Case Report: Utility of Ketamine, Lidocaine, and Mexiletine as Nonopioid Adjuvants in Complex Cancer-Associated Pain

A Specialist Palliative Pharmacist Enriches the Interdisciplinary Team: A Case Series Discussion Illustrating the Entrustable Professional Activities for Specialist Hospice and Palliative Care Pharmacists

Introduction: Palliative care (PC) pharmacists are an integral member of the PC team. Essential roles have been defined and entrustable professional activities (EPAs) have been recently developed for hospice and PC pharmacists. Case Description: We review four different complex patient cases where the specialist PC pharmacist worked with the interdisciplinary team to address whole patient suffering. Through the case series, we highlight the various components of HAPC pharmacist EPAs across the continuum of care. Case Management, Outcome, and Conclusion: Through the case series discussion, we brought to light PC pharmacists' EPAs in pharmacotherapy consultation, assessing and optimizing medication therapy, symptom management, deprescribing, participating in goals-of-care discussions, managing medication therapy in the withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy in collaboration with interdisciplinary team in alignment with patient and family values, prognosis, and plan of care. We also emphasized the importance of PC pharmacists contributing to the advancement of science.

An Analysis of Lidocaine Usage in the Treatment of Squamous Cell Carcinoma

Squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) is a form of skin cancer that can be treated using a procedure known as Mohs surgery. Mohs surgery is a safe and effective procedure for eliminating SCC. This surgery requires the usage of an analgesic known as lidocaine. Additional anesthetics were also reported to be necessary for this procedure to be conducted in a manner that significantly minimizes patient harm. According to the review, it was found that SCC was treated with lidocaine as a topical analgesic outside of Mohs surgery. This review analyzes the usage of lidocaine in the treatment of SCC. It was also discovered that lidocaine, as an agent, has the potential to slow the progression of SCC, but more research is needed to see if this is truly the case. On average, it was reported that the concentration of lidocaine used in the in vivo studies was significantly higher than that in the in vitro investigations. Further exploration may be needed to verify the conclusions that were based on the analysis of the papers within the review.

Dexmedetomidine Continuous Infusion for Refractory Cancer Pain at End of Life: A Case Report

Refractory cancer-related pain at end-of-life (EoL) is multifaceted and may require utilizing medications with different mechanism of actions beyond opioids. We report the successful use of dexmedetomidine in a 63-year old female with recurrent breast cancer and intractable left arm pain and swelling admitted to University of California, San Diego, Health (UC San Diego Health), palliative care unit. Patient's pain and agitation continued to persist and she declined clinically despite efforts to start methadone, continuous infusion opioids, continuous infusion lidocaine and intravenous chlorpromazine by the palliative care team. On hospital day (HD) 11 patient was started on dexmedetomidine continuous infusion for refractory pain per our protocol at UC San Diego Health. The next day the patient appeared much improved in terms of pain and agitation with grimacing and moaning completely resolved. She was able to have some lucid periods and interacting with her family. With the addition of dexmedetomidine to her pain regiment, the patient was able to peacefully die 5 days later. This case report highlights the clinical utility of demedetomidine in a palliative care unit for refractory pain at EoL.

Advancing Pharmacist Collaborative Care within Academic Health Systems

Introduction: The scope of pharmacy practice has evolved over the last few decades to focus on the optimization of medication therapy. Despite this positive impact, the lack of reimbursement remains a significant barrier to the implementation of innovative pharmacist practice models. Summary: We describe the successful development, implementation and outcomes of three types of pharmacist collaborative care models: (1) a pharmacist with physician oversight, (2) pharmacist–interprofessional teams and (3) physician–pharmacist teams. The outcome measurement of these pharmacist care models varied from the design phase to patient volume measurement and to comprehensive quality dashboards. All of these practice models have been successfully funded by affiliated health systems or grants. Conclusions: The expansion of pharmacist services delivered by clinical faculty has several benefits to affiliated health systems: (1) significant improvements in patient care quality, (2) access to experts in specialty areas, and (3) the dissemination of outcomes with national and international recognition, increasing the visibility of the health system.