduce use and related consequences among college students who use cannabis.

Sensitivity and specificity of the CRAFFT to identify heavy cannabis use: Evidence from a large statewide adolescent sample

BACKGROUND AND AIM

Screening adolescents at risk for cannabis use disorders is critical. The CRAFFT is a screening tool designed to address both alcohol and drug use among youth. Current study tests the psychometric properties of the CRAFFT and attempts to modify one of the screening items to compare the efficiency.

DESIGN

We examined the ideal cut-off point of the CRAFFT for identifying persons with heavy cannabis use and compared the utility of the original and revised CRAFFT.

PARTICIPANTS

Sample (N = 132,555) averaged 16.19 (±1.21) years of age; 51.0% were female, 59.7% were White, 15.2% were Latino/Latina, and 6.7% were African-American. Majority resided in non-rural area and 34.5% were receiving free or reduced lunch at school.

MEASUREMENTS

Heavy cannabis use was defined as using cannabis 10 or more times in the past 30 days. Sensitivity, specificity, the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve, and Youden value were analyzed to determine the ideal cut-off point.

FINDINGS

Maximum overall predictive accuracy was at a cutoff score of 2 or higher when using the original CRAFFT questions. At a cutoff score of 2, sensitivity was 82.0%, specificity was 83.7%, with an AUC of 0.880. On the contrary, when an alternative CAR question was used, maximum predictive accuracy was at a cutoff score of 1 or higher when predicting heavy cannabis use. At a cutoff score of 1, sensitivity was 92.7%, specificity was 75.5%, with an AUC of 0.900.

CONCLUSIONS

The results provide evidence that the CRAFFT is a promising brief diagnostic instrument for heavy cannabis use among youth. Modification to Car item may have potential in reducing disparities in sensitivity among different racial ethnic groups, as well as those who with low socioeconomic status.